Leo Gura

You not being a chimpanzee is just a limiting belief, bro.

I said it's more intelligent than many humans. Not more intelligent than an outstanding human. You should not use AI to create revolutionary work.

It is pure epistemology and metaphysics. It is not about personal development. It's about advancing mankind's understanding of mind and reality.

They get charged double.

Health is asymmetrical. It's very easy to lose and nearly impossible to create. The effort part is not losing whatever health you got from genetics. But if genetics didn't give it to you, you ain't gonna create it with effort. Effort just means not doing dumb shit to destroy your health.

That doesn't contradict what I said. Within that 1% you can do quite a bit. But no effort will make you Tony Robbins.

The correct theory is critical. That's what the book offers. Changing your state is beyond the scope of a book. I want people to swim deep into theory. I'm not a fucking Zen Buddhist.

It's already been 10 years. Understanding reality.

The difference between you and a chimpanzee is 2% difference in DNA. How important do you think genetics are to what you are?

Not at all. It's too much of a distraction from pure philosophy.

For those of you who love AI, I will spin up an AI slop book and sell it to you. Everyone else will get the real book. That'll teach you.

You are so busy looking for a takeaway you're missing reality. OP asked a good question. I supplied the precise answer. The rest of you are lost whining about it.

The book is going to strike a balance between formal and causal. More formal that a blog post but not dry. Clarity will be off the charts.

If I randomly changed even 1% of your genetics you'd drop dead within 30 seconds. All of your other factors assume genetics. You are a genetic puppet living out a fantasy.

@Joshe Wake me up when the nukes start flying.

That's Tony Robbins in a nutshell.

I didn't say that. I review my own work and I take feedback from others. I will have people read drafts of my book and offer lots of feedback. That is part of the final editing process. But I don't need anyone telling me how to write the core of the book. Getting minor stylistic edits is fine. People are using AI because they are not intelligent enough to be better than the AI. My work is on another level. I'm writing things no one has ever written.

It's more conscious to transcend the sex drive entirely. But unless you do that, then it's not a big deal.

Anyone making videos with WW3 in the title shouldn't be taken seriously. That's some serious algorithm prostitution.

There is very good reason. This book is written by a higher intelligence than AI. Subordinating higher intelligence to lower intelligence is a mistake that leads to inferior results. The whole point of the book is the intelligence behind it. I don't need an AI making any creative decisions for me. And don't forget, anything you feed to AI is instantly stolen by the AI company. You are giving them all your copyright like a fool.

Yes

The tone and style of the book is still undecided. My main concern for now is to get all of the key content and topics in place. Then I work on tone, style, and polished writing. I'm still fleshing out the outline. These snippets are part of the outline, not final pages. Thanks for the feedback.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0457d02e9go Seems quite serious.

I think it's BS that's great for selling books to rubes.