Leo Gura

Anyone doing personal attacks here will get warning points. So think twice before posting. Make your points without demonizing anyone, including Tate.

@KH2 Make your points without personal attacks.

Calm down or you're getting warning points.

Mankind is responsible for administering our own justice. That's what the legal and police system is for. If you feel the system is lacking, how about you make it your life's work to improve these systems rather than sitting there and whining about it. God doesn't mete out legal justice, mankind's invented systems do. God sees nothing wrong in what Jeffery Epstein did. You do. So you fix it. Watch the Pier Morgan interview in full. He clearly brings up the "women are men's property" issue and Tate does not admit any wrongdoing in saying that. He tries to defend the statements and doubles down. That's not all. Tate has said plenty of other toxic stuff. It's not our job to itemize it all for you. That's not merely what Tate said. Tate said that 19 year old women are more appealing to him because they have less experience with men so he can exploit them easier. If that's not toxic, I don't know what is. The issue isn't any one sexist thing Tate says. The issue is that Tate's whole philosophy is about using women for his personal selfish gratification. Treating women as objects. You cannot seriously argue that Tate doesn't do this. He obviously does, that's his philosophy, and that's the philosophy he's teaching young men. And that's why people are pissed off at him. Men are also crashing those sports cars, doing drag races, and other such dangerous stuff. Testosterone makes men do stupid things.

You're gonna be insecure as fuck with your wig. God help you if that things ever slides off.

Start by approaching girls at a mall or shopping center so you have more leeway. You also want to do most of your early practice sets at night in bars and clubs. Around a university there will be bars and clubs where all the girls go to party every Fri/Sat. Go there and do your practice. On a college campus during the day your approaches must be more calibrated and subtle so you don't come off as a creepy approach machine.

Nothing wrong with anything except in your twisted mind.

Nothing surprising about this. These vaccines were developed at rapid pace by design. The usual method for making a vaccines take 5 years. The government asked multiple vaccine makers to mass-produce vaccines before anyone even knew whether the vaccines would work. This had to be done in order to have 100s of millions of doses available for once the clinical trials concluded. The vaccines which did not pass clinical trial would simply be thrown away. Stop fear-mongering about vaccines. The data clearly shows vaccines save lives.

Who the hell buys 5-MeO in 1g increments? You gotta buy that shit 10g at a time

Not a wise attitude. 1) I highly doubt his net worth is that high. It could be a bunch of BS he told his gullible followers. 2) He's a materialistic grifter, so yeah, for him the loss of revenue does matter in the long run. If he didn't care about the money he wouldn't be running his Hustler University pyramid scheme. WAY, WAY less. Deplatforming is a serious blow to one's business. You're not appreciating how significant it is to get your biz banned from every major platform. This is a loss of $10s of millions of potential dollars for a big name influencer like Tate. Obviously he can still coast off his past earnings. It's not absurd at all. Look at Alex Jones. Look at Tate. Look at Harvey Weinstein. Look at Jeffery Epstein. Look at R. Kelly. Devils live in hell amongst us. Except you need your social media to make these $100 million. Good luck making $100 million today without any social media. That's virtually impossible. Toxic masculinity is an overused term, but in the case of Tate it applies. That term was invented for guys like him. Being masculine is not bad, but being masculine in the way Tate demonstrates it gives masculinity a bad name. That doesn't really matter. When Tate says that women are men's property, he is being toxic. Even if none of his girlfriends come forward to complain about it. Keep in mind, he could easily be paying his girlfriends off, or brainwashing them. It's not so hard to brainwash women into your personal harem/sex cult. R Kelly did this for decades with impunity. You can easily abuse women, gaslight, and bullshit them into accepting it. Especially in a place like Romania. The guy literally moved to Romania from the UK because it was easier to get away with exploiting women in Romania. That tells you everything you need to know about Tate. I can move to the Philippines and start a sex cult with 100 women, abuse them all, and none of them will ever complain about me, because I will just pay them off and threaten them. That's easily possible in a 3rd world country because the women are desperate, poor, and much more subservient and conservative. Women in a 3rd world country don't know what #MeToo is. It's like raping fish in a barrel. This is why Tate prefers younger, more inexperienced, more ignorant women. They are simply easier to exploit. Exploiting a 20 year old woman is like taking candy from a baby. I'm not judging him by criminal allegations. I am judging him by the scummy things he's said about women and by the scummy ways in which he grifts men and makes him money. The criticism of Tate is a criticism of his philosophy, which he teaches to young impressionable men. I don't really care what Tate does in his personal life. If some girl like his philosophy and wants to sleep with him, that doesn't change a thing. Women sleep with assholes and criminals all the time. Women are notoriously bad judges of character. I can be a rapist and get many women to love and defend me. This is silly. Biden is a saint compared to Tate. He claims women are men's property. This is a direct quote. There is no science that suggests men are better drivers than women. If men were better drivers then women then men would have much lower car insurance premiums. If anything, men are more reckless drivers because they like to drive faster and more aggressively. Yes, men are physically stronger than women and no one seriously disputes this. Keep in mind that all of Tate's wealth could be pure fiction. You have no idea how much money he actually has. He could be broke for all you know. All his fancy cars, houses, and women could just be rentals. That's exactly what Dan Billzarian does. This is exactly how social media is gamed, and Tate is the exactly the kind of scumbag who would game social media in this way. I can go rent a mansion and stock it with Ferraris and hot strippers tomorrow, and do all my videos live stream with girls with huge tits kissing my bald head while I talk. And you would be gullible enough to think that I am a millionaire playboy. And all this would be 10 times easier from a 3rd world country like Romania.

