Leo Gura

@Joseph Maynor You are a case in point. I let you back in the forum despite our past disagreements. I am not asking anyone to agree with everything I say.

@Salvijus Too much of a stretch. You guys are trying to stretch political reality to fit your moralism. That's not a wise thing to do because you will be paying the cost in delusion. You are better off admitting that terrorism is wrong.

Not remotely true. Hitler killed way more people than Israel ever will. And Hitler did it in much uglier ways for superficial reasons. But "they don't need to it" is a key point that you take for granted. Why don't they need to? Because they are more developed. Why don't I need to steal your money? Because I'm more developed than a poor person. If your position is so weak that you need to do terrorism, that's a big you-problem.

@trenton There is no right to own a gun. There is no right to anything. But that doesn't mean we must outlaw guns. The only justification you need is freedom. You can simply take the position that you believe some number of deaths are worth the benefit of being able to play with guns. That's the most honest ground. Inventing rationalizations is not smart. There are many dangerous items you are allowed to own in any country. Why draw the line at guns? It is an arbitrary line.

Alpha males like myself fly around on UFOs.

Spiritual bullshit at its finest.

We can send a demon to your house if you prefer.

For a more serious answer: Any creator with a large following on social media will be surrounded by fans and yes-men, because who else would join this forum but fans of my videos? That's not an error, that's the nature of the beast. You are talking about having a fanbase. Yes, I have a fanbase, but so does every other successful and famous human. And I am very cognizant of the dangers of echo-chambers.

@AtmanIsBrahman This is for you:

@Joseph Maynor Careful, or we will collectively force-choke you

Good, good!

Again, as I said in my first reply to this thread, you're conflating "you" with "You". Your life is a Cosmic Hallucination. The Cosmos is in charge. It decides 99% of what you see, not your ego. Just look around your room right now. How much of this room's appearance can you change without physical interaction? Almost nothing. Can you change the color of your ceiling with your ego's mind? No. Can the Cosmos create a pink ceiling? Of course. But "you" cannot. Not without buying some paint cans. The point is, the point of manifestation is to brainwash yourself to go to the store and buy paint cans. Not to be lazy and sleep and wake up to a painted ceiling. Manifestors are trying to avoid painting. Successful people learn how to paint.

I am dating myself right now The yogi lifestyle is not right for most. But I am not most. But Miguel is also not most. I only entered this chat because Miguel showed a desire for transcendence.

Yes, it is, but much less directly. Hitler wasn't killing Jews with his Jedi mind. He has to employ people to build gas chambers. Which is the work that manifestors want to use manifesting to skip. My point is, if you want to kill people, you need to do actual labor to make it happen. But all those manifesting people tell you that negative vibration manifests too. It can't just go one way, since good and bad are relative. Manifesting a billion dollars into your bank account is technically theft. You say it's good, but from society's POV it is evil. How would God decide which of your thoughts is good or evil in order to block the evil ones from manifesting? Obviously that can't work.

@Yimpa You got it backwards