Leo Gura

The language I use does not require people to read obtuse academic philosophy. That's part of the value I offer. Usually to get the kind of intellectual depth my videos offer would require reading very heavy, elitist academic tomes. I make very deep things accessible to normies.

Scientists are not blank slates. They have a default worldview.

The relationship is that conformity can lead to various kinds of addictions. Like smoking. But once the addiction is set it is not conformity, now it is more serious. Conformity is the gateway drug.

As if they would tell him and he would tell you.

Addiction sure. But addiction is not conformity.

You first

LeoGPT: Contemplate the following: How can the Devil use personality tests to fuck me?

You have to be blind and soulless to have all of today's tools available to you and not see anything beautiful worth creating. Mankind are asleep zombies starving for leadership, Truth, Love, God. And you see no way of leading them? Really?? There is a severe deficit of vision and passion here.

Because it is easier to discuss from a clean slate than trying to correct a flawed foundation. The distinctions and categories in academic philosophy take longer to correct than to just start from scratch. Getting into the weeds of academic philosophy is really only appealing to academic philosophers, not normal people. Why make my discourse intentionally arcane? I frame things in a way that requires no education in academic philosophy. I could go all philosophy-nerd. And I try not to.

That is not conformity, that is convenience. You are not using your phone in bed because others are too. You are using it in bed because it is natural and convenient. You would do it even if others weren't doing it. It is natural to use your phone anywhere you go. That is the purpose of a mobile computer.

I know all those positions and they are garbage. Not worth discussing. All of analytical philosophy is nonsense.

Hahaha

Of course. That's why it must be done.

Perhaps. Or perhaps you should stop being lazy.

Hell naw.

Salmom roe is great but expensive.

Yes. Definitely. Autonomy/Sovereignty of Mind. The religous mind is not autonomous, which makes it low.

If you are playing chess at 2000+, you are basically within the realm of mastery already. Don't confuse mastery with being the best in the world. That's a whole nother level which requires insane training and even right genetics. I did not promise you that you will be best in the world.

That is because that requires some heavy metaphysical work/understanding. Which is what I try to teach. It's not enough to have a mystical experience, the mind needs to mine it and integrate it into a much larger understanding of Reality. It is like assembling a puzzle, but they never assemble it.

Thanks!

Staring into the abyss.

I'm a big fan of the Harry Potter personality test. Jesus was defintiely a Gryffindor. Only Gryffindors can awaken.

No. That is an assumption you need to test. I want to see some data backing that up.