Leo Gura

Spiritual people tend to have lower sex drives. Otherwise they'd be out screwing all day.

No attack. Just truth.

Dudes, I don't even follow soccer. I have no idea what the ranking are, who the players are, none of that.

I can't read every post on this forum. And even if I could, I can't force everyone to agree with my view.

You got the wrong girl. Natasha eats kangaroos.

But I put Spain first in the list. Accident? I think not.

That's what happens when you try to jump into the fight like a kangaroo but you ain't a kangaroo.

If only Conor McGregor could kick like a kangaroo.

That is how tech bros see you.

Breaking news: Australia only to allow datacenters if they are run by kangaroos.

Apple and Meta both did research that show LLMs are not actually intelligent: The top researchers know that LLMs are not AGI. My point here is a technical one. LLMs cannot handle tasks they were not trained on. LLMs interpolate existing data. They do not generate novel skills or creativity. LLM cannot code in a language not in its training data. A human can. LLM cannot do basic math. Human child can. As long as AI requires so much data, it is cheating, not true intelligence.

I don't know how to create it. I just know it cannot be done by scaling the data of an LLM. It requires a new architexture than LLMs use. Probably AGI is possible, but much harder than tech bros assume. It needs to be able to handle novel situations without specialized training data for that situation. It also needs to be able to do math through reasoning, not probablistic guessing (as it does now). You will know it's true AGI when it uses very little data but is still intelligent. Memorizing the whole internet is not real intelligence. I want to see an AI that uses less data than my PC but is still smart.

Absolutely not.

Ho-ho!

Don't know. Did not watch.