LordFall

I'm trying to make a habit of not engaging with low value males unless they are open to feedback. I thought it was a harsh rule but the more I test it the more I think it holds weight. I will try to stick to it going forward. Good luck in life.

You guys just gave me a great business idea. It's a social media like a forum except a lot of the users are bots by design. When the users start engaging in low value nonsense, they get shadow banned but don't know it. They talk to AI agents that coach them to have social calibration and being able to communicate productively with other humans. I think this will really revolutionize social media and start a new era of interdependence for humanity. Some people are just too low in development to communicate with the rest of the bunch. It's actually a documented effect. It's called Gresham's Law of Discourse. What should I call it?

You felt the need to advocate on another user's behalf in a way that did not make for a good point imo. I then said that to elevate the quality of a forum debate, the only way I see is to take it to a higher input form of communication which is a face to face live debate instead of back and forth posturing. I don't know why you're finding it worthwhile to argue semantics here. Flattery does not invalidate the crazy stuff that you say my friend. Being a good friend to someone means being willing to call them out when they are out of life. Do you not believe that some of what you're saying is out of line?

You deserve to get banned for weird ego flareups like this lol. You are a very unbalanced person my friend. Why are you like this? Did you grow up in harsh environment? You have stage red outbursts like every day. It's interesting to witness.

If you can't argue your position coherently then you won't be taken seriously. I don't make the rules that's how life works. Leverage always depends on effective communication. You think farmers influence the policy in their countries or they are at the mercy of people that can communicate well? Most of the positions you listed have an incredibly high burden of communication on them. Parents being one of the top ones actually. Same with a novelist, an academic, a philanthropist, a doctor and historians. I thought we were on a forum built around overcoming our limitations and building an exceptional life. Not coping on our limitations and rationalizing them away. Communicating under pressure isn't "debate bro theatrics", it's the mechanism that translates raw competence into real-world influence. Without it, your output is always mediated by someone else who possesses that skill.

Keep your limitations to yourself. If you've honestly analyzed your tendencies and the amount of effort you're willing to put into relationships and decided that it's not worth it to you fine. Or join me and see how far the rabbit hole goes. Plenty of people are pulling it off. Feel free to order this book and read it if you're interested otherwise it's all good. https://www.amazon.ca/Ethical-Slut-Third-Practical-Relationships/dp/0399579664/ref=sr_1_5

Right my unique path of having real world impact as opposed to being delusional and scared of confrontation? Of course there are many paths. But any path that seeks to create actual value in the physical world—whether in business, relationships, or community demands communication, agency, and accountability under pressure. That’s not a lifestyle choice, that’s just reality.

That's exactly my point. To bring value as a human and especially as a man: you need to produce results. A lot of people on this forum run away from this simple fact, it's been the foundation of a lot of debates I've had on here for months now. Plenty of smart people are cowards that can't pitch convincingly to a board of investors or an employer and thus they underperform in life. Real life requires effective communication under pressure, otherwise you will fall way short of your potential. It's absolutely a part of being a competent person in society. Of course I have an advantage having a public brand, that's why everyone should have one. If you value anonymous keyboard warrior forum debates instead of a face to face conversation then you've lost the plot.

@yetineti You told the board that in real life no one would have the audacity to challenge you, bragged about how easily you’d tear me apart in a live social dynamic, and the second a link and time were set, you folded. Talk is cheap on a keyboard. The invite was open; you declined. We’re done here. I diagnosed you accurately days ago. A coward who intellectualizes life and cannot measure up to accountability. No it's not an insult, you can do introspect and do better. It's quite cringe to witness though. This is one of the main problem with this forum. People that talk a lot but don't do much in life. It makes for real weird discussions because people project all kinds of nonsense.

Perfect let's do it. 8 PM EST, on Sunday, does that work for you? I'll create a Youtube stream calendar and everyone here can tune in. I've already told you I think your points are bad and I've never ran away from acknowledging any of them. I've proved it but you seem to run away from doing so. Let's prove that conclusion wrong though. Pick an exact topic, you even get to field the point as long as it's a position I hold I'm fine with it. Let’s see if that real-life energy holds up behind a live mic. Ball is in your court.

Yes I had Gemini analyze his actions in negotiation this trade war. What would you rate him /100 and based on what? I think AI is great at synthezing information and giving us a baseline to go on. We can break it down further if you disagree with Geminis conclusion.

In real life I'm pretty sure you would crumble under the pressure and then shit talk to your buddies that you clearly won the argument when you made bad points lol. I was never hypocritical, I called out @Inliytened1 for his low quality rhetoric and pointed out the meta phenomenon in the thread of people looking for easy dopamine instead of making good points and helping each other work towards their goals. If you want to debate me live, I'm down. Pick a topic that you disagree with me on and we can stream it live this weekend. I understand why it seems that way but that's intellectually dishonest. If we have a disagreement and I manage to deconstruct why your points makes no sense, that's a valid and valuable form of discourse.

There you go, that's some wisdom! This guy is a very emotional dude that starts fights, shoots off a barrage of messages that gets more incoherent as he goes on and then tries to gaslight you about it lol. I think about what I say before I say it. I thought that was common sense.

You're a low value man that's desperately reaching for significance instead of just having the humility to ask for guidance in fixing YOUR blind spots. You have not pointed out any blind spots of mine. As I've said, I analyze all criticism and weigh their credibility of them. Your points are shallow and not well thought out. You would be a terrible coach. Read some more books, they literally teach that stuff. Even for free online now. There is no excuse for lacking value to share with others and resorting to egotistical copes.