LastThursday

And "immediate non descriptive consciousness" isn't that a linguistic statement also? You see the problem. To me absolute means "all encompassing", "total", "dead certain", "without doubt or error", "irrefutably". What sort of truth is that, what is it about an absolute truth that makes it irrefutable? How can it be known, if it's not conviction or faith?

Unfortunately you can't get away from linguistics. What is absolute referring to, and is it just one truth or many of them?

I'd say this is an excellent insight. Most people run at the whims of their programming, and feel helpless to change it. Neuro Linguistic Programming is one set of methods to reprogram yourself, but there are plenty of others such as Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, and therapy in general, and psychedelics of course. I would be wary of placing too much emphasis on the metaphors though, we're not machines in the conventional sense, and we're not computers either. The situation is paradoxical though. When you consciously choose to change or tinker with your programming, where does this idea come from? The system itself of course.

See it more as a Swiss Army Knife. You pull out a certain paradigm or set of beliefs for a given situation and act as if it were true. Every perspective has some truth to it anyway - you can use that to lean on. The problem isn't you, it's other people and their simplistic rigid beliefs, and dealing with them. But having a rich set of perspectives allows you to deal with lots of different people and meet them on their terms, so it improves your ability to navigate life.

For sure. It wasn't until I was 27 that I realised that caffeine intake was adversely affecting me, especially my sleep. Now I keep caffeine to an absolute minimum despite liking tea and coffee a lot. Even my sister can chug coffee before sleep without effect. But, caffeine is relatively easy to control. Short of full and intentional avoidance, how can you regulate what you're breathing in? And how do you go about pinpointing cause and effect, and so avoid the paranoia of thinking "everything is bad". Isn't that stressful paranoia also bad for health?

Traditionally a butterfly would be more normal

I think it goes both ways. People can become your idols because they reflect something already latent in you. Most of the people that have impacted me the most I don't idolise (consciously). Mostly the people that I've been in close proximity to: my parents, family, my close friends. Ironically, I have traits that I wish I didn't have that I have picked up from them. I've always admired people with skill and intelligence or beauty - more accurately those who create beauty. The greats: Picasso, Dali, Marilyn Monroe, Bach, Beethoven, Chopin, The Beatles, Nelson Mandela, Spielberg, Einstein, Newton, Euler, Gauss, Turing. The list is endless.

@integral the dose makes the poison. Yes there may be nanoscopic blobs of medication floating in the air, good. Will they have any effect whatsoever on you, ehh..... Don't get me wrong some VOCs may make you temporarily unwell, but again, it's the dose that makes the poison and some VOCs are highly toxic. Medicine is mostly designed to be effective at doses taken orally or intravenously or whatever, and is tested for human toxicity at those levels; the levels in air will be many orders of magnitude smaller and their toxity near zero. I would be much more concerned at non-medicinal things in the air, including UV, ionising radiation, car pollutants, Covid. Then again what can I do about it? Roughly nothing, short of living on top of a mountain away from all the riff raff below. (note ionising radiation and UV is higher on top of a mountain)

If someone criticises you for something you enjoy doing, then either ignore them or politely tell them to f*** off. I find journalling fun.

Levels of violence: 1. What is this shit post? 2. I totally agree where's the fucking episode? 3. Chill wo/man what's the problem? 4. You seem to be angry about something, want to talk about it?

I'm going to go meta. "Who am I?" is the perennial question isn't it? The main thrust of your OP is really to do with identity more than anything else. The confusion with identity is that it's not some monolithic abstract entity. Instead, it is the sum of all those parts that jostle with each other for attention. It is all your thoughts, behaviours, emotions and bodily sensations, right now. What a therapist enables is no different to what a doctor does in a hospital, and that is to prepare the environment well enough that the body heals itself. It can be done more or less well, a doctor that doesn't wash their hands before cutting you open is going to make things worse. But on balance, having a therapist is better than not having a therapist, you just have to find a respectable one. It is not impossible to heal yourself. The remarkable thing is that it's possible to observe the different parts of your identity at all. That observer does exactly the same thing a therapist does. A therapist works because they are detached from the melange of your identity and are able to re-align those parts that are not working together, mostly through observation and careful questioning. You've shown above that you are well able to "step outside yourself" and observe what is going on. Isn't that strange? You have all this stuff going on, and yet some part of you is able to detach itself from it. Aside from the mental and narrative aspect of identity, you have bodily reactions. To a large degree the body is an automaton that is programmed through repetition and extreme circumstances. Given a trigger in the environment or through thought it will consistently react in the same way. All trauma has already happened and no longer exists, yet the body is "programmed" by that trauma and continues it indefinitely. It does this as a protective survival mechanism. This is often the bit talking therapy doesn't get at. Sometimes no amount of talking can change the body's programming. But, that programming is not permanent, it can be changed (e.g. CBT). Often there is a lot of mental elaboration around what the body is doing instinctively to protect you from harm, which doesn't address how it can be reprogrammed.

