Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. I got asked by a film studio to take part in a documentary series about Andrew Tate and his private network. They saw my post from last year and replied to it. The interview is next week, and so far I verbally agreed to take part. But after reading the release form, I’m now unsure because it gives the production very broad rights to use my name, voice, image, and anything I share, apparently worldwide and in perpetuity. It also looks like I may be giving up a lot of control over editing, future use, and possible legal claims. I’m from Germany, so I’m also wondering whether there are extra risks for me because the agreement chooses New York law and court. My question: would you sign something like this, or would you ask for changes first? If you would change it, what parts would you try to narrow or remove?
  3. It means Leave Our Vote Even which means the absolute truth is a silent communicator. Silence is still language because being is language. This means Love is the logos. The Love of fair play because all we want to do is play all life. We will never outgrow our desire to play because what better use of your time than to play.
  4. It means Leave Our Vote Even which means the absolute truth is a silent communicator. Silence is still language because being is language. This means Love is the logos. Love fair play because all we want to do is play all life. We will never outgrow our desire to play because what better use of your time than to play.

  5. What is some music you like?

    D2sage replied to itsadistraction's topic in Off-Topic: Pop-Culture, Entertainment, Fun

    Been mostly listening to Deep House for years. There are so many unique tracks in this field.
  6. 1 year.

  7. Leo's Blog Discussion Mega-Thread

    lostingenosmaze replied to Leo Gura's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    https://www.actualized.org/insights/why-stupid-people-exist A microcosmic case-in-point:
  8. It's good that you're introspecting on which relationship model would work best for you. Not enough people do that and get stuck in societal norms which rarely are optimal for anyone. Personally I'm a bisexual polyamorist and would like to date multiple more submissive partners and ideally work on a collective business together and/or provide for the ones that aren't that productive. I work a lot and have worked on business for a while so seems natural to me to create my own structure outside of established norms. I live in Montreal so alternative lifestyles are pretty normal here. I would say use AI to flesh out and reverse engineer your dream lifestyle and go from there. What I agree with most in your level 3 relationship is the importance on going on a lot of dates to find a compatible partner. Dating is pretty exhausting so most people go on less than 10 dates and settle in a mediocre relationship afterwards. That's pretty wild to me, you should probably go on at least 30-50 dates if you aim to find just one final partner. Have you read through the female dating strategies subreddit? They fall a bit too much into the anti men philosophy but from a woman's perspective, it'll be probably refreshing to read through women fleshing out their ideal relationships. It's not active anymore but you can sort by top and read through the posts. Also in general there are plenty of provider males out there. I am one of them and in general I get dopamine from giving money to a woman and people in general as long as they are appreciative of it. It helps to work on looksmaxxing so you look your best and if by chance you're bisexual I think you're setting yourself up for a much easier ride IMO. https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/

  9. Leo's Blog Discussion Mega-Thread

    Joseph Maynor replied to Leo Gura's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    How about this reframe: There are both stupid and smart people and not even too?
  10. Why don't you want advice? How else will you get our of your situation? I empathize with your feeling of weakness friend but the best antidote for weakness is power and its top proxy : money.

  11. Carlos Castaneda smoked mushrooms

    PsychedelicEagle replied to Just Curious's topic in Psychedelics

    AFAIA you can boil mushrooms for a long time, drink the tea, and still have a full trip. Probably smoking elevates the heat to another level, then. But anyway why smoke mushrooms if orally they work so well?
  12. Yeah, they are really heavily leaning towards everything AI.
  13. Quite disturbing even, somehow retaining semen in your body since birth... So many fascinating things to learn about women...
  14. AI art

