Leo Gura

If all abolishing ICE means is moving those duties to another department then it's a meaningless gesture. But leftists don't want a meaningless gesture, they want to literally abandon those functions. You are trying to have it both ways. You want to abandon those functions but not admit that you are doing so. This is how leftists fool themselves. The fact is that at the end of the day someone with a gun has to stand guard at the border and deal with a flood of illegals, drugs, crime, etc. There's no abolishing that.

That's a good example of what I mean. You really wanna abolish ICE? And who will deal with all the illegal drugs coming over the border? The term "open borders" doesn't only mean 100% open borders. It broadly means the loosening of all sorts of border enforcement policies. There are many degrees of this liberalization. We have an immigrantion crisis on the border right now because of various liberalizations. Abolishing ICE would be one such liberalization, and you are not taking seriously that this policy could cause more harm than good. This one example demonstrates my whole point.

I do have a morality video planned.

Lolz

Yeah, but the EU has strict rules for membership. US states have open borders but that's very different opening to the outside. Because the states are roughly equal in economic and other kinds of development. And to be in the US a state has to adhere to many Federal laws.

Of course no country actually has open borders. However if extreme leftists had their way the borders would be a lot more open, and that could create serious problems which they are in denial about.

When it comes to building government, yeah.

Like Palestinians?

All of morality just boils down to minimizing the suffering your selfishness causes others.

A demon child.

I dabble in it. I make prototypes.

It's hard to say. I have a lot of experience using AI to make game art, and what I found is that it's so limited I still needed to hire concept artists. There is no way an AI can replace a good concept artist at this point. But who knows how it will be in 10 years. I suspect that there isn't enough data in the world to make seriously creative art AIs. It will take a lot of time to create that data. And until then AI art will be very basic and derivative.

Survival. The job of the military is to serve its tribe, not international law. The world is not developed far enough for international law to trump national law.

The people who run militaries are not progressives or SJWs. They have their own kind of group-think.

Your chemical needs to be very pure for injection. And you are never sure of the purity of your chems, so you'd always be gambling.

That's not related to AI. Game studios are always doing layoffs and closures. Then they reform and rehire. That's just the nature of the industry. There are cycles. Lays lately have probably been from the marker crash and the end of 0% interest rates on capital. Capital is much tighter now so every company is tightening its velt. No game company has enough data to train the kind of AI that would make game artists obsolete. What these large companies will do is create narrow, specialized AI tools. Like there could be tool that generates texture for you to use on the models. Or a tool that helps with certain repetitive animation tasks, etc. Companies who get too lazy and try to rely too much on AI to make games will end up making bad games, like Starfield, and soon go out of business. Games live off uniqueness and creativity, not cookie-cutter stuff.

Realistically AI will only replace low-level artists. You just have to adapt to doing art at a higher level. Design vs drawing lines. All work is gonna become less technical and more creative and abstract in the long run.

No ambition.

Ukraine has low ambition.

But the US doesn't see it that way.

Like people, some nations have ambition and some do not. The higher one's ambition the more people one will step on to acheive it.

I will answer that once I talk about the possible cure.

Do you even realize that there is no one to enforce law on the US? There is little pain from the US side. The pain is all outsourced overseas.

By buying billions in weapons and by millions in donations and legalized bribes. Palestine is too poor and too foreign for the US to really care about it.

Why would it? The US and Israel have much in common. Israel's selfish and closedminded foreign policy is outdone only by the US.