GomeGabrielDavid

disloyalty is no attachment intrinsically not buhddist not christian intrinsically, collision is violence, the brush of a tongue like a cusswords is collision Paradox [is] hope bcz opposites equate Example of paradoxe because surface is so thin it is shapeless Also shape comprises smaller (tinier than a dot, so tiny it is nonshape [paradox] But NO ATTACHMENT JUST hope not buhddist not christian not Microcosms and microcosms are the epitemy of the term "like" Not same But for all I know that' paradox 2 Everyone can be the best

Shape [is] infinite [amount] "subjects" [that] [are] smaller than shape [less] [that] [is] asymmetrical [logic]. ?base?foundation Possible simultaneous[ly] impossible [A] Paradox, asymmetrical logic Better than better ETC

shape [is] infinite [amount] "subjects" [that] [are] smaller than shape [less] [that] [is] asymmetrical [logic] ?base?foundation ?chemist?

..

Shape comprises infinite [amount] subjects [that] [are] smaller than shape [shapelessness]. [This] [is] not symmetrical logic [symmetrical logic ex. 1+1=2]. [The] triangle [is] primitive. [The] pyramid [is] primitive. Paradoxes[,] mental freedom[,] [a] compass.

Shape comprises infinite [amount] subjects [that] [are] smaller than shape [shapelessness]. [This] [is] not symmetrical logic [symmetrical logic ex. 1+1=2]. Paradoxes[,] mental freedom[,] [a] compass. [The] triangle [is] primitive. [The] pyramid [is] primitive.

I suggest reading my new topic "Effect And Cause".

I suggest reading my new topic "Effect And Cause".

I suggest reading my new topic "Effect And Cause".

location infinitely tiny (example: infinite locations within circle) motion require distance infinite instantly .

Now you neednt trip on anything. If one case is the case it is also false. But there are infinite options yet finite options yet no options.

If you haven't read my recent posts, it has lead to the following material (truly). Possibility and impossibility are different YET one. Is this "the way"? Be thorough. Now, if "location" is infinitely small (ex. the center of a circle) ... is motion "either" impossible or possible? Is surface infinitely thin, infinite? Is surface limited? Are they one (surface) YET different? They are opposites, do others operate like this? "If" "location" is infinitely small (ex. the center of a circle, which contains infinite locations) … motion is either possible or impossible? Simply saying God does this does not explain why infinity can be transcended. “If” no explanation is required for how motion is possible, no explanation is required for why anything is possible. Now, it is my belief that anything is possible and anything is impossible. Yet just as infinity is different from limitation (YET they equate), possibility is different from impossibility (YET they equate) much like surface. If a window allows complete visual passage, should it have infinite holes? Is a window space or matter [infinite holes?]? Should we be able to see through a piece of paper if we can see through a window? Is a window space or matter or both?

Possibility and impossibility are different YET one. Now, if "location" is infinitely small (ex. the center of a circle) ... is motion "either" impossible or possible? If a window allows complete visual passage, should it have infinite holes? Is a window space or matter [infinite holes?]? Should we be able to see through a piece of paper if we can see through a window? Is surface infinitely thin and therefore infinite? Is surface limited because it is tangible? Do opposites equate? Possibility and impossibility are different YET one. Is this the way?

Can you see through a wall? If location is infinitely small (precise rather than approximate), is motion possible? Anything is possible. Anything is impossible. If a window allows visual passage, is it solid? Should it have infinite holes? The senses are refutable. The senses are trustworthy. Is the way ineffable? Would an answer be effable? How is it we have knowledge of the ineffable? How is it we have knowledge of space? Do we have knowledge of matter? Anything is possible. Anything is impossible.

There is no such thing as plurality. Forget singularity lest you remember plurality.

Limitation and infinity equate (ex. surface [infinitely small and finite]. Do other "opposites" equate? Thoroughness: There is no such thing as limitation... but because this would be law (limit) it is possible. But, lest this seem senseless, is there there a reason limitation and infinity equate? Okay then. The final frontier for a creature is the discovery that fiction and fact are much like limitation and infinity. But this "finality" is much like the example of "there is no such thing as limitation". Because there is such a thing as limitation. Prepare, because within such a range of possibilities (and impossibilities) as "anything", is the term "if" (a limitation). Another question: Is location infinitely small or finite? BE THOROUGH.

Limitation and infinity equate (ex. surface [finite where it is infinitely thin, because you can touch it]).

The definition of infinity and the definition of limitation are opposites. But because there is evidence they coincide (ex. a tip [infinitely small/finite]), there is evidence they are two [where they coincide] (because they retain their definition) yet one. Therefore fact (inasmuch as infinity being limitation) is fiction (inasmuch as infinity being limitation). Both are fact, yet both are fiction [even this paragraph].

Is a tip infinitely small? Is a tip finite? A tip is finite and infinite. A tip is where the definition of limitation and infinity intersect, where fiction (inasmuch as properly defined limitation and properly define infinity) and fact (inasmuch as properly defined limitation and properly defined infinity) intersect. Now “if” fact be white and fiction be black (patience), an intersection would not be grey… because both share location. Now possibilities are unconditional, and impossibilities are unconditional (just as fact and fiction share location, likewise). “If” you were to establish a life free of suffering someone could as easily make you suffer during lack of suffering, since this is a condition. And because it is unconditional it must also be conditional, because conditionality is a condition unconditionality must be. Likewise, limitation is impossible. But because this would be a limitation (impossibility being a limitation and lack of one being a law, hence limitation), it is also untrue. Is location of finite size? Is an infinitely small location within such a finite location? Now anything (fact and contradiction) is possible and anything (fact and contradiction) is impossible (both simultaneously [as aforementioned] and apart [as mentioned “if” limitation were NOT infinity and vice-versa). For example, a minute of time contains infinite fractions... what is fast and what is slow and what is normal. Therefore I am convinced time travel is possible. Another example is that a limitation contains infinite fractions (should a limitation contain finite fractions? It is therefore infinite and finite). NOW “if” you desire control, initiate it. Energy is matter (vice-versa) ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE. Yet consider another can intercept you, because there is a breed of matter which delights in applying kryptonite. Beware of those who will take advantage of your patterns, call them stupid for noticing them (I don't know). Change it up a bit. Happy enlightenment. Stay calculating, have mercy "if" it is within you, and become polysemous. DO NOT WASTE YOUR FUCKING LIFE or trust me. I love you

The definition of mere limitation and the definition of mere infinity are polar opposites; although a limitation isn't bigger than itself, it contains an infinite number of fractions (nonetheless being infinite). In order to find where truth and lie intersect, let us examine a edge, corner, or tip. To say it finite is true though the edge is infinitely small (because you can touch it) but it is nonetheless infinite. Therefore the two definitions are valid yet invalid, because they intersect. Is this ambiguous (that a truth can be lie also)? Seek. It is my experience that fact and falsity have always gone hand in hand. Of course this includes body language, and this is the manner of manipulating your way through life. After all, how could motion be possible without truth being a sort of hyde and not just jekll? The whole body is a tongue, so be thorough in your speech. In fact, anything is a tongue.