LordFall

I don't think Owen's game relies on him being particularly attractive as an individual. It relies mostly on lifestyle design and aligning his business with his social life so he makes money going out 4-5 days a week and being an online authority for men. I'm sure he's dated plenty of attractive women from it but there are other aspects of self-development that he ignores that should be paid attention to as well. His lifestyle makes it easy to meet a lot of women, he makes millions of dollars travelling all the time without being stuck at a job all day .

What does that mean to you being a selfish bastard? Like you're not good at compromising? Can you give us some examples, I think that will help a lot to break it down.

Wow you're very precise here and really encouraging high quality conversation.

In what way? I think you're just shallow in your views man. He is not the best at expressing himself but what he says is not insane. He never said he wants to mislead women, he just said he wants a relationship on his terms in a way where he is a dominant man leading a woman that appreciates him.

Sorry to hear. Good of you to already have someone else though. I would get on Feeld, I get an ungodly amount of matches on there. Way more than Tinder.

Are you on dating apps? Feeld has a lot of women into alternative lifestyles.

Swinging sounds like the polyamory equivalent of one night stands. No it's not for me. I rather do polyamory as a polycule in a hierarchal polyamory type of setup where I invest into different partners depending on their levels in me and how aligned their life are. I host a lot of creative events and what I've started doing last year is small concerts so for example I'm sure I will get some more fickle FWBs that I invite to fun events like this and then have a more consistent partner that is intertwined in my business and finances. A lot of people are a fan of parallel polyamory where your partner never meet and you just date multiple without intertwining lives, I can understand why that is appealing as you avoid the friction of group dynamics. That doesn't really appeal to me though I want 2-3 girlfriends that are also bi and date eachother.

Interesting, thanks for sharing. Were these women into polyamory or were these girls that you picked up through game? Also how did this open relationship progress, how long did it last and why did you guys break up? I think open relationships make the relationship 3x more intense and there a lot of dynamics involved. A common trap I hear is after opening up the woman has a lot of the options and the man struggles to get laid, resents his partner and eventually tries to close the relationship and the woman now resents him for limiting her freedom and it falls apart.

Appreciate you, stay tuned

Same bro I’ll race you to it. The last one to achieve it owes the other one a beer 🍻 @something_else I don’t really like speaking in generalities. Which part of this idea do you think for yourself personally would be hardest to achieve and we can discuss from there.

Simply not true my man. You can be in a ethically non monogamous type of polyamorous relationship one main pivot and still fuck other women on the side with or without your main girl. You can do so in way where your main girl doesn't see other men or have it to where she does, depends on what she wants. It's absolutely possible to have deep emotional connection and safety and have sexual abundance. This is a false dichotomy.

I like your mindset, your ego is one of the smallest on this forum. Everyone else fights me vehemently when I deconstruct their points. I have two main posts that mean a lot to me on this forum. One is my quest to become a millionaire here. The other one is my passion project and perhaps my quest to becoming a billionaire if it works. My own worldbuilding project, Legend of the Abyss.

Why not? This is demonstrably false in many ways. Why do you care if people blast you? It should make your vision and thoughts way more powerful. Echo chambers are very dangerous to one's philosophy and overall epistemology. I'll repost this image as I think it illustrates the concept so beautifully.Being antifragile is one of the most powerful self-development concepts I've ever encountered. Steel is extremely solid, it can bend and resist all kind of torsion. It is one of humanity's greatest invention. Muscle is antifragile, if you tear it it grows back stronger. Same with breaking bones. Organic beings are unique in this property, actual dead matter doesn't seem to have this quality.

I've now decided to ban Judaism in Legend of the Abyss until the war in Gaza is over and Israel follows up on reparations for the war. If the game pops off there are good chances I will get banned from going to Israel in real life for this but I don't really care, their religion will be banned from the best game concept in the world so checkmate religion. As a matter of fact I've recently decided to make the entire lore be based on a critique of religion so people on this forum will particularly enjoy the plot. Stay tuned. I won't say too much but the Pope is basically the antichrist in the story and his actions compel the main character to conquer the world in revenge.

