-
Content count
2,380 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by RendHeaven
-
Dan Koe directly credits Leo Gura in his published book "The Art of Focus"
-
RendHeaven replied to Buck Edwards's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Joy of the dance -
Yes. Money comes from mirroring people's needs back to them. This is indisputable. The problem is that most people's needs are myopic, selfish, and petty. This causes higher-consciousness people to get fed up with the whole system and they try to overhaul everything with "higher consciousness values." But then their business dies because nobody cares. You can't repress biology. So we're in a weird spot where we have to dance that line between what they need (quick fixes, relief, feeling good, etc.) and what genuinely helps them (often overhauling their lives, painful reflection, facing fears, identity-level change. long periods of no gratification) You have to lure them in with the former before having a genuine impact with the latter. But this is pretty hard to orchestrate as a novice entrepreneur, creator, or coach. Because you're broke and overly idealistic, it's overwhelming. It's so much easier to turn off your brain contribute to the cesspool, or to endlessly pontificate about grand benevolent schemes that never materialize.
-
TAKE MY MONEY
-
RendHeaven replied to Leo Gura's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Pretty recent news -
RendHeaven replied to Leo Gura's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
This will never happen. Japan is too racist, they have an implicit "pureblood" bias and lothe the idea of foreigners soiling the ethnic homogeneity. Japan could easily fix its birthrate issues by being more immigration-friendly, but it's too prideful once again. Similar to how it refused to surrender in WWII despite clearly being backed into a corner, and the US had to nuke it TWICE. This neurotic "never surrender" mentality remains to this day where the leaders of the country would rather have a pureblood sinking ship rather than a functional, floating multi-ethnic multi-cultural ship. "never surrender" to dying pipeline is just sooo japanese lol (very stubborn). Of course, none of that stops me from moving to japan pfft. Ladies here I come! -
🤝🤝🤝
-
Love dating apps and daygame equally. My nightgame and social circle game are weaker because I like getting sleep and traveling
-
yes MALT always has annoying body load for me (I prefer 5meodmt) happens to me every time on lower doses. I prefer high dose
-
Femininity, in contrast: Being at the effect and not the cause. Embracing point A and B as one. Has one foot in each at all times. Force of Surrender. Releasing into your deepest desire. Liquid Potentiality.
-
Being at the cause and not the effect. Walking from point A to B in a straight line. Force of Will. Acting on your deepest desire. Potency. Actuality.
-
Yup shoutout to Leila
-
haha yep
-
SR-71 blackbird video made me spiral down a 3-day rabbit hole of cold war technology and politics
-
People don't care about your values, they care about their own values and how well you mirror that back. So theoretically you could mirror honesty back to a crowd who values honesty, but that's not particularly compelling in itself for several reasons you're definitely not 100% honest to begin with, and unless you plan to share every downtrodden moment, it's not honest to build a brand around honesty honesty is a fluffy high-level value that flies out the window the moment survival is at stake. Real fans stick around when their biology is served. Hear their pain, mirror that back to them, and offer a solution. Honesty becomes frosting on the cake, but the actual cake is solving their pain Furthermore, it's not actually a good idea to mix entertainment with education on youtube in 2024 (source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVOubeXUcx0) people who want to learn from you generally just want immediate results (and these are the people who will PAY YOU), and going out of your way to be an entertainer actually alienates them. youtube ads are extremely unreliable. It will be fun bonus money at best, but never a stable source of income. Patreon works if you are an artist-type who makes cinematic videos (b-roll, c-roll, music, edits). But if you are just a talking head giving advice or sharing a story, Patreon generally goes nowhere high ticket 1-on-1 coaching/consultation is unequivocally the monetization method to go all-in on (especially as a beginner). As long as you can earn their trust (be a mirror) and you can genuinely solve their problem, they will give you thousands in one sitting just to chat.
-
has anyone tried drinking MALT HCL? oral administration for 5meodmt is ignored completely because of some liver mechanism that neutralizes it (waste of substance). oral administration for DPT is actually possible though most people avoid it because it is inefficient. where does MALT land? I'm thinking of drinking MALT for science, let me know if that's a bad idea
-
whatever nerd i like girls i win
-
Nope, sexual polarity is a blessing. Best thing anyone could've ever possibly invented. Thank you God.
-
bro announced he has no motion
-
@MsNobody Thank you for this. I spent longer on that post than I would've liked (a whole hour... sigh). My aim is for men and women to begin to understand each other. Half the battle is to merely hold the "other" in your mind as a force of good, even when you are looking at their ugliest representatives. God, I love women so much. If God erased women overnight, I would kill myself without question. The only time I've ever heard "I love men so much," EVER, was from a group of Latinas lol
-
Holy crap are you kidding me? 10 level red scoops up my ass would absolutely flatten and murder me lol, just 6 scoops got me to the edge of the heat death of the universe. "pretty chill" for that dose is wild You must be very naturally high-tolerance for psychs (this is not uncommon, some of my buddies are built like this)
-
GOAT!
