Leo Gura

Go out of your house and talk to 1000s of people. Bars and clubs work well.

Learn to trust your girl. But also you can set boundaries with her. Clearly you've got insecurity issues tho which you should work on.

It won't be long until that microchip is implanted into your skull, and you will do it eagerly to interface with machines.

@Barna Don't confuse your BS for openmindedness.

If you keep trolling, expect your threads to be locked. I notice that a lot of you guys are not serious at all about this work. I'm not gonna let you waste our time here with bullshit. If you wish to do that, go elsewhere.

Not really. But sometimes you two just won't match up or she will not be into it. I've had dates where I was into her but she wasn't into me. I've also had dates where as I learned more about her, I didn't like her much as a person. Solution is to screen hard up front and stop going with girls just because she's receptive to your approach. Actually screen her for what you're looking for.

If you went on 30 dates, that actually means that a lot of girls like you. No girl will show up to a date with a guy she wouldn't be willing to sleep with. Your date game is just bad. Fix that and you will start getting laid. The problem here is that you're missing the fundamentals of inner game. It sounds like your inner game and self-esteem is so bad that it turns a lot of girls off. This is something you can fix. 30 dates is A LOT of dates! You're not even registering that as success in your mind, which is a huge problem. Getting good at dating requires a lot of persistence and patience. You have to work on every one of your sticking points. If girls are going on dates with you, your sticking points are not physical appearance, that much is obvious.

You shouldn't be consuming hydrogenated oils at all.

If death was real, all of spirituality would be pointless.

What you actually fear is not death, it's infinite consciousness.

Lol It is an unncessary burden because death is imaginary.

This one will be a classic for the history books:

No

Nothing works for everyone. You need to adopt more nuanced thinking. There cannot be a one-size-fits-all for awakening. Whenever we talk about spiritual techniques we are talking about loose probabilities.

We don't peddle in conspiracy theories here. This one is especially dumb.

Ah yes, haha Haha You got. Welcome to God-realization YES! Yup That's the bitch of it. Namaste But it also goes deeper

People are deeply lost in the dream and live like animals.

Focus on direct experience, not fantasy.

I don't do my work through non-work activities. I do my work through my work activities. 99.99% of people will never understand or be interested in Actualized.org I have long ago accepted that. Trying to do my work face to face would be extremely inefficient.

This point actually goes against you. If you seriously investigate the families of spiritual people you will find members in their family lineage who were spiritually gifted. Genetics is not some simplistic thing. Enlightenment is so rare that it's like expecting Michael Jordan's children to also be world-famous basketball players. That's not likely to happen. But there is no doubt Michael Jordan was perfectly genetically suited to play basketball and his children will get some of those genes. And it's not like two enlightened people ever fuck. This is extremely rare. It's obvious that spirituality is genetic because you cannot do spirituality as a dog. The only reason you can meditate is because you have the right genes for it. And if you didn't have the right genes no amount of meditation would ever help you.

No amount of radiation of your being will wake someone up who isn't ready to wake up. I am not looking or waiting for it. This work is very niche. I don't expect anyone I meet to be into it. Only by luck. I don't go around trying to convert normies. I put my work online and whoever is ready will find it. I basically don't talk about it unless asked. And usually no one asks.

Salt is more stable than freebase.

Can't change your genetics in this context. State is changed via all the classic spiritual practices.

I'm pretty sure Musk has plenty of union busters. Just more corporate types.

I tend to see it this way. The corruption problems in Russia are so deep that it's a much broader problem than replacing Putin. A weakling cannot run that country, he would be eaten alive. Someone much worse than Putin is possible. People don't appreciate this point. On the other hand, a pro-Western leader could also work and would probably be better for Russia. I think Putin's biggest mistake is not being pro-Western. Russia needs to be integrated into the West in the way Ukraine has been. This will be better for Russia than being so isolated. In the long run Russia and the West will have to come together and this will benefit both sides. A Gorbachev-like leader would best in that respect. But I don't know if someone like that will be able to hold power.