Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. Enlightenment is not for sale. It’s already free. If anyone is determined to sell this stuff, then sell it for free. No one has to be a beggar in their own kingdom.
  3. Because we're being harvested by dark energies. This does not contradict Absolute Good, because there's the potential to wake up and turn all the Darkness into Pure Raging White Light.
  4. It’s all Greek to me.
  5. I can’t because I am not disagreeing, I’m agreeing.
  6. Art is natural. Nature is artificial.
  7. No.... not mistaking the images... Yes, mistaking the images for what’s looking. What’s looking is real, what’s looked upon is unreal.
  8. No.... not mistaking the images... In English, the only time the expression "Fuck It" expresses positive determination is in the context of porn. If you disagree, please bring examples of circumstances where an individual exclaims "Fuck it!" "Fuck everything" to communicate a positive determination. Specifically catachresis. "Catachresis (from Greek κατάχρησις, 'misuse'), originally meaning a semantic misuse or error, is also the name given to many different types of figures of speech in which a word or phrase is being applied in a way that significantly departs from conventional (or traditional) usage" - Wikipedia Naturally
  9. We project other people and then make them our idols because we have nothing else to relate to, or with.
  10. Still no YouTube. Feeling great, just got phlegm now following second hit of COVID 19. Trying not to get a "big head" while remaining centered in my consciousness development. Holding myself accountable, started drinking coffee again, worse I have been having my favourite baileys in an affogato every day. I'll try to make today my last day, as I already had it ealier in the day. I didn't get a good night's sleep either (not the reason I had the affogato), and I dont have a good track record there either, so I want to make more of an effort on my sleeping habits as well. Right on top of my exercises on PROJECT : MEANING, in the midst of determining the strategic pathway for stage 3, as well as introducing different levels to stage one. Still very hesitant on releasing future stages given the tendency of human behaviour to want to skip certain stages across many disciplines without a strong foundation, will creativiae and reseadch more to discover potentially better pathways.
  11. I guess that's his point when he says 70%. not everyone can do that. most people are unconscious and are spiralling in vicious cycles of struggle and suffering most of their life, they just don't know any better.
  12. In my opinion God isn't responsible for our suffering and hardship, most of it comes from other people. He is not a dictator that determines every aspect of our lives, or orders people what to do. He gave us freewill to create the world that we want. I reccommend the books "Conversations with God" from Neale Donald Walsch.
  13. "They're not people. They're projections of my subconscious." "They're part of your subconscious. You're the dreamer, so they're your projections." "We create and perceive our world simultaneously." "The subconscious is what fills in the details. It's the subconscious that populates the dream." I'm convinced Christopher Nolan has experienced the deepest level of awakening, even more from Westworld
  14. Mamdani just keeps smiling and laughing and making everybody happy with his Enthusiasm but he has no power or initiative against the Genocide and AIPAC. He has so many times stated that his focus is not foreign policy but New York City AOC didn't she sign a law or a bill to pass weapon exports to israel? Bearnie Sanders is a good man but he has no support on the right, he just keeps demanding policy changes and reforms for decades but with no effect. He is a teethless tiger. Dan Bilzerian is young and has millions of followers and is totally serious on tackling any support to AIPAC and collaboration with Israel, he is a necessity without him we keep spinning this stupid wheel of Antisemitism debate and how much are we allowed to criticise Israel, come to Germany to see how amazingly stupid and retarded the people are. Three years into the genocide they still talk about israel as if it's an angelic country who has a right to defend itself. And no he is not like Trump he doesn't talk about foreigner bad genes or foreigners eating cats and dogs he clearly says that he is against any type of supremacy Including white black and Jewish supremacy and brings forth spot on facts that are not deniable. And he is not in the Epstein files, to the contrary he is angry that there are no arrests regarding the Epstein criminals Keep playing this stupid game of the other politicians including Mamdani, AOC and the entire criminal Democrats in Congress. Let's keep watching how little children are burnt and buried alive meanwhile we still haven't resolved if criticising it is Antisemitic, what a hypocritical nonsense. The tin is long due to punish anybody who collaborates with israel, imagine if somebody collaborates with Putin or Hitler with no consequences
  15. I listened to some of his teachings on youtube +10 years ago. He had some good insights, but always gave of some weird vibes. It makes me think of Ken Wilberts "Waking up is not the same as growing Up". Many gurus don't grow up, they think they achieved everything. This is especially true when everyone looks up to you and nobody questions your behavior.
