LordFall

I like to solve complicated problems and then help others do so as well so they don't have to struggle and suffer as much as I've had to solve them. It's worked here and there but if I could build a global business out of it that would be cool. The general concept of abundance is cool too, studying history all the human history has been one of struggle and scarcity. Seems we're going towards a more abundant future though so that's encouraging.

He's also one of the few starting revolutionary life changing endeavours that have already changed society for the better vs a lot of rich people that just don't really do much apart from finding gaps in the market to get richer.

Fuck yeah. Are you making and posting music right now? I would say don't wait to be setup to start working on it now. If you don't already make a youtube channel and start posting weekly releases about even feeling shitty or even your mental health issues. A lot of art and especially music is made through suffering unfortunately. If you don't know Hopsin he's a great example of that Also luckily for you making music and rap videos especially is a great way to meet women so two birds with one stone.

The idea that humans only want more because they're traumatized ignores basic biology. Every organism is biologically wired to optimize for resource collection to ensure the survival of its lineage. In a state of nature, animals exploit their environment until they hit a resource ceiling. Capitalism didn't create the desire for 'more'; it just hyper-accelerated our capacity to get it. If you look at human history before modern markets, resource hoarding and tribal dominance were still the norm. You're not wrong that the trauma of society makes it worse but it's not the root cause. The root cause is scarcity in and of itself. Only through something like post scarcity brought by the singularity/AI UBI can I see a way out of this.

I mean that's fair his political takes are pretty poor. Lobbying in general is pretty canceric to society. He's done more to bootstrap entirely new industrial sectors than any government program in fifty years. He broke the Russian monopoly on space launch capabilities with SpaceX, forced the entire global automotive industry to pivot to EVs, and built a global satellite network (Starlink) that literally keeps entire sovereign nations online during geopolitical crises. Still seems more net positive than negative. His familial life is a bit more chaotic than it should be but what's wrong with inseminating multiple women?

It's a joke to think billionaires are more toxic than the average person. They have a more negative effect but blaming them entirely is a joke. Communism has some cool ideals but it's a disaster in terms of understanding human nature and basic incentives. Thus why it failed in Russia and plunged the state in tyranny since then.

I mean you know yourself best if you're not very disciplined then it's gonna be hard to succeed at online business. Have you thought about the vision for your life and what you see yourself doing? Right now you're mostly focused on the negatives, if everything worked out what would you be doing 5 years from now? Not just in terms of leaving the country and having more opportunity but once you do find those opportunities what do you wanna do? CEO is a bit far fetched you can't really do that without a strong vision but being particularly successful to have an abundant dating life and lifestyle absolutely. Easier to date hot high quality women when your money is right. Being fit definitely helps a ton as well. It's also about the lifestyle you wanna live. When I was broke living with a club promoter and partying all the time I would sleep with a lot of women but those weren't solid bonds with women I was really attracted to and when I did get some longer term fwbs because my money wasn't right I didn't feel like I was valued enough by them to be satisfied.

It's true somewhat but you're simplifying brain architectures and personality types and conflating correlation for causation. They have wide ranging studies on personality and if you use the big 5, social skills can be related to extroversion and low self-esteem to high neuroticism and they're pretty much fully independent. Also when you work in technical fields you rewire your brain towards logical problem solving as opposed to real-time social processing which has nothing to do with self-esteem. @Majed If I were you I'd learn to make money online, sounds like you're gonna struggle through higher education anyway and by the time you're done in a few years the career landscape will have completely shifted with AI. Might as well get exposed to the market tomorrow instead of procrastinating with more education. Owen cook is really biased towards his bootcamps and every video of his is a sales funnel. He makes it sound like if you don't go out 3x a week your wife is gonna get fucked by another more charismatic dude everytime she gets out of the house. That does happen but in my experience it's mostly women that really unsatisfied in relationships that are open to dudes scooping them un when they go out. Most girls with a boyfriend will just have clear boundaries around it and not really be down to talk to you unless they're in your social circle which is a whole other issue.

Hard to say, it's hard to deconstruct self-esteem. I don't know if I agree with the blanket statements that most high earning highly technical dudes have low self-esteem but it could be right. If you didn't get socialized well you will probably not be able to express freely and charismatically in social situations by default. I don't think that summarizes self-esteem though. From the book 6 pillars of self-esteem it broadly characterizes it as thinking you're worthy of a good life and feeling confident about being able to handle life's basic challenges. You could be high earning and not feel confident around women which would be a part of that 2nd definition but once again that's solved pretty easily with some exposure therapy from cold approach and if your career is going well you'll probably have a high baseline of confidence overall.

