Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. Owen himself discusses this 1:05:37 - 1:06:21
  3. I'm really enjoying talking with and meeting people lately.
  4. This is why a marxist excess of Green country will eventually be destoryed, they will not want to fight for their country. They will be such fools that they will let the armies drive their tanks through their cities.
  5. Using A.I also for better decision making it all still depends on degress of Truthfulness, Honesty and consciousness as well as self-awarness
  6. The counter evidence I find with ChatGPT and some research is insane. Yes — for cigarette smoking, there actually is an interesting counter-evidence thread, but it leads to a more nuanced conclusion than either “smoking gives oxygen” or “smoking simply removes oxygen.” The best description is: Smoking can provoke physiological adaptations intended to increase oxygen-carrying capacity, even though each cigarette acutely interferes with oxygen delivery. The strongest counter-evidence I found A particularly relevant 2025 study directly measured total hemoglobin mass and blood volume rather than just looking at a pulse oximeter. It studied 30 young men, including chronic smokers consuming >10 cigarettes/day for at least three years. Smokers had significantly greater total hemoglobin mass, red-cell volume, and total blood volume than nonsmokers. That is genuinely interesting because total hemoglobin mass is an important determinant of how much oxygen the circulation can potentially transport. So there is a real biological adaptation something like: smoke → CO exposure → relative hypoxic signal → adaptation → ↑ red-cell/hemoglobin mass → potentially greater theoretical O₂-carrying machinery. This resembles one aspect of altitude acclimatization. But there is an important twist: despite that increased hemoglobin/blood volume, the smokers' peak aerobic running performance was worse. The authors themselves describe cigarette smoking as acutely reducing arterial oxygen content because carbon monoxide occupies hemoglobin. So smoking seems to be creating the problem and then forcing the body to compensate for the problem. A larger 230-person study found essentially the same paradox An older Thorax study compared: 114 nonsmokers 66 light smokers 50 heavy smokers Smokers in several age/sex groups had increased hemoglobin and/or packed-cell volume. Yet arterial oxygen saturation was generally lower among smokers. The researchers interpreted the increased red-cell mass partly as an erythropoietic response to impaired oxygenation. This is one of the clearest pieces of evidence for the paradox you're asking about: more oxygen-carrying infrastructure, but not necessarily more oxygen being delivered. There's an even larger epidemiological signal Another epidemiological study found that hemoglobin concentrations increase with cigarette consumption, supporting a dose-response relationship between smoking and increased hemoglobin. And a study involving 3,000 blood donors, including 373 smokers, also reported meaningful differences in hemoglobin and hematocrit between smokers and nonsmokers. So the increase in hemoglobin isn't merely an observation from a handful of people. But here's the really important distinction There are at least four different things that can all get called “oxygen”: 1. PaO₂ = oxygen physically dissolved in plasma. 2. SpO₂/SaO₂ = percentage saturation of hemoglobin. 3. Arterial oxygen content (CaO₂) = actual amount of usable oxygen carried by blood. 4. Tissue pO₂ / oxygen delivery = oxygen actually reaching your cells. Smoking can affect these differently. Carbon monoxide binds hemoglobin much more strongly than oxygen. That produces carboxyhemoglobin (COHb). Smokers consequently carry substantially more COHb than nonsmokers. Therefore you can theoretically have something like: PaO₂ = normal pulse oximeter = 97–99% but usable oxygen-carrying capacity = reduced. That's because ordinary two-wavelength pulse oximeters can't reliably distinguish oxyhemoglobin from carboxyhemoglobin. In CO exposure, pulse oximetry can therefore look reassuringly high despite impaired oxygen transport. So if somebody says: “My oxygen actually goes up after smoking.” and they're looking at a finger pulse oximeter, that observation could be genuine as a device reading without representing increased usable oxygen delivery. That's a very important distinction. There is one particularly interesting nicotine finding I also found an experiment that helps disentangle nicotine itself from cigarette smoke. Researchers examined smokers and ex-smokers and compared nicotine administration with cigarette smoking. Intravenous 1 mg nicotine actually produced a marginal increase in skin blood flow and tissue oxygen. But smoking the cigarette itself produced the opposite effect: it distinctly decreased tissue blood flow, tissue oxygen tension, and aerobic metabolism. That's fascinating because it means some of the subjective