Leo Gura

"and the disclosure will be half-assed"

Of course. Because pussy cares. Cock must care what pussy cares if it wants pussy

Not-knowing would do you some good.

It is not bad. It's just mid. Like I said.

"and the disclosure will be half-assed"

LOL. It DOES if you have a pussy. A pussy cannot afford to not care about social standards. Social standards are life and death, not a silly game.

I have a few of them on my list. Yup. I know.

Martial arts can be done without conformity. Ralston teaches how. It's just rare.

For certain products/services it can work. You need a very specific product/service.

Are you fucking serious? Eggplant!

What is the contradiction? Smartphone uses MP3s. Their status value is totally overblown and fake. That purse should cost $200 tops. Cucumber or mushroom makes way more sense. Eggplant is some kind of sick joke.

He is not wrong and even insightful at times. He clearly was intelligent.

We have entered the Idiocracy stage

Yes it is. Martial arts is a hive of conformity. Study some of Ralston's work to appreciate that.

Certain stupid emojis like the eggplant emoji or the ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ emoji. Who thinks that an eggplant looks like a dick?

QAnon OMG, QAnon is pure conformity.

That is so stupid. Lol It would make more sense if the Rolex was not waterproof.

Ironically, that's pretty original and creative, for whoever invented that idea.

Google ads is an ambiguous term. Google search text ads can be very effective for proper keywords. That's different than display ads on Twitter. Specifically, image based banner ads have very poor ROI. Google Adwords can have good ROI if you have the proper product/service. The quality of traffic and clicks on Google is like 10x higher than Twitter. I would not even trust Twitter to report honest metrics for clicks and views. Musk has manipulated the hell out of Twitter.

Well, display ads in general are very low ROI. Usually those ads work for major global brands, not unknow individuals doing direct sales. Those ads are meant for building generic brand presence like Coca Cola or BMW. Display ads generate very little direct sales. When you see a Coca Cola ad, they do not expect you to click a button and buy a coke right then. But as a non-major brand, you need sales to pay for the cost of the ad or you go broke real quick.

Lol Much like the film, you will need to go through an extended chase sequence to get the disclosure, and the disclosure will be half-assed

My post directly answered the question of this thread. Women's preferences are more relative because position in a social hierarchy is needed for their survival, and position in a social hierarchy is relative. That's why women are attracted to social proof and men are attracted to tits. Social proof is more relative than nice tits. If everyone in the world thinks I'm a celebrity, I will get laid a lot more just cause of that. Whether people see me as a celebrity is very relative. Social things are much more fluid and malleable than tits are, although these days even tits are malleable, haha.

Connor is a perfect example of what I mean by survival. How survival conflates with spirituality.

As long as she doesn't call herself a therapist or mislead viewers into thinking she is a therapist, I don't see a problem here. She should win the case on free speech grounds. Life coaching is legal and unregulated. She should frame herself as a life coach.

In the context of this thread, men are the providers, which is why women are judged on their beauty and not on their ability to provide. No man rejects a woman because she can't provide materially. Women are not called to be "providers", men are. If a man fails to do it, "something is wrong with him". If a woman fails to do it, nothing is wrong with her. Let's not act like this standard doesn't exist. This explains why women date up. It screens out those who can't provide. It is easier to provide when one is near the social top. That's why women are attracted to men near the top.