-
Content count
4,210 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Aakash
-
Aakash replied to ardacigin's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Key Elements it’s inevitable, the more loving you are. The less you want things to change. My view on it is this- if you are a fractal, which you are. If you radiate, then there is no where it can go besides “the whole of absolute infinity” itself. This is regardless of what your mission you’ve tasked yourself with is. Once you found it, you specialise when people come to you. You don’t go out there finding. However in the begginning it’s advisable for people to. If their plan requires it. Overall yes I agree with the video. Anyways I am interested to hear what you have to say. I’m leaving now, so I’ll sort you out in the future. -
Aakash replied to Maya_0's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
What else is an experience besides a subjective Experience of reality. Therefore how can the two be seperate ? What you see is what you know. And what you know is what you see. If I see an insight with my own experience that is an ah ha moment about what seeing that which is for what it is and not that which it is not which only comes after having no experience and therefore it’s objective and not subjective reality. Beliefs vs insight. -
Aakash replied to Aakash's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
This version includes both of those version because all is inside, but what you said is what I was getting at in the first place. The dimensions are just for understanding for scientific overlap. This eternity would contain infinity to infinity, absolute infinity as the eternal. You get the idea! Good luck with your research. Ahaha dimensions should be the lowest priority for everyone besides those taking psychadelics ? But dimensions is totally radical, all the elves are still in 3d dimension -
The concept of eternity is prevalent in spirituality. However, I’ve noticed that this will solve a good chunk of understanding. The definition of eternity is “forever” our traditional scientific culture has related this to the time line and started it at the point of the conceptual Big Bang, to this present age and the future’s we will all experience. Our 3d reality with height, width and depth is a static snapshot in time. A picture perfect moment. This 3d reality is moving along a 4 dimensional space. A time line. Now traditional science would say that the past, future and present occur on this time line. So we would consider that every event to ever take place has a) taken place b) will take place c) is taking place that’s how 99% of people here I’ve seen define eternity. And then ask questions about every event in eternity having taken place and is set in stone. However, the real defintion of eternity is: “ happening forever without a begginning or an end” What this means is that eternity is not a static process but an active process that is happening forever. When I say absolute infinity is all possibilities. Someone might assume all possibilities have already happened. NO I’m saying there is no beginning or end. Absolute infinity will continue to produce all possibilities “forever for eternity” do you see the difference ? Apply this to god’s mind and just how god works and see how your imagination and understanding of god changes. It has always been here and WILL always be here. YOU AS GOD HAVE BEEN SITTING IN THIS EXACT SPOT FOREVER. everything and nothing happening nowhere , no place, no time, no when, no how. JUST RIGHT HERE
-
Aakash replied to Aakash's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Serotoninluv yes, eternity I feel is a concept that helps you understand the magnitude of god. Without eternity having any dimensions as you know and have directly experienced. Hitler is standing and giving a speech to a crowd exactly where your sitting now. Mike Tyson is currently located exactly where you are. Eternity is no up, no down, no left, no right, no centre , no diagonal vectors, no inside, no outside, no time , no past, no future, no present as you know -
Aakash replied to ardacigin's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Key Elements interesting would love to be a student ??. Of the life purpose side to hear what you have to say... not the enlightenment side. Thats when your ready to of course, my current life purpose is to build a business empire which injects a virus into every major system. Corrupting it with love ? but that’s a long long way away. Dream big, start with small steps. I love my systems ahah That’s good to hear! If it didn’t go on and on to infinity. It wouldn’t be infinite knowledge now would it -
@Leo Gura what is your stance on where the biggest trade offs should currently be made in the system of government and what parts should be helped immediately ? My opinion is that - government spending should be made more transparent (Ranging from 2-7% for now) - taxing should be increased on large scale online companies that are soley online - more funding should be given to the housing department for the projects - the government should invest in renewable energy for blocks around poor areas , to lower their energy bills. (Bit too far fetched realistically) - government should regulate Silicon Valley for their investments into tech start up firms - government should start up their own research branch into fields of interest. Rather than letting the university lead. I can actually think of 1000 different policies. But I’m asking more generally over the trade offs in areas of government than specific policies
