electroBeam

I don't know but, I think psychedelics that make you enter God mode extremely rapidly (in minutes or seconds) might be undesirable. It freaks the ego out, which distracts you + makes you have a bad trip, if it goes very very very fast you can vomit just from the shear speed of it, and it can dislocate your chakra system (on first HBWS trip I noticed that my chakra system was dislocated/decentralised for a while). Then again if it goes very fast your ego doesn't have time to stop it aswell. Its like being shot to death rather than sliced with a sword.

Just create a backup for the high consciousness resources section The rest is mostly bullshit.

Yeah that's terrible, if only they were open minded to very easy to do, fun, accessible extractions. It just goes to show while these ancient methods have a lot of wisdom to them - much more than western medicine and science, there is so much opportunity to use science to optimise these ancient methods. Maybe that's what thesis projects should be based on? Designing ayahuasca that doesn't make you vomit?? Much more impact that figuring out how to make a faster rocket engine, building a better financial algorithm, etc. I sort of know what you mean by the unpleasantness. I ate 8 Hawaiian baby wood rose seeds and nothing happened except vomiting, nausea, etc. I sort of took the opportunity to feel and observe the sensations, ask 'why do I feel bad here' and maybe this is what shamans mean by its necessary, because it is valuable to do this - but I was only doing this because I couldn't get rid of the side effects not because it was intentional. When I extracted the HBWR using a polar non polar extract very little to no nausea occurred. It was much better, just fear of death and the present moment for 6 hours hahahah which ironically is much more valuable and insightful.

I think it was this one. Maths is taught beautifully here. You can see how chapters 1 to 4 teachers you about structure instead of content. It goes meta on the content. I wish school and uni was like this. Once you know and master the strategies in chapter 1 to 4, you don't need to be taught content, you can learn it on your own.

That would be a good thesis project

hmmm not sure about that haha. Many work their assess off to find a teacher. Lots of searching different communities, surveying teachers, trying them out, coming up with persuasive arrangements for teaching. It feels good to say that a teacher will effortlessly appear when 'youre ready' but in actuality many (except for the lucky) have to go through intense emotional labour to find the right teacher or to get psychedelics. I've gone through massive emotional labour(learning very technical knowledge) and significant legal risk to get psychedelics.

ok, I've experienced something different on mescaline. I didn't know others had nausea and vomiting from pure mescaline. I agree with my extremely limited psychedelic experiences. But shamans also do sweat lodges(suggesting that physiological purging is important to them), and they have a whole theory and practice on vomiting and purging. How can such developments be explained away as them making up excuses for inferior products.

That's because you're not extracting it. If you actually follow an extraction TEK the nausea goes away. This applies for NN-DMT, Mescaline and LSA. Extractions are fun to do, and make the psychedelic more pure. Unless you've got a problem/don't like science, and have a thing for doing it naturally, there's no problem with extracting it. P.S. I have been told by shamans that do ayahuasca that vomiting and nausea are actually necessary for 'purging'. They help you get rid of bad emotions, spirits, etc. To be honest I have no idea of the validity of that, but you might not want to assume that 'nausea' and 'vomiting' are bad things, they may be good, great, necessary, effective things.

I was just contemplating about why science is not True, and is False, and paradoxically how science is able to be used to create so much technology even though its false. Like how science is able to predict things and make aircraft fly, etc. I think the answer is, because science put laws/limitations on reality. It tells you how certain phenomena should and not not behave. And this very act of limitation has a profound implication for how our universe is structured. See limitation allows things to be created. Without limitation things cannot be created. When you set laws, like what's a number that's larger than 5 and smaller than 500, you allow all the numbers between 5 and 500 to exist, which is a whole range of creations. When you remove that limitation, how can anything be created? Any forms? Of course in this example its obvious, but when you contemplate about this, with every single limitation in the universe (our entire cosm) you start to see the function/purpose of duality. Scientists are not just going around misinterpreting reality by calling it atoms and molecules and energy particles because they are dumb. They are literally helping God enable creation. Without science, aircraft couldn't exists, and its BECAUSE science is WRONG/FALSE that aircraft exist. See how fucken amazing that is? Science is a creation tool. Its a worldly paint brush. That means, scientific revolutions and concepts have direct implications for what world we will live in. What will be created. This is the true importance of science. And if we want a world where everyone wakes up, guess what that means? Limit/divide the universe in such a way that it transforms living beings into people that wake up. In other words, use science and revolutionise it so that people wake up -> create psychedelics using science, technology that puts people in trances or hypnosis, etc. It really is possible, it just depends on how you slice and dice the universe. And its ok that science is false, its meant to be false, so that we can create, and by creating we create duality, and by creating duality we create the opportunity to experience God.

