Aakash

Member
  • Content count

    4,210
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Aakash

  1. @brugluiz @Smika what does it mean to be an empath in both of your eyes?
  2. i literally had this same mind attack today , i call it the stage where you realise what silence/ stillness really means!
  3. Yes you are both your higher self and your lower self. when you are more conscious of your actions and thoughts, this could be claimed to be the "higher self" that people so eloquently put it. For me personally, it definately worked finding my higher self, but sustaining it is rather difficult i find
  4. @theking00 just because you feel like your not being your higher self, doesn't mean your higher self is not guiding you to find yourself. The process in indeed quite long and drawn out, but eventually you have to learn to trust your own gut insticts and trust your intuiton, this is what is known as the higher self
  5. @ajasatya could you perhaps give an example of a time you both had to release your beliefs to end toxicity and how you went about doing it so to speak?
  6. @ajasatya would love to see you post on a seperate thread, very interested in your point of view on the matter. I have been debating it with myself for a while and always end up in the same place, which is "yes or no , which should i choose?"
  7. http://oshosearch.net/Convert/Articles_Osho/A_Bird_on_the_Wing/Osho-A-Bird-on-the-Wing-00000002.html
  8. I'm not going to continue with kriya yoga or take psychedelics Do nothing is actually a great idea, i was thinking about no mind meditation but you literally mean just sit there and do nothing ahah mindfulness with labelling - what is that? and what is concentration practice
  9. @Mikael89 its nothing to do with osho, osho just publicated the literature
  10. Exactly! its to make your physical processes better and its achieved through direct observation, awareness and education
  11. Oops posted in the wrong thread - http://oshosearch.net/Convert/Articles_Osho/A_Bird_on_the_Wing/Osho-A-Bird-on-the-Wing-00000002.html i'm currently reading this, its long and i haven't finished but its quite good!
  12. http://oshosearch.net/Convert/Articles_Osho/A_Bird_on_the_Wing/Osho-A-Bird-on-the-Wing-00000002.html i'm reading this right now, it's a good read! really long - i haven't got to the end yet
  13. @zambize for me you can define illusory in many ways A) something that was never there B) something that is not there when its meant to be there C) something that is there but it is not there All three of these things together produce a strange loop paradox in which basically nothing is real Try yourself to think of something that is not contained within these categories ? This is the totality of self-deception. The only thing we can ever consider real is awareness and so no mind without thought awareness must be truth! by definition of there is something and nothing in non duality I didn't illustrate this quite well but i hope it helps you guys
  14. Okay i've read it. Everyone take it from someone who has studied the brain quite intensively, none of this is metaphysics lool! this is what scientist call today neuroplasticising your brain, I self neuroplasticieded my brain and it worked quite well. Yes i encorporated metaphysical questioning into my programming, however! the only thing scientist will never understand is that data gets saved into the fabric of the akashik records. Without the understanding of this the relativety of knowledge that is already known is only attachable to what already exsist within the realms of biological science. This! is the brain neurones we all know and love. The difference is the neurones have nothing to do with metaphysics and only to do with physical adaptation. Metaphysics is stored in akashik records of your OWN being, which is not located within the physical realm. Yes you can neuroplasticied your brain through suggestion. But how things get truthed is within your metaphysical structure and bodies not your physical biochemical being hence the reason it is psychologically illusive. So although its someone true what this enlightened being is saying. it is only put within the physical terms of reality and not in depth metaphysical terms.
  15. Its really ironic i literally ended up back at the same place with no development except my mind! strange loop CONFIRMED
  16. What is life? what is life? what is life ? who am i? who are you? the tides that start the great quest always starts with a single question A journey long fought and a battle between two equally strengthened individuals Did you see it? behind my very words- the underlying meaning that you are searching A bee will bee A horse will horse a human will human but that's not you ofcourse! ME? a human I am ....... This is the infinite game.. make sure you play it right or else you will be the very thing you thought yourself not a human
  17. It means you have experienced the exact thing in your direct experience before and it played out in exactly the same way
  18. Dear sirs and madams How does one live a good life when all is unreal ? I am young therefore i am deciding to embody my bodisatva , i personally like my science and other subjects like history, psychology etc ... i wish to share knowledge in these subjects with hints to non duality in the world of play. Personally, i feel like i would become buddah nature towards the later years of my life, when i am ready. I accept illusion and decide to love in unconditionally! and therefore live a life of play.... no ego just pure illusory freedom really I will continue contemplating the nature of something, and doing spiritual practices The thing i love the most like leo said he loved non duality , for me the thing i love the most is finding alternative ways to sort out problems so i will continue this going forward and help out illusory problems before joining non duality Does anyone have any advice so per say on how to live a good life while in spiritual ego?
  19. ahah yeah probably thats why satsungs are for this reason, not gonna lie , i went to sadghuru inner engineering satsung. its actually weird looking at person who you know is not the person you see, inside.
  20. Yeah intellect can make all the faculties of greatest insights with everything you currently have at present with your unwinding of self deceptions! believe me it can make a better decision than your thinking brain. Books and educate just mitigate the risk associated with not thinking. but yeah anything you wish to know about the self is probably contained within the akashik records in your being. if you want to know how to build a car, well then your going to have to learn physics lol for example
  21. simple .. i've thought about this for a while and everytime i end up at one answer high consciousness books and scripts of religious text. its only really through reading you can improve your intellect substantially
  22. But again as @Arhattobe says i agree, even though intellect can be illustrated via words. The context on the mind is unfortunately not within the intellectual realm of the mind to create. There can only be one option in the now and thats the only thing you can intellectually produce, this is as he said dependant on our personal development and our struggles to educate and improve our mind. In the ways stated above
  23. In other words, for the definition of sad to exsist and even be a word with an associated meaning , the dual pair has to exsist in its place making it relative. i am sad only means something only when relatively understood to i am not sad therefore i am happy because i am not sad and the chain continues to every word in the structure of language in any language and symbols aswell
  24. Intellect for me has also been about one thing words, by understanding the fundamental duality of words. Once you understand the terms individually and how they are dualistic with frameworks regarding psychological, emotional, metaphysical, scientific, personal meaning added to the dualities. You can pretty much frame anything you want to after how you would like it! examples would be thinking vs no thinking happy vs not happy then the larger category is happy vs sad so really the duality pairs are [ happy and not happy] vs [ sad vs not sad] once you understand this, you understand every word in the dictionary imo