LastThursday

I wouldn't worry. If that happens we're all gonners. I'd prefer to see the flash than not, quicker that way.

Marriage is about showing commitment to your spouse. It also gets "buy in" from both families and shows you're serious about each other - and you're not just going to run at the first sign of trouble. A good marriage requires maturity. And in most countries there are legal, religious and financial implications (e.g. tax breaks). So there's lots of considerations to take into account. It's neither good nor bad. Neither high consciousness or low consciousness. It's like the difference between renting and buying a house (how unromantic I am!).

To oppose something you have to acknowledge it first. Although, I do think you're conflating atheist with scientist/materialist, they're two separate things. Scientists can and do believe in God. Scientists in the Vatican do astronomy for example:

My take, is that you transition over time to what you love and what excites you. Changing direction takes effort though. In the short term you're going to have to work more and concentrate on two different things at the same time. However, you're already an expert at being a teacher, so there's no extra effort required there, just maintain that status quo. Once you get some traction with your crazy dream vision, it will be self-sustaining. If it's exciting enough you'll find the energy. If it's not exciting enough, then drop it, try something else. You can then start tapering down the hours of teaching (I'm sure you can go part-time). You may even have to take some sort of financial hit in the short term. In summary, there's no magic bullet.

@Aaron p just work on constantly reducing your own self deception. Keep speaking your truth (but don't preach). There's nothing better than doubt to bust self deception.

Probably better spent pumping iron, building that next business, contemplating the meaning of the universe, mastering your own psychology, building foundational habits, plugging 5meo and I can't bring myself to say it... but it begins with P and ends with P, two words, two syllables, it's not a film, and it involves real life women, and a lot of rejection and cringe... (Sorry I forgot, health problems. Porn is just fine.)

@Jannes how would you feel about gamifying your experience? Here's my game strategy for you: one week of socialising non-stop (have a schedule and contact a different friend each day - make lots of plans to meet up), one week of complete isolation (be an introvert, recharge, play games etc.). Keep alternating for two months. Review on here at the end.

Contemplate if consciousness belongs to you.

Definitely the emphasis in education is a bad fit for most people. It's all about educating the masses for the workforce. Since employers are about optimising for profits and efficiency, they naturally want the most bang for their buck and so want to hire the "brightest" candidates. To know who's brightest you have to measure it somehow, and hence the heavy emphasis on exams and grades. Since most exams are fixed to a curriculum, there's a natural presssure to want to just "pass the exams" to get on in life. I don't know what the answer is here. Should young kids even go to school? Finland starts at age six or seven I think. Schools should definitely be teaching meta skills. Like, life skills and how to accelerate your own learning, how to collaborate and how to be creative, how to meditate and introspect etc. Also the breadth of subjects needs to expand hugely and to have a lot more overlap between them. And, if Johnny likes making pottery, and Jane likes coding, they should be able to explore that fully and with professional guidance. I've known teacher friends teaching subjects they know hardly anything about (e.g. languages). There's also no reason directed learning should stop at 18 or adulthood. Perhaps, the school system should taper off rather than stop dead at a certain age.

Some classical. Good old Grieg:

There's no definite answer. You're not losing social skills just because of a break of a few weeks, so it's not that. If you're anything like me, sometimes you're just not in the mood to be social. In other words you have to be mentally prepared to be social and it takes effort. Such is the life of an introvert. As for feeling awkward and boring, just let it happen and don't fight it, even if it's uncomfortable feeling. Socialising is not about performing well, it's about communication and connection and having a shared experience and expressing yourself. From experience, socialising is about directing all your attention to the other person and being delighted with them. The flow (of love) should be from you to the other person, not the other way around. You feel awkward and boring because the flow is the wrong way, you're basing your experience on your performance and your expectation, instead of just directing your attention outwards away from yourself.

How would you go about distinguishing a 2nd-order truth from a 1st-order truth? Is that a worthwhile activity?

Agreed, that's a very good description. It's a grieving process and it takes it's own path and time to resolve. You can't switch your feelings off like a switch and to be honest you shouldn't even try.

