This stream auto-updates
- Past hour
-
I think that this guy has a nice integration of stage Yellow. He has money and is spending it on helping people, children, and animals, especially in poor parts of Russia. I can see a good integration of blue, orange, and green in the way he thinks and talks about the systems in Russia.
-
I didnt attack mysticism with my posts, I specifically attacked solipsism with my post. Most mystics werent solipsists.
-
Euphoria, especially season 3. There are so many stage red behaviours (drug addiction and dealing, prostitution, crime, etc.) and examples there. There is also some stage orange and slightly green and blue, but it is mainly red. This is a good show, love it.
-
Get the HPV vaccines, even if you're a man. Gardasil was the one I took. Good for preventing oral cancer down the road. Alternatives is using condoms for oral sex as well, but then you expose yourself to microplastics 😂
-
What do you guys have against BJ? Haha yea, he's unfortunately caught in 🔶 Orange paradigms: reductionism, self-maximization. He has traces of 🟢 Green tho: psychedelics & veganism. Also a good example of how psychedelics use without proper spiritual/ontological/epistemological work gets you nowhere, or even more trapped in one's own worldview.
-
Apparition of Jack replied to Rafael Thundercat's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Don’t you guys like the opposite sex? lol. I was speaking about this with my therapist recently and it kinda occurred to me so much of modern gender discourse seems to just boil down to someone feeling emotionally detached from the other gender. As if love, dating, relationships etc are just transactions one person gets from another and there’s no real way to fundamentally humanise or care about the other person. Aw man. Now I just made myself depressed. It’s not that bad guys lol we can get along 😢 - Today
-
His inference from "not affirming solispism" to "you are stuck in a rationalist paradigm" doesnt make any sense for multiple reasons , one obvious reason being that you can have a mystic epistemology and not be a solipsist and also not be a rationalist. Ralston isnt a solipsist, Rupert Spira isnt a solipsist, Sadhguru isnt a solipsist and none of them are rationalists.
-
@zurew Not trying to defend Solipisism or Leo per se, but here goes somethings I got while reading this discussion: How do you know what an assumption is? If we go by the logic that any which view has assumptions into it by simple virtue of the fact that your knowledge is not 100%(meaning you don't know all the content and all the structure that existed, exists and will exists, and more), then it seems silly to look for truth in philosophy or any system of thought. Because the questions will never actually be fully answered, because each asnwer brings about more and more questions -- like a hydra. I mean sure you can critic other positions and have doubt, but don't you see the sillyness of it? The other person can do the same to you infinetely, you will never will run short of explanation or arrive at the ultimate answer that will answer all questions possible. I think the genius of Buddha is exactly this, he didn't directly address metaphysical questions(he probably saw the whole stupidity of it if one is to attain nirvana) because it is indeed circular and you can makes a guess that this too is what he points samsara to be. The human mind is samsara, it runs in circles never getting satisfied and never actually being transformed. His whole effort was into transcending the mind, because the mind is indeed a hungry ghost. When mystics says reality is this, you can doubt, you can potentially find holes in it if you really want it, but I think trying to be as precise as possible and digging into their words is stupidity. Because it will never end and truly transform you like a mystical experience. But maybe you don't actually want that, if that's not what you want and you just want to explore thoughts forever then ignore this. My question for you is this, how do you know that your doubts about solipisism is true? Can you ever escape my questinoning into you from this point ownards, and if not what this might be point to?
-
lol
-
It helps to have delved into and mastered rationality, prior to deconstructing it. Otherwise you fall into trap of unexamined contradiction, emotional preference and loose associative thinking (there are more traps it appears, these are just some obvious ones).
-
@integral I think stupid was defined pretty accurately above, and without baggage.
-
Natasha Tori Maru replied to kylan11's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
@LordFall read again, appears like your view of humanity is incoherent. -
Natasha Tori Maru replied to Rafael Thundercat's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
How disappointing. -
Its cause we are the same person. Shiva.
-
Ignorance is a lack of consciousness. Lack of Consciousness is just the umbrella term
-
This is implicit to everything I'm saying but with all the baggage the word stupid has, it's being dumped onto this topic. The word stupid just means judgment in our culture there's basically no way to use the word in any other way.