Are we talking about inner game or social skills? These discussions often conflate both. Are these software engineers and guys with high incomes regularly going out and good at expressing themselves? If so I doubt they'd have a hard time getting laid. Inner game to me is your self-confidence and belief in your ability to solve problems and handle pressure. Usually those high income guys solve a lot of their issues in one bootcamp because they have already good inner game they just lack the social skills portion of it. Also being able to put your ego to the side is probably a relevant part of inner game here. A lot of high income guys have mastered their career and don't like the idea of starting from scratch at social skills and fumbling for a few days/weeks to get the hang of it. I guess that's inner game or just not taking yourself too seriously. I would define having money in this context as being able to afford to live on your own and having some disposable income to date and also save/invest towards your future. So that depends where you're from, in Canada that's like a 80-120$k CAD income. You could also manage to do that remotely and have a more flexible lifestyle which would improve your dating potential big time. I know a lot of guys that are basically incels in the west that would crush it as passport bros.

I haven't watched his content but he used to make some good videos. I think perhaps it stems from intellectual narcissism he likes to dissect things intellectually instead of actually having a positive impact on the world? I tend to fall into that trap too, much easier to get dopamine from online debates or commenting on stuff rather than solving hard problems in a business for example.

100% agreed this guy just refuses to level up and fix his issues and just makes money from complaining about the dating market.

Depends how you define inner game. Most men with money have at least decent inner game, they are competent at their job/business and are just not in their comfort zone cold approaching women in a nightclub or in the street. The average man in western countries is too broke to date comfortably and financial issues are one of the top causes of divorce. Having a dating life is ludicrously expensive in a major western city, you can perhaps do the broke guy with the broke girl frame and sure that works with some women but definitely not all. Especially not if you like particularly attractive and in demand women. If you mean really rich you're forgetting about sugar dating. I knew a guy that did it and he took multiple bootcamps from RSD and he said these guys were coping in their belief that money doesn't really matter with women and the relationships he got from sugaring where sometimes better than the ones he got from cold approach. He said women he got through sugaring actually put effort in the relationship, their appearance and sex whereas regular women kind of took him for granted. He said people expect those women to be materialistic gold diggers but he said a lot of them just had financially insecure childhoods and were responsible and pleasant women to be around, used the sugaring money to pay bills not to spend on clothes or dumb stuff. I haven't tried it myself but it does make sense, PUAs cope hardcore. Having a successful career let alone being rich and being able to spend $3-8k/month on sugar babies frontloads a bunch of positive male characteristics into it. I still think there is something cool about pickup and knowing that skillset but most of the pickup guys I know(I've met at least 200) never even got to sleeping with really hot women, let alone date them, let alone have a stable long term pleasant relationship with them. It's quite easy. Demonstrate higher value and women will like you. There are lot of ways to do so, both socially and overall with your life. Which is why my strategy revolves a lot around social media and social circle game. To build a social circle with hot women over time you need to provide value in one way or another and social media allows you to display that to women all over your country and the world and widen your net.

No when did I say that? There are more fertility issues with women than men after a certain point but women can be quite beautiful in their 40s and 50s as well. Fertility tech is a blooming field so I doubt it'll be an issue for much longer. I think everyone in their early 30s that hasn't had kids yet should look into egg/sperm freezing. I'm 31 and I'm gonna do it in the next couple years. I like all women personally thus probably why I'm a polyamorist. I would date a 21 year old just as much as I would date a 41 year old. For women becoming higher earning starts to limit their dating options compared to the same person being a man where it exponentially raises them. It's just personal preference though, most women prefer to not date men earning less than them but nothing prevents them from doing so.

Probably true. I keep telling people they have a stange orange shadow on the forum, we should for sure have some industrialists and entrepreneurs in our ranks that have changed society in some way. I run communities across Canada but I can't say my impact is 0.01% that of Musk, you literally see Teslas each day down the street so that's product visibility let alone making electric cars again. Musk can be a dick but the main reason people don't like him is they're tired of being poor and just jealous of a dude that made it big. He's one of our top visionaries alive today and a treasure to the human race for sure. He is linked to child mining through sourcing Cobalt from the Congo though, he's apparently trying to diversify the supply chain and remove Cobalt from teslas through innovating in battery tech but still.