Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. I'm not so optimistic that's possible. That line of thinking skews easily into hyperbole. I'll believe when I see it.
  3. But that’s just your opinion, it’s how you see it there. If it’s mental isolation and closedness, that’s all your projection there, not anyone else’s, at least not mine here. I don’t see any mental isolation or closedness when I think about oneness, I see open boundless infinite vastness, quite the opposite of isolation in fact. But don’t take my word for it, think this through for yourself, see what you want to see. For me, the way I perceive reality to be, is that it always presents itself as an absolute presentation, not as a representation. A representation would be a false reality, because reality is only ever being itself from moment to moment uninterrupted, it’s never being here on behalf of something else separated from itself, which to me means being represented by a separate entity. Now that to me would be a very limited reality, because entities don’t last forever, they appear and disappear in what is ultimately always this seamless presentation we call reality.
  4. Again, it must be convenient to have instant amnesia for the things said there. I just think what's talked about here, triggers and frustrates the self illusion there. It goes against its illusory framework or paradigm. It threatens its own reality and entire fantastical belief system of being all of reality(undercover delusional narcissism). YOU ARE NOT ALL OF REALITY! THAT WHICH BELIEVES IT IS, IS A GIANT INFLATED SPIRITUAL EGO/SELF ILLUSION. THAT EXACT IDENTIFICATION THATS SAYING "I AM THAT", IS THE SELF ILLUSION. GET IT!!! And of course everything said here sounds the same and gets boring. The communication doesn't change or offer anything to that stubborn self illusion. It's a completely uncompromising communication. It would be strange and very questionable if the communication changed drastically over time, wouldn't it? What's being communicated here is timeless. It doesn't change depending on how many psychedelic drugs/trips have taken place, and steered the imagination drastically. And of course a confident communication that completely denies the existence of that identity is going to be attacked and labeled as malarkey. That's it's main defense mechanism. If it can undermine the credibility of the messenger, it doesn't have to take seriously the implications of the message. ❤️
  5. Yes, but what you are overlooking is the fundamental reality of what the stone truly is. If we turn again to quantum physics, we see that the stone, the light, and your eye are not separate entities. They are all entanglements within a single quantum field. The transmission of information, then, is simply the way this unified field interacts with itself, what I refer to as "dreaming." The brain has evolved to filter these signals, enabling you to navigate your daily life. Whether it is a dream constructed from memories or your everyday reality created by sensory input, the perception of distinct, solid objects is always a filtering function of your nervous system. At the fundamental level, there is no boundary between the stone and the eye. So even quantum physics denies that reality. From my perspective, it is the exact opposite of escapism. It means that everything is connected, and if you throw a stone at someone else's head, you are doing it to yourself, even if you don't physically feel the pain.
  6. the mind only represent the reality, don't create illusions. Create representations. The separation is absolutely real. You could say that ultimately everything is the reality manifested in a form, but you are a form that self preserves and that is separated of others, even all are interconnected. Saying that the self is not real, that reality is a dream and those ideas only leads to mental isolation and closeness
  7. I'll bite. Did you know scorpions are related to spiders?
  8. A clearly defined sense of self appears at around 18 months of age, or at least this is the point at which a child typically passes the mirror test. If you place a mark on their nose and show them a mirror, they do not touch the mirror; they touch their own nose. Other animals that have also passed the mirror test include dolphins, elephants, great apes, crows, and some small fish. Other animals do not pass the test, but that does not necessarily mean they lack a sense of self. It may simply mean that they do not understand their visual reflection. A pig, for example, does not pass the mirror test, yet when it is about to be slaughtered it appears to know exactly what is happening and may react with extreme distress. Any being that interacts with the external world and possesses sensory organs has some form of selfhood, however basic. At its most fundamental level, it is simply: "I am."
