Leo Gura

I don't know.

Intro To Serious Philosphy

This is not something to theorize about. You must go and experience the leading edge of God-Consciousness and push it to imagine a higher level of God than the one you presently know.

@Xonas Pitfall I dare you to imagine that there are other Gods just like you. You guys still aren't getting it: GOD is only limited by your imagination. Where you stop is where GOD will stop.

It is contradictory if you assume it's false. But I dare you to imagine that it's true.

It is exactly an example of what I said.

Think of it like this: Consciousness has to imagine how Woke it can be. If it can't imagine a new level of Wokeness, it can't reach it. If you tell yourself, "Buddhist enlightenment is all there is to consciousness", then that becomes your reality. Because you aren't willing to imagine anything more. So my advice is: be ambitious with your imagination, rather than playing humble.

Awakening being multiplistic is not a bug, its a feature. Yes, you can literally invent new kinds of Awakenings. Your own imagination is the limit. If you imagine there are only two kinds of Awakening, that will become your reality.

No, because what's usually grasped is parts of a larger thing. You can grasp many parts of math without grasping all of it. Grasping all of God at once is just not going to happen. That's a fantasy.

The reason it happens in degrees and facets and stages is because God is too much for a human mind to grasp all at once. Can you grasp all of math at once? No.

Omnipotence is just the ability to dream/hallucinate without limits. When you dream at night, that is a glimpse Omnipotence.

I don't think it is any harder. That's just a function of your unique self. Why would you expect all insights to be equally accessible to all people? Obviously some insights come more easily to some personalities vs others, just as math comes easy to some but hard to others.

I do not have that.

The only Pokemon I played was Red. Those were the good ol days.

Quine talked about it in his paper.