Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. @oOo I might make this simpler, if I may. If someone treats you poorly (in your perspective) - do you lower your standards of communication to a form that has the propensity to be interpreted as hurtful, attacking, sarcastic, negative or derogatory? I noticed this behaviour. It is antithetical to connection. Connection is top.
  3. https://www.instagram.com/p/CxyU-ubPB-9/
  4. It seems that you retreat straight into dissociative surrealism and word salad. I think you might be at the exact opposite of being post-rational and land in the pre-rational camp my friend.
  5. I am Leo. And my mind is hot. @Yimpa Behave yourself.
  6. When the breeze in the air said, "humour me", I submitted like a weasel with fresh glasses, not of spectacles but of wine; verbal snores made of blood, and satire made of Fox News sackings.
  7. Interesting, so what you are instead saying is that you want me to change my standards and that I should just view people as beneath me instead of interacting as an experimentation of my own consciousness? When you say 'lower yourself', is this a personal, intersubjective or broader cultural boundary? For clarity, if it is a personal boundary, then this is a measurement of your own personal character to yourself. In which case, it is yours and yours alone. If it is an intersubjective boundary, this is a measurement of boundaries relative to the reality co-created between people, and if ethically, its based on consent. If it is cultural, it is a measurement of a persons understanding of their cultural norms. Now, let's change 'boundary' to 'statement'. I would describe my own statements as 'intercultural', a blurring between the intersubjective and cultural boundaries with a meta-awareness of the individual environment co-created as its own meta-cultural space. Viewed from that lens, instead as merely being "oOo's personal statements", how does that alter how you now read potential advances I could make in my own rhetoric without purely supposing that I conform to your own intersectional norm? Consciousness in the context of physicalism is a moment to moment integration, it does not cease. When I stated, "this is learning", I meant it quite literally.
  8. What Disney didnt fuck up in Star Wars were the last episodes in season 7.
  9. I like what they did with darth maul. There was a lot to loose, Maul was epic and mysterious in star wars 1 and the story that he survived the fall didnt make no sense. The story in clone wars was epic enough to make up for it though. Now the show Maul - Shadow Lord was still pretty good but its getting a bit much.
  10. It just seems like a odd way of writing, I'm curious what you had to say about it. You also completely dodged the question about real-world output: What are you working on in life and what is your life purpose?

  11. *

    Judy2 replied to Judy2's topic in Dating, Sexuality, Relationships, Family

    not explicitly. probably, yes.
  12. I try not lower myself to standards of interactional rhetoric that are emotionally catalytic if someone is less than charitable to me. And I certainly do not intentionally do so. Unless triggered and projecting. I tried to observe, sandwich in a question. Rather than attack your claim of Coral or deny it. Express what is seen so you may correct my interpretation. An invitation. I try not to explain a person or their behaviour. So I can see how my words of choice were poor "The intent with the sort of language there was "I am hurt, so I want you to feel this way also"." The cleaner version: "The language communicates as though you are hurt and attempting to transmit that hurt." I might brainstorm and propose that there is conditioning present and unintegrated parts of lower stages. But this does not deny the Coral claim. Is it a sound expectation that someone of Coral stage would have successfully worked through this conditioning? I would argue I see parts of Coral. But residing firmly IN the stage is a hard claim to transmit to others without circular reasoning like "you would not know it if you saw it".
  13. I see. One of the reasons I bring this topic up is because of Leo's questionable statements and behaviours people witnessed here on the forum and sometimes the language he uses and attitude. So it does bring some incoherence with what I would consider awakened one behaviour and language . Not that I know what is meant by "awakening" either, but yeah I'm curious to hear people's opinions.

  14. Texting a girl fast back

    Sugarcoat replied to felixk_priv's topic in Dating, Sexuality, Relationships, Family

    What kind of expression is that😭😂☠️😂😂😭
  15. The issue I personally have with this whole situation is that Ed Sheerain stated that he does not want to be political However he has openly supported Ukraine in the past and even rallied behind it Support Ukraine is also political, just like supporting Palestine is So he is basically lying Lying can piss people off.
  16. @Natasha Tori Maru And how does that connect with what you said below rationally speaking? As for your last sentence, not at all. It's important to read the culture you are interacting with in the way that you have to know who's at the dinner table; I view much of the forum in the same way I do the Sentinelese, in the most positive sense.
  17. Yea, makes sense, then what people define as being awakened/awakening differs, so its part of the ambiguity of the topic, partly why I didnt mention it as I don't know always what is meant by it....

  18. What is some music you like?

    Sugarcoat replied to itsadistraction's topic in Off-Topic: Pop-Culture, Entertainment, Fun

    @LordFall I love some phonk too, I suspect some people would hesitate to listen because its too "mainstream" and doesn't seem like proper music, but rather associated with tik tok and gen Z brain rot. But if something is pleasant to listen to it just is, I don't think mentioned factors should limit it. Many are very catchy, and high intensity so its a nice boost, very and satisfying at times
  19. Yesterday
  20. I share similar thoughts, this seems like a sensible position all things considered
  21. By engaging in more relational dialogue to connect, be seen and reveal meaning. Diving into phenomenology, experience, meaning, feeling and thought type questions. To be seen and properly received - and have the person we are within dialogue with affirm this - gets us closer to understanding without projection. Cleanly observing free of judgement, but not divorced from discernment. Interesting question. The epistemology of a person. I ask - I state what I see. I report where things don't align. Asking more questions without expressing my own interpretation. I don't always get it right When I feel emotional charge arise through any sensation whatsoever (even positive), it is generally an indication of my own projections coming into play to cloud my discernment.
  22. Seems he has the human mind ego on daily basis, but more thin, meaning less dense than average human, and then has peak states of non-duality etc during trips.
  23. No human has a monopoly on Truth
  24. Interesting, and how do you distinguish between projecting onto me versus an actual consciousness state of development that I inhabit? This is methodology, and intuition is a part of that but where is the silver lining; grab it. This is learning.
  25. @oOo You have to accept lower stages will be jealous of your development
  26. Alright, but share your view on the topic.
  27. Not the dream taaaalk. That`s predictable.
  1. Load more activity