Leo Gura

That is hard to say. Most people will not be going hardcore mystic. Having kids is a huge decision, but relationships is easy enough to combine with mysticism. You can find ways to combine mysticism and family life and even kids. Delay one or the other. Either do your mysticism before you start a family or after your kids leave the nest. It all depends on your desires. Kriya yoga is designed for householders. So you can do it while you have a family.

Well, this is specifically in the context of how to talk to women.

That is what HoeMath is suggesting his audience does. Women don't help a man make himself, though. Women often discourage it. "Just be yourself". To make oneself requires understanding the gap between what one is and what one needs to become. That's why men require lots of coaching on this matter. There are many ways to go wrong.

It is okay, but there is the risk that you might want to start using chronically. Once the door is open, it's hard to forget. It much depends on your personality. For some people it will be easy to forget, for others it will be impossible to forget. If you are very serious about truth-seeking, psychedelics open a door that you cannot ignore.

Because you can't get laid sitting around in your armchair doubting your life.

Chasing comes from neediness.

That simply does not apply to modern civilization. You are talking about some mythical pre-civilizational past which is long in the rear-view mirror, if it ever even existed. Once civilization came online, everything forever changed. You can't undo civilization or act like it isn't a thing. Civilization is patriarchal because everything hinges on winning wars. Women can't win wars. There is no negotiating this. Wars need to be fought and won if you wish to live.

I don't mean chasing, I mean orbiting. It's a subtle but important difference. No one should really be chasing because it comes off as desperate. But if a woman really likes a man, she will chase him and that dynamic is not the end of the world for her. He will still be interested in her. But if a man ever chases a woman, he is cooked. No woman will ever sleep with him. It is more acceptable for a woman to be needy than a man. In a woman it's cute, in a man it's gross.

Both. The woman will not be happy in the relationship long-term if the man loses his center and starts orbiting her. Feminine energy orbits the masculine. This shouldn't be a desperate needy chasing, but a healthy kind of orbiting/following.

This is all natural for humans and it is our situation and it is not changing anytime soon. This is the market we must survive in. And he does complain a lot about how casual dating is a degradation from the old system of traditional marriage. So he is not overlooking that capitalism and liberalism shapes the dating market. As a conservative he dislikes this liberalization and sexual "liberation". It is ironic that feminism and liberalism has created our current casual dating situation. Women these days treat sex casually and get hurt by it. That is the foolishness of liberalism.

The feminine orbits the masculine. That is why women feel the ick about men who chase them. The man is not supposed to orbit the woman. He cannot keep women whom he orbits, only the one who orbit him. Women want to orbit a strong man. It's that simple. This is why a man cannot chase. It makes him unworthy of orbiting.

I don't see the sword thing literally. She is just expressing that seeing strength in men viscerally turns her on. This is not misogyny or trauma, this is what turns women on. Women are attracted to strong men. Why wouldn't they be? It serves their survival. A woman would rather be with a cruel strong man than a nice weak man. She does not view the nice weak man as a sexual option.

Men certainly treat women unfairly and selfishly. It is obvious that HoeMath doesn't really understand the feminine point of view because he has been hurt by women. He does not have enough care for truth to care about their POV.

Girls don't have requirements, they have feelings. Her only real requirement is her feelings. The rest is negotiable, right down to him being a cannibal. As long as the feelings are there.

Attraction is never wise or mature. It's just monkey hormones. So it works on everyone because everyone is a horny monkey. If you weren't a horny monkey you would hardly care to date. You have to wonder why dating matters to you at all?

Men need dating advice, but most of the men giving out dating advice are very corrupt, and the men needing the advice don't care because they are so desperate and immature and equally corrupt. Corruption seeks corruption. Flies seek shit. When you can't get laid, you don't care about being ethical or good, nor truth. You just want to either get laid by any way possible or to whine about why you can't and why someone but you is to blame. Immature men create immature dating advice for immature men to attract immature women. Immature women fall for it, so it works. When the women are so immature, you can't attract them with maturity or wisdom. Round and round the wheel goes.

That's more true of jeans. Jeans are the true norm. Jeans are just considered cool thanks to conformity.

I don't know why people love to hate on khaki pants.

Why do chimpanzees exist? Hard drug addicts are pretty much operating at the level of animals.

I'm quite surprised he didn't.

Many

But will he still hold office? Will he even step down?

It can because it is a subset of the Infinite. A droplet can reflect its source.

I've known about it for a few years now. I am skeptical. I doubt it can match the original and it really doesn't need a sequel. But I am intrigued. It could be decent. But I don't want my fave film to be fucked with by modern Hollywood. The first film is perfection and needs nothing more.

@Basman Touche. The dictionary should have a picture of a Japanese person under Conformity