LordFall

Seems cool, hadn't heard of it before. My favorite Star Wars game is Super Star Wars, on Super Nintendo. My dad got me hooked on emulators growing up so I played a bunch of classics. The one I most want to play now is Jedi Survivor, seems like a really cool polished modern action RPG. I will get back into gaming over the next few years and play some of the games I've missed. Like the Zelda games on Switch those look bomb.

I think it means that we are part of one universal mind and that other selves are just you in other bodies simultaneously experiencing reality. The mind is powerful and can conjure up all kinds of thoughts and ideas and visions. Being able to separate the random passing intuitions or visual hallucinations one gets while high on psychedelics or going through mystical experiences from the tangible wise insights that can be used to improve our shared physical reality is what seperates a wise awakened person from someone caught up in a solipsistic delusion/psychosis or going full blown schizophrenic.

What makes you say that? It's a dangerous train of thought and closer to delusional psychosis than enlightenment imo. I've definitely hurt people in various ways throughout my life and I'm sure you have as well. Touch some grass.

I agree with you somewhat and that perspective is helpful in ridding ourselves of judgement. Saying there is no stupidity though is robbing the world of meaning. There are plenty of obtuse people that are falling for simple cognitive bias and their lack of quest for wisdom and intelligence is hurting themselves and others. Our ability to identify those people and build frameworks to not be victims of their stupidity is very important to living a high quality life. The only way I can reason that stupidity is good is because is it gives me a strong competitive advantage, I don't think that it's good ultimately though.

I'm not too sure how that makes sense from your perspective but from my perspective what that means is that by solving my own egoic shortcomings then I'll be in a better position to help the world heal itself and unite. I think from other states of being I could easily start wars so I can see how other people do.

I think we've diagnosed the issue with this reply. Since this is your comfort zone of topics you probably default to talking to it and do it in a way that's more logical rather than fun and playful which is why the women you've gone on dates with end up offput and a bit scared. Being dominant on a date is a good thing. Women want to show up and have an automatic good time they don't really have to have to put too much effort into it. So it's your job as the man to lead the date to being a fun and pleasant experience that takes both of your minds off of the hardships of life. I like the do you believe in ghost one, it could be easily turned into past life conversations and a "I bet you were the bad guy in a past life" playful teasing. I'll try it out. Usually I just talk about meditation and how its improved my life and lowered my anxiety but it's more of a boring topic. Maybe you can put your hand on her hand and and say do you think we are the same person in different bodies? I'm sure if the date is going well that will escalate quickly to the bedroom. Alright challenge accepted I will get laid with the spiritual topic.

Well first of all I use AI daily and am working on an automated content system with monetization verticals in different industries so I'll hopefully be one of those elites myself soon enough, I recommend you join me in that quest. Even for the poorest people though there are big incentives in catering to them and giving them UBI. UBI goes back into the pockets of corporations anyway, you pay them your rent and buy their food and services. Having starving people with weapons like in the states would be a bad plan even for a psychopathic pedophile leader. Although they are trying, never underestimate stupidity lmao. Red scare 2.0 https://therealnews.com/johnson-says-pentagon-needs-more-money-for-fighting-communism-on-our-own-shores

Totally agree it's beautiful because we now have globalized access to world class intelligence and whatever wonders it brings. The moat of academia is pretty cringe, a bunch of indeed smart people that just regurgitate what they know but don't really build much usefulness. I'm pretty anti-academia I'm a high school dropout myself, I'm sure there is some utility still to the university system but I'm a pretty big believer that you can learn anything from books and Youtube these days. The new products and services that will come out in the next decade will be pretty insane. I feel like the last decade was pretty mid not much cool stuff came out. Just improvement on stuff that was already there the whole time. I'm a gamer and I quit playing video games because it was the same shit for a long time, I think League of Legends was the peak of that medium and nothing better has come out since then and it's been out since 2010.

Focusing entirely on military history to determine your pride is a massive bottleneck. The true American experiment isn't about the Pentagon; it's about the platform. When you ask what culture we have worth protecting, you're ignoring the global operating system. The culture of individual agency, rapid innovation, and open-source collaboration that powers the modern world is uniquely American. The actual future of humanity from AI to private aerospace and biotechnology—is being funded and built here in the present, not in past history books. Asking 'what is my role' is incredibly passive. The system is a decentralized playground. It gives you the infrastructure and freedom to build whatever you want. Your role isn't to sit back, watch the news, and grade the country's performance; your role is to utilize the platform to build something of value. As long as you're not in a medical emergency without insurance it's a pretty big blessing to be American. Overall we might win though as Canadians sorry . Although our job market is quite tough at the moment, our unemployment is higher than in America.