  16. During my initial awakenings, I observed sacred geometry and symbols resembling alien code, ancient Hebrew, and glyphs. In deeper states, I perceived the fabric of reality as perfectly interlocked, holographic yin-yang symbols. These emitted a sound similar to windchimes as I moved through them, appearing like a curved holographic screen. My latest awakening, which prompted me to come across Leo's videos while researching Solipsism, revealed a futuristic transistor or node rendering physical matter through my consciousness. I also saw wavy fabric-like holographic grids. I am curious if others have experienced these how they would define them before the memory fades.
  17. Today
  18. My understanding is that under his view, God is everything and God is infinite and God experiences everything and Infinity includes every possible thing and scenario (including all the good and bad stuff). Under this view, its not like God has a choice not to "create" certain things, because everything is God and Infinity cant just remove certain parts of itself. So its not like other views, where a conscious agent seperate from and not identitcal with its creation, has an ability to decide what state of affairs he should create and with what kind of moral parameters. There is no problem of evil under this view, because there isnt any possible conscious deliberate choice that could prevent certain scenarios from happening, since infinity necessarily includes all scenarios. But this is why its problematic for Leo to just randomly collect quotes that were said in a wildly different framework, because once you examine who said those things and in what framework, you immediately realize that the meaning of those statements is very different and the problem of evil takes an entirely different shape there. Under Leibinz view, God created the Universe and the Universe is not identitcal to God and since under that view God has a choice (before creation ) about what to create and not to create - under that view, Leibinz response entails that God after contemplating about it, made the decision that the Universe needs to be created exactly as it is right now - so one less kid getting raped would make the Universe less perfect; just one less person getting burned alive would make the Universe not as perfect as it is now etc. Under Leo's view though, infinity necessarily includes kids getting raped and people being burned alive and infinity cannot not include those things. But its also the case, that under this view the label "perfect" is very much vacuous.
  19. @Lila9 You are modifying the meanings of concepts just to fit your arguments. That is literally the meaning of matriarchy: "women on top". No, mens biology tends to heavily objectify anything. You say that feminism does not push for erasing the biological differences but then you yourself argue for it. I tell you a story. My sister used to dress her dolls and say stuff like:"she is tired today, i will put her to bed". Then I come and take her doll and rip it apart just to understand how it was built. She started crying telling mom that i killed her doll. Maybe some of these ones: women have such an abundance of choice in the dating market due to social media and dating apps that most men feel invisible even if they are above average in looks and other traits. Women have now overwhelmingly the upper hand in the dating market. Women can more easily make friends. Women can use their beauty to get all sorts of kudos nowadays. Sometimes when I am dating I feels like an unemployed worker with a weak CV in front of a turbo-capitalist employer. I have to walk on egg shells in order not to be opted out, because I have such low leverage. She basically can tell whatever the fuck she wants but if I say something that upsets her I am out. Because she has 10 more men waiting in line. And this is for @Leo Gura give me a break with doing pickup in the clubs. I dont like those girls. They are ugly as fuck on the inside and outside. I am looking for a relationsip with a mature woman not just sex with a kid. I had enough sex. And cold approach in the city is not as easy as it seems, there are very few attractive women walking around. Maybe only of you cold approach in NY or something like that but I dont like living in such oversized shitholes. And I don't like building social circles either. I don't like to eat 1 ton of social shit from immature idiots just so that maybe they will introduce me one day to a cute girl. Dating is hard for men today! There are plenty of privileges men have but those are getting fewer and fewer due to the raise of feminism which puts the feminine perspective above the masculine. What? In the same way I can say this about women: Women are governed by conformity and feelings. Feelings are corrupting their perception of truth. Lol No, most feminists do not understand masculinity and therefore the masculine perspective. You might want to make men better but the results can be the opposite. Because again, men are not women. Men develop through challenges and accountability not just feel this feel that. I see moms raising their boys through the feminine lens leading them into a failed life. They become unattractive, shy, unmotivated nerdy whimps not the gentle and mature men you wish for. Careful what you wish. The problems you radical feminists are pointing to are mostly because we have too much toxic masculinity not masculinity. But you dont understand healthy masculinity. You mistake healthy masculinity for femininity. This is a crucial distinction you have to learn. Until then, all your actions will lead to more misogyny, shitty relationships, immature boysh men, hatred towards the opposite sex, mental illness, loneliness. Good luck 🤞.
