CreamCat

The researcher did what it could. Does a computer scientist regret his work just because employers use softwares to put workers under tigher surveillance? The computer scientist can try to take responsibility and create softwares to counteract surveillance softwares. It seems you are saying that a finite being shall see infinite moves ahead and see infinite consequences. However, it's usually a bad idea for a finite being to try to see infinite moves ahead. I can't do that. I can counteract whatever undesirable side effects come up.

I decided that the fight I have been fighting is right for me. But, I cannot answer whether my fight is the right for you. I'm not trying to do it to appease others. I do it in service of myself and others. Heroes serve humanity in their own ways.

Your examples are bad because the vast majority of people work in fields that don't involve murder. I want to make a name for myself as a creator and inspire others to do the same. That's not going to change the human species, but I want to do it. Not every fight has to affect human species in any major way.

I know my fight. My fight is to become a very good master in my field of work. Is becoming a master blacksmith the right fight? That's difficult to answer. I just want to become a master of my field.

One that helps me and others instead of killing them. In my case, the definition of the right fight is not obvious because my line of work doesn't involve murders. Once I become a master, I will ask that question again. What is the right fight? What is worth fighting for?

He chose a wrong fight. He could have fought the right things.

I want to exceed all known limitations in my field of work. Excellence will do it. I want to be satisfied for my work.

No. I was not precise in my words. I want to become an absolute legend.

I'm more interested in becoming a better human being that can tackle more difficult challenges and learn faster and become a legend. I want to become an absolute legend.

@Leo Gura Ask Leo Gura.

I've done the search for you. It starts at 1:39:33.

The one I have is too long. But, he simply describes Coral as the stage where you realize you have responsibility for everything as God. He said he was responsibility.

@Joseph Maynor TJ Reeves defines Coral as the stage of responsibility. Do you resonate with his definition?

If Leo Gura states that he's not enlightened after years of pursuing enlightenment, I cannot rely on enlightenment for years, either. Personal development cannot depend on such an unreliable concept. But, the definition of enlightenment is not clear. A man on this forum claims to have attained enlightenment after one year of hardcore self inquiry. Is the man enlightened by Leo Gura's standards? I don't know.

Are humans the only devils?

I like it, too!!

Let me remind you that a Green college is still an expensive college.

Right now, the status of your personal development is a swiss cheese with holes from Beige to Green. You want to plug holes in tier 1 until you don't complain about mundane things. By the way, you might want to reconsider going to college. Depending on your life purpose, college could be a waste of time.

I just read about the sibyl system. I could read devilry from the brains in the system. Personally, I wouldn't want the sibyl system to be managing my life. It controls what kinds of jobs I can or can't have. It blocks immigration and emigration in japan. It basically turned a country into a large prison. It runs the country like a giant prison camp. It is the warden. It treats people as potential criminals. Its thinking is one dimensional in that it only judges whether or not someone is a criminal. It has no problem with being cruel to potential criminals. By blocking immigration and emigration, it crippled japan's economy, too. To me, it looks like a tyrant or a totalitarian warden. Some forum members dream of turning a country into a prison camp, too. The problem of management is that as you optimize your job as a manager, workers become less and less productive. As management becomes more optimized, productivity becomes less optimal. It is an optimization problem. For example, a manager wants to maximize one's effects on productivity of workers. The manager may actually increase one's effects on workers' productivity. But, the productivity of the whole company plummets as the manager meddles more with workers. Think of managing programmers as if they were factory workers. A manager may manage when a programmer can or cannot go to toilet or when a programmer is allowed to take a rest. Managing bodily work like that may work, but managing a knowledge worker like a factory worker is going to backfire. One of the major reasons that the sibyl system blocked immigration and emigration is that it doesn't have enough computation power to manage movements out of and into japan. It crippled the computation power of the entire japanese population. By allowing people to have more freedom, you allow them to utilize their computation power and contribute to the economy. Strict management kills computation power of workers.

You might know a bunch of concepts. But, you may embody 0.1% of it. You might even have wasted time on a bunch of unrelated concepts that are irrelevant to self actualization and confuse them with actual self-actualizing. I see some people do that. One can waste 10 years on irrelevant stuff and think one is now developed. If you overestimate the level of your self-actualization, trying to raise others' consciousness can easily backfire or can prove futile. Even nazis were thinking that they were raising their consciousness by learning nazism and killing people. Focus on improving yourself first before thinking about helping others in any profound way. Until you become developed, you help yourself. Self-help.

Any big transition is always potentially life-threatening. But, at the end of a transition waits a better world where people are not forced to work for living. The end of wage slavery. The end of aging process. The end of poverty. In the long run, short-term losses can be amortized. AIs can use biotechnology to make or break humans. So, I'm not totally sure. Will evolved AIs preach love or hatred? Would their love be the kind of touch love that gets many people killed during a transition period?

The transition can still entail the death of a billion or another world war. Even if Ais try to keep humans alive, the big transitions endanger human species. However, in the long run, short-term losses can be amortized. God works in mysterious ways.

I'm talking about proper solid integration of tier 1. I can say that my integration of tier 1 is a swiss cheese with a lot of holes from Beige through to Green. There are not many people who have solid foundation of tier 1. But, there are still many people who are simply centered around Green. JP is but one man. It's not one man's fault that the global population doesn't have solid foundation of tier 1. Being centered at Green is not hard. Proper integration of tier 1 is. I suspect that simply being Green is not enough to prevent large wars because Green without proper integration cannot control its inner monkey. Assume that monkey is going to be there. Monkey magic is powerful. Someone who has a solid foundation of tier 1 is a hero and can tackle world problems. We need more heroes who can tackle world problems and prevent wars rather than super villians who create wars. Since the global population cannot evolve fast enough, heroes have important role of protecting human species. A hero might even think about preventing the death of billions in the face of automation of 99% of jobs by AIs.

The fact that billions of humans are uncontrollable monkeys with nuclear weapons on a gravity prison called earth doesn't change. I have a feeling that Green is not enough to prevent the third world war unless people integrate tier 1 properly. Being centered around Green doesn't mean much without proper integration. People who lack proper integration are lazy and spiteful and vengeful.

Almost everyone on this planet seems to be against universal basic income. Without some form of cash handouts, most people would starve to death when AIs start automating 99% of jobs quickly. Job automation could happen very fast. Currently, without jobs, there is no income. Without income, you cannot buy food or maintain house. What kind of economic system can sustain billions of people if 99% of them are jobless? Humans have never tried a jobless economy, yet. The transition to one can be done, but the transition could entail the death of a billion. It could encite the third world war, too.