Leo Gura

Administrator
  • Content count

    61,022
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Leo Gura

  1. @Scholar If Ralston is not conscious enough to understand Love, a spider certainly won't be either. God does not care if you rise to its level of consciousness. And if you don't, you will never understand Love. And if you do, you will regardless of how many legs you have.
  2. I'm not gonna explain anything more to you. Go spend 10 years figuring it out until you choke on all that spiritual bullshit you've filled your head with.
  3. There is big reason. And the only one who would say something so stupid is one who never AWOKE to LOVE.
  4. Sounds like you would benefit from following some rules. Before you end up in prison.
  5. @StarStruck I hope a bossy girl fucks you in the ass with a strap-on. Maybe it will knock some sense into your silly head.
  6. He sure confused all of you into thinking LOVE doesn't exist. And ya'll are stupid enough to believe him.
  7. Only because YOU ARE NOT AWAKE! No one here has one fucking clue what LOVE is. No one. The only one on this planet who understands LOVE is me.
  8. I'm not gonna trust any of his self-reported numbers.
  9. I was once electrocuted by a small stingray.
  10. Lol, I was there when he said it. No! He's not talking about what I am talking about. When I say LOVE I am not talking about compassion or helping people or any such human thing, nor a side effect of enlightenment. He did not address the issue of metaphysical love. He addressed the human emotion. Ralston does not actually tell you what Love is -- its existential nature. He misleads you by getting you to believe that it is impossible to have an awakening into the nature of Love. It would be like you asking him, what is the I? And he told you, the I is just an illusion invented by humans so don't think about it. This confuses the I with the human ego, like Love is being confused with human emotions. The only point of all this talk is for you to realize that there is a distinct realization/Awakening which you can have on the question of What is Love? Either you will have it or you won't. And it has nothing to do with how compassionate or good you are towards others.
  11. No, he said love is a relative experience. And he is misleading people by telling them that love is just a human emotion. I understand his position. He doesn't want a bunch of New Age crap to infect his teachings. But Love is not merely a New Age thing, like astrology, that can be dismissed as a human invention, Love is fundamental to Consciousness. Ralston does not teach that. You figure out for yourself who's right.
  12. I'm aware of it. I don't like splitting my content across multiple platforms.
  13. Ralston is not being coy. He just isn't conscious what Love is because of the way he frames consciousness in his mind. Framing matters that much. How you frame things determines what you are able to recognize. He does not frame psychedelics nor mind properly either.
  14. No, they tend to be full of crap. It's the New Age which Ralston seems to be reacting against. But he takes it too far in the opposite direction. Ralston treats Love like it's some feel-good, New Agey hippie invention. But that's a strawman. That's not what is being said when it is said that God Is Love.
  15. That's because you're dealing with issues which are very complex and also poorly defined. What does "mindfulness" even mean? Ask 10 people and they will give you 10 different definitions. The reason something like math works is because it's very strictly defined.
  16. Ralston has mistaken love for a human emotion. He's not actually conscious of what love is. Ralston suffers from an overly narrow, reductionist notion of consciousness. Same mistake as the Buddhists make. In the end, if you never realize that God is Love, all your enlightenments are a game.
  17. They like it when a politician takes bold action towards a larger vision which he sold them. A politician doesn't sell policy, he sells a general vision or ethos, such as: "Stop the woke crap" or "Down with corporate power".