  20. @lostingenosmaze
  21. Knowledge work is different from practicing a martial art. Managing life is different from practicing a martial art. Mastery is like a square and life is like a rectangle slot. It's like pushing a square inside a rectangle slot
  22. @Joseph Maynor @Mellowmarsh

  23. Leo’s Reels/Shorts Discussion Mega-Thread

    lostingenosmaze replied to Miguel1's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    https://www.instagram.com/leogura1/reel/DXotJeTjrdk/ @Leo Gura Now that's a real shower thought. Since you're experimenting with content lately, you could try and go viral making insights like these + quotes and lesssons from your blog and compile them into a kind of "high-consciousness shower thoughts" compilation. Something like Aperture's series on YT but obviously more serious and existentially practical. Could also be a good way to revive your Actualized Clips channel:

  24. Why did God make life so hard for humans?

    Natasha Tori Maru replied to LordFall's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    It is worth inspecting the judgments we attach to hardship. When something is difficult, do we automatically label it with some aversion (or desire?) IE "bad". There’s a difference between the experience itself and our interpretation of it. Pain, stress, and difficulty are very, very real. Some of the most powerful things we experience, but what we make of them is not fixed. Hardship doesn’t inherently mean something has gone wrong. For most people it does feel that way. This isn't always the case, some are inherently high in wisdom and can shift perspectives and interpretation. It’s possible to hold clarity, perspective, even a kind of steadiness, while going through it completely sober. You do not need to be high to maintain a higher state in this way. It can be achieved even during the worst of times if we drive to be able to view things from all perspectives. Hardship is a catalyst, but not a virtue.
  25. Continuing… Process vs. Product: "Knowing" can be viewed as a continuous process, whereas a "concept" is a static product or labeled idea. Beyond Words (Non-Conceptual): Non-conceptual knowing is considered a state of consciousness that occurs when not thinking, involving a deeper, immediate intelligence rather than conceptual categorization. "Knowing" vs. "Understanding": While understanding involves mental, conceptual, and intellectual processing (connecting dots), knowing can be a direct, non-mental recognition, sometimes described as an unconscious competence. Essentially, this perspective argues that the act of "knowing" transcends the mental structures (concepts) we use to label it.