-
Hmmm not a fan. There are undertone insinuations here (taking into context all your other posts on dating): men supposedly "love sex" in an unsophisticated, predictable, simple, base, stupid/shallow manner women supposedly "love sex" in a sophisticated, unique, complex, refined, intelligent/deep manner Well get to this later, but even without reading into the subtext, your claim simply does not fit my lived experience. Regarding women: I'll only briefly mention the endless HOARD of horny, frivolous, carefree, happy women who fuck like dogs and don't have a firmly-held identity about being a sexual gourmet critic! You must not be familiar with the Latina community in southern Arizona and Mexico (and ALL of central/south America lol). The authentic, unrepressed sexual frivolity of women from foreign cultures may surprise you. Do these girls "not count?" Or perhaps they haven't matured yet? I find that you have a very refined personal taste and you project that onto the entirety of female sexuality. You're not entirely wrong in doing this, but you downplay or ignore the "scooby doo and shaggy" aspects of femininity (because those are the aspects that get targeted by men. Having a "refined" sexuality keeps you safe and impervious). This is not a fair understanding of your sisters around the globe or even of your own inner Goddess. Alright, back to the "undertone insinuations" above... If I could boil it down to one sentence: I think you grossly underestimate how sincere the average man's pure sexual desire/longing is. You will never know the depth and power of raw admiration and ecstasy a man can feel by merely fixing his eyes upon a woman - much less touching her, or getting to know her deeply (the inverse is that I will never know the depth of a woman's subjective attraction, which you frequently point out. And I completely agree, but it actually goes both ways). Since men experience attraction within seconds (often physical) and sex is always on our minds (again, physical), I see why this seems to you as "scooby doo and shaggy." But make no mistake that this raw, unbridled admiration, and oftentimes lust and impulse, is an endlessly deep, compelling, intelligent, and divine force. Nothing short of a true miracle. A man's love of sex and his fascination with a new woman, which flares up unprompted, is the soul's recollection and appreciation of Infinity itself; we see in you the brilliance of Eternal Beauty (with a capital B!) in ways that neither of us will ever understand. We can also enjoy the "climax of the movie" without any buildup because we see the entire movie - or in some sense, the whole cosmos and the majesty of creation - in that one second alone. What may seem shallow and tacky and rushed to you is inexplicably precious to me. So let's take a concrete example of this underestimation of sincerity in male sexuality: You (and the other intelligent ladies here) often write an elaborate breakdown about the average man's repressed shame, and how he must drop all facades and open up his heart and interact with women from a place of organic inner truth - but then in the same breath you will inadvertently shame men for attempting to learn pickup or cold approach, seeing his earnest attempts to date as somehow manipulative or insecure or insincere or reinforcing a fundamental falsehood. It may have never occurred to you, but for a young, healthy, single man, in touch with his emotions, with no shame - running up to pretty girls and saying hi, and offering to spend time with her, is GENUINELY the highest possible degree of authenticity, truth, openness, self-embrace, surrender, and non-manipulation in that moment. In fact, seeing that pretty girl and NOT talking to her because, "emerald on the actualized.org forum told me that I ought to focus on embracing my shame, and doing cold approach is bothersome to women - so I'm gonna fixate on personal releases without bothering anybody until hopefully a girl "organically" discovers me one day, the way Justin Bieber was plucked out from early YouTube by the music industry!" - this is what real deep-seated self-manipulation, dishonesty, perpetuation of shame, and holding on to ego looks like. In your favored world of surrender to authenticity - happy men would actually be thrilled and blessed to initiate conversation with random happy girls, and they will do this hundreds of times, if that's what their desire commands. And lots of consenting sex will happen, and it will be apparent that both the masculine and the feminine have their brand of scooby doo (shallow, simple) and gordon ramsay (deep, complex) sexualities. Alas, the real world is not so peachy, and nearly everyone is inauthentic. So reading this, you might comment back that maybe "pickup" or "cold approach" isn't inherently bad if it's done from an authentic place, but perhaps your main contention is that a lot of guys are doing these contrived approaches from a "forced" place or attempting to fill the void within by leeching from the external environment. And you know what, you're right. A lot of guys are pretty fucked up, and they have to whip up a mental frenzy just to go say hi to a cute girl (I am deeply, deeply sympathetic to this). That's clearly not the healthiest relationship to oneself or to women, so your critique is somewhat valid. But I will tell you from direct experience that it never gets easier. As a man you can spend 10 years in retreat doing emotional release work and opening your heart, but the moment you leave your house and you see that cute girl, all that shit goes out the window and the only way you will ever talk to her is to kick into a mechanical, "action taking" gear to blast through your self-image blocks and to bootstrap initial action-taking momentum. This takes brute force and repetition. It's an ugly process and a stepping stone (before you can authentically and freely say hi), but you cannot skip steps. If you ignore this step in favor of a more "organic" encounter, you will be permanently crippled in the degree to which you honor your own inner desires, like a lion who only knows how to catch sickly prey ("organic encounters") but can never run down the fastest, healthiest gazelle (hottie across the room who you may never see again). Such a lion could only live with himself by pretending he never even wanted the faster gazelle; pretending