This stream auto-updates
- Past hour
-
Elliott replied to Husseinisdoingfine's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Marines are being mobilized for deployment. May all these Epstein fighters die an honorable death. #IServedInTheEpsteinWars You Israelis better leave state, Iran is not showing signs of letting up, they will likely annihilate your nazi country. -
YES. I want to add: Depends on the moment, too. Yes in a sense of "fits my experience of reality". Have recently met a girl, the first criterion she named was indeed stability. Not looks, not money, not status. "He knows who he is and he's stable, he knows how to regulate himself". Have many other examples from other contexts that support integral's statement. Too harsh IMO. It all depends. HOW you do it is IME much more important then what. There is something inside that nothing from the outside can give you, yes. BUT: There is something you can get from connection with others that simply cannot come from within. And emotions are part of this. IME the problem is never showing emotions or feeling them. Nobody wants to live with, or communicate, or even fuck with a block of ice, right? Emotions are fine. It is how you handle it, how you do it, what you do with it. As a rule of thumb: Women have been able to handle my emotions to the degree they can handle their own. I have been able to handle the emotions of others to the degree that I have faced my own. I swear, I have worked in some projects where my main value added was to just remain calm and even keeled in times of turmoil. Coming back to @integral above - "good vibes to boost and keep them steady along the right course" - I'm learning that I can make good money just providing this in combination with some consulting 1&1, good communication and genuinely caring. Seeing the strengths and skills in other people and helping them to make use of them, overcoming their fears.
-
That's why I don't take him seriously anymore. Maybe I should, but I just can't by into the bullshit hype. Time will tell.
-
Butters replied to Husseinisdoingfine's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
I hope that people will stop making war ❤️ -
I think he says these things just for lolz. Maybe it increases the stock price, maybe not. He just enjoys attention is all.
-
Butters replied to Butters's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Am definitely more confused than before I posted this, but sometimes the pondering is the fun. This doesn't really seem to have a properly understandable answer I think. -
My ex was complaining that I wasn't emotional enough and wasn't sharing my emotions to the degree she wanted. I think if you feel a need to do it, you should, not out of some requirenment that you read somewhere, or just because girls asks you to. Just be genuine, and see where that takes you. Of couse if you act like a cry baby, complaining, whining and being emotional daily to her, that might become a turn off. Find a masculine ground if you are leaning more into it, but also find ways to integrate the feminine. Being vulnurable and emotional from time to time can be okay and deepen intimacy I think.
-
Disco elysium was fucking awesome. It’s like a novel.
-
Since the last draft of my ontological cosmology, my theory has become A LOT more streamlined. It seems to have moved from the domain of analytical idealism to the domain of field ontology. Of course, I have been inspired by physics, however, I am using every concept borrowed from physics as a metaphysical principle that applies to all of reality, including physics on every level of granularity because of the self-similar nature of reality. What is Reality? Field is the absolute. Reality is space. A space is a duality with an outer boundary, and an inner boundary that separates the dualities. The space has the field quality. The outer boundary of the space is necessary to prevent the disintegration of the space and the inner boundary is necessary to prevent the collapse of the space. The outer boundary allows the field of the space to resonate. Resonance is what happens, when the frequency of the wave match the outer boundary, such that it becomes a standing wave and therefore allows for existence, which is an instance of being which is field. Any wave with the same frequency with an inverted phase in the same space will cause destructive interference and therefore the complete negation of the standing wave, which is non-existence. A space with no wave is empty. The qualities of field Field has three qualities: Unity, duality and wave, which itself has four qualities: Frequency, Spectrum, Amplitude and Phase. Unity is the devine desire for the collapse of duality, which is space, into singularity. Duality is the gift from god that establishes space and allows for existence. Frequency is sequentiality and causes the manifestation