@trenton this sounds like a mentally and emotionally complex situation you have going on. I don't have direct any answers, just observations on what you wrote. The consequences of sex for men and women are assymetrical. Women are the ones who get pregnant and carry to term, and very often are the primary caregivers of the child. Men can and do walk away without much comeback from society. That's a heavy burden for women, so they have to be picky and make sure first before engaging. Basically, men and women have different sexual strategies. I would question this assumption. For a man, disinterest after climax, sure, euphoria after climax, sure. Repulsion and shame don't ring true. Indeed it's harder to understand feelings both your own and others'. Essentially, feelings can't be reasoned out, most reasoning that normies have about feelings is post-hoc elaboration. But there is a tacit understanding of what feelings are signalling, and I would say this is harder for someone with autism to get to grips with: you have the feelings but don't know what to do with them. I'd say this is a more modern worry. I would say that men naturally express vulnerability a lot less than women, and wouldn't be expected in all relationships. But expressing vulnerability is really just talking about yourself and what's going on in your head, which judging from your post you're more than capable of doing. It's a shame @Emerald isn't around a the mo, she would know what to say about shame. Otherwise therapy is one way to go, in order to heal your traumas and negative associations. But in short: There is a wide spectrum of standards. The joy of that is that there is someone for everyone. The trap a lot of people fall into is worrying about how they will be judged, instead of simply expressing who they are. More outwards, less inwards.

@Joseph Maynor I saw Hiromi Uehara play live at a festival a few years ago, to a full tent. She's unbelievable and great energy. I really like stride piano too, reminds of black and white films I watched as a kid:

So simple, yet this piece of music always gives me the shivers. It's like Bach was channeling god.

@shahar uriel I know it's early stages but you should do it anyway. AI didn't learn from nothing, it learned from human coders. In fact human coders invented the AI in the first place. For some high level insight into how AI is affecting the industry then this is enlightening:

Threesome? Honestly, joking aside, who cares what we think. Go with your instinct. When I'm unsure about things, I just sit in a quiet place for as long as it takes to be still, and then ask myself the question "what do you want?", and then just let the answer come.

I can sort of see this. I get sick with cold or whatever less than once a year. 15 years is a bit of a stretch though. And of course you might be infected but show no or very minor symptoms. And people have various tolerances for what the deem being sick.

Put it this way, I'm voluntarily not working at the moment, and I'm not concerned about money.

You're right, the detail can be complex, but trust me, running a business you've got to know what's going in and going out, and how much it will cost to borrow money. Once you have the basics down, everything else becomes a lot easier.

From a systems point of view capitalism wasn't invented from scratch, but was an evolution of what went before. Inventing a new stable system from scratch, like Communism, is nearly impossible. Communism collapsed because it isn't workable in practice in the long run, even China has partially embraced capitalism. Capitalism will eat itself eventually, and it will evolve into something else, the best we can do is nudge it in the right direction.

Money is fundamentally simple you don't need a book. The rules are: have as much as possible coming in, have as little as possible going out, and there's no such thing as free money. Everything else builds on that foundation.

Consciousness is way trippy. An eye can't look at itself. But consciousness can look at itself, in fact it's its primary attribute. That being so, what does consciousness "see" so to speak? I think if there was no meaning making at all, then consciousness wouldn't happen at all. What consciousness sees is then all meaning and nothing else. If there was no meaning, you wouldn't go insane, you'd disappear into a void. Raising consciousness is then making ever finer and more intricate meaning from itself, this happens naturally as it goes about its business. There are levels of meaning, when you're sleeping a night dream has less meaning. You wake up and realise the dream was nonsensical.

Immortality, it's not just for Christmas (other religions welcome).

I'm saying nothing.

In my experience if you're interested then most women will realise your interest. If you persist enough they will generally let you know if they have a partner, often in a passing comment. In other words, there's nothing wrong with expressing your true intentions, how else will you progress things?