Leo Gura

All the perverts exposing themselves by their own feverish pervertry.

@Rachel L I can help you via PM.

This is a notice for everyone who posts: We are cracking down on people who post without proper punctuation and capitalization. Properly capitalize your posts and titles. Use proper punctuation in your sentences. Use proper grammar. I will be handing out warning points to people who chronically refuse to capitalize and punctuate their posts. Make sure that you properly capitalize your title when starting a new thread. Do not make all lowercase thread titles. To Mods: if you see people posting without proper punctuation, capitalization, and grammar, send them a private message informing them to start doing it or they will receive warning points in the future. Here is a brief guide to proper capitalization: https://writer.com/blog/capitalization-rules/

Your explaination does not account for why women are more social than men. Women are more social because their survival requires it.

I don't think so. He has become the average of all the immature corrupt friends he hangs out with. Rogan will always be anti-mainstream. That's his overriding style. And he's not going to do any deep self-reflection because it would be suicidal to his career.

No

New Age BS

Look at it this way: if Tate went Green he would get laid less. Which is exactly why he doesn't like Green. And Tate is far from exceptional in this regard.

Women need to be more social because their survival requires it. Women are oriented towards people. Men are oriented towards things and abstractions. So of course a woman will feel more lonely if she is unable to be social. But in practice she will be more social than men and not feel lonely because her entire life already revolves around other people while a man's does not.

@Daniel Balan I applaud you for caring to be better.

McDonalds invented by a Croc? You don't say.

1) Doesn't really matter since what matters is their own perception. Similar to how Trumpists vote against their own economic interests but tell themselves that Trump is good for the economy. 2) Overall I would bet the misogyny does lead to more sex because it allows men to dominate and exploit women. That is its survival function. Its easier to get sex when women are treated purely as sexual objects and not at equal human beings. The lack of empathy is functional. It enables cheating, lying, manipulation, abuse, rape, exploitation, prositution, corruption, etc. Say what you will about Tate, I'm pretty sure lack of sex is not one of his problems. The function of his toxic philosophy is to get more sex. Incels yes. But the other mens groups are taking action and getting some results. Women don't really see the ideology. Women sleep with men based on how actively social men are. So even a horrible ideology will work as long as it gets men out of the house and talking to women. Nazism will get you laid as long as it gets you out of the house. Literally Nazis start having sex with each other just because they meet at a Nazi rally. In a sense Nazism is just an excuse to get out of the house. Ideology tends to get people mobilized. That is its function. Incel and Blackpill ideology is an exception.

Pro bodybuilders figured this out back in Arnold's day. What they do is they gain muscle and fat at the same time most of the year. Then they do a short fat-cutting phase which also loses them muscle but they use steroids to maximize keeping muscle while losing fat. To gain muscle you basically gotta gain fat too. You can't only gain muscle. And when you cut fat you will also lose muscle. This stuff is not magic.

Hell no. It's endless murkiness and contemplation.

It's challenging. Life is challenging. Just do your best. Never forget that this work we do it really challenging. Which is why good people are so rare.

Rogan doesn t even have enough awareness to understand that Alex Jones and Elon Musk are devils. His mind is hijacked by his career and all the rich and famous people he is friends with. Rogan is the definition of elitism and corruption from fame, power, and wealth.

No. This notion is ridiculous.

You are speaking nonsense. No one needs to prove anything to you.

Literally Thomas Campbell. There are wackos, but you will not know about them because what you know is what is popular and mainstream. But yeah, it is rare because you are asking for someone to master two totally different and even adversarial domains. It's like you're asking why there are no hippie vegans working in a butchershop, or woke pacificst progressives working in the Navy Seals. Mastering quantum physics requires 10 years of academic PhD training. And by the time you have invested that much time and money, speaking about God will just get you blacklisted as an unscientific crackpot who no one in academia should ever read, hire, fund, or work with. It would be career suicide. And that 10 years of training will brainwash you so deeply with materialism that you will never understand God. And it's not like a new theory of quantum physics would be accessible to you or any laymen. So you would find it unsatisying too.

Yup. When a Trump supporter tells you he would have supported a Green if only Green gave him X, Y, Z -- do not believe him. He is not mature enough to support Green.

No. I reject the idea that people are not going Green because Green doesn't cater to them enough. If you need Green to cater to you, then you aren't ready for Green. It's like, "What are you gonna give me if I behave well?" Nothing. I will give you nothing. And if you don't like that, that reveals who you really are.

You don't get to Green by being pandered to with goodies. You get to it through education and personal development. People who demand to be pandered to with material rewards in order to develop will not develop far, because that is how a child behaves, not a serious mind.

Look at pickup artists, the Tate phenomenon, Incels, Red Pill, or powerful people. They all have a problem with giving up misogyny to treat women as equals. Because doing so loses them power and means less sex. And so all these groups skew fascist, because facsism panders to them with hyper masculinity.

Green cannot deliver on its values because most people are too undeveloped to be Green. When Green really gets going most people freak out and regress to where they feel comfortable, which is some combination of Orange and Blue. It's easy to virtue signal about Green, but when the rubber meets the road and it's time to pay taxes or surrender power or give up sex, people say, Hell no, and live at Orange or below. People want the appearance of having Green values while actually surviving at Orange.

@Clarence You can get a prescription online. Use google.