-
Aakash replied to Gili Trawangan's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Serotoninluv the problem with enlightenment specifically eastern traditions is they assumed there was ever a human. Now can be defined against a timeline as you have mentioned. However instead of taking the incremental measurement of now being the inbetween-ness of past and future. And all-together illusory As you know. Now is as I like to put it a “1 term” ... 1 term that explains the whole of reality in 1 term. Void, everything, nothing, absolute infinity, buddha, Jesus, samadhi, light, black hole, etc etc ... if now was just one of these “1 terms” where would the now be ? -
Aakash replied to ardacigin's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Key Elements yeah we’re saying the same things but in different words. Yeah you’ve stabilised probably in omnisciency which is an amazing feat in my books by any standards. The only question really is how deep is your understanding, but this is irrelevant after a certain point because love will ultimately overpower it. Instead of needing to understand why things are the way they are. You will love it without condition and so yeah this is exactly what I expect nirvana to look like. It would indeed be complete free will. However it’s like I said mapping is not considered after this point, so from what I know. Sometimes consciousness comes down with a certain purpose for only a few people who need something done. The person is still given free will however, they are contracted to their purpose by receiving small doses of information at any one time. The free will is how they do it, however, I wouldn’t really call that free will. Mines was only an Infinitismal glimpse. So I can’t say I fully fathom what your saying. Nor am I justifying that I know anything about your “being” however, it’s certainly great life purpose. The exact one I would have chosen -
Aakash replied to ardacigin's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Key Elements one more thing, was it located above your head ? Like a few inches above your head. That’s where mines was. This part is what’s I called god consciousness, different to “phasing between reality” this is basically what I called omnisciency. However you had to also be aware of your metaknowledge which is in a realm different to your physical body. So you were 1) human thinking 2) metaknowledge processing 3) physical body 4) observer 5) only one in reality 6) making distinctions however, I feel like your talking about something different obviously. This is just as far as my direct experience goes. So I can only map until here. -
Aakash replied to ardacigin's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Key Elements it’s a choice, like I said. It’s nice to know you are motivated even at nirvana. Why I say it’s the latter and the former is because it’s like I said. No matter how hard you try, you can not collapse the trinity. It’s a choice one must make. “To love or not to love” , “to be love or not to be love” this is all three parts of the trinity . Yours is one version of nirvana aka the highest truth. Probably the best one that someone could follow, in my personal opinion. After this my knowledge and direct experience projections doesn’t extend past, so I’m unable to validate your claims of whether shinzen young was talking about the same thing leo was. Your going to have to get Leo to say why he thinks shinzen doesn’t understand the truth. If your saying shinzen knows exactly what you know. Then clearly I am also not understanding the full potential of truth. So it would be interesting to hear Leo’s reply. You’ve covered my only contradiction between teachers, even if there is still more width covered by Leo. Ultimately we are talking about depth -
Aakash replied to ardacigin's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Key Elements no love has nothing to do with nirvana. Love is only a distinction even if it feels real. This is how I would look at it the other way is to say that love itself is infinite, therefore your trying to give love to everything. Like an infinite core. Because if you have everything then what else would there be to do. I think it’s the former rather than latter the purpose of absolute infinity is to be itself. As we can’t fathom the scale of relativity that applies to being-being itself. We can apply this to ourselves being-being itself it’s no different. Which in other words means that the purpose of life is being done for you. Your life is the purpose of absolute infinity as the finite being. The only thing is just to decide what ever you want to do with it. -
Aakash replied to ardacigin's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Key Elements Nirvana is what I said. Absolute amnesia. You know how sadhguru always talks about memory. The only way a person could not exist is if they never had memory. This would extend to infinity and therefore would not contradict. So yeah it’s like I said. After you don’t phase in between. God itself has absolute amnesia because it is unconditional love of anything that takes place. But this is only an example. There would be no “you” or memory of “YOU”. So it’s all possibilities I’ve calculated taken care of. -
