-
Content count
3,778 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About LastThursday
-
Rank
- - -
Personal Information
-
Location
UK
-
Gender
Male
Recent Profile Visitors
14,961 profile views
-
Levels of violence: 1. What is this shit post? 2. I totally agree where's the fucking episode? 3. Chill wo/man what's the problem? 4. You seem to be angry about something, want to talk about it?
-
I'm going to go meta. "Who am I?" is the perennial question isn't it? The main thrust of your OP is really to do with identity more than anything else. The confusion with identity is that it's not some monolithic abstract entity. Instead, it is the sum of all those parts that jostle with each other for attention. It is all your thoughts, behaviours, emotions and bodily sensations, right now. What a therapist enables is no different to what a doctor does in a hospital, and that is to prepare the environment well enough that the body heals itself. It can be done more or less well, a doctor that doesn't wash their hands before cutting you open is going to make things worse. But on balance, having a therapist is better than not having a therapist, you just have to find a respectable one. It is not impossible to heal yourself. The remarkable thing is that it's possible to observe the different parts of your identity at all. That observer does exactly the same thing a therapist does. A therapist works because they are detached from the melange of your identity and are able to re-align those parts that are not working together, mostly through observation and careful questioning. You've shown above that you are well able to "step outside yourself" and observe what is going on. Isn't that strange? You have all this stuff going on, and yet some part of you is able to detach itself from it. Aside from the mental and narrative aspect of identity, you have bodily reactions. To a large degree the body is an automaton that is programmed through repetition and extreme circumstances. Given a trigger in the environment or through thought it will consistently react in the same way. All trauma has already happened and no longer exists, yet the body is "programmed" by that trauma and continues it indefinitely. It does this as a protective survival mechanism. This is often the bit talking therapy doesn't get at. Sometimes no amount of talking can change the body's programming. But, that programming is not permanent, it can be changed (e.g. CBT). Often there is a lot of mental elaboration around what the body is doing instinctively to protect you from harm, which doesn't address how it can be reprogrammed.
-
@trenton this sounds like a mentally and emotionally complex situation you have going on. I don't have direct any answers, just observations on what you wrote. The consequences of sex for men and women are assymetrical. Women are the ones who get pregnant and carry to term, and very often are the primary caregivers of the child. Men can and do walk away without much comeback from society. That's a heavy burden for women, so they have to be picky and make sure first before engaging. Basically, men and women have different sexual strategies. I would question this assumption. For a man, disinterest after climax, sure, euphoria after climax, sure. Repulsion and shame don't ring true. Indeed it's harder to understand feelings both your own and others'. Essentially, feelings can't be reasoned out, most reasoning that normies have about feelings is post-hoc elaboration. But there is a tacit understanding of what feelings are signalling, and I would say this is harder for someone with autism to get to grips with: you have the feelings but don't know what to do with them. I'd say this is a more modern worry. I would say that men naturally express vulnerability a lot less than women, and wouldn't be expected in all relationships. But expressing vulnerability is really just talking about yourself and what's going on in your head, which judging from your post you're more than capable of doing. It's a shame @Emerald isn't around a the mo, she would know what to say about shame. Otherwise therapy is one way to go, in order to heal your traumas and negative associations. But in short: There is a wide spectrum of standards. The joy of that is that there is someone for everyone. The trap a lot of people fall into is worrying about how they will be judged, instead of simply expressing who they are. More outwards, less inwards.
-
@Joseph Maynor I saw Hiromi Uehara play live at a festival a few years ago, to a full tent. She's unbelievable and great energy. I really like stride piano too, reminds of black and white films I watched as a kid:
-
So simple, yet this piece of music always gives me the shivers. It's like Bach was channeling god.
-
@shahar uriel I know it's early stages but you should do it anyway. AI didn't learn from nothing, it learned from human coders. In fact human coders invented the AI in the first place. For some high level insight into how AI is affecting the industry then this is enlightening:
-
Threesome? Honestly, joking aside, who cares what we think. Go with your instinct. When I'm unsure about things, I just sit in a quiet place for as long as it takes to be still, and then ask myself the question "what do you want?", and then just let the answer come.
-
I can sort of see this. I get sick with cold or whatever less than once a year. 15 years is a bit of a stretch though. And of course you might be infected but show no or very minor symptoms. And people have various tolerances for what the deem being sick.
-
Put it this way, I'm voluntarily not working at the moment, and I'm not concerned about money.
-
You're right, the detail can be complex, but trust me, running a business you've got to know what's going in and going out, and how much it will cost to borrow money. Once you have the basics down, everything else becomes a lot easier.
-
LastThursday replied to Infinity16's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
From a systems point of view capitalism wasn't invented from scratch, but was an evolution of what went before. Inventing a new stable system from scratch, like Communism, is nearly impossible. Communism collapsed because it isn't workable in practice in the long run, even China has partially embraced capitalism. Capitalism will eat itself eventually, and it will evolve into something else, the best we can do is nudge it in the right direction. -
Money is fundamentally simple you don't need a book. The rules are: have as much as possible coming in, have as little as possible going out, and there's no such thing as free money. Everything else builds on that foundation.
-
LastThursday replied to No1Here2c's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Consciousness is way trippy. An eye can't look at itself. But consciousness can look at itself, in fact it's its primary attribute. That being so, what does consciousness "see" so to speak? I think if there was no meaning making at all, then consciousness wouldn't happen at all. What consciousness sees is then all meaning and nothing else. If there was no meaning, you wouldn't go insane, you'd disappear into a void. Raising consciousness is then making ever finer and more intricate meaning from itself, this happens naturally as it goes about its business. There are levels of meaning, when you're sleeping a night dream has less meaning. You wake up and realise the dream was nonsensical. -
LastThursday replied to Mellowmarsh's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Immortality, it's not just for Christmas (other religions welcome). -
I'm saying nothing.