Shame that he went the rapist route. 30 seconds to mars was such a good band with a good message.

That was a few years ago, I'm 31 now. I also don't have a cat anymore, it was my roommate's girlfriend cat and she cheated on him so we don't talk about Mango the cat anymore

Got it makes sense. How is your search for that soul make coming along and do you feel you have any bottlenecks stopping you from achieving that goal in the near future or you think if we talk in 6 months it'll be done and you'll be dating her?

Appreciate it. I'm 31 now so my body doesn't seem to heal as fast as before but I'll figure it out eventually even if I have to become a cyborg in the process

It's not about humiliation, it's about intellectual integrity. Your post was condescending and of course since you lack aforementioned integrity you back down from a good faith intellectual exchange in a format where we can actually exchange ideas in real time while meeting eachother instead of keyboard warrior back and forth. No worries if you aren't interested in having the debate. I would be careful with being jumping to conclusions when encountering ideas that surpass your level of knowledge, as it opens you up to all kinds of intellectual blindspots. Posturing is never good for growth.

That's fine. To be monogamous it's actually way more important to be selective than if you want to be polyamorous and date multiple women like I do. You're looking to entangle your entire life to one person and combine yourselves as legal entites and to purchase financial assets together. To not be very sure of what you want and to start to commit to women quickly instead of taking your time to date multiple ones and vet them over long periods of time is insanity and how a lot of men(and women!) get wrecked in marriage. I would go on at least 30+ dates before thinking of committing to just one. I would encourage you to write that journal like I've suggested and post it here or in the journal section. I think it will be a useful exercise both for yourself and other men on here to learn about self-awareness.

Absolutely. It's important to understand that dating in our society is based on paradigms enforced on us by hundreds and really thousands of years of group think. To let go of those shackles is very scary but beautiful. Everyone on this forum is coming at it from a different frame so they will disgaree with you vehemently. You should take the advice I wrote about earlier and write a full page at least if not 3-4 on your dating goals and needs and if anything in the universe was possible, what would your life overall and dating life look like in 5-10 years and not let anybody gaslight you out of achieving it.

Have you tried polyamory before? I think it's worth exploring to unlock deeper dating paradigms and also push your comfort zone especially if you do enjoy spending time with her but want to continue dating other women or expanding your game skills and social capital without trapping yourself in a monogamous relationship prematurely. The concept of not sowing enough seeds and reaping too soon is very common on this forum. Be careful of that trap, I've seen countless men fall into it.

Yes, I think using false dichotomies caps our intellectual potential and leaves us arguing nonsense instead of actually making deep points that add values to our lives. Why is it telling that I feel the need to deconstruct your ideas? Shouldn't you welcome new insights if you have blindspots to your thinking? To me when I see bad points I feel like I'm doing you a favour by adding to your ideas, if you don't appreciate and seek pure validation then that's more accurate honest signal of insecurity. Someone that is selfless can get even more happiness from giving some to others but idk how else to tell you bro but the way you framed it is so bad that it leads to a dichotomy which is defined as two opposing points that miss nuance. You should want happiness for others and not just yourself if you are truly a high consciousness person and I think the way you phrased it shows deep spiritual bypassing which is also common in gurus that focus on their own internal peace without helping the world solve it's problems.

Very interesting, thanks for sharing. Also shows that the spiritual bypassing is deep in his character for some reason. I think he does a lot of good work and spreads spirituality globally and on a lot of mainstream platforms which is great but I always felt a lot of shadow from him. The easiest examples is when he doesn't know something he doesn't admit, he gives word salad answers that confuse people and looks like spiritual narcissism to me.

Sure, you're still rejecting abundance as a valid frame though. Why does it scare you so much? What you just described can be simply summarized as having the self-awareness to understand your wants and needs and knowing where they come from.