RendHeaven

Yeah I'm not surprised no girl wants you, the energy you give off (from just 1 paragraph of text!) is so depressing, I'm willing to bet my family's dog that IRL every woman you speak to feels that negativity but x1000 amplified. Women are in some ways like mirrors. If you're negative, she's negative. If you hate yourself, she hates you. But that's a great thing IMO, because it means that if you're positive, she's positive. If you love yourself, she automatically loves you. It's on you to take this feedback seriously and to strive to be better. Ultimately nobody else will save you. If your response to what I just said is to argue/debate or to get more depressed, please seek professional help. You can't get the help you need from this forum. But, if you feel inspired to work on yourself, to become more positive and loving, I'll go as far to get on a call with you to address your communication skills + energy.

this is my favorite vid of yours

You're assuming separation

there literally is no death, speaking strictly matter-of-factly. this is very obvious.

This is pretty crazy and awesome to read coming from you, I love seeing your open-mindedness in action. I think my first memory of you on this forum is a little debate we had over whether or not a video-game centered life purpose was high consciousness or not. I think I argued that no, video games are too inherently attention-trapping to be a medium of genuine spirituality while you argued that yes, high consciousness can be brought to any medium. In hindsight we were probably both myopic. Obviously there is no right or wrong or high or low here and we were probably both right from our own POVs. But it's just cool to see your shifting stance overtime. And of course my stance has changed drastically as well, I no longer have the desire to "argue" for any particular worldview.

based demon slayer fan spotted. opinion embraced. brotherly love extended.

Absolute Solipsism is the final "step" after understanding Death & Reality - or more specifically both insights feed each other. You ain't got it brother.

this is a miserable objection bro

she should be scrambling to not drink to be more like you

for real lmao

Naive conflation. It's really that simple

LOL this is hilarious Have some pride that you're not poisoning yourself semiregularly.

inexperience

This Don't even get me STARTED! Anime saves lives. Seriously.

Well said

Exactly. This is stage yellow storytelling. Connie isn't killing for power-hungry reasons (stage red). He's killing despite knowing very intimately his opponent (Samuel, Daz's) POV, and further knowing that what he's doing is wrong. Yet he still does it because, as Bertholdt once said, someone has to be the one to stain their hands with blood. How do you NOT see the stage yellow? Everything is so multiperspectival and interconnected. We once thought that Bertholdt was the "bad guy," but it turns out he was NO DIFFERENT than our boy connie. And so now we are forced to just sink in empathy for both sides while we watch the bloodbath continue. There is NOTHING stage red about this presentation. Also, notice that Connie was the first one to notice Samuel falling, back in season 1. This further shows us that Samuel actually meant a lot to Connie. You sure you still feel this way? If you think "brutality = stage red" you're simply misinformed... Stage red would be, one-dimensional killing for the sake of personal gain without considering outside perspectives. Think season 1 Eren before the trost arc... but he, along with the whole show quickly transcended that perspective after learning about titan shifters

AoT is NOT stage red LMAO. Easily stage yellow.

lol this man is gonna get canceled so fast

Aw got here late I'm impressed by Adeptus here, he is showing an admirable level of respect. A little thought I had, reading through the earlier exchange: Unfortunately for Adeptus, Leo is correct in assessing his lack of understanding of consciousness. The situation here is a bit like a middle schooler critiquing a calculus professor, accusing the professor of making up "nonsensical scribbles" (or at least this is how the equations seem from the POV of the middle schooler who has not done any advanced mathematics) - the professor then says, "you simply have not studied enough," and the middle schooler retorts, "yeah nice deflection there mate! these string of symbols are obviously nonsense but you're just unwilling to admit the truth because you're stubborn." In this case, the professor gains nothing by attempting to defend his position. Nothing he says will convince the middle schooler otherwise. It's on the middle schooler to actually go and study calculus seriously. But for him to do this, the middle schooler must admit first that he actually has not studied mathematics much (if at all). If the kid thinks he's already got it all, he will forever be incapable of understanding where the professor is coming from. So, how do we make sense of who is the kid and who is the professor? It's simple: In the above hypothetical analogy, the calculus professor was once the middle schooler. However, the middle schooler has never been the calculus professor. Leo has in the past been at Adeptus' current paradigm of skepticism and rational sense-making. He transcended this paradigm by realizing its contradictions and limits. In other words, although Leo no longer shares Adeptus' paradigm, he has actually traversed through it, and so he can recall through his own memories an intimate understanding of the limited paradigm from which Adeptus argues. Adeptus on the other hand, is not and has not ever been at Leo's current paradigm of God-Realization. This foreign paradigm is simply outside of his comprehension. Thus, Leo gains nothing by attempting to defend his position. Nothing Leo says will convince Adeptus otherwise. It's on Adeptus to actually go and study consciousness seriously. But for him to do this, Adeptus must admit first that he actually has not studied consciousness much (if at all). If Adeptus thinks he's already got it all, he will forever be incapable of understanding where Leo is coming from. --- On a side note, the mod behavior here is disheartening. The emotionally-charged self-preservation is so obvious from a bystander's perspective. It does not fit the spirit of our work here. But I'm prone to having those proclivities myself, so I get it.

lol

she can't help but fall in love after hearing this

In my humble opinion, THC is dogshit next to proper psychs. Not even in the same ballpark. Psychs are lord and master in their own league. People claim THC is like a mini-psychedelic, but I've had purer sober realizations than the woozy disassociation that marijuana brings on. The closest thing to psychs in my experience is shamanic breathing: If you go hardcore warrior-mode with this breathing (hours per day - consistently) you will grow by leaps and bounds both emotionally, spiritually, and even in terms of physical health. Done responsibly (i.e. have the awareness to know if you're pushing too hard - stay relaxed, and stop if anything feels physically damaging) the results will be as though you are hacking life. But you have to actually do it. Don't just sit there thinking about it, actually pull out a timer or a guiding video, lay the fuck down, and breathe! Again and again. And again. And again. Are you up to the task? Or will you archive this technique as neat information for "later" and move on?

No. Your body is insanely efficient. If you're not using your muscles, your body will deconstruct them.