physiological effects people attribute to smoking may arise from nicotinic stimulation, while combustion products—especially CO—push oxygen physiology in the opposite direction. So: nicotine ≠ cigarette smoke. And carbon monoxide itself has a strange “hormetic” research literature This is probably the deepest counter-evidence I found. Researchers are actually investigating controlled, very-low-dose carbon monoxide exposure as something analogous to hypoxic/altitude training. The reason is that creating a temporary oxygen deficit may stimulate: CO → temporary functional hypoxia → EPO signalling → red-cell production → ↑ total hemoglobin mass A 2024 scientific review specifically evaluated whether intermittent low-dose CO exposure might increase total hemoglobin mass and endurance capacity. It concluded that the idea has physiological and experimental support, but evidence remains limited and important safety questions remain. A small experimental training study even reported that four weeks of controlled CO inhalation combined with exercise increased total hemoglobin and VO₂max/running economy. Another 2024 review examining CO as a potential endurance aid found some evidence for increased EPO, hemoglobin mass and aerobic adaptation, but emphasized that the human evidence is small and inconsistent. This is probably the biological phenomenon closest to the idea you had. But notice what's happening: CO isn't supplying oxygen. It's temporarily doing the opposite. The body senses that deficit and subsequently attempts to increase its capacity to carry oxygen. It's somewhat analogous to altitude training: Low oxygen stimulus → adaptive response → increased oxygen-transport machinery. And cigarette smokers appear to show part of that adaptation The new 2025 smoker study is especially interesting for exactly this reason. Smokers: ↑ hemoglobin mass ↑ red-cell volume ↑ total blood volume but simultaneously: COHb ↑ acute arterial O₂ content ↓ peak running speed ↓. So I wouldn't describe cigarettes as giving more oxygen. I'd describe them as producing a chronic hypoxic stress that can make the body construct additional oxygen-carrying capacity in compensation. That is a much more defensible claim scientifically. Traditional medicine adds another layer I also looked into traditional tobacco medicine rather than dismissing it automatically. There genuinely are long-standing medicinal traditions involving tobacco. Ethnographic research among Amazonian healers describes tobacco as one of their central medicinal plants, used within an elaborate healing system. Some healers describe it as strengthening, cleansing or regulating the organism. Historically, European medicine also prescribed tobacco for conditions ranging from respiratory complaints to pain and other illnesses. However, I couldn't find convincing traditional or modern clinical evidence demonstrating that tobacco smoke directly increases oxygenation. The traditional claims generally concern cleansing, spiritual effects, nervous-system effects, purging, antimicrobial properties, or other therapeutic concepts—not measured PaO₂/tissue oxygen. And those ethnomedical traditions should not be equated with modern daily cigarette smoking; dose, tobacco species, preparation, frequency, intention and route can all differ substantially. So the surprising answer is There is a grain of physiology behind the intuition: Cigarette smoke does not supply extra oxygen. But repeated exposure can apparently stimulate the body to develop more hemoglobin/red-cell/blood-volume capacity, probably at least partly because CO repeatedly creates a relative oxygen deficit. I'd represent it like this: Cigarette → CO enters blood → COHb ↑ → usable O₂ transport temporarily ↓ → relative tissue hypoxic stimulus → compensatory erythropoiesis → hemoglobin mass/red-cell volume ↑ → theoretical oxygen-carrying reserve ↑ BUT cigarette → CO + combustion toxins + vascular effects → tissue perfusion/O₂ delivery ↓ → exercise performance generally ↓. So the adaptation is real; the net oxygen benefit is not. And the 2025 hemoglobin-mass paper is probably the most interesting piece of counter-evidence I've found for your hypothesis, because it measured an actual physiological adaptation rather than simply comparing pulse-oximeter numbers. If you want, I can go one level deeper into the CO → HIF-1α → EPO → erythropoiesis → mitochondrial adaptation pathway, because that gets quite close to explaining why something that reduces oxygen acutely can paradoxically increase the body's oxygen-handling machinery chronically. What about vaping in this case? Yes — and this is where vaping differs quite sharply from cigarette smoking. Assuming you mean a nicotine e-cigarette, vaping largely removes the carbon-monoxide mechanism we were discussing. A 2024 human comparison found that, unlike combustible cigarettes, e-cigarette use did not significantly raise exhaled CO or carboxyhemoglobin (COHb). So the cigarette pathway: cigarette → CO → COHb ↑ → functional hypoxia → compensatory erythropoiesis/Hb ↑ is largely absent with normal vaping. Does vaping therefore give you more oxygen? Compared with continuing to smoke cigarettes, effectively, it can—because hemoglobin is no longer being occupied by nearly as much carbon monoxide. That's different from saying the vape itself adds oxygen. Think of it this way: Cigarette → oxygen available in lungs → CO competes for hemoglobin → less functional Hb available for O₂ Vape → oxygen available in lungs → very little/no combustion-derived CO → much less Hb blocked by CO → more of your existing hemoglobin remains available for O₂ So someone who completely switches from smoking to vaping could experience an improvement in effective blood oxygen transport even though vaping itself isn't supplying oxygen. But vaping can still transiently interfere with oxygenation This was surprising when researchers directly measured it. A randomized clinical experiment with high-wattage vaping found evidence of transient tissue hypoxia and lower-airway effects, even though there wasn't cigarette-like CO exposure. Another experiment in regular e-cigarette users found that acute vaping—both with and without nicotine—slightly reduced transcutaneous oxygen tension. The investigators thought this was probably caused by temporary disturbances in pulmonary gas exchange rather than CO. And in a small randomized study of smokers with cardiovascular disease, 60-W high-wattage vaping reduced arterial oxygen partial pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation and tissue oxygen tension compared with sham vaping. The authors proposed ventilation/perfusion mismatch as an explanation. So vaping doesn't seem to be completely neutral with respect to oxygen. Nicotine creates another effect Nicotine primarily acts on the cardiovascular system rather than oxygen-carrying hemoglobin. A randomized crossover trial of 25 people found that nicotine-containing vaping increased heart rate and blood pressure, increased arterial stiffness and impaired endothelial-dependent vasodilation. Nicotine-free vaping did not produce most of those effects under those experimental conditions. That's relevant because: nicotine → sympathetic activation → HR ↑ + BP ↑ + vasoconstriction can mean tissues have a greater oxygen demand while local blood flow may become less favorable. So nicotine may make you feel activated, alert and energized without actually increasing oxygen availability. What about the "altitude-training" adaptation? This is where vaping is much less convincing than cigarettes. With cigarettes there's substantial population evidence that smokers have somewhat higher hemoglobin/hematocrit, consistent partly with chronic CO-related hypoxic stress. One large cohort included 16,254 adults, with smoking intensity associated with increases in hemoglobin and hematocrit. For vaping, I could not find anything remotely comparable—no 5,000-, 10,000-, or 20,000-person cohort showing: vaping → chronic mild hypoxia → EPO ↑ → Hb mass ↑ → superior O₂ capacity. There are some odd exceptions. A 2019 case report described polycythemia associated with e-cigarette use that disappeared after stopping vaping. And a 2026 case report described another patient with erythrocytosis that resolved after e-cigarette cessation. Those are interesting because they suggest that under some circumstances vaping might generate enough hypoxic/physiological stress to stimulate red-cell production. But two case reports are radically weaker evidence than a population cohort. They also don't establish that the red-cell increase is beneficial. So I'd compare them this way EffectCigaretteNicotine vape Carbon monoxideHighVery low/none normally Carboxyhemoglobin↑ substantiallyLittle/no increase Usable Hb immediately↓Much less affected Chronic compensatory Hb riseWell documentedWeak/rare evidence Acute tissue oxygen impairmentYesCan occur Acute vascular dysfunctionYesCan occur Nicotine stimulationYesYes Provides actual extra oxygenNoNo There's therefore an interesting paradox. If someone currently smokes cigarettes and completely substitutes vaping, their oxygen physiology will probably move in a favorable direction mainly because they're removing carbon monoxide, not because vaping improves oxygenation. But if a nonsmoker begins vaping in order to improve oxygenation, the evidence goes the other way: there's no demonstrated oxygen benefit, while some controlled experiments show temporary gas-exchange, tissue-oxygen and vascular impairment. And this actually clarifies our earlier discussion nicely: the higher hemoglobin seen in cigarette smokers shouldn't really be thought of as a hidden health benefit. It's closer to the body buying extra delivery trucks because some of the existing trucks have repeatedly been disabled by carbon monoxide. If you're interested in the beneficial version of that adaptation, exercise, altitude/hypoxic training, and possibly certain breathing protocols are much more interesting