of logic and the object. Spectrum is Simultaneity and causes the manifestation of meaning and the symbol. Amplitude is feeling and causes the manifestation of phenomenon and the subject. Conclusion Of course, this is just another draft. The theory will change again, when I try to integrate more concepts into it, especially from physics, about which I need to learn a lot more. It might not seem like it, but as it stands, it explains A LOT. There are still open questions and inconsistencies like: What exactly is phase? How exactly does resonance and dissonance happen? What is a mind, and how does the distribution of the three attributes (neurodivergence-neurotypicalness distribution) arise? Idea: Mind is a topology (resonance body) that creates a space with special attributes The HSP topology creates a ton of feedback (wave is trapped inside for longer). It creates resonance when there is a pleasant feeling and dissonance when there is an unpleasant feeling. The Autism topology creates resonance when a wave is coherent and dissonance when it is incoherent. Neurotypical topology creates resonance when a wave fits its identity and dissonance when it is in conflict with its identity. If the field comes first, then what comes second? The wave or the space? Does the wave create the space (high frequencies create smaller spaces with a frequency of the Planck length creating singularity and lower frequencies create bigger spaces) or does the space create the wave? If it's the latter, then where does the space come from? Where do these forces of unity and duality come from? Do high frequencies create unity and low frequencies duality or is it the other way around or not at all what's happening? Is all of this in some way related to physics or just Deepak Chopra style pseudoscience? I'm pretty confident that I'm onto something, also because: (Fields of sense seems to be a lot more limited to my theory since it seems to assume spectrum, which is meaning, is the most fundamental, which is only a part of my theory)
-
I just saw it, looks promising. Do you get any value out of that community? Are there valuable discussions?
-
Yes let me know what you find! Some people say you can exchange the Nutella with any other chocolaty-hazelnut creme, but I disagree.
-
Xerces replied to CARDOZZO's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
https://itascabooks.com/collections/1122philosophy/products/whereof-one-cannot-speak-absolute-consciousness-beyond-the-self-1 You can order directly from Itasca Books using the link above, my copy is on the way -
Was wondering what would happen after his ayahusaca-40-day-fast-actualized.org-interaction psychosis wore off
-
Ziran replied to ZGROPIUS's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
A detailed answer depends on the circumstances, a case-by-case evaluation. In general, a sorcerer is able to interact with primal and primordial energetic principles which universally co-exist within each individual. These energetic principles go by varying names: demons, spirits, gods, angels, messengers, guides, aliens, Elohim... Because the energetic principles co-exist, within and without, a competent sorcerer can locate a root or "vestige" of it within themselves or among the others which strongly corresponds, like hand-in-glove, with its vestige or root within the afflicted. But, to be clear, accurate correspondence is culturally specific. It's usually a version of scrying within a doaist lineage. Some lineages have a patron/matron diety or dieties. See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrying Most often they're referring to self-defeating-cognitive-traps. A daemon, pre-computer-science. -
pursuitofspirit replied to pursuitofspirit's topic in Life Purpose, Career, Entrepreneurship, Finance
@LastThursday @theleelajoker Thank you both. Incredibly helpful insights. -
Sincerity replied to Someone here's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
I think there can definitely be overlap between insight and belief. Having what felt like a „profound insight” which later turned out to be false and based on fake foundations. I’ve had that in life. Being wrong is a bitch. 😆 But I wouldn’t draw insight as just a subset of belief. I think it can depend on 1) whether you’re approaching contemplation (especially on the fundamental) from genuine beginner’s mind and interest in truth and 2) whether your insights from this beginner’s mind repeat across time. I think genuine interest in truth for the sake of it is a mechanism that cleanses you of the corruption of invalid beliefs. Across a long span of time, that is. Doing the work to see truthfully and to throw all that isn’t true out, if you care about that. Having done that, I think the possibilities of true insight are real. And you’re obviously always still fallible, even if you care about truth. -
Who, Elon?