Well my simple argument against this is that there is no economic incentive to do that, it would actually be unprofitable vs building robots and letting the poor people and middle class people do whatever they want. There are actually a lot of incentives in keeping a middle class alive, it stimulates spending and it gives you a lot of social status in comparison. Just 10 rich dudes in a room is not a pleasant room it's just ego battles and competition. 10 rich dudes and 50 middle class dude and 50 middle class women is much better for everyone involved. In what ways do you disagree? I'll have this debate anyday I'm a massive fan of Bryan Johnson and how he's publicizing his health journey. A lot of other rich people are doing the same thind behind closed doors and not letting the rest of us benefit from their journey. His girlfriend Kate Tolo recently got diagnosed with Endometriosis and I sent her IG to a woman in my creatives chat that also has it to inspires her and give her hope that someone else richer than us is working to cure it so it's looking better than before!

Think of being mysterious more as a teasing move not literally being a mystery. I have a buddy where we went on a double date with these two older women and he refused to reveal his age when asked multiple times. I like to make them guess the first time and then say it, it lets the girl do some cold reading on you and then gives her satisfaction when you actually tell her the answer. If you refuse to say your age it starts to look uncalibrated or genuinely maliciously mysterious like you are refusing to reveal relevent information because it makes you look bad. First dates are about do you enjoy spending time with this person on a surface level just getting drinks/food/a walk for a couple hours before you invest more time into them. OKAY WHAT ARE YOUR DEEPEST BELIEFS ABOUT REALITY, LETS DISCUSS is not so much chill fun conversation unless you're really smooth about it.

Maybe if she's nice to my other women. Do you really believe that free will and the self are an illusion or are you using it as a common talking points in spiritual debates? I personally disagree and think our main experience of reality is free will, I don't mind debating the topic if you have a particular interest in it. I agree that it's dumb to derive your sense of self from your country since you don't control it and it's on you to make the best of the cards you're dealt. I think it's an interesting topic in that America is currently facing a crisis of identity and the left winger are always quick to throw the baby out with the bathwater. As a Canadian I see both sides, my country is doing better in terms of human rights and universal healthcare and I'm proud and benefiting directly from that national ideology at work; I see a lot of americans that aren't wealthy suffering from the class elitisism that america is struggling with.

Which lawsuit in particularly are you following? I'm well aware of them, some of them are valid and some of them are getting thrown out or getting counter sued. I think the Midjourney suit vs Disney, Warner Bros, and Universal is most interesting because they are arguing my exact point that it was done in a fairuse way. They also just filed a countermotion arguing that the studios are themselves scraping data and training their own proprietary models on third-party works and if they can prove it it'll be a landmark case that will settle most other smaller cases. https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/04/midjourney-wants-hollywood-studios-to-reveal-the-details-of-their-ai-usage/

Why? The United States is a phenomenal country both in its history and current power to affect mankind for the better. I say this as a Canadian. Narcissism is wanting unearned praise, America deserves plenty of praise. It is the bastion of innovation. @Yimpa Cool perspective, it's important to be proud of who you are. Trans women are awesome.

You're very welcome. A lot of users on this forum(myself included) are falling short of our potential and it's insulting to see other people rise up to theirs. Everyday is another opportunity for greatness though, we always have another shot to do something great. Our generation will be amongst the first wave of humans to become biologically immortal and see our species go beyond our planet and conquer the galaxy and entire universe. Yourself and your children and grandchildren will become infinitely rich as we go beyond the limited resources of this planet and capitalize on the infite resources of the universe and the infinite playground that God has built for us. It is a beautful paradigm but understandably it sounds completely insane. My roommate was telling me about post scarcity years ago when I was broke in our apartment and I believed him but it was so far removed from my painful existence that it was just insulting to hear. We are building it though, it's happening.

Bro wait til the first rich people start become immortal and there will be fucking immortality riots everywhere lmao it'll be a cool thing to see. People like Bryan Johnson are a gift to humanity and popularizing this sort of quest. Soon enough there will a Charlie Munger dude that spends $20 billion and manages to actually make himself immortal. Gemini estimates that this will happen in around 2035 and we will now be in longevity escape velocity territory. Never do this my friend, this is letting anti-intellectualism win! World changing ideas are worth fighting for; do not let lazy cynicism permeate your speech it is truly a disgusting phenomenon to witness. Bryan Johnson is a hero and people dislike him for challenging the very paradigms that are LITERALLY KILLING ALL OF US AND OUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY SINCE THE DAWN OF TIME. I thought we were supposed to champion radical openmindedness on this forum.

AI is great, it empowers the motivate people in society and creates more competitive advantage for us. People that complain about AI are just creating a larger and larger competitive gap. Even in a world where everyone gets guaranteed food and shelter with global UBI(what I hope happens in the next 20 years), you will still have the average dude be broke and unproductive and motivated entrepreneurs having all the leverage in society. It's sort of a tax on the lazy if you think about it but also their saving grace since eventually it'll pay their bills.