@Lento All of the technology you see, cars, aircraft, all exist in the form they are because of the way science has been CHOSEN to be divided up. Science cause a massive domino effect, creating all sorts of technological creations. If you invent a new scientific theory/revolution about the life sciences, you will see that science ripple through all of the plants, animals, etc, all of the plants and animals will literally transform into something completely different to what they were before the theory. Contemplate this: did evolution happen before Darwin? What if evolution became 'real'/appeared in existence at the same time Darwin created it? That means in the 1500s evolution was literally not real. It only became real after Darwin. then it rippled not just from Darwin's time to future, put also from Darwin's time to the past. Evolution is not a thing that always existed and Darwin found that truth, God/Darwin literally created that truth on the spot after Darwin created it. The universe literally didnt have evolution before darwin created it. This shows you the power of creation. You can literally create the universe you want. You can transform the entire universe into anything. And when it has been completely transformed into something indistinguishable then the past, people won't even notice - they will walk around as if that's how it's always been. EDIT: slight correction. I don't mean evolution became real for everyone as soon as Darwin created it. I mean as soon as someone learns about Darwin's theory of evolution, God literally creates evolution on the spot in your consciousness. That's why creationists have such a hard time with evolution, in their consciousness, evolution literally doesn't exist. God literally didnt create evolution in their consciousness. So actually when creationists say evolution doesn't exist - they are exactly right, it literally doesn't exist. As soon as they learn about evolution, and their perspectives change, then God literally creates evolution on the spot. This is the essence of changing paradigms. People in different paradigms are literally living on different planets. There isn't 1 planet and we are all sharing it. There is a multiverse of planets some with evolution and some without, and we are all living on different ones but communicating to each other as if we are on the same one. So it's possible to create whatever planet you want. And take people along with you on that planet. You can make whatever planet you want.

yes its reductionist rather than holistic, making it incapable of connecting 'emergent properties'. Holism is not superior to the reduction of science. Our mind is capable of intuitively interpreting multiple phenomena to produce a cohesive solution to a problem, or a cohesive 'knowing' to some set of complex phenomena. For example knowing if you should meditate for 1 hour or 30 minutes takes a large amount of phenomena to process to know the answer. Its about combining it all to come up with a cohesive knowing of what to do. But our ability to holistically interpret this phenomena is limited by how reliable this phenomena is, and how well its structured. Where reduction becomes valuable is increasing the reliability and structure of this phenomena so that holistically interpreting the results becomes easier or more reliable. A lot of ancient techniques, methods and knowledge in the past was a lower quality than it could be because the information they had was not in its best shape. Ancient ayahuasca brews cause vomiting while newly developed, chemically extracted ones(using western science) reduce that vomiting. The ones that created ayahuasca brews did not have the ability to design the brew to decrease vomiting because the information they had was not good enough. Science for all of its flaws can produce very high quality information for holistic interpretation. Science is the mastery of using different quantity to produce different qualities, and if the ancient ayahuasca brew inventors had western science, they could of designed a much more effective brew. This is one example(albeit primitive) of how western science can be combined with ancient spirituality to produce techniques for the divine. I can't wait to see how the power of using quantity to produce quality can be used to develop more effective meditation and yogic techniques.