Mod dreams

That is incorrect. I am a full-time mystic and self-help YouTuber.

If you're a witch, you might really like DPT, mushrooms, and DMT. They are all extremely visionary.

I'm not going to ban Tate here because Tate's opinions and worldview is fair game for discussion. Tate also has plenty of reasonable takes, only some of the stuff he says is toxic. Tate is not Connor Murphy who was acting like a monster on this forum and towards myself. You need to learn to tolerate worldviews which are not the same as yours without needing it banned by some daddy figure. I've already said that I consider Tate's views of women to be toxic and not a good role model for men, and he's also a grifter. But in general you guys need to learn how to separate the signal from the noise when listening to various worldviews. We don't have that much Tate content on this forum anyways. Mostly people just discuss their opinions on Tate, which is good use of free speech. Tate's views easily discredit themselves. Most people here understand the toxic aspects of what he says. You should also be open to the possibility that Tate's advice has helped some people. It's not all bad. If someone comes here and says that Tate's content helped him, that's fair. Who are you to say he's wrong? Maybe Tate has some positive impact? You should be open to that possibility.

Because resources are stretched thin.

From what I understand that's how our current system works.

Such a silly argument. Abusers are reformable and this assumes they've served their time so they will be free regardless. You're not putting abusers in jail for life. Abusers should still get a punishment, whatever is warranted.

We have finite resources. Especially in the prison and social services system.

1g

Irrelevant because: 1) This is a resource allocation issue. 2) Every murderer will have a bad upbringing story. Why should this useless guy get millions in societal resources when we could funnel those resources to other people who need them and will make good use of them? As an example, the therapists we waste on this guy could be used to help abused children. I would rather invest $1 million in abused children than in this depraved dude. Why do you want to take $1 million away from abused children? That's the proper framing

Mods get all their sins absolved in the afterlife.

Fine with me. Death anyway. It's not about revenge, it's about properly allocating resources. Death penalty simply needs to be made cheaper than life in prison. There is no ambiguity in this guy's case. He could be justly executed tomorrow. Here's a simple rule: anyone caught on camera shooting at children in a school is executed within a month.

Sure, why is this even a question? Then again, nothing entitles you to free therapy. Therapy is an expensive service that must be earned or rationed.

@Kksd74628 Nothing is wrong with you. It's not like I considered everyone on this forum.

No one knows. They may not be damaging at all if consumed properly.