Ibn Sina

Just a question, is this God speaking or Shaun speaking? Just to clarify.

God, Please, I want to know you, I want to realize you, I want to know that I am you, why are you covering me in this veil of ignorance? Please help me break free from it. Why are you putting me in this situation? I love you and I want to you to penetrate my being and kill me. Answer me God. NOW.

What are the things/ points people are disagreeing you on? Also, why is people listening and not listening to you an important thing such that , just because I listened to you an entire crusade has stopped? When you just preach without other people asking, then chances are they won't listen, unless what you say is extremely compelling. But it shouldn't bother you and stop a 'crusade' when 'finally they have listened' , it should be like, it's their loss, and I have nothing to teach them. "information is provided on the forum" I am not finding a coherent pattern in your posts, I have no idea what you are trying to say or not say, though I might extract a thing or two, but that would be my interepration of your ideas, not your original idea. Just give me something like- I am saying that ____________________.

You just said no one is listening to me, and here I am listening to you. What did you mean by 'no one is listening to me', is your message , 'go have conversation with god not me'? Is that what people are not listening to you, or you have something more to teach that people are not listening? Of course I can go somewhere else, but for the time being I am interested in you if you have something else then 'go have conversation with god'.

I am. Give me your best teachings. I want enlightenment.

This is the meditation section, not dating and sexuality section.

GIVE ME JUICY TEACHINGS !!!!!!!! THAT IS ALL I AM ASKING FOR!!!!!!!!!!! I WANT JUICY TEACHINGS!!!!!!!!!!!! Woops, got a warning, wasn't intending for that.

I like the way he sounds I like his cutting edge sharp knife logic I love the mind fucks after mind fucks in series of successions.

Gems

I am not sure if I can ask this question in the forum. But it's like in the 'high consciousness resources' section. If any of you know a link , please send it,

@Truth Addict LOL it's equivalent to someone as unconscious as Trump saying that to me ?? Who told you to push? I have Leo, Buddha, Sadhguru and countless others. You gave me a paradox, I said thank you for your 0.001 cents, and here we are.

@Truth Addict But I am open minded. I allow those possibility. So I ask you again if you couldn't understand, WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO TEACH ME? Yes, it is. And I don't think you are a highly developed individual with high congnition. You show no signs. Though you might claim otherwise (with no logical basis, but by 'just saying') You should repress your desire. Why? Because you are wasting my time. You have no gems to contribute. I won't be reading your further replies, I know your ego is hurt because I don't value your ideas highly.

It's so nice of you to say that you are asking for my opinion on that matter. I have the answers, good answers. I want you to ponder "How can an enlightened person be a stock broker?" time to time, I want you to have a deeper understanding of enlightenment and existence. This is not like a non-dual exercise, but a thought exercise with non-dual underpinnings. I want you to bridge the gap between the dual and the nondual. Someday when you answer, I can verify it. I know you might have other intentions like trying to prove me wrong, but if you are here to learn, then I want you to think deeper.

@Nahm?

They have their own time to hatch. Not all eggs hatch at the same time , but their life cycle is laid out across the arrow of time. I know , as usual you have something deeper going on, so I am holding tight to my seat belt.

You asked those questions to support the answer you gave to my question, you asked them with the answers embeded in those questions so fundamentally they are answers. Doesn't enlightenment come with the responsibility to raise the overall consciousness? You asked that to support your previous claim "Why would an enlightened person be a stock broker?" Don't you realize that you're not seperated from anything else, so trading stocks would hurt yourself, because the stock market is build on speculation and exploitation, a game where more people lose than win? It's all to support your original claim about the incompatibility of stock broker and enlightened, a claim that you have already retracted, Ergo for the 3rd time, I say, you are not logically consistent. Not worth my time.

You are hopelessly deluded no matter how much you deny (told not by any logical basis, but the same way you are telling to me) I have accepted many good solutions. Just look at the forum. There are 2 good answer here. Your's is not one of them. "If you're sincere, then you wouldn't be wasting your time on putting your precious 'logic' on a pedestal, but rather you would consider the possibility that logic is fundamentally flawed and cannot be applied to everything." LOL I do accept that logic is flawed, ergo I am sincere. You are making such judgement to me (with no logical basis). I agree with your idea that Logic is flawed. SO WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? What are you trying to teach me? Then why you keep replying to my message saying I am blind, I am deluded. If you didn't have a problem you wouldn't reply. Your ego is hurt, that's all.

Now you are changing the topic. The topic is, whether an enlightened person can become stock broker or not (which branches out from the main idea of Enlightened professionals), I said yes, you said no, and here you are changing the topic. I don't think you asked a question. I did. You gave an answer. And you applied it in a lazy manner without rigorous logical consistency and came up with a skewed , incomplete conclusion that wouldn't have any truth in any reality, the problem is in lack of clarity of thought and perception, and lazy thinking. You can apply all sorts of ideas to all sorts of things, just because you applied it doesn't mean you applied it correctly without any of your prejudices, beliefs and egoic distortions to coat your conclusions. And here you are again deviating from your original claim. As I said, you lack logical consistency. Good, you should also add- I don't know and that was only my opinion. Instead of making the claim that- An enlightened person wouldn't be a stock broker.

because they haven't hatched? I don't see anything deeper if you are pointing towards something deeper. You can help.

So are you. You are even closeminded then me you have no idea of what intuition is, and you don't know what you are talking about. And I can make those claims the same way you are making about me, that is with 0 logical basis, but pure intuition as you claim to be using. I was asking for help and you gave me your 0.01 cents and I said THANK YOU. So what's the problem here? I don't want you to again answer me again with labels like- you are closeminded, you don't know x y z, because that would be repetition.

You are even blinder than me. How do I know? My intuition (not logical basis). The way I know how much you say is near the truth is that I have sensor for detecting what works and what reduces suffering and improves my life. My sensors didn't fire up, that's why I can't give put your ideas on a higher rank. While Leo's ideas fires up my sensors like crazy.

This is a problem solving session, but I doubt you have anything high quality to contribute. A mental masturbation session would imply it's directed at speculation without an intent to arrive at a solid solution. And yet you are the one to say that that an enlightened person is the one who would never go to stocks and would raise consciousness. You can't even see your own hypocrisy. Your thoughts are not even logical consistent and has a bent of ego, instead of a bent of truth.

I do that and will do that every single day. I want enlightenment.

Thanx for your 0.1 cents to solving the problem (though it's not a huge one).

It's the same problem with you. You also don't understand the question I am asking. You can properly read the answers that I wrote to wavy dude, specially the "There are only 2 logical ways to answer" my post and also look at my original post. Why an enlightened person would go to stocks is just irrelevant, and thinking that they wouldn't because they want to raise consciousness is talking about the topic with an intellectual capacity of a 2nd grader. I can tell you exactly how an enlightened person would also be a stoke broker, but if you could think deeply, I wouldn't have to tell you. If I asked the same question to a villager in a remote place in India or Pakistan, would someone like Buddha be a buisnessman or a politician, they would also say- no, because they are bad people but Buddha is a good person. They Would answer the same as you