RendHeaven

Dear God! You're a champion!

Well said. Lemme add that even the notion of "questions" are drenched with social matrix stink. As well as the notion of a "notion"/"negating a notion." There are no questions or notions, fundamentally. But by the time you truly realize that, you're floating above the charade and laughing, and you've got nothing to combat. That's not to say that questioning is not valuable, though. It can set you in the right trajectory. But the mistake is to think that you're out of the muck just because you're a questioner!

LOL.

It's gonna be ok.

why must something be "real" for it to be manifest? and what meaning is there in saying that it's "yours" when there are no others? redundant...

@Batman Hey at least the last line was good shit

I'm stealing this for my upcoming book.

bwahaha you just said you were going for no BS and then immediately said "mathematical energy" with no context or explanation with a straight face lmaoo I'm gonna be charitable and assume that you were being poetic/figurative, though if you meant it literally I'd love an explanation There is a difference between questioning from "above" and questioning from "below" - especially regarding metaphysics. When you question from "above," you totally embrace the guru's position and more - you've realized more than him metaphysically, and so you see the precise limitations of the guru's paradigm (for you have already traversed that territory). The new paradigm from where you currently question does not exclude what the guru is saying, but it embraces his teachings AND MORE (of which the guru has yet to realize). Your comparison is sincere, and you have no interest in who's right or who's wrong. At a certain level of awakening, you can be so certain and lucid of your True Nature that the realm of language, communication, ideas, philosophies, teachings... these all become like a playground to you to frolic in. You detect immediately and certainly when a teaching is self-deceived or lacking, and at this point you have no will to fight against it or to disprove it. You'll question it just enough to sense its deception, laugh, and then move on with your day unperturbed. When you question from "below," you subtly reject the guru's position without ever having embraced it; you've realized nowhere near as much metaphysically as the guru, but you are personally in denial of that. You think you know the limitations of the guru's paradigm, but you don't really, as you've never even bothered to traverse that territory. The paradigm from where you currently question is bias-affirming and ignorant, and you simply have more to realize before you can begin to sincerely compare (but this is hard to admit). Due to being cut off from your True Nature, you carry existential doubts which you wish to dispel. Your main interest is to either prove the guru wrong or to prove yourself right; or even more subtly, you may demand that the guru publicly demonstrate his rightness, and only then will you be open to his teachings. Either way your mind is mired in the game of rightness vs wrongness. For some reason language, communication, ideas, philosophies, teachings... these all have a dense importance to you, as though something would be lost if you ever let them go. Since you are not certain and lucid of your True Nature, whenever you detect that a teaching is self-deceived or lacking, you must always be wary of your own ego misinterpreting. When you encounter an unpalatable teaching, you feel the need to resist it, and your questioning has an agenda. I'm not gonna prescribe you to either camp, although I encourage you to self-diagnose. Keep in mind it's totally possible to see yourself questioning from "above" for certain teachers while questioning from "below" for others... everything I just laid out is context-sensitive and of course, relative. In a strange-loopy way, I also encourage you to question anything I just wrote, but be wary of whether you're coming from "above" or "below"

Absolutely speaking, there is no such thing. Clearly, it is. Absolutely speaking, this never happened. You're clutching to this idea of "the relative world" like your life depends on it lol. Maybe that's not an accident.

@Leo Gura Learning that I literally invented you was the most epic moment of my life. I wanted to tell you about it but... by that point you were uninvented, leaving nobody to tell haha. Even now as I type this out in a state of relative unconsciousness, I intellectually know that when I close my laptop, you Leo will literally vanish along with all of the brightly-lit pixels (not that you were ever there when the pixels were alive either ) yet I maintain the vague conviction that somewhere across America there is a human being similarly situated with their laptop reading this message. What a stunning assumption! Moreover, if "you" actually respond to this, what is literally the case is that the appearance of "a message from Leo" would self-spawn in the form of consciousness reconfiguring itself with no material or temporal cause whatsoever, and yet it will further bolster my assumption of a "you" "out there!" I'm still in disbelief at how you manage to make a teaching out of this. I'd love to teach something similar one day, but it's a titanic task, simply nobody will understand. You're asking to be misinterpreted. What an ingenious barrier of entry.

