LordFall

I think women can experience the same thing but they have more criteria when evaluating men so it's rarely just by looking at a beautiful man, it's more by witnessing male greatness over time. Women usually get crushes on guys they know over time; even when it comes to celebrities. When women are really into an artist, she bonds with him over months by listening to his music when she feels down for example so it's also a function of how much value the man gives her. Most men don't give much value so there's not much to be in awe of.

No hollywood has been shit for the past 5-10 years. 2000-2015 had way better movies than we've had for the last 10 years. If you look at the top 10 grossing list each year most of the recent ones are sequels and reboots; very few new ideas are tried since the costs of production went up. Rehashed stuff that's written in a non offensive ways makes for very flat creation.

Always, guilty as charged. Female energy makes the world go round, plus I need high-tier muses for the empire. But you're definitely losing points here. No gaming? Never sat down and appreciated the cinematic greatness of Star Wars? Tragic. We might have to revoke your cool card for this one.

Lmao I hadn't even heard of the chicken nuggets

An unproven generalization is called an assumption or a claim, not psychological projection. Projection specifically means attributing one's own repressed psychological traits onto someone else. As for evidence: we literally have active threads on this forum full of users debating whether semen retention gives them superpowers, arguing that lust is lower-stage consciousness, and framing sexuality as something that must be "transcended." If you don't see the ambient sexual repression in spiritual subcultures, you haven't been paying attention. Polyamory is not a monolith with a single rigid ideology. The movement spans everything from relationship anarchy and completely open dating to closed polyfidelity. Includes setups like closed triads, quads, and polycules that establish their own internal boundaries and agreements. The entire foundational principle of ethical non-monogamy is relationship autonomy: consenting adults having the sovereignty to negotiate whatever structure works best for their shared lives. You’re referencing the modern progressive stigma around the one man many women type which some people like to call one penis policy. Gatekeeping relationship architecture and shaming people for choosing asymmetry or specific boundaries is just another group trying to enforce their own dogmatic relationship norms onto consenting adults. Besides, I’m bisexual; having other men involved in my dynamics down the line is something I’m completely open to. But if a polycule happens to be one man and multiple women for a period, whose business is that from the outside as long as it's built on transparency and enthusiastic consent from everyone involved?

I'm not trying to weasel my way out of it at all. A lot of spiritual people fall into stage green which demonizes materialism. Some of them are like hippie free love types who are more sexually open but a lot are more sexually repressed folks. I encounter this attitude a lot on this forum, haven't you? Come on now, I don't think I avoid arguments at all. Often times, people make bad points and their points are simply not valid. All opinions are not created equal. If we use wrong definitions then we can never have actually high quality intellectual debates. Both camps just throw their biases at each other without actually getting somewhere. Each proper debate should start with defining the terms of what we're actually talking about otherwise it devolves into nonsense quite quickly. She is still using the word projection incorrectly. Haha yeah it happens in mankind too, the good old origin meaning of being a cuck. Yes an alpha male with provider qualities is basically the dream for women. I call it a purple pill man, the beta qualities of a blue pill man and the alpha qualities of a red pill man. I discussed it many years ago with Rollo Tomassi on his show but he didn't really believe in the concept, his view is very jaded and he thinks this type of man is so rare that women inevitably either cheat with fuckboys or are stuck with beta males. I thought his view was a bit limited then and I still think so today. @something_else Silly man, don't push your limiting beliefs onto me. Dating multiple women at the same time is polyamory by definition.

This seems to be a growing talking point so I figured we might as well talk about it. Flock cameras are the first big one to become mainstream but it's popping up in other forms. There are CloudRunner cameras being installed on the US Consulate in Toronto and Synagogues around Ontario. I'm gonna go against the grain here and say I think it's both an inevitable trend but also good for society. You need police to be able to enforce the law and stop crimes. Individual criminals and organized criminal organizations have been running rampant these past few years. Leo made a great point in the libertarianism video that one of the main purposes of a nation state is to hold monopoly on violence and use it to ensure the safety of its citizens. Now the obvious question to ask is what do you do when the government itself is acting like an organized criminal organization!? That's a bit harder to deal with. Rule of law should apply both to the masses, to the elected officials and to the shadowy elites. I really liked the journalists that went to surveil Flock headquarters themselves and Flock was weirded out and offended, what hypocritical buffoons lmao. I think ultimately the utopian vision would be to have an AI model that surveils basically everyone and has a threshold of error that is basically foolproof and only reports criminal activity for a human to review when it meets a certain threshold. That model should be open sourced and distributed on the internet so that people can verify that its weights are actually impartial. It would then also be used to surveil and judge the elites and humanity would live happily ever after. Is the philosophical idea at least. Curious on counters to this idea or in general thoughts on the mass surveillance wave that's about to ramp up further due to the AI surveillance tech now available for police agencies globally.

