Aakash

@Truth Addict I like what you said, but even animals will have meta knowledge that isn’t pertained in their physical body. Their metaknowledge is embedded in the infinite fractal of sound. We use a 26 letter alphAbet. The alphabet in my 2nd language uses around 35 letters, with many deviations. Totally around 80 single combinations. Frequencies of sound aren’t symbolic but even more direct than symbols themselves. Humans do it like this metaknowledge- speech - symbol - speech - metaknowledge this is language going from one person to another. For animals it’s metaknwledge - speech- speech - metaknowledge. This is why it makes it seem like they’re living in the present moment. There’s no symbolic language for them to feedback on. If the frequency doesn’t match the metaknowledge. Then no action is done between the animals. We use symbols to interject and match their understandings for ourselves. So what we can conclude is that animals do in fact have intellectual capabilities. They’re without symbols. Enlightenmrnt is about this detaching from symbols. So what your saying is you want no intellect capable of processing symbols but you will settle for better intellect. Have you ever consider that what your saying is actually devilry ? ??‍♂️ The devil doing devilry calling others devils ?

Lol the problem with truth is, everything is absolute truth. Therefore there is nothing to doubt. You can believe that if every possibility plays out. There is a multiple time lines of Earth, existing on multiple parallel universes, existing with multiple different “laws of nature” and you can be that the city of Atlantis Is real. If we’re talking about god here that is. If we’re talking about in our specific historical timeline and KNOWN historical period. Then it’s only a possibility of aliens existing, which is not plausible but neither complete y undeniable. Logically we’ve only discovered 5%-9% of the oceans depths. As light from the surface doesn’t penetrate. Oxygen aswell doesn’t synthesis because the ocean is a co2 containment unit. It provides planets with co2 to produce oxygen. Planets don’t photosynthesis at such depths and therefore less fish can live there. Our technology is also limited and if you look at historical maps, sea levels have risen a lot. It is not only continental drift and tectonic plate movement that causes land to reshape or reposition. It’s also flooded land from sea levels rising. Atlantis is a myth because sea- humans can’t exist. However aliens can. Considering human biases, it’s possible that underwater ancient civilisation caves were found and the myth got overdramatically emphasis with hyperbole. If this were true atlanteans wouldn’t even have to be aliens, they could be normal humans of ancient past, segregated by geographical location. Still within our time line I would say the probability of all this I’ve said being true is about 0.5-1% true.

@Mulky it’s abit of a stupid idea and highly inaccurate form of measurement with so many flaws. However, it’s possible that when you truth a statement that you don’t find truthful your body becomes heavy. I myself have noticed this and when you are grounded in non-duality. Your body is light. This is because of identification. Meaning a true statement which is false to you (relatively remember) makes your body heavy. A false statement which is actually true makes your body heavy. A false statement that is false makes your body light and a true statement that is true makes your body light. The body is nothing more than a vehicle for non-physical dimensions of reality. Reality is intertwined the reason this article statement is therefore true is because your beliefs which are misbelieved to be inside of your brain are not actually. Therefore your body is not reacting in chemical reaction based time line sequencing. I.e there is no delay. The responses are immediate. Meaning all it takes ever to measure LOC as a scientist is very accurate technology and psychological ego modelling theory, with mysticism. In other words to conclude: from a subjective ego POV - it sounds stupid from an objective non ego POV - it’s plausible and probably true. Any science to do with mysticism is ultimately true, because mysticism creates it itself. It’s not material based science. It’s possibility based science

? my whole problem with this journey is the part about becoming godly. I like yourself, come from a normal civilised family. Exerting pressure from such an unnecessary thing like becoming god is in itself a paradoxical form of love which is conditioned- unconditional. It comes from the fact they let me persue what I want freely and build my own building blocks. A contract bond that excludes becoming god based on principality. “I did not let you do what you want, so you could become a god which you are not” from my perspectival projection. Maybe it’s not what they’re thinking now. However, it would be what they would say in the future. “Why did you choose to do it, when we could have lived a normal life” , “why does it have to be you and not someone else” hence I rarely enter my non-dual form. Just like for 5 minutes a day to shift my reality to have an awakening and then reform duality solidly.

