Leo Gura

Not true. I posted some really good videos and links a while back on my blog.

False

You cannot define Good because it is Infinite.

God only creates Good. Evil is just your lack of intelligence in comprehending God's Goodness. If you were as intelligent as God, you could not see evil. What you consider to be evil is just a speck of dust on your glasses. If you bothered to wipe off your glasses the evil would disappear. But instead you go fighting the "evil" out there in the world. How silly is that?

No. I am saying something far more profound. I'm saying evil simply doesn't exist. The only thing that exists is Good. Good is not a subjective human evaluation. Good is a metaphysical Absolute. To reach the highest level of Awakening you will have to see good in absolutely everything. Anything you reject as "bad" will limit your consciousness. This is not license to act like a jerk. Although if you do, God will love you all the same.

Yes. The whole point is about how you hold reality in your mind. When you hold things as evil, you construct falsehood and increase your own suffering. But when you can recontextualize all evil as Love, you become as intelligent as God and feel God's Love in all things. When I walk down the street, when I watch the news, I see all things as Love. And that's what I'm trying to teach you guys. That is all there to spirituality. That's all God wants you to understand. But humans are so selfish they reject it. It's really that simple. This is also not merely about healing trauma. That's nice but ultimately weak. It's about falling head over heals in love with reality. You can feel so much of God's Love that it brings you to ecstasy. That's what I'm really trying to teach you.

Notice, when a horse kills someone you don't demonize or even hate the horse. Pretty interesting, huh?

Interesting. Thanks for sharing.

@AdeptusPsychonautica Communicating with you is pointless because you're too dense to understand the basic things I teach. You are not seeking truth, you are a reactionary and deliberately adversarial. This is not an appropriate attitude for truth-seeking, especially on topics as nuanced and advanced as this. I have something profound to teach you but you are not interested in learning it because you think you know better. Evil does not exist. That's what I teach. It's as simple as that. Good luck with your work.

Okay, you guys have had your fun. Time to wrap this one up. Say your last words cause we are closing this soon.

All every girl wants is a man who can lead her into profound Love. And a man cannot do that unless he loves himself. Of course! It's so simple. "Hey girl! You are lovely, but I am more lovely. Which is why I can lead you to Love." Try that pickup line

Just cause something is love doesn't mean it is healthy and you shouldn't change. Learn how to select quality men -- now that's serious self-love! God does not want you to settle for scumbags.

I don't have a problem with the laws. I just wouldn't call it rape. You can keep the laws as-is otherwise. Yes. Heal yourself however you like. I don't care. I'm just saying how I would go about it. Hatred is def less than love when it comes to healing yourself. Be careful with that. Legends are legends not real life. You cannot stop all the suffering in others. Suffering is an important feature of survival. Part of waking up is recognizing the deep intelligence in suffering. Suffering is a great teacher. You should think twice before wishing it away.

I have been demonstrating healthy Green with my political stances. Conservatives have been giving me shit for it ever since I started speaking out against Trump and saying that the left is more developed than the right. I get a lot of shit for saying that. Yet I say it cause it needs to be said. One of the problems with Green is that it loves to eat its own allies if they don't fully support Green group-think. Green has some bad ideas about racism.

We have a glut of Green anti-racist ideology right now. I don't need to beat that dead horse. It would be counter-productive. Anyone following my work should understand why racism is stupid.

You know no such thing. I could be a murderer for all you know.

@Jake Chambers Go ahead and idolize me. I'll just make it a little harder for ya Nothing I said contradicts a vision of love for mankind. Jesus. You are acting like I lynched somebody. Holy fuck.

Go back and read what I wrote. Politics cannot be about my personal perferences but what is best for the whole community. My political vision has no racism in it, obviously. That I have to even tell you this is an insult to my intelligence. If you truly wish to eradicate racism you need a realistic view of the mind's innate ethnocentric and tribal biases. You are not going to eradicate racism by calling 90% of the population racists. I am giving you a Yellow perspective. You are hammering me with Green.

This is leading people in the right direction. People don't want politically correct cliches. They want realness. This is part of the reason why we got MAGA, because overly PC liberals and progressives are not realistic about how ethnocentrism works. Calling everyone a racist for having ethnic preferences or concerned over immigration is stupid. Also, you guys idolize spiritual teachers way too much. I am showing you the reality, not the fiction. You probably think Buddha and Jesus were not racists and sexists. I would like to see the look on your face when you learn how they really behaved.

Honesty is a fault of mine. Enjoy.

You guys are so touchy on this. It's cute you are so idealistic and naive. Have fun with that.

I don't so much mind well diversified neighborhoods. What I don't like is an all-ethnic neighborhood. Like I don't wanna live in a neighhood of all Hassidic orthodox Jews. That is just awkward.

Sounds a lot like projection. Maybe don't tell me what I need.

When I do it to you, I promise you will quickly be disabused of that notion. I heard a story of Sasaki Roshi, Shinzen Young's master, grabbing students by the balls just to stress a point or two

Obviously in general. But not always. The problem is that you guys are making a lot of generalizations when in fact each case must be considered according to its precise details. You cannot let generalizations trump the specific case.