RendHeaven

This language is misleading, as it seems to assume linear time (almost as though we're suggesting that one lifetime will give rise to another sequentially... this is nonsense). In some ways it's more truthful to say that you're living her right NOW, whatever that even means. But we're really stretching the human POV here in considering such things. When we realize The Cosmos, all human notions whatsoever literally vanish - i.e. sequence, perspective, etc.

?????????????????

lmfao

I see what you're saying, and yet still from higher perspectives, All is True and none is false. That really fucks with me

100% relate You've inspired me. I'll be joining the youtube grind soon <3

Haha wow story of my life. Esp. the bold

oof

Interesting, thanks for sharing

Lots. Of course not. No "intended communication" is EVER fully "taken onboard." Doesn't matter. Genuine sharing doesn't micromanage influence. You seem to have this attitude that insights aren't worth sharing unless they've achieved peak profundity, but that seems a lil' neurotic tbh. All refined teachings started somewhere. The expectation that people should withhold all insights until they've found a way to perfectly formulate it (if at all) comes off as resisting reality...

The Ultimate Truth. It's a shame that you can't share it with anyone on a social level since death is presumed "real" and "bad." But then again, there's nobody to even share this insight with anyway...

@4201

@Hardkill Sorry if my earlier comment was hurtful, I meant it as a playfully provocative wake-up call.

@4201 @Harlen Kelly You're both simultaneously right.

Being "good with women" vs being "bad with women" is the difference between women throwing themselves at you and saying things like "I love you," "lets hang out" vs being completely ignored or pushed away... maybe from certain perspectives, this distinction is "fake," but from other perspectives (mainly, the biased survival perspective of the typical hetero male) this distinction feels like life or death! Exactly. I'm advocating that dudes learn genuine charisma, not compensating charisma. I don't really make a distinction between charisma and lack of insecurity - these go hand in hand.

Just had my first needle hurty. It didn't hurt

You're right... at the same time though, I'd like to imagine that I at least have an *informed* assumption. Attracting straight women as a straight man is actually not rocket science(!!!), so even though we're all fundamentally assuming things about our dear Hardkill, I think we can still strongly point towards what needs work, without waffling in uncertainty. Maybe I'm naive but I sincerely believe that all guys can learn to "get good" with women because charisma is trainable & not static.

Just saying what needs to be said. The personality is clearly the problem, it's frankly a disservice that nobody has brought it up. You actually have to suck astronomically to not get women while "having the body of a fitness model"

lol yikes man your personality must really suck

Does gravity exist for a fish? I ask this sincerely on a literal, "physical" level. You see, as humans we would say, "Oh yeah gravity always exists for all beings, and any being that denies the existence of gravity is just not intelligent enough." But such a narrative is inextricably tied to our experience of being a human - and very conveniently so. I dare y'all to contemplate with extreme seriousness the possibility that if you were a fish, gravity would literally, "physically" cease to exist (such that it was never even there to begin with), and this "nonexistence" would have nothing to do with your "limited intelligence." (Sidenote: there's nothing actually physical about gravity but I'm just phrasing things this way to appeal to our common notion that gravity is independent of our minds) Or in other words, notice that the absolute conviction that we have of the mind-independent existence of a so-called "gravity" is necessarily relative to our frame of reference of "being a human." No human - No gravity. Period. Not even as a word game, but in terms of literal existence. Obviously, don't just believe me though, work through this yourself. Matters of Existence/Being are wholly on you to investigate - no scientist or external authority can bestow knowledge of Beingness upon you, for you yourself are Being first and foremost; the authority of the hypothetical scientist here in regards to Being is necessarily second-order. (Science will, however, measure and explain relationships between the preassumed existence of two or more things, and insofar as you also preassume the existence of these same things, the scientist has more knowledge and authority than you specifically with regards to measuring and explaining these aforementioned things.)

https://www.youtube.com/c/EPICKEI/videos this you?

pfffft lmao

"You have to realize that a dream is also a self. In true no self, even a dream is just consciousness." "So no matter how wholly you escape the dream, it's all within consciousness." "True God Realization puts an end to this simple binary notion of asleep vs awake."

Hehe... its true

Thoughts?