What? Aging is your whole body, organs and muscles starting to degenerate and fall apart. You can call it natural doesn't mean it's not a catastrophe that should be solved asap. As a matter of fact each year for the past decade or so pretty massive breakthroughs have been made on the journey to biological immortality. Why? Why is thinking death can be cured stupid and unrealistic? Sorry bro I'm gonna call you naive and uninformed right back. This is proven documented research that literally won a nobel prize, we are currently on track to cure aging by the 2050s. It sounds pretty wild but that's why I talk about it a lot on the forum. In 2012, Shinya Yamanaka won the medicine Nobel Prize for proving that cellular aging can be reversed. By using just four genetic proteins—known as Yamanaka factors—to reset mature cells back to a youthful state, he proved that aging is not an unbreakable law of physics, but a biological program we are actively learning to rewrite.

Awesome, love the adventure mindset. What's your goal with this journey? If you ever want to organize a model photoshoot overthere let me know, would love to help out. My goal is to create creative communities and events globally and connect people worldwide.

Well that's what I mean, I don't know what you're talking about most times I read your posts. I try to ground myself personally in very tangible outcomes so it makes sense why my personality type resonates more with the scientific framework. To be fair though I do believe it's the most valuable way to think and live your life. If you don't value tangible outcomes you will not be very successful in any society on earth due to not being able to produce anything that's useful for your fellow human beings and thus waste our time and yours as well.

Yes most people don't like ambiguity and fair enough it's quite scary. Much more appealing to get a worldview in a box like mainstream religions. I've done it a few times but mostly for mild topics like meditations and sometimes psychedelics. I think with good reason, what exactly is your purpose for bringing heavy topics on a first date? It's not really a spiritual thing, people don't tend to do that in general and repeatedly bring up like starving children in Africa on first dates. Some people do like bleeding heart leftists and to be fair it'll heavily screen out people that aren't super passionate about these topics but for me it's not a top priority. In my mind overly spiritual people are using it more as a coping mechanism for being unsuccessful in real life rather than being actual deep thinkers so I would be likely to be turned off if a girl was particularly new agey. I don't mean successful like make a lot of money but even being a responsible, dependable and consistent adult that's ready for a healthy relationship is often times lacking in those circles in MY personal experience. Also most people are not intellectuals they don't enjoy discussing abstract concepts, they deal more in tangibles. If are heavily involved in your business/career in a spiritual industry that would be one thing but if you just like the videos and enjoy discussing it then it's a whole other thing.

I think looking at it as an "invented concept" misses the point of what frameworks like Spiral Dynamics are actually doing. Original researchers like Clare Graves were trying to map out an objective, shared reality of human development. They were pointing to evolutionary patterns in consciousness that escape most people in ordinary states of awareness. By studying self-actualization and doing the actual practice, we’re able to tap into the exact same terrain those researchers discovered for themselves, rather than just playing with words. I myself find the spiral dynamics model incredibly useful for me in understanding the ways other humans think because I often fall into the trap of thinking everyone thinks the same way as me.

Models is pretty good it shares the core fundamental principles of having a healthy outlook on pickup. In my mind the best game program ever released is the social circle blueprint 1 and 2. It's not really about pickup per say more around social circle and status building. The stuff in it is so powerful it can be said it's too powerful to just pickup women you might as well use it for business and political aims. RSD Luke is massively underrated. Now the course is on Youtube so enjoy, highly recommend it.

Right but in that view AI only improved their ability to do art for fun. They can still draw whatever they want and they now just got improved tools to change it if they want to or give feedback. A top AI image generator doesn't stop anyone from sketching a drawing in pencil. I think the money part is core to AI fear, people are worried about being able to pay their bills with cheaper and cheaper AI workflows coming on especially with morons like the current american administration in charge. Some people I think(like @Leo Gura ) are offended at the very notion that a program can come up with greater intelligence than they can after a lifetime of work but that's just how evolution works. AI has made me so much smarter already, so many concepts I'm able to debate with it; I'm full on the boat of seeing it as a tool not as a competitor. We are gonna need a UBI or subsidy response for AI layoffs though that's real.

Perfect bro now that you're enlightened perhaps you can help us solve some global issues. How do we solve the last-mile distribution crisis of perishable nutritional yields in conflict-ridden, infrastructure-deprived regions like the Horn of Africa without relying on centralized military escorts that inevitably siphon off 40% of the aid? Since you have the 'Buddha eye' and can see into the closed-door meetings of the human realm, let's test a highly critical, active security negotiation. Right now, there is an intense diplomatic effort regarding the escalating grid collapses in Ukraine and the catastrophic threat to the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant’s cooling systems. Which two Western nations actually drafted the landmark resolution on this crisis (GOV/2026/25), and why is it being negotiated through the IAEA Board of Governors in Vienna rather than the UN Security Council in New York? What is the specific technical 'shutdown' status required for Zaporizhzhia's Unit 1 and 2 reactors under this framework until the cooling and off-site power crisis is resolved? Which major Western superpower—traditionally Ukraine’s biggest ally—surprised the delegation by refusing to support this specific March 2026 resolution? Surely an enlightened being who can communicate across entire cosmic realms can easily read the text of a resolution sitting on a desk.