  26. Because there is only awareness, the content of such is already awareness which cannot be split into knower and known separately. Reality is seamlessly one flow flowing from itself and returning to itself. Knowing is immediate one without a second. Knowledge is always on demand, never immediate. Therefore knowledge can only appear to be a real fiction for the mind. —— A.I. “This statement aligns with philosophical and psychological perspectives that distinguish between conceptual knowledge (labeling, static information) and direct experience (immediate awareness). Here is a breakdown of why "knowing" is often considered more than just a concept: Experiential vs. Conceptual: Knowing is frequently described as experiential, immediate, and of the "being," whereas knowledge is often stored information of the mind. For example, you can know about honey (concept) or know the taste of honey (experience). “
  27. Not “fake vs enlightened.” Too crude. Taken more broadly, this is gifted-anomaly inflation, a lion in spirituality amongst cubs, oh wait thats just my humour but let me continue. So IQ, creativity, meditation, altered states, doctrine and followers can rarity into cosmic authority. Examples include but are not limited to Leo (no offence as I am not a hypocrite, also myself (hence why I will always be anonymous), Owen Cook, Christopher Langan, L. Ron Hubbard, Tom Cruise, Hollywood puppet masters (theres actually many humble people in Hollywood, Will Smith's wife "2-pac dodged at least 1 bullet, dont you think?" , Russell Brand, Wim Hof, every dictator in history. This teaches us that spirituality is not exempt from narcissistic delusions and narcissistic tendencies are not exempt from spiritual insights which can be weaponnised or at the very least, create the potential for a narcissistic fantasy that the very least corrupts their audience. Most of the anomalies I have mentioned either do not know enough about human psychology, ontology, philosophy or if they do not in practice, including myself there as I still have much to learn and to save myself I do my best t never refer myseld as a teacher, to avoid all the pitfalls, that Leo himself brings up in the very cultish thinking, that I would expand towards including even being a cult unto oneself. In the context of socialised spirituality, an ego has the potential pitfall of spiritualitising things like: “I awakened” becomes exemption. “I see deeper” becomes dismissal. “Oneness” becomes boundary-erasure. “Transmission” becomes power economy. “Infinity” becomes a shield. These are however transient, forms od dissociation and from dissociation towards fragmentation that further imprisons or is only released by the very awareness or social, emotional maturity, that wouldn't dissociate in these ways. Misconduct is not just ethical failure. It is epistemic contradiction when its discarded as irrelevant, because its relevance is right fucking here before us now creating a ripple effect isnt it? Thats the awareness that is delusionally being witnessed when the ego creates narcissistic defenses like these. Even denialism by the very same mechanism can say "its not narcissism, that is your human paradigm. I am now Ra, or at the very least an alien here in a human body to instruct humanity". Youre here to instruct humanity, a role that has consequences, arguably positive ones, yet you are exempt from negative consequences for whatever conduct is involved in that process but you reap the rewards for whatever positive you do? Right, right, thats a 2 pac gunshot wound that got shot twice. The "Ra" sentiment and the like is just statistical anomaly delusion, Sam Vaknin, a guy that wrote a lot about this subject, would likely agree with me but because his own status of having NPD, he would also probably correct me however unnecessary it would be to do so. Also, understand that I am differentiating between narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) and the environments, including being a statistical anomaly, that can in these environments, reinforce narcissistic patterns that otherwise wouldn't reveal themselves as strongly, hence the adage and analogous, "power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely", and I would just add, where there is the lack of broad consciousness development. Also another distinction that needs to be made clear is this, and its so freaking paramount, there must be differentiation between specialised consciousness development like awareness of infinity, versus broad consciousness development, which is the container to hold the highest of specialised consciousness developments. Otherwise its not consciousness development, it just becomes a weapon of persuasion and influence analogous to the "halo effect" of being attractive, which only further adds to Mr. Massaro's statistically anomalous spiritual status. If awareness is profound, why weaponise insight? Why miss consequences a mature teacher should detect from dependency, coercion, secrecy, sexual confusion, money-pressure to group distortion? This isnt about abandoning authority and equalising consciousness among persons as it defeats the purpose of growing consciosuness, however being a statistical anomaly that is only a statistical one not an absolute one, does not grant one the privileged status of superiority in the intrinsic being aenae. Awareness should sharpen consequence-detection: less manipulation, clearer consent, deeper humility, harder accountability. Real states can pass through corrupt structures. Then realization is partial, unstable, or ego-colonised. Heres the test as a relatively good rule of thumb: Does awakening make the teacher easier to question, or harder? If harder, it is not teaching. It is hierarchy protected by metaphysics.
  1. Load more activity