I'm sorry you're feeling pain. Be easy on yourself, there's no pressure to pretend he never existed. And there's no shame in heartbreak, just allow yourself to feel into it for a while. Some relationships just take a lot longer to get over than others. Unless you're very lucky, there's always some unresolved emotions around a breakup and that's why it's difficult to let go. Give it time don't rush.

The meaning of life is to discover it has no meaning, and you are as free as a bird.

William Sidis had some ideas about life: My own take, is that life is any bit of matter that actively works to keep itself intact over time. All life has an identity it maintains against chaos (entropy). This is what Sidis says above. Most life does this by reproducing itself (and so includes viruses). Identity itself can be diffuse and not necessarily concentrated in one individual.

Have a women only section to the forum. More detail in my journal:

Should there be a women only section to the forum? And how would it work? From a detached viewpoint I can see there's an imbalance to this forum. Imbalances always cause problems of majority groupthink, suppression of the minorities (even if not intended), and implicit bias towards the concerns of the majority. I know for a certain fact that women are no more or less able to take on the task of self actualisation and spirituality than men. This should be reflected on the forum and on Actualized in general. Women are just as numerous as men in the population and this should be represented here too. A women only section to the forum could be set up. It would just be a general section where anything can be posted. Everyone would be able to see all the posts and replies, but only women would be able to post and reply. This can be controlled through the gender option on a member's profile. There would have to be some nuance to using the gender option. All members can choose to have a gender or not disclose this at all. On top of that a member can disclose their gender, but not have it displayed on their profile. However, only members who identify as "female" can post in the new forum (whether shown on their profile or not). To stop abuse, all new or existing members have one chance to change their gender after which it is locked. After that only a mod can change your gender for you. And as a further safeguard only a female mod can change your gender to "female". Only female moderators would be allowed to moderate the new sub-forum. Only female moderators can post in the sub-forum. This would exclude Leo himself (he is male), and he would have to comment only indirectly through a female moderator. Having a women only sub-forum will have several benefits. It will give women a "safe space" away from male trolling, gaslighting, adversarial style interaction and sexism. But it will also allow discussion of more female centric subjects and concerns. It will start off slowly but I think it would gather momentum over time and have a virtuous effect on the rest of the forum - by redressing the imbalance. With my programmer's head on, the changes required to set this up would be minor (an extra column in the member's table in the database to indicate the gender is locked). And then a few "if" statements to control who can post in the new sub-forum based on the gender field. And a couple of changes to the UI to accommodate all this. Of course, I wouldn't be allowed on there either, but that's a small price to pay.

Do you sleep face down on it? ??? Sleep on it? Why not frame it and put it up on the wall? (I can't believe I just said that)

Sort of, but it's weirder than you say. There is only consciousness and that's it. Perspectives, universes, source code, NPCs, infinity, "you" are just appearances within consciousness. Some appearances give the impression of being stable and permanent (like your sense of yourself), but those impressions are also just appearances. There is no story or explanation for consciousness or what it's doing, because an explanation is just another appearance within consciousness. Even calling it consciousness is just an appearance. My head hurts. I think I need a lie down.

And therein lies the answer you're looking for. It's not your consciousness. You are inside it, not it inside you. In other words you're as much a construct as the person whose eyes you're looking into. They might not have consciousness, but neither do you. Solipsism is not true.

Just playing devil's advocate: There's circularity in this way of thinking. In order to say A is not B you have to know what A and B are to start with. Your claim is that intellectual pursuit IS NOT infinity. This means you know what infinity is already. Maybe you do, maybe you don't, I have no idea. However, I can say that the concept of infinity is itself just that: a concept (a.k.a. coming from intellect). I don't know what infinity means to you. But to me it might mean: never ending process (which you allude to), or unbounded thing with no end. Again, this is just my intellect and conceptual thinking. I can slap on the label of "infinity" onto anything in my experience. But the label is never the thing itself. When it comes to communication, everything is words, models and intellectualising. I don't know if I've explained myself well here, but maybe you see the problem?

The irony of this statement. @Tyler Robinson don't worry, you have more brain cells and eloquence than most of the knuckle dragging gobshi**s on here.

Of course! You are the porn actress (said with Leo's voice).