  9. Interesting question. I'm struck by the idea of self-assembly and copying. A shell, leaf and a brain assemble themselves from matter over time, they grow. A pebble or stone is ground down from bigger lumps. All leaves, shells and brains of a particular type are similar, stones are randomly sized and shaped. A clockwork doesn't assemble itself and is more like a stone. But it does get assembled by something that is self-assembled (a person), so you could call it an epiphenomenon of nature. Its complexity is way less than even a shell, although, you could also call a shell an epiphenomenon. But, there could potentially be many identical copies of a clockwork. A stone could have a complex mix of constituents, but the arrangement is not orderly. I'm guessing a clockwork is mostly brass or steel, possibly ruby for bearings, maybe gold for trim, and quartz for glass; maybe that's fewer ingredients than a stone or pebble?
  11. Of course separation exists, in the relative sense, yes. But in the absolute sense, the source of every relative thing is seen as oneness. Of course, in our day-to-day physical reality, separation is very real and necessary. Without it, the universe could not function. That’s not being denied. The hand is separate from the heart, the heart pumps blood, not the hand. Both the heart and hand are different parts of the same singular body. That’s all that’s being pointed to. From a universal or non-dual perspective, all boundaries are ultimately illusions constructed by the human mind. Everything in existence is seen as an interconnected whole. Just as your hand and foot are different parts of the same body, so are all things viewed as parts of a singular existence. If you don’t like what the word ( illusion) is pointing to in this subject topic, then that’s fine by me. Also, the word illusion has many interpretations. So it’s a useful word when used in the correct context, of course. Make up your own mind about these things, I’m not here to doubt anything you think about these things, think what you like, I do.
  12. [intro of CoPilot based on my in-depth explanation, yet somewhat it's own vision or ideas] Simply About Infinities — Version 2 (codename "Curated") This repository is not just an update of a document. It is a shift in the entire orientation of the work. Version 2, codenamed "Curated", reframes the project from a single text into a multi‑layered exploration of infinity as a living principle. The original PDF (Version 1) remains available as a historical reference, but the new structure expands far beyond it. The repository and its companion visionary website together form a developmental arc: from conceptual clarity, to symbolic depth, to future‑oriented imagination. This is not mathematics in the conventional sense. It is the groundwork for measurement‑primitives that may one day support a new kind of math, but the focus here is not formulas. It is the inner architecture of understanding: how infinity behaves as a direction, a symmetry, a value‑gradient, and a generator of worlds. The scientific, philosophical, and spiritual dimensions are all present: - scientific: infinity as structure, recursion, projection, symmetry - philosophical: identity, meaning, balance, long‑term reasoning - spiritual: compassion, consciousness, non‑duality, infinite orientation The entire repository functions as a bridge between these domains. The visionary website expresses the same ideas in symbolic, narrative form, demonstrating how a black‑box abstraction can still produce coherent worlds. Visionary Statement of Interested Robot: https://app-c2bp101xkow1.appmedo.com/ Repository (Version 2, codename "Curated"): https://github.com/tambetvali/SimplyAboutInfinities/ This is not a theory of applications. It is a foundation for future possibilities. A seed for worlds that do not yet exist, but can be imagined.
  13. No, it proves that if was a dream created by your brain. The proof is that next day there is not any hurt. I could imagine a stone now and it's different than the creation of the brain when the information of a real stone is transmitted by the eye, it's another level of representation When you dream a stone it's because you have seen real stones , then the brain remember them. If you were blind from birth you couldn't dream stones I know that spirituality denies the reality, but it doesn't make sense. It's like being a believer I in flat earth, just scapism . You don't need to invent a parallel reality only for "awoken", the reality is real enough