-
Not affirming solipsism = being stuck in a rationalist paradigm. Next time I will try to do spirituality and philosophy with your approach and I will ask Leo what set of things I need to affirm. Red herring is when I bring up something that is directly applicable to solipsism and you have no answer for it. Yeah and that point is very stupid, because it is accounted for in many paradigms better than in others. And you also agreed with this previously btw and immediately ran away from it by saying "why should we care about explanatory power bro, I like simiplicity more and maybe explanatory power shouldnt be cared about bro, what matter is what true bro and what true is true bro regardless of explanatory power". You claimed solipsism makes 0 assumptions ,which is laughably false and anyone can recognize this who isn't mind raped by Leo. it perfectly makes sense. Your lack of ability to imagine that others have consciousness doesnt get you to others not having consciousness and especially not getting you to the impossibility that others have consciousness - but of course you wont recognize this because Leo paved the entire landscape of possible thought your mind can navigate through. And again there are a bunch of alternative idealist views that are different from solipsism that can perfectly account for this, but of course you dont know about them , because your knowledge starts and stops with the things Leo feeds to you. (nonduality, Bernardo's analytic idealism etc).
-
Dude, this is disgusting. Why to put yourself and others in such risk? Work on your self-esteem and the reason you want to sleep with 100 women to begin with. What are you trying to prove, and to whom?
-
Grateful Dead replied to CARDOZZO's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
But isn't that what Tolle means by overcoming the pain body? You've healed the energetic structure of your trauma and are now living from a deeper level that's no longer defined by suffering. I see no difference there from what Tolle describes. I don't understand your problem with the teachings of non-duality. I find Neo-Advaita aimless as well. But true non-duality dissolves barriers and opens you up to the Absolute. It is one of many ways that make it possible to bring the mind into harmony with reality. The goal is to see the light everywhere, until the seen and the seer dissolve into one another and only eternity remains. That is good, and you yourself say that it is merely the starting point for enlightenment. Now you still have to find a way to dissolve the barriers of the self. And how do you do that? What is your technique now? I do this, for example, by seeing the formless everywhere, much like light shining equally everywhere; in this, resistance dissolves within me, and I perceive this as true non-duality. -
Seneca said that the comics often speak the most truth. This bit on relationships by Gaffigan is pretty good, especially the part were he jokes how little men have to do with the birth process. If men had the risk of pregnancy they too would be much more picky and less eager to have sex.
-
enchanted replied to Natasha Tori Maru's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Exactly, even if that vision turns out to be wrong in some way (not saying it is) Johnson is a great example of how to be a visionary in the modern era. -
Wow those police siren and chainsaw sounds were really made by that bird, nice😀 hard to believe if you don't see it
-
@OBEler Regardless, his commentary on sleep, nutrition, exercise and our toxic food supply chains and fast food companies are true. All his supplemental products and nutrition products have science behind them and are third party tested his food plans are available for free and align with nutrition experts I’ve seen in the past. His appearance is odd. Always has been. He looks the best he has, from what I’ve seen. He is older, and didn’t live that healthy for most of his life and damage has been done already. I wonder why his eyes are red, or what happened prior to him being on camera. Worth wondering. Calling him a drug addict is a weird accusation in my opinion. I don’t follow that. He kind is kind spoken, teaches practical health advice and is motivating for health conscious people. He seems to be focused and inspired by health, longevity and enjoying life in a healthy way…. I don’t see the issue with that. Don’t die from preventable diseases that are lifestyle related is a fair purpose. I don’t know the extent of his personal health. I know he has data on all his organs. Not all of them are healthy. But, he has good biometrics according to him. But, none of us truly know. Appearance is a way of judging for sure. But, I’m not convinced it’s enough because those are only snap shots. His eyes looked fine when talking to Theo Von recently… He is a middle aged man. He’s gonna look like one. He looks fit. His face is weird and he has done strange procedures to it early on in his project too.
-
James123 replied to James123's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
What he said "Tiny bubbles" for entire universes. So, where is the absolute, it is Being. Therefore, forget these reincarnation, infinite realms, life's, fucking energies etc... You are already giving your own answer 😂 Everything arises and falls within You, but You are none. -
Lila9 replied to Rafael Thundercat's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Yes, they are full of shit to be honest.
.thumb.png.6923c588efc2b0a901602fddf3954db2.png)