This all makes sense now, The correlation between an enlightened person and their level of understanding is their mastery it is not their mastery of consciousness, this is a misleading statement it is their teachings By my calculations, and understanding of absolute infinity, which is at this point quite extensive The only missing part is a full enlightenment I would confirm that leo has surpassed all other enlightened beings teachings with 100% certainty. What this pertains to is his teachings that relate to "understanding of truth" which translates to understanding of "consciousness" an ego is a heavily loaded term, the ego still exists in absolute infinity, it can not be removed. Nothing can be removed from absolute infinity because there is only absolute infinity and consciousness. There is also nothing that can be fininite or monopolised in absolute infinity , because this would limit infinity, which wouldn't make it infinite. Therefore, i am 1000% sure my understanding of absolute infinity is correct. Including the trinity. every prediction i've ever made except leo becoming the unpopular saint, because at the time i didn't realise that things organise at higher levels. What i'm saying is there is only one enlightened being with knowledge on par with leo's and i think that is sadhguru. There is an anomaly with his consciousness, on the lines of jesus consciousness. Lets put it this way, consciousness is a fractal. most of us have to work to have deeper and deeper consciousness fractal. What i'm saying is sadhguru is the deepest fractal born today. The reasoning behind this is because he has been gifted "inverse fractal consciousness" i would call it. where as we have "reverse fractal consciousness" we look into consciousness fractal to give answers, he looks out of fractal consciousness to give answers. Which is EXACTLY my point about stage dark (transcended turquoise SD)

@zeroISinfinity The miracle is that you get to experience more of your own self. Yes it’s like I said, it’s not that I worked for it. The divine knowledge just happened to come into my hands by chance. elsewhere to leo, it’s not like I deserved it realistically but I definitely earnt it slightly. The strange loop is leo’s and mode Incompleteness thereon. Its not that you are wrong or nahm is right. It’s just that you are both equally wrong as you are right relativity. There is actually no force that can adjudicate relativity except love because that is what it is. Love is the tipping scale which delicately balances how to make a conscious decision. Let me give you an idea of relativity. You could be so loving that you would sit down in the forest in the middle of nowhere and let your pshyical body die. Because everything is already perfect, so what need the change? Or you could be a loving person and spread that infinite love however you decide to. But ultimately my personal decision is that yes nahm would be right. There is a bigger self than you which makes you smaller, but at the same time you are indistinguishable which makes you bigger. They are equal. So the better thing to do is become a proactive god instead of a reactive god. Again equal. It sounds just my personal opinion of the situation and you are allowed to exercise your own expression of love which is zeroisonfinity and infinityiszero

Likewise dissolution of ego is not about seeing it with x-ray vision. It’s about becoming egoless with love. In this way enlightenment is not binary but effort- based. Its as Jesus said. Love thy enemy for they are you even an enlightened being has ego. An enlightened master reduces their ego to minimal. There is no escaping dualities. Transcending dualities is understanding both sides of duality individually. Why one can not 100% exist and the other can’t 0%. It’s the meaning of going full circle. Reached 85-90% that now I’m at 0% with it. There is degrees of everything because it exist because of love. So a teacher has to teach love but in these terms. But you have to acknowledge yourself that there are degrres of everything otherwise you won’t understand what god is

@zeroISinfinity Yes pure consciousness is indistinguishable from void in words. But how do you then become it. The answer is states of consciousness. There is a difference between having x-ray vision and touching an electromagnetic wavelength physically

When you loop around and two is infinite lol! Then you by definition must be infinite. The only thing you could do to scale a model of infinity is create a strange loop within a strange loop. Model scale size version. You know literally infintismal: infinite in ratio. God is self-deceptive precisely because it is unconditionally loving. To counter self- deception. You would have to create a strange loop of self-deception that can extend to infinity over time. This is ultimately why I say spiral dynamics is itself the most important model in the universe. Ps: even I wasn’t smart enough to figure this one out. So it’s not like I think your wrong. I’m just saying think about it or don’t think about it.