And this is a green shadow when you say my yyyy side doesn't like xxxxx, it doesn't like it because yyyy has some dogmas that clash with xxxxx. You're problem isn't that you're too advanced and now reintegrating blue is too hard for you, you're problem is that you're not advanced enough. Your in some sort of no mans land between green and yellow, and to healthy integrate those blue values, requires you to contemplate them in yellow fashion and integrate them.

Nope, you've become too advanced now, a sort of Einstein, you can never develop those primitive monkey values ever again.

Definitely, adds a bit of Tantra to the path. Got a vision board, have no idea ehat you're talking about, perfect question for shrooms

@Fede83 I had this question for a long time. A lot of tension between the legal dangers, mental and physiological dangers vs the deep curiosity and desire to try them. This is just my perspective, if you feel you haven't got the right technique and the techniques you've been doing are not effective, you need to try every technique(including psychedelics) to truly know what your unique path is. Choosing not to try them out of fear is unhealthy(caution is another story) and limiting your understanding of the best path for you. But once you've figured out how effective is and you choose not to do them, that's awesome, you dont need to do them again. If you find them effective then why not keep doing them?

what happened

thanks Nahm for that Could you just elaborate more on what you mean by thoughts get recycled as appearance? When detachment of thoughts occur, I notice that less thoughts occur and more present moment happens. Of course the present moment is actually another deeper layer of thoughts, like you're peeling layers off an onion. But I don't see what this recycle stuff is.

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Go tell that to the shroom in your profile pic and see if it agrees with you. Going from loss of job -> CEO at most reduces a minuscule of suffering, if any. The reason why you disagree is because you've been brainwashed by the Capitalist upbringing you've had to believe CEOs have better lives and are in less suffering than people on the streets - and yet CEOs have the same, if not higher rate of suicide, early deaths and drug abuse as people living on the streets. God knows that the answer to people's suffering isn't manipulating the dream to suck up to the dogmas of capitalism. God knows its a mindset problem. And that's partly why the world is exactly the way it is. The world is already the best, beautiful, optimised for happiness the exact way it is right now. No not the world you're living in, I mean the world you go to when you focus on the present moment so hard that you forget who you are. Any other world than that found in the extreme depths of the present moment is as imaginary as the monster under your bed. And you wonder why, why God did you make a world with loss of jobs, illnesses, murders - simple. Because those things are as real as the monster under your bed. You dream them up every day, then complain when those dreams don't go the way you want. The solution isn't to shout and yell at that monster, the solution isn't to try and kill that monster(how can you kill a dream that you keep thinking about?) the solution is to stop believing in the dream. Same with poverty and illness. The solution isn't to try and cure poverty, nor is it to eradicate disease, its to stop believing in it in the first place. And yet its still valuable to eradicate disease, because God likes to create - but don't be fooled, you're not meant to eradicate disease to end suffering, you're meant to eradicate disease IF its a way for you to express who you want to be, who you are, you do it for the sake of helping God create.

thankyou for that but already know what victim mentality is, I don't need you to give me an example.

Actually a man you were with did a bunch of things and you interpreted the things as negativity So it was: men did bunch of stuff -> entered your brain -> your brain chemicals converted bunch of stuff into 'negativity' So actually you brought the negativity into the relationship, not the man.

That's because the real ones that run the show are not the founders - its the investors. And investors STRICTLY care about maximizing profits. How could it be any other way? If they didn't, there would be no investors. Investors would die off. Startups are a risky business even for the most intelligent investors, so if they loosened their grip on the money side of things even a little, they would be loosing money not gaining any. "the sheep spend their life scared of the cattle dogs, but in the end get eaten by the shepherd".

Go ask him That's not a utopian society, that's much of the same of what's already happening Yes. Because its only the ego that desires perfect health for all humans. The Buddha desires all humans to awaken to that monster under their bed. Try to observe your mentally retarded family member without the ego's corruption. Maybe instead of mental illness you will see deep intelligence. Can you give this perspective to your mentally ill family member? That's what Buddhahood is really about.

@Mindfang413 Time for you to take 5 grams of shrooms

hahahahahahahhahahahaha good one

How do you know when to scrutinize a thought or detach from it. Scrutinizing and detaching are 2 different techniques with different results.