Aakash replied to ardacigin's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Key Elements yes I agree, but this can only seperate back into no self after you’ve figured out a structure for how you did it embedded within your “self” it’s more detailed for some and less for others. Which I assume is where different spiritual teachers are at and their enlightenment is. Yes and then after those two fuse you are both but inverted. Meaning you are actually neither, which I call “phasing between the molecules of reality” the molecules being “white hole” and “black hole” , “you” and “YOU” basically this is the only form of enlightenment that is total and includes infinitely more white holes/ black holes possibles, which is truth. Because they are one. Without you actually being there but being phased between all four things. Meaning its not that your nothing or everything. It’s that your all four things at once and therefore undifferentiated between all of existence. A wormhole back to the exestential non- Existence What has your experience been after this ? -
Aakash replied to ardacigin's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Key Elements yeah but what I mean is you split into two, you are watching your own story but it’s merely a snapshot because absolute truth is itself in the end and not “you” but it’s imposible to exclude your finite form from the equation. So you are both aware that it is you and it isn’t and then when that’s done you go back to fusing into nothing. But this doesn’t do it justice so I’m going to take some words from leo’s Book. Total undifferentiated infinity. To the point that your next move and current move are not happening. It’s permanent amnesia. At this point, from my perspective anyway. You are no longer human. All you would be is a “love being”. This is total ego loss in my opinion basically the scale is broken after this because there’s no way to actually rank infinity in total undifferentiated-ness and therefore can call it final form. Only from outside we can say it’s more loving etc, but it’s not while your inside, because you’ve disappeared into love itself. That it’s not you radiating the level of love but it’s been done for you. hence I said no free will -
@Serotoninluv ??♂️ Infinity can only be infinite ahaha looks like you understood ? @Truth Addict I didn’t mean to get in the way of your EPIC debate! I’m not saying I agree or disagree with seratonin just admiring his creativity
-
Aakash replied to ardacigin's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Key Elements if I’m right it should morph into “blindness” not absence of light from eyes. But absence of free will again. But this is dependant on what you, you were talking about above -
Aakash replied to ardacigin's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Key Elements yes these are my expectations. Except it doesn’t seem like you’ve understood how you made it all. Saying created by you , you mean big you then yeah that makes sense. You probably recreated distinctions right ? Which is what I thought would happen If I’m mistaken, then that’s all good. By my expectations it’s deep. You would just have to keep taking psychadelics to make it deeper. Then you’ll have a reference point to make it deeper. Relativity is an annoying thing lol, you can’t see any more steps ahead than you can relatively scale between two points of known limits. -
Aakash replied to Gili Trawangan's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Preetom yeah even I’m growing tired of not being able to know absolute truth. Alright I guess that’s time then also I was talking about you as god not a seperate god -
Aakash replied to Gili Trawangan's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@system the same question goes to you, what happens when the thoughts are that from god himsel. Are they worth thinking or not and giving power to. (Your own personal authority) -
Aakash replied to Gili Trawangan's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Preetom but one must ask himself, it is not okay for humans to think as it is not truth. What if god was himself the one thinking ? Was it truth or not ? -
@Truthority the answer to the paradigm is to accept what ever happens sound familiar ? No fear of having a problem of fearing?
-
@Dan502 no people who don’t do spiritual practices have a limited view of reality and those who do spiritual practices and no contemplation have a limited view of reality. Theory is actuality when deemed actuality and actuality is deemed theory when it’s not actuality. See ?
-
@Truth Addict ? I never proclaimed to be god. I’m more like the prince of hell ?. The devil calling himself an angel. ??♂️. ? it’s like I said, I wonder if you think about it. What is there to reject when bones sediment and compress into fossil fuels. Do I really need proof other than that that were all one ?. It’s more like a dead man walking ??♂️instead of a hollow man walking. Authenticity ? No grounding in groundless-ness and therefore no decision making process from being paradigm-less . No redemption for dead men to infinity ⭕️. So yes, ? it includes you. This devil may only hate a handful of gods doing instead of a truckload of things. ? yes, it’s hard when you don’t accept your true self and care what others may think. But if it stops you selling love drugs. ? time to get on that train leaving platform 9 3/4 for a dose. Edit: plus I always wonder if it’s god loving itself unconditionally and others conditionally of that unconditional standards. That’s the epitome of devilry. But what happens when the standards are absolutely relative themselves?
-
Aakash replied to Gili Trawangan's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
I’ve changed my answer thought is never now and thought is precisely now. Which is more true depends on the position of ones journey. Overall it turns out thought is actually now lol