to examine, because they can induce parts of the HIF/EPO/mitochondrial adaptation without exposing the lungs to cigarette smoke. can vaping nicotine hence cause this skin-conductivity thing? Yes. If by the “skin-conductivity thing” you mean skin conductance / electrodermal activity (EDA/GSR), nicotine vaping can plausibly increase it. Skin conductance mainly rises when the sympathetic nervous system activates sweat glands. Even tiny amounts of sweat—far below what you would notice as sweating—make the skin conduct electricity better. Nicotine vaping activates that same sympathetic/arousal system. In a human study comparing cigarettes with e-cigarettes, skin sympathetic nerve activity increased by about 72% after e-cigarette use, very similar to the increase after cigarette smoking. Other controlled e-cigarette studies likewise find nicotine-containing vaping shifts autonomic activity toward sympathetic activation and raises heart rate and blood pressure. So the pathway would roughly be: nicotine vape → nicotinic acetylcholine receptors → adrenaline/noradrenaline + sympathetic activation → sweat-gland activity ↑ → moisture/ions at skin surface ↑ → electrical resistance ↓ → skin conductance ↑ There is also direct older experimental evidence that small doses of nicotine alter skin conductance, and a study of 115 smokers specifically used skin-conductance responses to measure the physiological effects of acute nicotine. One neat distinction from our oxygen discussion is that this effect doesn't require carbon monoxide at all. A nicotine vape could therefore give you: ↑ skin conductance ↑ sympathetic arousal ↑ heart rate ↑ blood pressure while having virtually none of the cigarette-specific CO → carboxyhemoglobin → hypoxic compensation pathway. And if you're thinking of something you personally notice—such as your fingers seeming more electrically conductive, warmer/colder, clammy, or a wearable's EDA reading jumping after vaping—that would be physiologically quite plausible. The EDA increase would primarily reflect autonomic/sweat-gland activity, though, rather than increased oxygenation. If you meant skin conductivity in relation to grounding/electric current through the body rather than GSR/EDA, that's a slightly different phenomenon and I can explain that connection too.

  7. Leo's Blog Discussion Mega-Thread

    Natasha Tori Maru replied to Leo Gura's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    Not needing closure. Or Resolve. Settled. Residing - none of these are resistance to knowing. When I am in dialogue with someone I don't always feel like I need to come to a conclusion. In any event - I suspect you did not attempt to relationally understand me here - which is more what I am pointing to. My comment quoting you could have been a comment illustrating Leo's behavior. I don't think you asked me what I meant before assuming it applied to you (at least, this is what it how it appears) - and then defended. Relational understanding vs analytical understanding. Go too far one way we tend to retard the other.
  8. Gandhi used teachings of nonviolent agitation and universal brotherhood as a social tool to unify Indian society which was highly fragmented along diverse casteist, religious, regional,racial and linguistic lines , and to channel their energies to fighting exploitative british colonialism back then . Through his personal example, speeches and writings,discussions and so on, he created a unified and cohesive society and political movement against british colonialism. Many of his muslim friends and comrades also joined him in this venture . Khudai Khidmatgar was a non-violent, Pashtun muslim freedom movement against British rule in colonial India inspired by Gandhi. Founded in 1929 by Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan (also called Bacha Khan or the Frontier Gandhi), its members wore red shirts and worked nonviolently and progressively for social reform, education, and national unity. That Gandhi was able to unify such highly fragmented sections into a cohesive whole was a great success in itself and showcased his leadership skills. I don't think there is any other leader in the world that have achieved such a feat. This should be seen in the background and context of the regressive Hindu and Muslim societies back then in India stuck in primitive conditioning and consequent inter-religious disharmony, which was further inflamed by the British with their divide and rule policies which they had heavily invested in. While Gandhi's efforts were instrumental in unifying Indian society to a large extent, he was not able to overcome the partitioning of India on religious lines. However, India had survived intact for the last 80 years and is also on the road to great prosperity as the fastest growing major economy in the world for many years now. It is the fourth largest economy in the world and is forecast to displace the US as the largest economy in the world after a few decades. The