Leo Gura

Well, display ads in general are very low ROI. Usually those ads work for major global brands, not unknow individuals doing direct sales. Those ads are meant for building generic brand presence like Coca Cola or BMW. Display ads generate very little direct sales. When you see a Coca Cola ad, they do not expect you to click a button and buy a coke right then. But as a non-major brand, you need sales to pay for the cost of the ad or you go broke real quick.

Lol Much like the film, you will need to go through an extended chase sequence to get the disclosure, and the disclosure will be half-assed

My post directly answered the question of this thread. Women's preferences are more relative because position in a social hierarchy is needed for their survival, and position in a social hierarchy is relative. That's why women are attracted to social proof and men are attracted to tits. Social proof is more relative than nice tits. If everyone in the world thinks I'm a celebrity, I will get laid a lot more just cause of that. Whether people see me as a celebrity is very relative. Social things are much more fluid and malleable than tits are, although these days even tits are malleable, haha.

Connor is a perfect example of what I mean by survival. How survival conflates with spirituality.

As long as she doesn't call herself a therapist or mislead viewers into thinking she is a therapist, I don't see a problem here. She should win the case on free speech grounds. Life coaching is legal and unregulated. She should frame herself as a life coach.

In the context of this thread, men are the providers, which is why women are judged on their beauty and not on their ability to provide. No man rejects a woman because she can't provide materially. Women are not called to be "providers", men are. If a man fails to do it, "something is wrong with him". If a woman fails to do it, nothing is wrong with her. Let's not act like this standard doesn't exist. This explains why women date up. It screens out those who can't provide. It is easier to provide when one is near the social top. That's why women are attracted to men near the top.

Peter Joseph is the best source I can think of right now on that. Watch his YT channel. I shared his vids before on my blog.

Yes, and that is about as long as books can practically be. Any longer and it's multiple books for sure. 500k is basically my limit, so I need to fit it in that. I don't want the book to be exhaustingly wordy. It has to be dense and potent.

Women need men to be providers. Men don't need that from women. I am not saying anything new here. Just pointing out the obvious. That is counter-balanced by men needing women to being good mothers.

Those guys are handsome and seen as strong though.

Men can also be attractive on their own merits. But, since women need men for survival, they want a man who is better at survival, and survival for humans usually involves higher social standing. Men don't depend on women for survival aa much (excluding reproduction). So yeah, it is asymmetrical.

Find yourself a real bitch and marry her. More practically, you need to date a few hot women to directly experience how annoying they can be.

The "art" that Hollywood makes these days is so poor that I get more enjoyment from watching criticism of it than I do from watching the art. We have entered full late-stage capitalist post-modernity, where the reviews are more interesting than the art

I am not so much trusting their judgment as I listen to the plot of the movie and how the movie generally works. This gives me information about whether it interests me or not. After I learned the plot of Disclosure Day, I lost interest in it. I thought it would be something more interesting. If I am truly interested in a film I will avoid reviews and even trailers. But such films are rare these days.

There is too much Hollywood trash these days not to consider reviews. I am not saying I know it is bad. I am saying the evidence points to it being not so good.