tsuki

I think your avatar explains it perfectly.

You are so intelligent that you can convince yourself that you are stupid.

Logic is a map that maps maps. It is a curious property of experience that we can imagine outcomes, but to attach oneself to an outcome via a 'should' is a fatal mistake. Time does not exist, consistency is illusory.

Can we, really? Have you tried to predict something yourself? Take a ball, weigh it and calculate the time it will take it to fall to the ground from a certain distance. Run the experiment and see if it fits your predictions. As you increase the precision of your experiments, you will quickly learn that you need probability theory and statistics to talk about your results. One of interpretations of statistics is that it is a mathematical method of transforming beliefs. In this sense, you are not predicting future, but re-arranging your mental furniture in such a way that the present moment does not surprise you.

Logic is a mental tool that helps you determine truth of statements depending on assumptions you make. Asking whether it is true or not in itself is meaningless.

Moving my energy has been my primary way of meditation for several months now. I did kriya yoga for a few weeks at some point, but It didn't stick with me at the time. It may be a good time to invest in learning the techniques now that I bought the booklist. I tend to stick with techniques that I developed organically as well. Absolutely not.

The doctor said that I must have constricted the nerves connected to the bony labyrinth when I moved my head about. I was instructed to consult a neurologist and take an x-ray image of my neck. When I was taking it, I thought about how ridiculous the idea of shooting deadly radiation at my head is. Just to learn what's wrong with it. Willhelm Roentgen, I salute you for convincing people that it's a reasonable thing to do. Your life must have been hell for you to come up with such an idea. I really appreciate how badly my head hurts today. It's like the body is the older brother to the mind and it is saying: You know, I know that you're smart, but you're stupid and I'm going to make you feel hurt so that you don't hurt yourself, okay? I got a prescription for painkillers, but I don't think I will be taking them. ---------- Yesterday I practiced stilling the mind and observed a candle flame burning. I haphazardly decided to wait until it burns down, but before I started I checked that it would last 4 hours. I decided to stick with one hour and settled for measly 15 minutes. The session was successful. The body was very still but it took willpower to extinguish thoughts and I know that it's not what I'm supposed to do. Strangely enough, when I was practicing SDS few months ago I could still myself to the point where my vision would turn white. It's like only contours of objects would remain, but the whole contrast is gone. This is what happened this time, after around 1-2 minutes. The only thing that remained was the flame.

My mind runs through this question a lot lately and I need a place to chew through the thoughts. So, what am I - or, what is "I"? Or maybe: who am I? Are these questions the same? No point in thinking about that. So far, my line of reasoning goes like this: I am not the monitor, because there is a distance between it and my body, which means that I may be my body. As I started to touch my body, I became aware that the extent of my body is defined by short-circuiting of touch. Touch is a sensation that appears on the inside of my body, and in conjunction with sight, they define contact. As I look at my hand that touches my chest I feel the touch on the inside of my hand, and on the inside of my chest. This is how the extents of the body are defined - by touch on the both sides of the bodily boundary. Now, I became aware that touching something that is not-me is not really one-sided. The sensation of touch cannot really be fully located on the inside of the body. Touch just is, and it appears simultaneously with the visual cue of proximity. Hmm... Anyway, I call my body 'mine', like 'my cup' and 'my monitor', so can it really be 'me'? Can I be the body if the body is mine? Is it just a linguistic twist? Various things are 'mine'. What is the relationship between 'me' and 'mine'? There is definitely a degree of 'mine-ness'. The body is more mine than a cup, and my cup is more mine than my colleague's cup. But why is my body more mine than my cup? Is it because I move my body and I can't move a cup by itself? Well, the eyes blink by themselves and they are more mine than my cup, so it is not a matter of will/control. Is it about inseparability? Have I ever been separate from my body? Am I separate from my cup? No, I'm not. A cup is a cup because it's obvious and undeniable. It is self-apparent, even if there is nothing about this thing that makes it a cup. I recognize a cup to be a cup. So, perhaps - I am the recognition of what a cup is? That is an interesting way to put it. If I am the recognition of what a cup is, then I am also the cup, the monitor, the keyboard, my body, this text, etc. I am everything. It's like there is this duality between objects as concrete things, and actions that I can perform 'with them'. These actions are what these objects are, and I am all of them? But isn't a cup defined by its ability to hold liquid? Is this still a cup? Yes, in negative space of actions. hmm...

https://nathanieljharris.wordpress.com/category/chaos-magic/

What am I? HAHAHAHAHAHA My god I must have written that book!

My painbody is gonna enjoy it. Go on.

The beauty lies in the eye of the (sometimes offended) beholder.

There is no difference between the two if all you have is laughter.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

As I'm re-watching Harry Potter movies, I became interested in chaos magic again. The movies are just a little more than nostalgia trip with occasional symbolic craziness, but Liber Null is another thing altogether. This book is incarnated madness. I love it. I'll be starting a new journal soon.

@Zigzag Idiot Did you happen to come across an elaboration of what the 8 trigrams of I-Ching represent? https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Bagua https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Wu_Xing

You don't understand something unless you can explain it to a layperson. Rehash your theory by explaining it to an imaginary friend and note the parts where you have trouble with clarity. Those are the parts you need to focus on. When it comes to practical side of things - practice. Do stuff. Don't memorize solutions, make them from scratch and theory is your scratch.

"Why" questions ask for a causal relationship between finite elements that interact. Asking a "why" towards infinite intelligence is nonsensical because it is not a finite thing. Infinite intelligence does not exist. No thing is 'it'. Your question comes from being lost in language. Spiritual awakening is when you find your way out.

Beautiful.

I wonder what a married Zigzag Idiot would say in retrospect. Would he claim that it was a mistake, or would he see it as a vehicle for his growth? It's a shame that life is but a sketch of a painting that is never made.

I've been officially declared a non-addict by my wife for completing the 7-day challenge. I can now return to wasting my time here on my own leisure.

Alright, I need to prove something to my wife and she promised to get off my back after that. I will be having a 7-day retreat away from the forum. It starts now.

There is no individual that is divorced from culture. Culture is the material from which an individual is made. There is no 'you' apart from 'others'. You are you only as much as you are useful to the society. Try naming one thing that define you that is somehow not related to other people. It's impossible.

From my point of view, this was one of the most disappointing videos Leo has ever made. Very ideological.