Leo Gura

Administrator
  • Content count

    65,409
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Leo Gura

  1. Addiction sure. But addiction is not conformity.
  2. LeoGPT: Contemplate the following: How can the Devil use personality tests to fuck me?
  3. You have to be blind and soulless to have all of today's tools available to you and not see anything beautiful worth creating. Mankind are asleep zombies starving for leadership, Truth, Love, God. And you see no way of leading them? Really?? There is a severe deficit of vision and passion here.
  4. Because it is easier to discuss from a clean slate than trying to correct a flawed foundation. The distinctions and categories in academic philosophy take longer to correct than to just start from scratch. Getting into the weeds of academic philosophy is really only appealing to academic philosophers, not normal people. Why make my discourse intentionally arcane? I frame things in a way that requires no education in academic philosophy. I could go all philosophy-nerd. And I try not to.
  5. That is not conformity, that is convenience. You are not using your phone in bed because others are too. You are using it in bed because it is natural and convenient. You would do it even if others weren't doing it. It is natural to use your phone anywhere you go. That is the purpose of a mobile computer.
  6. I know all those positions and they are garbage. Not worth discussing. All of analytical philosophy is nonsense.
  7. Of course. That's why it must be done.
  8. Perhaps. Or perhaps you should stop being lazy.
  9. Salmom roe is great but expensive.
  10. Yes. Definitely. Autonomy/Sovereignty of Mind. The religous mind is not autonomous, which makes it low.
  11. If you are playing chess at 2000+, you are basically within the realm of mastery already. Don't confuse mastery with being the best in the world. That's a whole nother level which requires insane training and even right genetics. I did not promise you that you will be best in the world.
  12. That is because that requires some heavy metaphysical work/understanding. Which is what I try to teach. It's not enough to have a mystical experience, the mind needs to mine it and integrate it into a much larger understanding of Reality. It is like assembling a puzzle, but they never assemble it.
  13. Staring into the abyss.
  14. I'm a big fan of the Harry Potter personality test. Jesus was defintiely a Gryffindor. Only Gryffindors can awaken.
  15. No. That is an assumption you need to test. I want to see some data backing that up.
  16. Except personality type does not capture other crucial aspects of this work like the tendency for effortless mystical experience or baseline state of consciousness. These factors are far more important than personality. Someone like a Jesus didn't get there through personality but mystical experience. Personality may be a red herring.
  17. A fool's errand. This work is not about guessing. If you don't know, then not-know. Don't invent stuff just to feel like you know. Trying to guess Jesus' personality type is ludicrous.
  18. That is not necessarily true. Isn't Sadhguru an extrovert? Please be more careful with your assumptions and jumping to conclusions. Awakened masters usually have way more weird traits going on than just personality type.
  19. I find it laughable that they have personality types for Jesus, Buddha, etc. You have no idea if these people even existed. Nevermind their personality types. Has any of those people even been given a personality test? Doubt it. You can project whatever you want on those people.