stability which India enjoyed for many decades inspite of large-scale diversity, is mainly due to Gandhi's legacy of nonviolence which prevented the balkanisation of India sequencing to various small regional conflicts and wars , as has happened in Europe prior and during the two world wars and aftermath as well, and which had killed many millions of europeans then and now. You don't need to kill or maim anyone or destroy public property created by tax money, to make a religious or political statement. Just carrying a banner and uttering slogans or going on a fast will do. In Pakistan, inter-sectarian conflicts resulting in Sunni-Shia-Sufi-Ahmediya riots are commonplace resulting in deaths of thousands of muslims due to suicide bombings and riots, while the same do not take place in India. The only muslim scientist to get a Nobel prize in physics was Abdus Salam from Pakistan. However he was subjected to severe state and societal discrimination and prejudice in Pakistan due to his Ahmediya sectarian background. On the other hand he was treated respectfully and well in India receiving awards for excellence in science, when he came to India and later he stated that he was prouder to be called an Indian than a Pakistani. Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam was a former Indian president of muslim identity and rocket scientist who played a major role in Indian space programme. Kalam considered non-violence India's greatest contribution to global civilization and believed humanity has yet to find a better tool than Gandhian thought to unite people and reach a common objective He frequently highlighted Gandhi’s philosophy of non-violence and the convergence of minds as an unmatched model for resolving conflict and achieving national and international goals.
  9. No one gets out of here alive. So now you know it’s always alive because no one can get out of what no one got in. Survival never happens. Don’t be scared of this great realisation no one has.
  10. Today
  11. Good question. God created evil and is cursing it.
  12. I am not really getting to do any work, this enviroment goes crazy for energy, and I meet seriously troubled people when I started to work, for just feeling good, it's insane what I experienced her no wonder I had to go to a psychiatric ward, but they released me so quickly you can just send me to prison at this point, there is so much damage this white vanity whore drive does it's obnoxious and just at times deserves to be fucked and dominanted and treated like trash, as they treated u like trash and kept more quiet, simply because the subtle abuse everyone tolerates, and does nothing about, and we also hate the hero, but love the villan.
  13. Yes, I agree that is also a nice experience, I was more aggresive usually as I saw women eyeing me often for the status game of money, yet I am not directly very good with words instantly and charming, so often I just bought drinks and moved on, and later when I was partying they came back for the provider quality of sex itself, but it made a lot of the bitter guys angry, and I noticed let alone being authentic when drinking alcohol causes a lot of troubles, so I was careful I never got into a fight going out often stupidly, when I was younger. The status game is very real, and I dislike the ahrimanic forces of it, and the "clean manipulation" a lot just forcing endless perfection while providing very little safe spaces, to expore real skill building etc. If you're authentic even raw and dark social media grows automatically, imo I hated scaling it, and working with a video camera on social media and editing is a lot of effort, I hope you can find something suitable for what you yearn to create, I feel exhausted from my own desires to use it, due to the constant ahrimanic forces and demand of perfection, I lost it after a while, and I also have a strong shadow like this, I miss proper rest and sleep for a while. I also disliked it when I went to the dance floor that at one point if you're good at dancing people will just start dance battles and challenge you it looks funny from the outside, but the energy and rawness of the experience is super real and also dangerous imo, especially how people talk behind ones back, I am usually with the cynical gang so I am already hostile , I do my best to even seperate from them I am more of a "loner" usually. I just sit and drink alone and roled or smoked cannabis fucking stupid what ressources alone can attract, but this was mostly with cheap stuff, nothing serious, but I miss some level of party and festivals it has become so weird, ever since I and other raised standards, but never gave anything back to me and just pressured their own interest, anyhow...
  14. I don't think what you said here is restricted to religion per se. Replace religion with some other communication.

  15. Half-thoughts

    Jirh replied to Jirh's topic in Self-Actualization Journals

    Love can only occur within perceived equality.
