Aakash

@Truth Addict Yes paradigm lock is exactly what needs to happen for me, I'm not sure what's on my current paradigm because it hasn't been discovered yet in my opinion. So the best odds to counter against, is to help others discover that consciousness paradigm's is truth seeking itself and it's exactly what needs to happen if we want to progress consciousness. Of course this is counter-productive to those seeking enlightenment and therefore the distinction needs to be made. The pointer hasn't been completely formed yet. so currently i'm only pointing to an illusory idea. Progress is not linear, i just never expected to have such an impact on the enlightenment, so i'm finding a way to split it up. Dude mental masturbation is exactly what someone should do! it's not to be demonized just because it doesn't get you to enlightenment. What i want is to create great loving leaders, who if they wish to take the avenue of enlightenment, do so. With proper understanding of the ramification of making such a decision between the two highest forms of the truth. Its not such a simple decisions to decide what the best course of action is in life. Especially when the framework provided by society is sorely inadequate. Right now, i just want to save others time by changing their understanding, so they don't have to go through the same confusion i went through.

@Natasha Yeah its a very accurate video, its a cultural issue which needs to change, exceptionalism should be the norm, rather than being special is what i should have said. If your stuggling to be exceptional, then there should be help given by society if it manages to become caring. This video is accurate for this day and age and quite practical information. What i was saying was exceptionalism, is what is in the video sorry, i should have watched the video ahaha, i just don't like people believing in limiting-beliefs

@Natasha Lol this is just a down-right lie, I haven't watched the video but people shouldn't accept mediocre results when they are exceptional human beings as soon as they are born. We need inspiring people, not limiting-beliefs that are predicated on fear

@Truth Addict Unfortunately if would be great if it was actually a worldview, the truth is not a world view. I know it doesn't make sense now man, but i think its already complete. We'll see how time goes. it'll probably take about 10 years to get feedback LOL. I can't do this alone, but anyways its done. but yeah, its probably all set up to make sense in the next 10 years for people. We need people on both sides of the highest truth ,it's just how do we unify such both truths for both sides to co-operate understanding of each others as the highest truth and accepting the other and moving forward aswell. It would take a civil argument between both truths and an acceptance of it as absolutes. Because the absolute itself is beyond the absolute we derive as humans. This is what will verify them. The cascade will result in many prosperous years for humanity. It will regress if people all took enlightenment as the highest truth and that's the issue i'm trying to dissolve. but how long would it take for people to reach tier 2 SD and on top of that have an omniscient awakening, neglect enlightenment and continue searching for possibilities and solutions for human problems that don't relay around enlightenment and seeing the issues as illusions. When they actually are illusions itself at the highest truth. Its a contradiction that needs a recontextualised word to make it work and omniscient awakening is not the word.

@Angelite i don't want to confuse you, its better someone else answers your question for now. I don't have the recontextualised words to put this into a framework that systematically allows you to understand the highest levels of relativity and the absolute

@Inliytened1 You see i tried to systematically process the whole trinity for people, which included enlightenment + non duality + duality. However this is an impossibility. To a person who has already become enlightened, they have to choose enlightenment if they wish to reside in highest truth as their priority and to seekers yet to find their highest truth. it is equally as possible to become non dual + dual in consciousness. Which is a different highest truth and then help the world, its actually a way to live in consciousness properly. They are two different highest truths. Which the ideal breakdown of the trinity can not provide. Its getting this message across to people that's difficult because of the confusion around enlightenment being the be all and end all. Still the options doesn't change. An enlightened person can switch to non-enlightenment and then go to duality + non-duality. Which is what i think everyone who has gone to everything has done. but the point is, it's not enlightenment. its something else that someone needs to come up with a name for. its so people can consciously take action in society, they can take conscious action with their lives and they can do things with experience itself. They are both together the highest truths possible for any human being's relation to god. Its your choice which you want to be, I'm just saying that its a regression from enlightenment itself relatively , in the end its god -realisation but in two different ways of breaking down the trinity. They are completely equal in highest truth standards

