Leo Gura

I'm a big fan of the Harry Potter personality test. Jesus was defintiely a Gryffindor. Only Gryffindors can awaken.

No. That is an assumption you need to test. I want to see some data backing that up.

Except personality type does not capture other crucial aspects of this work like the tendency for effortless mystical experience or baseline state of consciousness. These factors are far more important than personality. Someone like a Jesus didn't get there through personality but mystical experience. Personality may be a red herring.

A fool's errand. This work is not about guessing. If you don't know, then not-know. Don't invent stuff just to feel like you know. Trying to guess Jesus' personality type is ludicrous.

That is not necessarily true. Isn't Sadhguru an extrovert? Please be more careful with your assumptions and jumping to conclusions. Awakened masters usually have way more weird traits going on than just personality type.

I find it laughable that they have personality types for Jesus, Buddha, etc. You have no idea if these people even existed. Nevermind their personality types. Has any of those people even been given a personality test? Doubt it. You can project whatever you want on those people.

Because the fundamentalist is all wrapped in beliefs whereas the rational scientist is at least thinking and doubting and asking questions. Development level is measured by the capacity of the mind to question reality. Beliefs are athithetical to that. Even having the right beliefs is worse than having the wrong belief but at least being in a process of doubting and questioning. The Christian is not questioning reality so he is stuck. The epistemic process is more important than believing the right answer.

You have the ratios calculated out. Ahahaha

You pulled the whole universe out of your ass (with love)

Is there? How do you know?

Move discussions of Infinity to another thread. This thread is about the podcast.

Look, dude, you are deep in the Ralston paradigm and I am way over it. I don't know how else to explain that to you. Ralston is severely limiting your understanding of this domain, great as Ralston is. I am not going to keep arguing with you over it. Do not distract this thread with Ralston debates. Do that elsewhere.

I am in contact with the hosts via email and they seem to be open to future conversations. So that is promising.

@UnbornTao Sigh...

Sure, man. We can do that. Contact me via PM for scheduling.

This is so stupid. Every culture has the notion of God. Someone should tell him about Teotl, Zeus, Ra, Ahura Mazda, etc.

And I am saying it is complex. There are aspects of Infinity which no one here comprehends or imagines.

I am not talking about beyond absolute. I am talking about deeper insight into Infinity/God. Insight which you could have if you stop acting arrogant.

That's where you are totally wrong. But have it your way.

Look, dude. You are being so arrogant. You not hearing what I am telling you: there is specific insight which is being missed. If you think you got Infinity all figured out, you're kidding yourself. There's way more to it than anyone comprehends. I am guiding you towards real insight, not stories you can debunk.

I am speaking of an insight which virtually everyone is missing. It takes a lot of work to realize what Infinity is. You cut that work out and flatten the process so people will never have the insight I am speaking of.

Kastrup is not going to lead them to God. It will just be academic philosophy.

Be nice, guys. Don't belittle our hosts, so we can continue the conversation in the future. They did a good job overall talking to me.

You understand that there are infinite Infinities? No?

Thanks mate.