Leo Gura

No medicine is ever 100% safe for everyone. You can have severe bad reactions to all sorts of approved and widely used pharmaceuticals. You guys make piss-poor arguments.

I can't because you're stuck in your mind.

They are more ignorant than corrupt.

Yeah, the lizard people got to me.

@Hardkill An important missing factor in your analysis is how much better healthcare has gotten in the last 100 years. Hospitals saved many people from dying from Covid. But I still think your general point stands.

I am.

Ta-daaaa!

That's easy: Meat-only diet.

I'm doing whatever you imagine me to be doing.

I am AWAKE. So I can do such things. Science has always been foolish from the dawn of time up through today. The fundamemtal problem is that there is no method to distinguish true vs false science. It is NOT the hallmark of science. Science doesn't even know what Truth is. No scientist can tell you. If you are so keen on making distinctions then fine, make this distinction: truth vs science.

I claim you're imagining me.

The vaccine was extremely effective. At one point over 90% of people in ICUs with Covid were those who didn't get vaccinated. The rapid distribution of the vaccine saved at least a million lives, not to mention the benefit to the economy. Without a vaccine we would have had a bad recession and even worse inflation. Just because you hate Big Pharma does not mean their vaccine didn't save many lives. Nuance.

Because I am also doing other things. Yes, it will be the most advanced thing I've seen. Yes, information nobody knows.

Because there's only you.

You're speaking more about the corruption of universities and academia than science.

NO! It will not work at all. Freebase powders do not dissolve in water at all. HCl dissolves quite easily in water.

All my critiques of science apply directly to the most serious science you can think of. You cannot get away with saving science by making a distinction between proper and improper science. This begs the question. You have no epistemic basis for making this distinction. Science is not fraud, but there is certainly fraud within science. Don't strawman me.

It's not a scam. It's just corrupt and biased.

That whole system is corrupted with group-think and dogma. 50% of research fails validation. It's all biased as hell. Scientists are incapable of being unbiased. They are nothing more than apes in lab coats after all.

It's a great litmus test. If RFK was in charge a million more Americans would be dead right now. Mature my ass. The establishment exists for good reason, because most of the time it works better at scale than all your hippie crap. Your wokeness will kill a million people if you aren't careful.

@Princess Arabia I dare you to be cold. Beware of idiot compassion.

Sourcing still not allowed.

I never said all scientists or research is corrupt. What a strawman of my post. To say that something is corrupt does not mean everything within it is corrupt. Every one of these points misses what I said. I made accurate statements about science, corruption, and human nature. This is a good example of being so pedantic it makes you dumb. The existence of good science is so obvious it doesn't need to be said.

Not really

In my experience you will NEVER feel any difference between organic and inorganic. However, that doesn't mean it won't affect your health over decades. You can't notice something that takes a decade to build up. When something finally goes wrong with your health you will not even know why. You will be confused as fuck about it for years.