@Key Elements yeah that’s what I inferred. Understanding of how to get back to ego is understanding of how to be one and two. But this segment is no different to other teachers. I’m saying from my understanding at current. That the ideal ego is 90:10 no survival to survival. This is unconditional love. As your still a finite body, limitations still apply. So think about it, is your action unconditional love or is it that your still within a greater unconditional love ? I see what your saying and if this were true shizen yung would be omniscient, I’m not saying he is or is not. It’s like I said, I don’t know his teachings. I’m asking you

@Key Elements @zeroISinfinity How does one get to the end of something that is infinite ? So what your saying is pure consciousness is beyond any degrees of conscious. Kinda like a “all conscious is one thing” So your saying there’s no states of consciousness. It’s just what is. Isn’t that everything being one and not two ?

@zeroISinfinity Okay, now what about the depth of consciousness ?

@zeroISinfinity So what about consciousness ?

@zeroISinfinity Let me phrase like this. Can you become more loving than you already are ?

@Joseph Maynor it’s interesting, I do not know what context to interpret this from. In relative sakes, what would outwin here a) giving you an answer that satisfies you b) giving an answer that makes you grow c) giving you an argument for why your wrong D) showing you the error in your answer E) telling you you are right, when you are not F) picking out certain points in your argument and giving a counter rebuttle to specific parts instead of the whole thing H) don’t talk about it because you got it and let the person be I) don’t talk about it and let the say something to make the person happy J) don’t talk about it and say something outrageous h) don’t talk but give out some wisdom. j) realise their answer is love and say an answer which has more love in it. Which is the best one ?

@Joseph Maynor it’s difficult to explain but it’s not loving it because it exists. It’s loving it as it exists.

@Leo Gura lol yup it is

@Key Elements Upgrading metaknowledge means your meanings on meanings on meaning of shifting words around into different sentences for me. It’s not a very good explanation. But it will have to do. I didn’t exactly know you were talking about awakening people. I was just talking about general fields of study i didn’t get what he meant by being shot with an arrow that went through time and space. What it sounds like was he basically went back to his physical body after realising it’s all one with all the “understanding” of god ? This is the only inference I can make. If you must know. I have not. But after today, it’s dawning on me that people don’t actually do the process of thinking. Let me explain like this. If a facet of god is self - deception and it’s infinite. How do you escape it all of a sudden ?

@Inliytened1 yeah I can imagine language doesn’t do it justice. Who is in charge of your thinking and decision making ?

@Inliytened1 So what does infinite intelligence feel like? If you had to describe it ?

@Inliytened1 does oneness mean enlightenment at this point ? Yeah sorry, I thought this through. Yeah I repressed the non -dual side of it on purpose because I didn’t know what the ramifications of enlightenment were. Its like I’ve been saying I’ve only been making duality into one. Rather than using non-duality to make it one. Does this make sense ? I’ve been bringing non duality into duality. Not duality into non-duality or both simultaneously

@Serotoninluv ahah that’s cool, it’s trippy without a NOW to ground in

@Inliytened1 bro lol, my reality is flipping between dualities without stabilising lol. Can you give me the solution if you understand ?? the only solution is to embrace absolute infinity and basically proclaim I am god here. Or remain as enlightened self nothing. How did you merge them ? It’s an impossibility because you are both and they are indinguishable . This is what I was trying to get at the trinity. That you have to ultimately choose one and therefore all three types of enlightened beings are correct. There are different versions of the highest truth and connection is “god”

@zeroISinfinity I understand what your saying, I’ve already inquired about this. And what you want to do is become the god beyond absolute infinity - non-existence. And this is an impossibility. Because only existence exists. The god beyond absolute infinity like I keep telling everyone is unprovable. It will let you become absolute infinity but it will not let you become it. It is you and you are not it completely. It’s as I’ve said it’s an incomplete - complete model. What you asking for is an impossibility sorry to tell you. You would be wasting your time for no reason, reaching for something that is an impossibility. Your best bet is to leave love alone and go for absolute nothing. Simple. It’s as I’ve said enlightenment itself is within existence. It’s just the highest truth possible across all boards of relativity

This is dumb, there is no difference between enlightenment true self and consciousness. But my reality can’t fix it into one and two at the same time? Why is this ? I am god. I don’t need enlightenment to become god. Like I literally am god. But why can’t my meta knowledge and direct experience put it all together in union.