Thanks bro appreciate it! I'm starting to get traction on socials so that will help with momentum. Once I start growing a community I assume it'll be easier to get help with the game design side of things and it'll accelerate my timelines. I think I said somewhere earlier in this thread that I would have a demo out in 6 months, that's gonna definitely be pushed back but the project as a whole is moving forward! No to all three? 0 for 3, you're killing me Sugarcoat. What's your thing then?

You don't understand the meaning of the word projecting as it doesn't make sense to use it in this context. Unless you think I'm anti-sex? Otherwise it's fair to say that my statement is hard to prove but perhaps it's just the men on this forum that are sexually repressed and not the spiritual community as a whole.

The poor nazis, why were we so rude to them! They were only trying to better the economy

It's a dark fantasy multimedia project called Legend of the Abyss, based in the 17th century. I talk about it more in this thread It's somewhat inspired by Game of Thrones; that show is based in the 15th century and the Wars of the Roses. I wanted mine to be a bit more modern and focus more so on imperial conquest and world domination over just warring kingdoms. My story focuses more on the Thirty Years War which was basically a religious war that tore Europe apart and was one of Europe's bloodiest conflict before the world wars. The show is basically around the idea that the Abyss is Hell but basically also infinite consciousness and the multiverse and the origin of magic. It's heavily misunderstood by the regular human governments and religion of the world and they commit all kinds of weird actions like the witch hunts in the name of God until the blood mage God-Emperor Nerathar conquers the planet and the Abyss itself and turns mankind immortal. I wanna make it based in our real world unlike Game of Thrones so that by playing the game and reading the story you learn about real world history and politics; the magical elements are put on top they don't really invalidate the mechanics of our world. Started coding a game but thats hella hard so I'm mostly focused on worldbuilding and releasing the manga to create a fanbase for now.

Should be able to make it happen from Summer 2027 onward, for the next few months its grind time! What about yourself what kind of travel plans do you have?

That's clearly how they look at it. Over a medium and long term though that strategy doesn't work, I think dudes liked hearing Fresh & Fit trash women for maybe a few months or like a couple years but after a while it gets old and they become more and more irrelevant as their audience grows up and trends change. To keep that example of Fresh & Fit they've had their audience drop by 70-90% since their 2021 peak. I'm actually surprised they still get a few tens of thousands views but I mean as someone who likes to grow I would be very depressed to have a brand around that. Especially with content creation your numbers don't lie so you can see it in real time. They should pivot to something new like actually teaching stuff and producing results in the lives of people instead of focusing on cultural commentary.

I study worldbuilding mostly these days as well as watch content creators breakdown shows I like so I learn stuff. A lot of music so I can vibe and get my creativity going. I also started trying to build my own youtube channels which is a whole other type of grind, makes me appreciate how people put together videos even more. That shit is hard.

How's this for non-duality and boundaries collapsing lmao, I'm into a lot of things but this one I have never done and am not planning to. According to the stats some of you on this forum are bound to have done it Kinsey Institute (1953): In Alfred Kinsey’s landmark survey, approximately 3.6% of women reported having had some form of sexual contact with an animal at least once in their lifetime. Modern Epidemiological Estimates: Contemporary psychiatric and sexological research estimates the prevalence of actual zoophilic behavior across the general adult population to be around 1% to 2% or lower. Kinsey Institute (1948): Alfred Kinsey’s data indicated that approximately 8% of men reported some form of sexual contact with an animal at least once in their lifetime. (Among men raised in rural environments, Kinsey reported rates as high as 17%, largely involving farm animals). Hunt Survey (1974): Morton Hunt’s study reported a decline in lifetime prevalence among men to approximately 5%, reflecting increased urbanization. Modern Sexological Estimates: Contemporary studies estimate current active or lifetime zoophilic behavior among men in the general population to be around 1% to 2%. These stats hold true in my experience, I haven't even been with 100 women and I've had one admit to getting head from her dog and one admit to fantasies involving horses. If any of you are dating dudes raised on farms then Godspeed, you need all the STD panels available to mankind In some cultures it's not even taboo, this vice news doc investigated a niche Colombian tradition where young men are made to lose their virginities to donkeys as a rite of passage to manhood.

The old republic would be so sick, it was way cooler than current storyline. @Joseph Maynor Fair enough, let us know your thoughts when you've watched some of them! @Cubbage Agreed! Have you watched the newer movies and shows that came out from Disney?

Now we're talking. If I am given such an important quest I must fulfill it and report back. Not for my sake, of course. For science.