  16. Oh... Here, let me see if i can separate it into a form everyone can recognize... First, when i think of "just m3ditating... just relaxing... or trying to just run on instinct" (iuno wat do nothing means per say, alas i tried to give it some notion of wat yous might be thinkin bout, including myself, when thinkin of, like, la-de-da do nothing), i think of a cushion, like you said, its that very comforting, but also dangerous foundation — Like its insurance for the soul... Chicken soup for the soul, sortve thing... Relatively... Personally or emotionally speaking... You dont have to do anything or 'try to do anything. In an absolute sense, you really dont need to do anything. Thats also what survival is, its the ability to balance that harmonic resonance w/ the active stimulation. You dont need to do that... You dont neeed to do Anything. But you technically speaking, need to, in order to continue the routine that says you have to, otherwise, you cant even talk or contemple the absolute, like the paradox is such that, you dont have to do anything absolutely, meaning you can focus on Being for beings sake, and still exist, even in death. But you wont be facing the absolute, youll be somewhere else that is no longer facing the absolute, cause absolution is the relative idea that "One can BE absolute", like its the outward expression of an inward experience, that doesnt end at absolute... Ergo, you dont face towards the absolute, you only ever face towards an idea of the absolute, which itself is that outward perspective that doesnt actually become absolute, Like... We are describing a paradox, but its something like that, Like youd have to understand that intimate connection of life and death, but yeah, its something like that, its a paradox that you have to experience to even know wtf im tlkin about. P.s. Paradoxes are also physical things too, like, a paradox isnt just the conceptual idea of "whatll happen on a large scale", like, reality and paradoxes are intimately wound up w/ the present moment, which is to say that paradoxes have real effects on life... its not just conceptual mumbo-jumbo
  17. Yes it is. it is discoverd by scientists. it goes against liberalism. so that scientific findings are attacked and censored
  18. I analyze my own behavior 100x more than anyone else's. Understanding the mind is just what I do. Which is why I do it with others as well. For example, I've probably spent over a dozen hours asking "why do I write the things I do on actualized.org", lol. Imagine having deeply inspected every type of action you take, and knowing what the root motivation is. Do that enough, and you no longer need to "inspect" specific actions anymore, as you already know the motivation behind them. You and I keep coming back to this idea of perpetual "not knowing". It's like you don't want to know some things and want them to forever remain open to interpretation or something. Resisting conclusion related to the psyche or something. IDK. Interesting though. Is it possible to fully account for and understand your motivations? If so, what would the implications be?
  19. Today I’m posting something 100% for virality and 0% for depth and art
  20. Snippet of my grok convo:
  21. @KosmicGeng I found out later that she had been eyeing me for a while and really targeted me. Ditched her friends just to come approach me. As for your concern about corruption, there will be some for sure. I will try to keep it minimal, but the stage orange game is very late stage capitalism atm. You gotta play some of it, if you wanna make it in social media.
  22. Where in the cave do you live in where there’s no dancing in only the whole night life and in many daytime events?

  23. Any Writers Here?

    Sandroew replied to soos_mite_ah's topic in Life Purpose, Career, Entrepreneurship, Finance

    Literally the same over here. I think its like hearing your own voice or seeing yourself on camera. Best advice i got is just to write and write and write. And dont try to write your best idea right away. Your first book should be a learning experience not a bestseller. Similarly to a painters first paintings.
  24. also this in a.i was so annoying I don't know anything and I should guide you all are you stupid????? BUILD MY POTENTIAL AND FUCK WHITE PEOPLE AT TIMES OR ASIAN LUCIFER FUCK YOU 2
  25. That isn’t true. Stop brainwashing yourself with redpill nonsense.
  26. Or you know what, i take that back... Renaissance painters proved you could be homosexual and have blatant religious shyt in the soup too, but they reimagined it as Adam and god, not just Adam &eve, or atleast Michaelangelo & Leonardo (both were homosexuals) but they hated eachother, not to mention they were different ages i believe... Leonardo was older, or wait... wait wat, what is that story where leonardo goes out to the court / agora, and michaelangelo shows up pissed off everyone is hovering around him nd watknot? P.s. Claude gave us something to keep in mind, "Worth remembering too: in that era, religious subject matter wasn't really optional — it was simply what the market (Church, confraternities, wealthy families) paid for. So "genuine belief" and "this is the job" weren't mutually exclusive; both men worked within that system regardless of where their private convictions sat"
  27. @LordFall yup. every man she fucked , her body retain some of the particle from sperm of every man she fucked into her body or brain . And when a guy marry her , their child will inherit some of the traits of every man she fucked other reasons exist too
  1. Load more activity