LordFall

@Majed Of course it's normal. Do something about it, I gave you the best suggestions and you ignored it. If you choose to be a victim of your own mental blocks that's on you more to do than any woman.

@Majed Link your Instagram here or DM it to me. I'm one of the top dating photographers in North America I'll help you figure it out for free for the benefit of consciousness lol. Cold approach is just one way and only really gives great results for some guys and particularly those that have extroverted MBTI functions. The 4 core ways are 1) Cold approach(Day/night game) 2) Online dating 3) Social Circle 4) Social media I've spent thousands of dollars and thousands if not tens of thousands of hours learning this stuff. It's not easy but phenomenal results. People get results in different ways but I'd say the results are guaranteed if you don't give up. Also lets talk specific metrics, you say literally thousands of approaches or do you mean 150 and are exaggerating? How many dates did you get out of it? How many Instagram/Number closes did you get?

Communism never achieved collective ownership of anything. They nationalized the ressources and had a central commitee manage it. Much closer to monarchy than true Marxism which was utopic and impossible to achieve at that time. With blockchains and smart contracts you can have zero trust(solved by algorithms not trust me bro) ownership of productive assets.

Why do as a man your problems come from another man? I'd say it comes 80% from victim mindset.

I really don't understand what's going on with their Romanian case, seemed to me like there was plenty of evidence and there was judicial pressure on the Romanian authorities to not take it easy on them. Perhaps they are really rich enough to influence it in their favour or they're less guilty than they seem, those are the only 2 logical scenarios that make sense to me.

I don't think we have to take away their trillions of wealth; as a matter of fact I think that's impossible and would lead to the Civil War(2024) movie. I think we have to create new wealth with these AI agents and have that wealth allocated in a more effective way than the current wealth is. The rich don't benefit from LA and San Francisco starting to ressemble Fallout more and more. They want beautiful nice cities in which they have a competitive advantage. We can make selfishness work to our collective advantage. The only other alternative I see is AI becoming AGI and forcibly redistributing the wealth if it finds it necessary to do so.

It has to be win win I think, just like game. Perhaps it starts off with a DAO that owns these factories and redistributes the profits probably moreso to the executives and people running it but still owned by everyone so we're all going up together. The more I get into business I think you're right that most people don't have the guts or psychology for it and won't succeed but no reason it has to be billionaires or starving masses, just have to all benefit from the pie and eat from it and someone people can have more to eat if they like working all day.

Are you saying Bitcoin is a shitcoin or you mean altcoins?

I'm a pretty good looking guy but I'm an INTP without that much extraversion so I don't do well in night game and mostly pull through online dating. You gotta find what works for you and try everything in the meanwhile. I'm also pretty good at systems thinking so social circle game works wonders for me but the escalation part is a bit hard.

We must find win-win solutions for the massive economic inequality problems of humanity . Feel good, stick it to the man solutions are not helpful and definitely detrimental to our cause. Rich people are people too and they have feelings and antagonism is not productive. I do not think that redistributing assets is a feasible idea but collective ownership of productive assets makes a lot of sense(shoutout to comrade Marx.) The cornerstone of our economy relies on manual labor. Food production, construction, manufacturing, healthcare, transportation, energy extraction, etc. It's seeming more anad more like over the next 10-15 years all that will be able to be mostly automated through robotics and AI software. The common view of this is that the rich will own it and the working class will be screwed. We are at a crossroad of humanity where it's actually possible for the ownership of these systems to be decentralized and be turned into a public utility. The effects of that would be complete transformation of our economic system. This wouldn't be the same as taxing the rich more like giving people a way to build up their assets slowly overtime without having to wage this classwarfare that the communists are such a fan of and I believe is impossible. A simple end solution would be eventually we'll end up with a let's say $3000 USD/monthly UBI(adjusted for inflation permanently) and no need to work while those that choose to can still accumulate more wealth and a much greater income than that $3K. That seems to me like a win-win solution that lets both the rich and the poor collaborate towards an unlimited future for humanity. Posted this on the anti work subreddit, this my take on figuring out a utopic future for humanity. Curious to hear thoughts. This and Leo's post on Elites here: https://actualized.org/insights/leftist-populist-misunderstanding Gary comes to the conclusion that the elites are the problem and we must tax them to make things equal. I believe this is impossible because the elites are made up of the smartest, most ruthless and most competent members of any societies and they fundamentally cannot be opposed. We must change the overall system to make win-win solutions otherwise the bottom 99% will always get crushed. I was a professional League of Legends player top 0.01% and the idea that an average player could beat me was ridiculous. Same thing applies to financial and business elites, some people spend 14 hours a day working on becoming more powerful. The working class cannot opposed them and must join forces with them. Curious on your thoughts @Leo Gura, I think this idea is one of the only ones that make sense that I've seen.

It makes me less depressed and more content with life and come up with great ideas. It's also a psychedelic so I get nondual experiences from it at times. I believe it can do great things but also can be used wrong, gotta be self-aware enough to know the difference. Doing a 75 day no vice challenge though so curious what it'll be like afterwards.

Bro you're overthinking it and have been mislead. Full confidence is just the absence of fear and anxiety, it can even be called presence. Some crackheads have full self confidence. You can achieve it in the next 5 minutes. Maintaining it throughout hardship is of course a different beast altogether. What would this full self confidence allow you to do? I would focus on that.

I like his point that your life should be so epic that you can sit down and be moved to tears just thinking about your life. Regular marriage is garbage imo, it's an institution meant to stabilize society and unite two struggling peasants together and help them reproduce. I like the idea of having an anime harem and taking on world changing missions with my (positive) sex cult.

Then you're already lost and clueless if some random notes on a computer define your life. I would seriously meditate and contemplate on the weakness your life is based on. I think you're speaking in hyperbole but you're an infinite being. Stop saying such weak nonsense it's insulting to yourself.

Why do you want to get married? To settledown and have a family? What does involving the government in a legally binding agreement make sense for you? I love the idea of commitment and long term relationships but legal marriage is insanity to me. I will offer my wives a private marriage and pay for the whole ceremony and have the family so they have their special day but their commitment is with me not to some random bureaucrats. I understand there are reasons why it was done like usually relationships end in feud and child support/alimony helps preserve stability in society but I still think exporting that responsibility to the system is a strange solution.