Yes and he's right. God is alone. "with the same relationship to infinite God" LMAO my guy you literally ARE God, there is no such thing as a "relationship to God" other than by falsely believing so. This is inevitable, because Reality is Absolute while communication and interpretation are necessarily relative. It's your job to see past the relativity and pierce straight to the Absolute. I don't know much about him, but if what you're saying is true, he most likely boils down his teachings to make them more mainstream while ignoring the radical implications of nonduality in doing so.

LMAO

but I thought porn was free... lol...

This is a construction, lol.

^HUGE Well, actually jerking off is lit but doing it to porn consistently over a period of years will destroy your natural arousal mechanisms

Are you kidding? Being an advocate of veganism is the perfect intersection of "helping animals" and "personal development." It's literally right there on a golden platter. Why do you resist it? Is it because you're a "meat eater?"

Incomparable. You're just deluded if you think lack of height makes you "fucked"

Re-watch Leo's newest video and investigate the wisdom of silence. Your character lacks maturity.

How old are you

lol too afraid to exercise because your weight might potentially change? you're totally gaslighting yourself! your body was made to move.

If this is true, the poor guy probably didn't even make it to stage green lol. Red/Blue to the grave it seems. Seems like he didn't actually understand it, if the next day he hurt other people for personal gain. Not to mention his epistemology was garbage. Dude apparently spewed Hitler's rhetoric? The self-deception is obvious lol. Stage turquoise is not about taking some drugs and talking about God. Stage turquoise is about deep inner work over many years and actually letting go/resolving selfish tendancies. I repeat, talk is cheap. Ok, sure. But 99% of people, including you and I are able to develop our empathy to greater and greater degrees. So I don't see what you're trying to accomplish with this Manson example? Please remember that this all started because you made an arbitrary distinction between the well-documented stage turquoise and the fantastical "stage coral" - a distinction you're free to believe in, but also a distinction that holds no relevant meaning relative to observable human development. Obviously. Just look at Connor Murphy lol. Dude has realized love and god on drugs but is stuck in tier-1, totally construct-unware and immature. If the ego-vessel is corrupted, who knows what'll happen. I am talking about a pure, cleansed ego-vessel when I talk about stage turquoise people automatically gravitating towards the empathetic choice for no reason other than whim. I have personally verified this myself alongside the stories of hundreds of others. Learn to be mature, spend years destroying your self-deceptions, spend some time basking in stage yellow systems thinking and relativity, realize your true nature as Love beyond all systems of thought or identity, and finally compassion just happens spontaneously!

@SamC She's extremely clever - I read some more posts on her blog. She has a very construct-aware mind. She's also capable of observing male-female dynamics (in particular around the attraction phase) honestly and neutrally, which is indeed rare. She understands the male archetype that actually turn her on, as opposed to the male archetype that most women would proport "turn them on." That being said, I wouldn't be surprised if she still has a pickup shadow. Because pickup turns useless unattractive and creepy men into valuable, attractive (and frankly normal) men. And women love the latter type of man, but despise the former. And when they hear that the former has authentically turned into the latter, they feel manipulated (understandably), and they become defensive. Almost all women want the fruits of a man's transformation without hearing about the starting point or the journey (understandably). But then again, maybe this girl really is the exception. She reminds us on her blog frequently that she was at one point prepared to literally die out of Love (I know what that feels like personally - you have to really not care about your petty human desires to reach that point). Maybe she really is that one miraculous girl who doesn't care about her female self-image and guarding against manipulation. It's a shitty survival strategy, but it opens the gate to genuine understanding

Talking about universal love doesn't make you turquoise. Anybody can do that. Talk is cheap. Stage blue priests do that. What makes you turquoise is psychologically embodying the lessons of each prior stage and working through your inner shadows. An actual turquoise person won't choose to be a murderer, despite knowing that he is free to become one. Because the desire to harm comes from unintegrated personal traumas, myopic thinking patterns, and lack of construct-awareness, all of which are frankly resolved at yellow. Manson never even made it to tier 2.

They frame their teachings in tier 1 language ("spiritual enlightenment") for the sake of teaching to normies. They don't actually take that language to heart. Sadhguru doesn't sit on his cushion thinking "oh man I'm so spiritual" lmao It's just silence. He knows better than anyone else that it doesn't matter what he does.