that there is no virtue in speed or ferocity; or convincing himself that the sickly prey is perfectly satiating and all he will ever need. As a woman, you will have no sympathy for this condition: in fact, you may accuse me of advocating for inauthentic and harmful behaviors, and you will certainly take offense to the prey metaphor, and you will frame my claim above as being overly fixated on initial attraction without giving any thought to longevity, and I understand why you would think all of that, because your concern is for these poor girls and not for these poor boys. This here is the fundamental misunderstanding: It's not about who's right or who's wrong. That was never even the discussion. It's always been about who's concerns do you identify with? That is the only game in town, for all of us. But this is what I mean when I say that you underestimate a man's sincerity (this seems to be a collective feminine shadow in the western developed world). Yes, we men are horny; yes, we are often inconsiderate; yes, we can be hurtful - VERY hurtful. And I make no excuses for this behavior. But underneath all of that is a real desire to connect. And for a lot of us this desire happens INSTANTANEOUSLY, within seconds, with a sincerity which you will never understand, because frankly it would terrify you if you ever fully understood, and it likely already terrifies you even in your ignorance. So perhaps you're not meant to understand male sexuality, and that's OK. But by refusing to remember our basic goodness, it is you yourself who is torn apart. I am well aware of the destructive and dark capacities of men and their desires. But I hate to see the ladies here emphasizing this time and time again (often implicitly, nothing is ever said out loud). It's never celebration or praise or real encouragement of a man's desires on our terms (and who can blame you? y'all don't owe us anything, and we haven't done anything to deserve it, and truly empathizing with us leaves you painfully vulnerable) - every post is colored ever so slightly with the following tone: "Men are insensitive and predatory; women are complex and vulnerable; be yourself fully, release your shame, and you will attract real love one day! (but you're a MONSTER if you go out of your way to "hunt" us! How dare you be spontaneously attracted to us, and how dare you want sex when you don't even know me yet! How insensitive! Shame on you!)" Something about that tone just makes me really sad. I aim to one day live in a reality where I will have nothing but pure celebration, praise, and real encouragement for women and their desires, on their terms, without being naive to their faults and shadows. But that will demand a lot of me and I will have to give more than I am currently willing to give.
-
Haha what a fascinating man. I would love to sit him down and pick his brain. I'm still not convinced that his rock solid conviction is not just deeply cemented expectations from early childhood (modelling his environment; his parents and role models, etc.) What if we took the same man and raised him as a roman prince 2000 years ago? Or as a caveman 40,000 years ago? Would he still pick out his queen and scoff at the notion of sex with any other woman? It's not so clear. In fact, we will never know, so whether his convictions are an artificial collection of social expectations or a deeply original desire will never be known - nor is it so clear-cut. At this point in his life, the dichotomy of programming and originality bleeds together, and in the end you guys are happy so in your case it makes no difference. I still have a sneaking suspicion that ALL men (yes, literally every single one), raised without societal programming, would covet multiple women. And even if you show me a living breathing counter-example, I will find a way to blame society (heheh). But I'm aware of my own projections and fallibility. At the end of the day I know nothing. Still, I speak (and write) with firm claims because I love being opinionated. I understand. I have this really personal esoteric woo-woo belief (I have never shared this with anybody) that every woman on the planet is literally my daughter. Sometimes I look at my own mother and see in her eyes the fear and longing of my unborn daughter and it simultaneously breaks and warms my heart. It's really impossible to explain but I'll try. My default is that I honestly don't even perceive distinct individual women (unless she needs me to see her individuality; which I am happy to do as well, for her sake). My subjective POV is that I just see One Goddess spread across countless vessels (no - literally! I can't make this up). And Ultimately, She is identical to me. My insatiable, howling desire for WOMEN is in precise proportion to my masculine identity which has forsaken/abandoned my feminine identity. You may imagine that upon my birth, there was a cosmic rift where everything feminine was torn away from me. Even as my mother held me in her arms, there was a subjective "her vs me" distinction being formed where this field of consciousness slowly forgot the quality/attitude of actually embodying source femininity. From this moment on, no matter what I did, or how I acted, I could never BE the Goddess I once was. But this was a necessary fracture. I "had" to forsake/abandon this Goddess (Myself), because if I held Her close for Eternity, I would stay as Her, and I would never know what it's like to stumble onto Her with fresh, foreign eyes. And she would never know what it's like to be cherished and contained by this foreign God known as "Man" The leap from this nondual origin story to "every woman is literally my daughter" is more of a poetic liberty. I say daughter simply because I deeply recognize and feel how every woman wants to be held, and that I am responsible for hearing her plea and placing myself firmly between her vulnerable core and the cold world (which is also me) from which she craves sanctuary. Hence we have Me protecting Me from Me because that's what Me wants. I can't think of anything in this world that is more compelling. Bless you. Note taken This has always been my view as well Beautiful. Thanks!
-
AI is still too PC for my taste. I mean I guess the forum is no better though haha. Y'all would lynch me if I really spoke my mind Hence, IRL inner-circle is the way to go