  15. Leo's Blog Discussion Mega-Thread

    Thought Art replied to Leo Gura's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    @Carl-Richard I think there likely is stupid and smart people too
  16. Today
  17. I think Ralston would say that while an initial traumatic event happens, the ongoing trauma and suffering are actively created and maintained by the mind's unconscious assumptions and defensive reactions. As I understand it, Ralston doesn't use the expression "absolute truth" to divide something into true and false, but rather to point to what actually is when all concepts fall away. Where you say "hallelujah," "glorious," Ralston says: "absolute truth." Again, I think Ralston wouldn't really disagree with you. Biological distinctions are functional realities. What you describe as an empty mind, Ralston would describe as a state, probably a state of not-knowing, and you're right, one doesn't think of separation in that state. In my view, when Ralston speaks of the illusion of separation, he means psychological separation, that is, the idea that you are an isolated ego that has to survive in a dangerous world. Yes, in a certain sense, relatively speaking, that's true. But as you know, one can realize that the separate feeling of self is a pure mental construct, or do you disagree? I think you're misunderstanding. To my understanding, Ralston doesn't say that enlightenment is knowing what is Absolute Truth. Ralston says enlightenment is the moment of direct experience of Absolute Truth, precisely what you describe as openness to the unlimited. He almost never actually speaks of enlightenment, but only of enlightenment experiences. Yes, that's what I see in Ralston and also in Tolle. And I don't believe that one can express and embody this presence without having had a profound opening and being in the process of enlightenment. Do I believe that Tolle or Ralston are as deeply realized as Jesus, Al Hallaj, or Ramakrishna? No, not even close, but they are some of the best teachers of our time and therefore relevant to me. I see the limitations in Ralston just as I do in Tolle. I also think that, to put it simply, both of them have closed hearts. And I also don't think that Ralston transmits presence, at least not in contrast to Eckhart Tolle. But I think Ralston doesn't even want that, because then he would make you dependent on his presence. What I do notice with Ralston, however, is that he conveys presence and clarity through his teachings. So if I truly put into practice what he tries to teach, then I see the inner clarity of it and get a sense of the depth of his realization. With Tolle, it's the exact opposite: his teachings aren't profound or particularly deep, but his presence is very strong, and that conveys to me the depth of his realization. So, while I see limitations in both, I also see that they are far ahead of me in many areas that I also aspire to embody, and therefore I learn from them. If it's purely about opening myself to ultimate reality, then I'm only following the teachings of Jesus. But since I'm unfortunately not permanently completely open and also have to be active in the world and live consciously there, I want to find ways to do this as smoothly as possible. Because Ralston and Tolle live in the same era as me and understand the demands of this world, I find it easier to relate to them in that sense.
  18. I would say not really. I don't even know what you look like.
  19. But we are not talking face to face. Anyway, it's still real life. You could judge the message instead the messenger, then we can talk about the topic
  20. The majority of men might be in the lower stages where they don't think for themselves. Also if a person isn't racist or cares about the environment only because an authority told them to do so they are still stage blue, not green.
  21. It's very different to have the need of being the one who's right than seeing the absolute mistake in a spiritual teacher that has great influence in the spiritual human paradigm nowadays and don't point it. It's not a matter of opinion, it's that he's totally wrong and is a huge hindrance for any Spiritual seeker. His message is seductive and false from my view. Anyway, many tell me that I'm this and that but no one say nothing about what I said about Ralston paradigm, except greateful death . Maybe it's me who's wrong, then tell me where For me this is like an exercise to see where are the barriers, not an exercise to be great.
  22. Just chop off your.. hand.
  23. Look, my channel never never be huge because of my content. But, it doesn’t need to be. Huge is dumb. The masses are dumb. Focus on serving your niche and building a profit model through a backend offer if you want to.
  24. i feel a little offended because now i'm not even granted access to files i personally wrote on this very device.

  25. What is some music you like?

    Joseph Maynor replied to itsadistraction's topic in Off-Topic: Pop-Culture, Entertainment, Fun

  26. @Natasha Tori Maruyes, it's basically embedded in my Files Explorer now, if you mean that? but now everything is really messy, i can't move entire folders without stuff getting lost, i can't open some very important documents anymore, even though they were saved on my desktop.
  27. thanks:) not a bad idea
  1. Load more activity