I've tried it one time. It didn't feel like that but it was pretty good. Just helped me compile and make sense of my earlier awakenings. Usually when I have mystical experiences it feels like life is a video game and it's the best thing ever but not specifically like sex more like reality is all mine to enjoy.

This is a pretty important to watch to really understand how misogyny works and the horrific consequences its had in history Heinrich Kramer was a Catholic friar that got a papal approval by Pope Innocent VIII to conduct witch trials and he wrote a whole book in 1487 on witchcraft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_Kramer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malleus_Maleficarum He was basically an old school Incel. His crusade against women started when he lost a trial where he tried to prosecute a group of women that didn't wanna go to his sermons and started criticizing him. In the trial he asked weirdly invasive questions to the women about their sex life and marriages that didn't have anything to do with the charges. The bishop overseeing it got the case dismissed then he got the pope's approval. Himself personally he was responsible for killing 50-200 women and his book lead to the death of 30-50k women. Now were the women demonic or was he? The more you study the history of feminism the more you realize it was just about power and status, it goes even deeper than gender really. A lot of the witch practices that women were accused of like divination through tea leaves reading was caused by very logical situations like being able to voice an opinion with plausible deniability "Oh its just the leaves that said that perhaps the a shadowy figure is haunting the castle, I'm not saying that my lord is a murdered of course not! " Be careful with stereotyping and dehumanizing people. As I've said personally in my experience I find men much more treacherous than women, they pretend to be your friend and then are either unreliable or so self-interested that you can't trust a lot of them. On the surface they're just chill bros though. Bit me in the ass many times both in personal friendships and in business ventures.

Actually surprised people were willing to answer that question on camera https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dcegcv4S7AF/ Alcohol is a powerful weapon of truth!

Multi-perspectivalism is guilty of sounding so simple that people gloss over it. Humans are rarely capable of considering multiple perspectives at once. Especially those that go against their core biases. I like some Red Pill content and also have read some feminism and think they have valid takes. I don't understand why almost no dating coach or red piller can say the same thing, it wasn't really that hard to accomplish and I'm alive and well after ingesting both perspectives.

Yes. I think that phenomenon really shows how hard it is for the human mind to operate with nuance and under cognitive dissonance. We think we're so smart but it's easier to observe when other people make clear logical fallacies. It's not because you dislike one side that the other is automatically good; that's insanity. There was a really funny meme where its a Hamas soldier and a liberal woman falling in love and they are happily running ever after into the sunset. Then the end of the comic is the Hamas soldier behind really happy and her being beheaded. Hamas supporters are really disgustingly stupid people. The details of the rapes and murders that came out of October 7th are horrifying. Basically medieval torture being used on just regular people attending a music festival. Truly demented people. https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/18tbeo3/captured_islamic_jihad_terrorist_admits_his_squad/ Trigger warning don't click that link if you don't handle negative content well, It's just text but the comments on Reddit recap well what went down. The IDF has been caught doing basically the same level of depravity, both of these camps should have as little support as possible. It doesn't seem that hard to understand that in a war both sides are horrific.

I guess it's competing incentives? Why do these studios do this if it fucks up their IPs? I guess its a case of a slow motion car crash or like the titanic where it slowly but inevitably goes towards an iceberb and some people know it and watch in horror but their salaries are big so they don't care that much and some people are delusional and think they're great at their job while they are ruining cash cows. Reminds me of the last season of game of thrones. It ruined 70% of the show's value and nobody talks about it anymore while it was the biggest thing ever while it was airing.

@Schizophonia Fair enough, when put that way I agree. The claim of superiority often times leads people to grandiosity and lack of critical thinking which makes them less effective and capable than their adversaries.

Wow, that was a great video. Thanks for sharing; it made a lot of sense. I just watched ep 1 of the Obi Wan show and there was a scene that bothered my logical brain so much. 8 year old Leila Skywalker getting kidnapped by mercenaries and it takes them 45 seconds of foot chase to get her. It instantly ruins the show and the competence of the mercenaries and I had a discussion with Gemini as to why tf nobody filming this was like isn't this a terrible scene why are we doing this? It said basically what the video said; the people in charge of filming, editing and directing the scene don't have the actual authority to change or write anything. The executives in charge don't really give a fuck it's actually great filmmaking, they want something that will not cost too much and be ROI positive in the short term and reshooting a 1 min scene at that level of production can cost like $500,000 I think AI will make a lot of this stuff much better and give the power back to smaller teams of creators and not make it so only massive corporations can produce media. I find most Hollywood movies so trash and they have bigger budgets than ever. Middle management is really a curse to humanity. How that chick explained the lack of responsability that comes from having big teams and meetings makes so much sense. It's everyone that is actually kind of doing their job but the way the business is setup it sabotages the project. Very interesting how that system works.