Leo Gura

Back in the day, pregnant women would wrestle dragons bare-chested. Those were the good ol days. How far we have fallen.

I do not hold that men are superior to women.

You need to get to the rock bottom of why you believe this. Why are you unworthy of advice? That is quite a specific and radical belief. Introspect and contemplate it. Psychedelics would help.

Not really. I don't really care. Men are obviously better equipped for providing security and handling tough survival tasks. This does not preclude that women could handle some of those tasks when situations demanded it. Personally, in my own dating, I do not play the provider. A woman should be able to provide for herself today. I am not her workhorse. But in the past that made more sense.

But it is much more than that. Woke is an ideology.

Fine. But this does not change the fact that women are optimized for mothering and men are optimized for providing. Valid scientific facts can be used to come to false and absurd conclusions. The ego manipulates science to construct a view that serves its political agenda.

They don't need to rig that. The problem is higher up stream. Just because they found some women who hunt in some part of the world does not make it disprove larger average trends. No one is denying that some women in some cultures hunted. And some women were cannibals. So what? In ancient times women had to be more hardy just to survive. A man isn't always around to save you. So women had to step up or die.

Woke here means leftist, not spiritually woke. Woke agenda is often Marxist, anarchist, moralistic, and seeking artificial equality. Yes, there is a real problem with pushing a woke agenda, especially in science and history. Woke people don't believe in truth, they believe in social justice and equality. So they will sacrifice truth for equality. They will say things like that men and women are equally good at sports, and other such nonsense.

That is exactly the kind of stuff that is happening in the social sciences. The social sciences have been corrupted by post-modernist, anti-colonialist, SJW agendas. It is a real issue. Woke people do bad science because they have a need to validate their political worldview. A researcher with a PhD in colonialism or gender studies, like on that paper, will have a strong woke agenda. The lefty agenda is so baked into the academic cake that they don't even know it is there. They are fish in an ideological pond. David Graeber is a good example of this. His writes books on ancient history as science and he is a leftist political activist type. It makes his books unthrustworthy because he has an obvious agenda. Many of these social scientists are Marxists or anarchists and see the world through that lens.

Well, I suppose Trump has been so blatanly corrupt that voters can't help but see it. So I guess that's good.

Voters don't know what corruption is.

Truth is discoverable independently by many people. That's the whole point of truth. When you are looking at a truthful pattern in nature, others can find it too. If it could only be found by one person, that's how you know it is fiction. Of course not all the insights I share are my own. I share insights from psychology too.

People's minds on Trump are long made up. The Epstein angle won't help. Gas prices and inflation are a better angle for getting voters.

Convergent evolution. I did not rip it off.

There is a woke agenda, but conservatives overblow it. There is an anti-woke agenda too.