Leo Gura

You can buy cheap electric hotplates.

Because as with anything, you gotta do it with the right intentions. I think most people get better over time, not worse. But you have to keep in mind how bad they were when they started off. Of course there will be exceptions of people who only use it to get laid and don't improve character. It's not really that pickup grew my character, I had good character to begin with. But pickup rounded me out as a man and allowed for development opportunities. I don't know of any who have committed suicide.

I think AI can become original, but to test that you want to not give it all the answers. If you want to test your class, don't give them all the answers for homework.

Pray tell, how many years of studies have you done to ascertain the long term side effects of a covid infection or long covid? What if getting covid causes you to grow testicles on your face in 10 years? The double standards here are beyond absurd.

Nothing any girl of his will ever say can counteract the awful character that Tate himself has outed himself to be. Tate admits to many ugly things he did. There is no dispute he pimped out his 4 girlfriends and scammed his customers and also his own girls.

I used Oxalate and it is potent as hell, no less than HCl or freebase. Of course there could have been bad vendors or batches, but tan colored Oxalate is good stuff if from a legit vendor. That first photo looks totally legit. The color is normal and fine. You can't judge potency by color. If something is only 50% of the promised product that means some middleman cut it. Lab grade stuff is like 98% purity and a lab has no good reason to do 50% synths unless they are total baboons who don't know what they are doing. I doubt anyone is doing home synth of 5-MeO-DMT. Good labs make it and then some middleman might cut it. I have never had a bad batch of any chemical. They were all super potent. I have tried over 30 chems from various sources.

No. My trips are as natural as it gets. Only lately I have started to crack down on myself and get more rigorous because being too flowing leads to getting lost in distractions and not going really deep existentially. Getting more rigorous is where the serious gains happen. If anything, you guys suffer from not being controlling enough with your trips, doing stupid stuff like watching cartoons and other distractions, when you should sitting still and introspecting. It's easy to waste a trip doing silly things that feel fun.

Time to put a ring on it

Woke bias confirmed!

Irrelevant to what I said.

Or this: Can you tell me what is the most intelligent/interesting prompt I could ask you?

Advice for how to have sex as if it was written by Shakespeare This AI could be used purely for comedy.

You can try to give it the task to read Chris Lagan's jargon papers and translate into normal human language. That would be quite the achievement. Or can you can ask it to try to render an intelligent criticism of Leo Gura's philosophy.

Haha, that's hilarious! That's exactly what academics do! "Robust ocular contact" is my new fave pickup advice I must admit, it's nice to finally be recognized as an "orator" Robust ocular contact and vigorous verbal intercourse will surely result in boisterous penial junction.

Enough that I am too lazy to itemize them all.

But what is meaningful about that? Of course you can buy a parrot and teach him to talk like me. You can even teach him to say, "But Leo!"

Very interesting, thanks! He's as incompetent and stupid as Trump. The only reason Trump didn't make things as bad is because the US has a highly effective deep state of world-class professionals.

Well, that's easy. You can just ask it. But in order to ask, you yourself would have to understand science, which almost no human does. I could easily ask it and see how good it comprehends the limits of science, if I wanted to. Because I spent my whole life contemplating this topic and I know all the traps. Of course it could. But will the AI be wise enough to appreciate my videos? How will the AI know to weigh my statements higher in truth value than all the other crap found on YT? The real magic would be if the AI could arrive at all my answers just by contemplating what it reads on Wikipedia about science, without ever reading my work. Then it is truly thinking. If you just give it all the answers that's not meaningful. - - - - - Basically you can ask the AI to this: Read through all the information about how science works on Wikipedia, then contemplate the nature of science for yourself and generate some unique insights about the limits of science which you did not gather from any online source but came up with independently by looking at the first principles of science and their inherent limitations. That's basically what I did.

Chess develops a very narrow kind of intuition. It's an intuition for the mechanics of the pieces on that board. Of course your intuition for chess is massively developed through play. Doesn't mean it will translate into other parts of life. It almost certainly will not because it is so deeply tied to the mechanics of those pieces. That intuition will hardly even translate to another board game like Go. You speak nonsense.

We'll allow the link in this case.

What you said does not connect with what I said.

What happened there?

There is actually good reason to rush. If you truly need to transition, doing it before adulthood is key or your results won't be good. You just need to be damn sure you want this. It can't be some flakey group-think cultural programming crap. That is really the only concern: How much of this stuff is pure group-think?

@something_else Interesting. Thanks for sharing. But all that info can basically be found on Wikipedia. Still impressive how it assembles it with such fluency. Actually I would say this is false. Incompleteness is the very reason for mystery. If reality was complete it would could be fully explicated and therefore lack any mystery. Incompleteness = infinity = mystery But you will not find this insight on Wikipedia. You gotta think it thru for yourself.

Soon enough I predict these AI will learn to think for themselves. But even so, I don't know how good it will be at thinking about the kind of stuff I teach.