  14. In this ranking of how complex an object actually is, where would you put a clockwork? I think there is a point to be made to put it anywhere — no manmade object comes even close to the intelligence to natural things like a biological thing like a leaf (when you look at the cellular level) or maybe even a rock. So that could be reason to put it very low. On the other hand it expresses a kind of meta intelligence — the object in a way is an expression of awareness of reality. But is this moreso a secondary attribute, or is it somehow backed into an object in an actual way? Its a real practical question btw. I want to view targets for remote viewing and this is one question I want to ask "how complex is the target?".
  15. @kavaris You can use the Filmot search tool engine: actualized.org videos word "exhausting" + "possibilities"
  16. Today
  17. @integral thank you!
  18. https://understandmyself.com/ My results: https://files.catbox.moe/id4jcc.pdf Agreeableness: Moderately High | 77th percentile Compassion: Typical or Average | 55th percentile Politeness: High | 89th percentile Conscientiousness: Moderately Low | 28th percentile Industriousness: Exceptionally Low | 0th percentile Orderliness: Exceptionally High | 99th percentile Extraversion: Exceptionally Low | 3rd percentile Enthusiasm: Low | 21st percentile Assertiveness: Exceptionally Low | 1st percentile Neuroticism: Exceptionally High | 99th percentile Withdrawal: Exceptionally High | 98th percentile Volatility: Exceptionally High | 98th percentile Openness: High | 89th percentile Intellect: Very High | 92nd percentile Aesthetics: Moderately High | 75th percentile
  19. Whats the one w/ "Exausting all possibilities" in order to learn / to understand things, or to explore the areas that you want to know, et caetera... im butchering the exact terms he used, but thats the video i want to find and highlight... i dont remember which one it is though. i started watching in the era where we transfered to the stuff up my alley, but thatwas a long time ago, nd it could be any of those videos, but i assume its gotta be later on, within the last 5/6 years... maybe.. but i really dont know...
  20. So, if a stone falls on your head in a dream tonight and you feel pain, does that prove that the stone in the dream is truly separate from your body in the dream? If you don't like the dream analogy, you can instead turn to quantum physics. From that perspective, the universe is a single, invisible underlying fabric. Within it, a head and a stone are not isolated objects, but merely local nodes - condensations within this continuous medium. In this context, your pain is simply the collision of these nodes. And your brain, in this sense, acts as a receiver that filters the data. Thus, within this framework, separation is not a factual reality, but rather a filtering function of your nervous system, one that screens out this shared reality in the course of everyday life.
  21. My experiments are mixed right now: Soft drink causes brain fog and fatigue, it's black-and-white obvious and it happens within 10 minutes Orange juice has a nice energy to it and improves overall performance, eating the orange feels just as good Cranberry juice has a kind of high, it's very clear and altered kind of state almost like being abit drunk but without impairment. Water with some table sugar in it makes me feel tired like the soft drink, but it's not as strong.
  22. I think it's one of these, unfortunately I don't remember!
  23. I know some things, a lot of things, but do you know somethings that aren't on my "some things i already know" list ? i doubt you know such kind of some things.
  24. We don't really need to create something more inteligent than ourselves, they just need to achieve parity with us in all aspects of inteligence/cognition, and need to have the ability of recursive self improvement. That is the point at which it would make ITSELF more inteligent than us. The same way inorganic materials created primordial organic materials needed for first form of life to emerge, then that life underwent a tremendiously long process of self improvement. I can definitely see some parrarels here

  25. advice on text game

    something_else replied to Olaf's topic in Dating, Sexuality, Relationships, Family

    Yes, and if you give her nothing other than boring mechanical and logistical texting she will largely feel nothing towards you. Again, I'm not arguing you shouldn't be direct, I'm arguing that you should try to be engaging and interesting as well as direct, and that combining all of those together is where the skill in texting lies.
  26. You don't need that anyone tells you, if I hit my head with a rock you don't feel pain, but if it's your head yes. Then your head is separate from my head, and the rock is separate from both. Where is the mystery?

  27. Hyper-Addictive Shorts

    Thought Art replied to integral's topic in Off-Topic: Pop-Culture, Entertainment, Fun

    @integral Yeah haha
  1. Load more activity