LordFall

Well for example I quite like the Alex Hormozi books on business. I read the $100M offers so far and it boils down a lot of business down to your offer. Since then I've really separated the different parts of my business from operations/content production to the actual product/service I wanna sell to people and how I'm bundling it. Highly recommend the books!

What makes you think that everything has already happened? I had that sort of thought when in a psychotic state but it doesn't really make sense to me in a sober more logical state. Do you mean that human history is already written and in our day to day life we just removed our ability to know what's gonna happen but ultimately the collective consciousness knows it all already? That sort of makes sense to me but I think there is perhaps still room for spontaneous events or perhaps not hard to tell.

I think polarity is the core concept you point at. The masculine is usually closed off, solving problems and conflict oriented. If you identify with that version of masculinity then a being who's more freeflowing, relaxed and like focused on painting their nails and doing their hair nice is gonna feel like a beautiful and needed contrast to you. It's funny because even in bisexuality I'm mostly attracted to only feminine men. And femboys tend to not really fit in with traditional masculinity and focus more on authentic self-expression. It works for my personality type because I like to spend all day thinking about problems and working on business so the more financially free I am the more I can attract that type of man and women in my life and have them mesh well with me. I can also find those aspects of carefreeness and relaxation in my own self and sometimes it feels good to relax into that and for me it manifests more as childlike enjoyment rather than feminine traits but it can be interpertred in all kinds of ways I guess. Gender roles also have to do with your life goals and identity, it's interesting to deconstruct them. I'm a big fan of performed femininity and usually the cost for that is that you perform masculinity in return. When done right this polarity is pretty fun for both polarities. In a few years when my business cashflow is really solid I don't mind sugaring my partners so they don't have to work and I get their undivided energy. I've met a lot of especially career women who end up jaded bitter and unpleasant due to being stressed and exposed to cortisol all day. I want my partners to perhaps post content and have their own brand but to mostly chill and socialize on their day to day while I worry about paying the bills, the AI revolution and scaling our lifestyles.

I think it's a great model of relationships, I'm glad it's becoming mainstream I hear people talk about attachment styles that aren't super into self-development. I think it's perhaps common to start off as anxious then veer into avoidant and then hopefully fall into secure. It started off that way with me with my ex I was I'd say the more anxious partner and she was more of an avoidant. I spend like 6 years outside of serious committed relationships working on myself and only having hookups and FWBs type of arrangements but I'd say it allowed me to understand myself and my needs more to now be able to enter secure relationships in the future.

I think Leo makes some good points in his critiques of science but throws the baby with the bathwater in the process and in a lot of his blog posts is a critique from below not above. What he is doing himself with this whole site and his whole Youtube channel is following the scientific method for philosophy. I found this blog post on who gets to define science a bit silly https://actualized.org/insights/who-gets-to-define-science Sure on an ultimate level anybody can share their truth. Being able to take random ideas(hypothesis) and testing them in a rigorous way that produces reproducible results and doing that over a career in a specific field is what makes a credible scientist. If has an idea that sounds right to them but won't test it rigorously or falls for common cognitive bias that's what we call pseudoscience of half-baked insights, the scientific community mostly does its job in not letting people like this gain credibility in academia. There are a few bad apples that fall along the cracks or even structural corruption in academia but how we get to more truth and better epistemology is more rigorous science; not by saying science is stupid and obsolete.

Yes I love it, spending time understanding concepts or the fabric of our civilization is one of my favorite hobbies. It's what separates us from the other animals and allows our hopefully endless evolution. Sociology is particularly interesting in how it shapes our class warfare and dating.

That's a weird way of phrasing it though, you could say the scientific method is one of the most anti hallucination process we have. It takes phenomena and breaks it down to make sure you can replicate it to make sure it's not a hallucination. Your main critique of science seems to me that it only allows for a certain percentage of hypothesis to be tested and doesn't allow for stuff that goes against the core incentives of academia or just the overton window. You can't literally mean that life is such a hallucination to the point that it's not worth even conducting experiments and having hypothesis. That ends up in all of us being schizophrenic in a park together like the commies want.

Can you share your Instagram and ideally do you have a video of you talking to a woman like a street interview? It's hard to diagnose a problem while just taking your word for it. Do you approach with wingmen sometimes? Usually a guy that knows what they're doing can spot your mistakes pretty fast. The idea that comes to mind is if you dislike doing cold approach and talking to women when you talk to them you can sound robotic or boring and really skew your success odds. If you do look decent you should be able to get an instagram close from like 5-20% of the women you talk to and a date from like 25% of the instagrams you get so each date you need to talk to anywhere from 20 to 80 women.

I think this is a good idea, humans being there for each other without the need for artificial products to get in the way. If there are any women that need help with holding up their boobs, I am available for a very reasonable wage. Also if you are a wealthy man and don't trust our overly capitalistic system I am available to spend your money for you.

Self-improvement and resilience should be part of your identity. Some people think they are perfect the way they are and the world owes them everything and then they encounter market forces they collapse. Antifragile is a good concept around this. Then they come that society is too materialistic lol

I think you have to be more precise when you criticize science, surely you don't have a problem with the actual scientific method since you seem to use it yourself for your findings. Academia and big science is different than the core premise of making hypothesis and testing them, that part is pretty bulletproof. I think mainstream science gives you limited option as to what type of questions you're even allowed to ask which severely harms the quality of findings they can reach.

Nah I haven't read the books just watched the movie. It seems that yeah Paul rushes into it and hurts Chani unnecessarily. Most media is really bad narrative wise, due to human error but just how they have to simplify plots to have mainstream appeal. I have a lot of hope for AI written entertainment to revolutionize the genre. I cannot stand hollywood blockbusters, I have to get really high to enjoy them. I've been getting more into historical dramas or animes. Anime has way better plot than movies or tv shows most times.

For me understanding the difference between a complex and a complicated system is key to understanding reality. A complicated system has many rulesets that once understood although a difficult task will make the system as a whole predictable and you can conceptually understand the whole thing. A complex system has emergent properties and is actually an ever evolving concept so it doesn't matter how well you map it, you will never fully grasp it. As an INTP I like to build systems that work against reality and I was always shocked that it seems to always elude me but by understanding that the very nature of reality is an ever evolving system and by virtue of being an agent of the system my mind is not wide enough to grasp it then paradoxically I feel much more at peace with it and understand it deeper.

What do you mean? I don't understand what you're trying to say

I've helped many men that look all kinds of ways to get laid. Your advice is dumb, it's a bad idea to get a bootcamp without trying cold approach for yourself extensively to get a baseline of results. Doubt you even read my post or the other ones I made on this forum, the whole idea is to build status, money, social circles and leverage so you can get amazing results regardless of your appearance.