-
I'm in the black uniform, red headgear Disagreed with the outcome. Uphill battle before the bell even rang. Blessed to have been in that ring tonight. The work continues. Respect to my opponent. The arena gave us both something tonight. The politics in amateur boxing is so fucking corrupted, this is my second fight and nobody told me that you cannot wear the same color trunks and tops, the beltline needs to be a different color so they can identify any potential low blows. I told the referee respectfully that it will not happen again and he gave me shit, he was being sarcastic and he was only telling me that he's not going to give me any warnings and he's only going to tell me once to keep it clean but he didn't tell my opponent anything. Then he asked the judges and the officials if I'm disqualified because of the uniform, to which I told them that the owner of the event said that I'm good, and they looked at me and told me that it didn't matter what I said and they called the owner while the fighters were in the ring and the owner told them that I'm good. I kicked the guy's ass, boxed his head off, even launched his head gear off and they didn't give him a standing eight count. I could have controlled the center of the Ring more but I boxed economically and landed the crispier punches but I didn't get my hand raised and I stayed respectfully even after the fight, I looked on my Fightbook and the judges put that I lost all three rounds which was absolutely absurd. Everyone there saw that I got robbed. Back to the drawing board
-
@LordFall No I'm not into dating apps, but I don't think that's true. So you could take photos of an unattractive (looks) guy and make him more attractive? How?
- Today
-
Carl-Richard replied to Someone here's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
But then we're talking deep in the Walmart sandbox kind of deep. That's why I think "insight" and "belief" are truly not firm distinctions. Insight (unless if we're talking about non-dual awakening as kind of insight, which here we're not) is just when something bubbles up from the pool of other beliefs or the same cognitive architectures underlying those beliefs (language, concepts, words, expressions). It might be highly salient, highly meaningful, by virtue of it bubbling up in that way, but still, it is bubbling up from the pool of beliefs / cognitive architectures and presents itself as that. "Eureka! My mind just had a mind blast!". Ok, but are you the universe yet? -
To what end? 🤨
-
Sincerity replied to Someone here's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
God/Now is always elusive and non-solid. That’s true. But still, you can train yourself to know what to contemplate on and how to raise state to such a level that you have a profound awareness of God. I’m speaking from experience. You could do it too. -
Also given the bullshit content that most people is producing at least Bryan Johnson is promoting health and taking care of yourself. He's also open minded about the inquiry process and both has debunked much bullshit on the field and is open to try uncommon stuff like magic mushrooms or 5-MeO-DMT.
-
Breakingthewall replied to Husseinisdoingfine's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
No, Putin is wise because he seeks stability, prosperity, and sovereignty for Russia. The ayatollahs are stupid because they seek the destruction of Israel based on the teachings of a medieval warlord they consider a god. Quite obvious right? Then any war is a genocide? Why do that demagoguery? You know that if Israel wants they would kill 1 million in one week with phosphorus bombs. It's an expulsion, it's bad enough, but it's not a genocide Sure but nobody believes it. In Islam it's legitimate to lie the kafir If Iran would stop burning flags and shouting death America every day in the congress, we would see what happens with integration Yes, Middle west is not stable because America Satan, without the great Satan, Gaddafi, Saddam, the ayatollahs, Al Assad and isis would do party, hugs and dance . Also dance with the ottomans if the British wouldn't displace them. Maybe you don't remember that Middle east except Iran was colonized by the turkish for 5 centuries, when any rebellion was suffocated with iron fist, without mercy. Example destruction of Diriyah Later I will do an analysis of you, if you let me, then you can say if I'm totally wrong -
While that is true, the question is how much does it matter to be dehydrated for a couple of minutes or whatever it takes for you to get to the point of drinking water and elevating your bodily hydration to normal? It's like you have 24 hours of the day to be either optimally hydrated or dehydrated. If the thirst signal has a delay in the span of minutes for maintaining optimal hydration, and you follow that signal, you will probably only be off by a couple percentage points each day even if you eat the most insanely dehydrating foods. It's the same logic with how working out can increase longevity even if it involves putting your body through heavy strain for a couple of minutes/hours each day. The strain is only a couple of minutes/hours each day, out of 24 hours (or whatever the workout rate is). So the adapative benefits from working out can outweigh the effects of strain during the workout, because the strain is so little compared to the overall picture.
