Leo Gura

Is this really true? Source? That's a huge win for them if true.

Nonsense. You are denying the whole game of angling to get the highest value men and the whole screening process that involves. As if that isn't happening. That is the lie. You can play whatever games you like for whatever rationales, but don't then carry that deception into the domain of understanding reality. Anyways, I'm tired of this topic. It leads nowhere good.

That's the trick! Because in reality women sleep around easily and frequently with dishonest players. But the nice honest guys get the short end of the stick. Thus game is born.

All that is obvious. But not just to protect herself. To screen out low value men. Or to put it starkly: to protect herself from low value men.

It's deceptive to any honest rational actor. If an animal behaved that way, you would call it deceptive. Like when a possum plays dead. It takes skill and training to see the possum's trickery. It's hard to get a possum to admit its own tricks.

Because it is deceptive. It's called game for a reason. From a man's POV, a woman's deceptions require deciphering. Of course the woman cares about none of that. This has no import to women. I'm not saying this to women. I'm explaining this to men, so they can have some success. The women don't care about this.

Your games are your survival. Games are life and death.

That's cute, but that's not how women work. The higher value they preceive a man the more they will delay and withhold sex in order to get him invested. And she's not gonna get horny for a guy she's not attracted to. So again all this assumes attraction.

1) Of course by that point the issue is moot. You have assumed attraction, which is the whole issue for men. For women, the pre-attraction phase barely exists. But for men, that is where all the effort goes. 2) Women still play games and withhold sex after obvious attraction.

It's much worse than illegal immigrants. Illegal immigrants don't try to grab land for their native country. It's a deliberate weaponization of immigration, with military, financial, and political support from the state. Imagine if the American government paid 500,000 US citizens to move south of the border, build little cities, and then build exclusive super highways back to the US. And then the US military patrolled those highways shooting any Mexicans who protested and bulldozed their houses. It's like a growing fungus.

He's def more conscious. But that has little to do with how a large organization of people operates. Sadhguru could be the most conscious dude on the planet and his followers could still be raping kids behind closed doors.

Some higher aspects of reality cannot be thought of in an explicit concrete scientific manner, but can be thought of in a more loose, indirect manner.

Sadhguru's minions are def brainwashed, but that's what they signed up for and that's par for the course in India. The whole of India is brainwashed with Hindu spiritual dogma. Becoming a monk is an intense life choice. Obviously not right for most people.

PM is more correct than say a religious fundamentalist who reads the Bible literally and thinks his interpretation is the only objectively valid one. Or a scientist who thinks that science is the best and most objective way to see reality. That's what PM is pointing out as a mistake.

What's unhealthy for society is denying the obvious psychological differences between men and women. When I say man, what I really mean is masculine. If a man is not masculine then what I say doesn't apply. Just because there are feminine men doesn't touch my point. The meta problem here is that people don't understand the proper and important function of generalizations. You tell a stage Green a valid generalization and they instictively try to hairsplit it to death to satisfy their political social justice agenda and worldview.

Sounds like a tempest in a teapot.

It's hard to articulate since it is oblique.

Watch this: Now ask yourself, Does the Fossa logically know how it selects mates? It has no idea. But it is very good at it nonetheless.

Your survival is not logical. You don't know you're doing it, you're just living. There is enormous intelligence in how women screen out low value men. And it's all instinctive and unconscious, such that you'd have to study it for years like a zoologist to see it.

That's not a bug, that's a feature. That's how women screen out the weak men. They don't want to give weak men explicit signals or help in mating them. What you gotta understand is that women are not here to serve you. They are always doing what is best for them, not what you need. Don't try to change women, change how you see them. It is not a woman's job to help you have sex with her. Her job is to put up obstacles.

If you were a Zionist you'd be happy and self-righteous, patting yourself on the back.

No, I mean using internet to replace having a social life. Too long, I don't have time right now to analyze all that.

She makes plenty of high quality and wise posts on this forum. She just has a different perspective than you. Why make it personal?

Tone it down a bit, please. Being this aggressive hurts your arguments.

I blame video games and internet. Men are simply not learning how to socialize.