@Inliytened1 Put it like this, the point of enlightenment is truth seeking , correct? In this sense... Enlightenment IS the highest truth. This is exactly the way it has been teached in traditional schools for years... To go back to everything after having enlightenment is actually REGRESSING on the highest truth. See i wasn't quick enough to make the distinction because i couldn't calculate what an enlightened being is... But after that talk with winter knight i am 100% that its enlightenment in its fullest that is the highest truth. This video is actually misguiding, the brown bear is actually correct in the matter. He is the one speaking from the highest truth! To go to the white bear, is actually taking 1 step backwards to a lesser truth from the highest truth. its about comfort-ability and the truth itself. reforming duality after becoming enlightened IN ANY SENSE. is going backwards and then it has a knock on effect where it teaches non-dual beings, who haven't reached enlightenment that they have because of their non-dual sense of awareness. it's actually so counter-productive what i did, to bring up enlightenment version 2. It was necessary. But its like i said, i wasn't quick enough to the ball and processing things with my mind and systematise it correctly.

@pluto Its the exact problem of mixing the two enlightenment together, which is a mistake i made. You can not have both sides of the trinity. You need to pick either full illusion or non-dual experience. There is no middle ground where you have enlightenment + non-dual awareness. Either you have enlightenment or you have non -dual awareness. it seems like you are locked directly down the middle. Unable to fulfill the prophecy itself. There is no answer that will give you everything you want. You have to pick which double-edge sword you want. Enlightenment and no experience experience and non-dual awareness You can't have enlightenment + non-duality + duality. its an impossibility. You have not chosen yet. You are stuck in the middle it seems.

@Angelite Oh that's fine then, as long as you know its relative... its all good! yeah all knowledge is relative and therefore its always delusional. As a society or even enlightened society. We have to pick what we want to aim for together. One person doesn't know what's better for everyone under any circumstances.

@Serotoninluv Lol it was actually a poor understanding of genetics. I have an interesting thesis about genetics. untested but my hypothesis is that repeated gene expression within the DNA stores up a form of "non-physical" energy. This "non-physical" energy raises the probability of that specific genetic coding being passed onto the offspring. Due to the fact that its "survival" based. This is why specific genetic sequences is passed on and allele pairing is maximised for randomisation and survival itself during meiosis. its only a hypothesis that i got from seeing a documentary about a cow that gets electrified by the electric wire when it's being herded. This fear gets passed onto the offspring and for seven generations, they don't go near the fence. DM me if you wanna talk about it. I would love to get your opinion on it. @GenuinePerspectiveXC I had a few points to say about IQ IQ in its realistic sense is .... understanding of reality. The greater understanding of reality you have the greater your IQ should theoretically be. However, you american's have it backwards because you base intellectual understanding on how much you know about a specific subject and reward someone with a higher IQ when they are able to manipulate knowledge for personal benefit. Real IQ is connectivity between inter-subject, not intra-subject. So comparing standard IQ between people who have different capabilities intra-subject, is subjective to their standard of answers, which is as it should be. However, to go further and use that subjective IQ as a universal standard across different intra-subjects dilutes the accuracy of the measurement even more. By these standards , a history mojor with a 150 IQ is actually less smart than a quantum physicist with a 110 IQ. Logically you would say that quantum physics is a harder subject. So this is actually accurate. This is not the case, the person with 150 IQ is seen as smarter. The same relativity applies to real IQ. Lets say Leo's IQ was 80 officially and you look his body of work at actualise.org you would actually say he is smarter than both the 150 IQ and 110 IQ students. This is if you have viewed his work and deemed him reliable. If you then told everyone else who believed in standard IQ they would say your nuts, leo is actually stupid. To conclude, IQ exists. It just doesn't represents intellect accurately. Given the right conditions and right circumstances, ANY person who believes they have a 2.2 GPA or 60 IQ if they are given the right help, can be a genius with a 4.0 GPA and 150 IQ. if IQ was referenced correctly about understanding of reality. This is because they would be able to make the CORRECT inferences in their fields and therefore the basis on which the IQ is established for ALL different subjects would be the same. Thus solving the problem of IQ and making it representational. I'm not trying to be racist, but its actually statistically probable that white people in america must be smarter than people of colour and that is because the quality of education within the family has gathered and refined over time. This is why they are able to take the moral high ground. They aren't 2nd or 3rd generation immigrants. IQ always increases across generations, because the quality of education improves. So its actually ridiculous to compare lets say a 1st generation immigrant to a 8th generation USA citizen. This is by traditional standards of comparing in the certain subject. If it was about reality, the ironic thing is the 1st generation immigrant would have a higher IQ. I hear that its actually reversing now and the 3rd and 4th generations are becoming more intelligent via standard IQ measurements, than the average american citizens. it would be quite bad, if this was to happen and immigrants actually overtook over all structures in your country because they become smart. it would be better to put them in wage slavery and slow down their educational process. Disclaimer: I don't particularly like the white entitlement claims. As well as i don't feel its right that the average white person is blamed for the white supremacy of historical past and present. but It is what it is. You pay or benefit off the backs of your own cultures history and then you demonize others for not being as good or worst off as you.

