GomeGabrielDavid

disloyalty is no attachment intrinsically not buhddist not christian intrinsically, collision is violence, the brush of a tongue like a cusswords is collision Paradox [is] hope bcz opposites equate Example of paradoxe because surface is so thin it is shapeless Also shape comprises smaller (tinier than a dot, so tiny it is nonshape [paradox] But NO ATTACHMENT JUST hope not buhddist not christian not Microcosms and microcosms are the epitemy of the term "like" Not same But for all I know that' paradox 2 Everyone can be the best

Shape [is] infinite [amount] "subjects" [that] [are] smaller than shape [less] [that] [is] asymmetrical [logic]. ?base?foundation Possible simultaneous[ly] impossible [A] Paradox, asymmetrical logic Better than better ETC

..

Shape comprises infinite [amount] subjects [that] [are] smaller than shape [shapelessness]. [This] [is] not symmetrical logic [symmetrical logic ex. 1+1=2]. [The] triangle [is] primitive. [The] pyramid [is] primitive. Paradoxes[,] mental freedom[,] [a] compass.

Shape comprises infinite [amount] subjects [that] [are] smaller than shape [shapelessness]. [This] [is] not symmetrical logic [symmetrical logic ex. 1+1=2]. Paradoxes[,] mental freedom[,] [a] compass. [The] triangle [is] primitive. [The] pyramid [is] primitive.

shape [is] infinite [amount] "subjects" [that] [are] smaller than shape [less] [that] [is] asymmetrical [logic] ?base?foundation ?chemist?

I suggest reading my new topic "Effect And Cause".

I suggest reading my new topic "Effect And Cause".

I suggest reading my new topic "Effect And Cause".

location infinitely tiny (example: infinite locations within circle) motion require distance infinite instantly .

Now you neednt trip on anything. If one case is the case it is also false. But there are infinite options yet finite options yet no options.

If you haven't read my recent posts, it has lead to the following material (truly). Possibility and impossibility are different YET one. Is this "the way"? Be thorough. Now, if "location" is infinitely small (ex. the center of a circle) ... is motion "either" impossible or possible? Is surface infinitely thin, infinite? Is surface limited? Are they one (surface) YET different? They are opposites, do others operate like this? "If" "location" is infinitely small (ex. the center of a circle, which contains infinite locations) … motion is either possible or impossible? Simply saying God does this does not explain why infinity can be transcended. “If” no explanation is required for how motion is possible, no explanation is required for why anything is possible. Now, it is my belief that anything is possible and anything is impossible. Yet just as infinity is different from limitation (YET they equate), possibility is different from impossibility (YET they equate) much like surface. If a window allows complete visual passage, should it have infinite holes? Is a window space or matter [infinite holes?]? Should we be able to see through a piece of paper if we can see through a window? Is a window space or matter or both?

Possibility and impossibility are different YET one. Now, if "location" is infinitely small (ex. the center of a circle) ... is motion "either" impossible or possible? If a window allows complete visual passage, should it have infinite holes? Is a window space or matter [infinite holes?]? Should we be able to see through a piece of paper if we can see through a window? Is surface infinitely thin and therefore infinite? Is surface limited because it is tangible? Do opposites equate? Possibility and impossibility are different YET one. Is this the way?

Can you see through a wall? If location is infinitely small (precise rather than approximate), is motion possible? Anything is possible. Anything is impossible. If a window allows visual passage, is it solid? Should it have infinite holes? The senses are refutable. The senses are trustworthy. Is the way ineffable? Would an answer be effable? How is it we have knowledge of the ineffable? How is it we have knowledge of space? Do we have knowledge of matter? Anything is possible. Anything is impossible.

There is no such thing as plurality. Forget singularity lest you remember plurality.