Leo Gura

Interesting strategy.

Don't put all your eggs in one basket? Lol Imagine 5 divorces. Worst investment evar.

Time to invade Canada. The War On Bugs.

Dude, no woman wants it. It is brainwashing from birth.

@Inliytened1 It has been tried and it does not work unless your repress women. Polygamy is a form of abuse. That's why developed nations outlaw it. It only sounds cool if you are thinking with your cock. Ask your AI why it is outlawed in the developed world.

Bin Laden's wife divorced him. You are not going to keep a woman as a pet.

Explaining anything to Jesse Watters is an exercise in self-torture. His head is full of packing peanuts.

Girls are annoying and stubborn everywhere. They will not give you peace.

Seriously. 5 wives? That is my definition of hell. You would have no peace. No wonder Bin Laden was a terrorist

Marriage is a conformist scam. Don't bring the state into your love life.

Lol. I don't even want one.

It is legal is shithole nations where you would not want to live and women are treated like animals.

I been in America. Where you been?

Polygamy is illegal. Maybe you mean polyamoury? Ask Aubrey Marcus

No, no. I did not mean Aba. I mean true Dark Triad types. Aba may be immature, but he is not Dark Triad. Comedians are often immature or underdeveloped people.

Satan doesn't visit Canada in the summer because it's more comfortable in Hell

Sadism is the key to all of it. Haha.

Canada is bug hell.

Canada has some wicked mosquito swarms. I know from watching survival videos.

@Thought Art Do you live in a swamp?

Conformity.

A lot.

What's hilarious is how modern their dress is. No Jew dressed like that for 3000 years. But now all the sudden they all have to dress like Lex Fridman

Finally an excellent example! More of this, less BS.

Yes. Oblique thinking is a way of getting around the limitations of finite symbols and langauge. For example, to say something of God while knowing as you say it that that's not entirely what is being meant. You can use a symbol while mentally noting that that symbol is not really what you mean. It is a diliberate slipperiness to language. It is a way of grappling with high levels of abstraction without breaking the abstraction by making it explicit.