@Angelite Lol by your definition, everyone except 5 people probably aren't enlightened masters on this forum by my calculations. This is just an obscure way of looking at things. There are actually 20+ enlightened masters on this forum. Just because they can not communicate truth amazingly, does not mean they aren't amazing enlightened masters. The truth is, it doesn't matter if you can enlightened others, if your a master, your a master. The highest forms of enlightenment are in my thread labelled "my highest insights" maybe you should give that a read. You are looking for a holistic enlightened master. It's very difficult to find these types of beings

This is subjective and a projection of a master. The truth is enlightened masters are actually terrible at explaining the truth to people and that's why its not widespread. Your version is very idealistic, it just doesn't exist. By this logic, every enlightened master could solve all metal health issues just by ushering words to the individual.

@zeroISinfinity I've exceeded my maximum number of posts, before i get banned for hijacking. Its impossible to teach people, because they don't actually reply to my thread itself LOL! the irony of having to take it to people, because they don't come to you. Yes its just for lack of a better word. I can't come up with a new word, because it won't stick. You need an authority figure to have the word stick. People think i don't know what i'm talking about. So it'll just be ignored. "One truth one love" One truth = enlightenment is not the only highest truth about reality One love = love includes all of us, we aren't included in love and that includes enlightened beings and non-enlightened beings So we are all equal and that includes all of our highest possible truths. Of which there are only 2 that dissolve the whole trinity. "All or nothing" everyone gets to choose

@zeroISinfinity its like i said, your mind can only take one absolute. its difficult to navigate that absolute, when it doesn't exist as an absolute itself. This is nothing to do with the bodhisattva path, that's just a word. I'm saying that its actually exactly the same in highest truth as enlightenment whilst you say it is less than your complete love. Still if your being inclusive of my love, then it's even worse LOL because you are having a negative effect on the future itself i promise you bro, i have to stay humble to prove my point. its really difficult This is as humble as i can get. i don't subscribe to this all lovely perfect life... everything is love, do nothing to change things type of comments. Still its my fault at the end of the day. I wasn't quick enough to the ball once again. I'm always too late, I feel like shit for spreading devilry and not creating a clear distinction between enlightenment and self-actualising god itself.

@zeroISinfinity Yes in the 2nd version of enlightenment! so by default what ever love you have , isn't the total totality of infinite love. Because there is always more. Anyways never mind, it is what it is. its too early to check the feedback mechanism which is backfiring on me, because i was confused about enlightenment and truth. wait but need to confirm you understand this, that love is not you? that love includes you. you get this right?

@zeroISinfinity This is the exact system i messed up by saying enlightenment is everything + nothing. Enlightenment is just nothing... like winterknight said The 2nd version is everything + nothing. But you are looking personally for the first version (i think) it seems like that is what you've been aiming for this whole time. To get rid of experience itself and to do that, you have to let everything go and surrender, including feeling love aswell, so its different form of love imo.

