RendHeaven

In terms of MUFA content yes, but not PUFA. More importantly the extraction process worries me. Especially since "canola"/rapeseed is not even edible in its raw form. You have to genetically engineer it and then modify it to an unrecognizable degree to render it liquid. And then it sits in a plastic bottle exposed to sunlight lol. Compare that to a wholesome cold pressed olive oil in dark glass, it should be no contest.

I generally avoid vegetables (but no, I'm not carnivore since I eat rice and fruit). But that's just my own idiosyncrasy. Most people should handle vegetables well. Though, gun to my head, if I had to pick a "vegetable," I would happily rep root vegetables like carrots and onions. Not a fan of leaves or stalks. They taste like shit and leave me gassy, groggy, and itchy. I have a theory that nobody truly enjoys leaves and stalks. Ya'll likely gaslight yourself into enjoy it by cooking/steaming, adding sauce/dressing/spice, etc.

Haha looks like I'm dead

3/10 not enough women

Give me 6 months and I'll make it 30

Hey now don't give him credit for MY sophistry Anti PUFA stance is almost uniquely Jason & I. Schizo is adjacent to us in the sense that he eats whole foods with animal fats but he's too chad for nerdy mechanisms. Sad to see him slurping the canola juice though... oh dear At least we all agree on whole foods.

@NewKidOnTheBlock Doesn't exist

Brilliant. Proud of you bro. That's exactly right. And it only gets better from here

I'm so lit rn reading your journal while looping fein Likewise! Daniel Schmachtenberger. Probably the only man on this planet right now who makes me think "I wish I were him" Unfortunately yes. Humanity cannot afford to developmentally backslide for too much longer before irreversible damage to the collective ecosystem is done (biosphere and social institutions alike). Vaush is solid if you can avoid getting sucked into his biases. I recommend adding Johnny Harris and Daniel Schmachtenberger to your 2025 media intake : )

This is so fire now I gotta send this test to all my friends

A certain role model of mine often says that "you have to be mildly psychopathic to be totally stoked about going to heaven while everyone else remains in hell." Being distraught, and even depressed about the state of affairs of this world is a sign of your awakened humanity. Anybody with a heart is rightfully shattered upon witnessing the destruction of the sacred. It's actually quite concerning that the majority of us are blindly chasing happiness without further consideration. Self-centered self-improvement and spirituality is a cruel joke. There is no improvement of me at the exclusion of you. There is no awakening of me at the exclusion of you. This growth fixation is not inherently harmful or bad - it just gets hijacked by myopic actors, fueling a cultural narcissism loop. I laugh whenever people blame their ex for being a "narcissist." What an outrageously ironic moment of narcissism! Almost nobody is exempt from extreme rampant selfishness. Manifestation is real but it doesn't work in the way that 99% of people think. And especially internet gurus in that space are the most deluded and clueless. Such spaces get hijacked by self-centered marketing incentives as well. I mean hell 99% of manifestation content online is about somehow "shifting" to your "dream reality" ... a framing which perfectly reinforces self-fixation. Nobody is buying a manifestation course or coaching call package or retreat in order to accelerate global conflict resolution initiatives. You buy the course to indulge your personal fantasies about getting your dream husband or being showered with financial "abundance." Hilarious. People have lost their openness. This is a cultural cancer. Thanks for your reflections. It's good to see someone else thinking about these things.

Yes, actually. Your snobby tone is just a lack of adequate contemplation around these topics. You're very emotional about who has sex with who.

Great follow up. Funny enough, that's my favorite villain song in all of Disney

I mean threat in every possible dimension. It's a very broad net but it has perfect explanatory power. Some aspects of threat are so subtle that they bypass the radar of conscious thought. Oftentimes various seemingly-disparate threat sensations coexist in multilayered fashion. But at root, there is always unintegrated aspect of Self knocking on the door, and the ego has to shut it out in an emotionally charged way to maintain its walls. When I originally wrote "not invited to the party," of course that applies to men that can't get sex, but it also applies to men that can get sex. And it also applies to women, and all group dynamics. This explains everything. For example a woman who slut-shames her female friend is "not invited to the party" in the sense that there is an aspect of reality that she has rejected (unleashed feminine desire), and seeing another woman embodying this possibility space makes her bitter about female sexuality, yes - her OWN sexuality - since it is directly threatening her identity, attachments, ideology, communal values, epistemology, and energy holding patterns) Let me know what I'm missing!

The claim is: "You can only be bitter about a [woman's sexuality] if it threatens you." Threat is a core mechanic of shame. You can replace "women's sexuality" in brackets with anything you wish. This is infinitely profound and true. Your dismissal is disappointing. I have nothing to do with PUA.

Read my statement again. It is bulletproof and irrefutable. You're doing a lot of projecting

Someone is a daniel schmachtenberger enjoyer! well written. bravo.

You can only be bitter about a woman's sexuality if it threatens you.

Obviously slut shaming only comes from people who aren't invited to the party.

I don't recall ever saying that Asian girls are merely pretty. Asian girls are the sexiest beings in my eyes, straight up. Is that racist? Probably.

Great nuance in this comment. Also great work lately with raising awareness on this health issue. Although my diet is probably very different from you (lots of meats), I agree with pretty much 100% of your words across all threads. You are great at highlighting the common enemy (harmful compounds) without being too rigid about what's good or right. You have a balanced take on meat for someone who leans plant-based.

Yes he has said this. I'm afraid I'm team Leo so this is gonna be a 2v1 bro

You win comment of the week LOL I'll up the ante and say that pretty girls are always kind, and elephant seals are always unpleasant. As far as I can tell.

No, is it worth it? : )

Damn my homie is a seed oil defender ;(