This stream auto-updates
- Past hour
-
It doesn’t own him. It can feel that way, but that’s a false assumption. The beauty I’m talking about is consciousness itself, not something biological.
-
Thanks for proving my point. You failed the test
-
It’s not that the question itself is bad. The problem is that Olaf, a guy, is asking women how he should approach women. That can come across as insecure, and that’s where the aura points are lost. If a woman asked the exact same question, it wouldn’t be nearly as bad. Olaf isn’t a woman asking this, nor is he on his way to becoming one. So why pretend the optics don’t matter? Of course you don’t care. You’re not in your prime anymore and you already have a partner. I’m talking about women who are still in the game and under 30. And this is exactly why I made that other thread about women being deceptive. You want us to believe you’re all angels who never judge a guy for things like this, but we both know that’s not how attraction works. Attraction responds to confidence, not a guy standing there asking, “So what do women want me to do?”
-
@Karmadhi Ben Gvir is polling at ~7% right now. Read the poll I added on the previous page.
-
Desire is the splitting of oneness into separation just for the joy and pleasure of reunification.
-
I don’t know what gender you are, but can a man control his erection? That erection owns him. That’s what I meant by owns you.
-
You asked the question. I gave you my answer. How you choose to manipulate that answer is none of my business.
-
@Joseph Maynor So, am I getting an answer to my question? It is important to stress test the concept, lol
-
Okay
-
This is why you love manipulation, because you know people see you as a prize.
-
Women experience the same thing with men. It’s not different. Not in my case anyway.
-
desire is the egos attempt to become whole
-
Come to realize there’s a subtle distinction here. For me to truly take a teaching a spiritual teaching seriously- I’d have to work pretty hard in creating the conditions to come to same realization as the teacher. Not through simply reading or intellectualizing; I need a direct experience of what the teaching is saying. I cannot truly grasp any teachings thru language alone. Learning via spiritual texts will forever be limited in this way. Actualized.org for example, I spent the first 3-5 years watching tons of content, journaling, contemplating. It was until I really started to push against the method of: me + Leo + listening to/watching - for me to grasps that I could only go so far with it. I now do my best to find deeper and more nuanced ways in observing my mind constructing reality in ways that were not as accessible through consuming content alone. Nonetheless I had to start somewhere. Don’t take my word for it, but the most powerful teaching one can ever give you is that you are God, and that you are constructing all of reality. Grasping intellectually is great, but once you get a direct insight- your experience of life will never be the same. You’ll recognize it as such when you do :-), and you’ll no longer need any validation from teachings/teachers - you’re imagining all of it.
-
Yes, they realise.
-
It only owns you if you let it. Men have a harder time letting go of it than women do.
-
It would help more if you admitted whether you’re a baddie or not. Do attractive women experience this too, or is this mainly something women with less attractive faces experience?
-
A reflection of the imageless. Convincing enough that you just want to look at it, for there’s nothing else to see. Looking at the imageless is all that looking can do. Narcissus didn’t fall in love with himself. He fell in love with perfect synchrony. His reflection never interrupted him, never misunderstood him, never arrived late. That’s not vanity. It’s a refusal of real connection.And now we know.
-
Thanks for your answer, that was really interesting to read.
-
I’m glad we agree on this.
-
Okay
-
Had i thought of it originally, id actually be working on a whole thing, based on just that, or something just like it, cause wen you find somethin like that, ya gotta build a whole thing round it, like those are some rare things that come together... like it would then be working out also the rhythm between words and stuff like that, like the more abstract mechanics no one thinks of, but that add to it when spoken out loud (probably. i actually never really thought about it myself)
- Today
-
Okay thank you. I'll try to contemplate on it.
-
Sure, we can learn something from it. I just wouldn’t confuse two women’s personal preferences with the female instruction manual.
-
"Prince of the Word, you built so good a castle out of sound and name— but what walked through it, phantom-hued, ... said it was 'creation from nothing.
-