@zeroISinfinity Yes its blank once you give up your experience. It has to be. There will be nothing left like i said, its just not the same type of love as we normally think Still i wouldn't say that if you bring it up in your direct experience 24/7 then it's not possible to fuse it with being. itself would be undefinable. I don't know. I don't like talking about enlightened beings anymore. Its impossible to define nothing. i have learnt, it is not my department to talk about. ironically, the brown bear is actually right, funnily enough. he is the higher form of enlightenment LUL To live in truth is a tricky game lol

@zeroISinfinity There's no way to answer it, Its blank <<-- but this doesn't describe it. I've learnt you can't use words to describe an E-being, its as pointless as life itself lol Cultivating love is pure love aswell in my opinion, its a feeling distinction. nothing wrong with it, it's nice to be able to experience love and part of the diversity of infinity itself. Ofcourse this is a enlightened vs enlightened version 2 debate ahahahaha!

@zeroISinfinity LOL its just how it is, the being itself- he understands it to be love. just not the same kind that we know its an interesting thing to think about, when we consider him doing reiki aswell. it probably extends to the whole of reality itself. That's probably the base frequency. its not conscious frequency dependant, it probably penetrates all veils straight through

@Nahm may i ask, do you atleast acknowledge that its not progressive? just asking out of interest i 100% agree with you otherwise. especially about the smokescreens.

@possibilities I agree, its like i say. Its a choice of preference. I find counter-acting deeply ingrained beliefs with pinpoint truthful insights, a more effective way of dealing with mass delusion of the whole forum. This is my version of an equal playing field. It is not right or wrong in my opinion. Still there is much value in your approach. We are in for the same long game. People using their critical thinking abilities to proactively create amazing and insightful debates. Thanks for the conversation.

Lol i've been doing some thinking, never thought i'd ever be called a religious fanatic, thanks possibilities. It means a lot, maybe it is projection. It's not like i demonize projection. it's more like, creating future ground work lol. I forget sometimes we live in the 21st century and then my relativity becomes skewed. Still , it is what it is. Not a big fan of the silent pathway. Maybe you are enlightened. Enlightened beings tend to dislike projections LOL. Still thanks, its a compliment that i got to experience, which is nice.

@pluto Nah dude, lol the RA files are not something a kid can imagine up. It has to be an alien transmission. its too accurate an insight about oneness and enlightenment for a random person to come up with and write a whole report up about the conversation.

@possibilities Nah i'm not about long arguments about logic, i want to debate other consciousness matters LOL so i'll stick to my proselytising. Your trying to disprove my logic frame of reference and i'm trying to disprove your logic frame of referencing. Your saying your right and i'm saying i'm right. That itself shows that logic is relative. However, your taking it one step further. By arguing the relevance of logic, nobody here is disputing that logic is relevant. and that so called authorities are trying to brain wash people, by making them lose their frame of reference by saying logic is not needed. To defence such a position, is itself relative. The inherent problem with relativity is, its pointless from both ends. The only adjudication is which is more conscious? which is something you dislike people taking on blind faith. To which my rebuttle is to do the practices instead of wasting your time arguing online about so-called authority figures trying to brain wash other people on this forum with their delusion. Authority is only there to help if its quote on quote good. An echo chamber can be a positive thing, and parroting is needed for anybody who isn't enlightened. it doesn't matter how hard you try.. if you defend a viewpoint. That viewpoint means something to you. Still i sympathies with you, because you remind me of myself. Now i'm on the receiving end, i can't blame you for not trying to shift your relativity. As it should be. So good luck really Its like i said in my other post, there are only two highest truth's at the end of the day. All other's are practically illusory but neccesary to realise the two truths themselves. It's a process

@possibilities Lol we've literally just said the same thing, I put it in an illogical way to disprove your logic and you put it in a logical way to disprove your own logic LOL So if you've disproved your own logic, then why argue with logic if you know its illogical under any circumstance LOL yeah i'm done with this aswell you win, you disproved logic by proving logic is illogical congrats it truly was game set and match