Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. @enchanted It infringes on personal freedom. We might as well strike a balance and ban it for people with a criminal or psychiatric record.
  3. Lol this is the funniest thread in a while. Thanks for the laugh. The two Indian virgins going back and forth with a @Inliytened1acting like a sex crazed lunatic just kills me and nobody else answering the original question. I've haven't seen something this funny in a awhile.
  4. Increased guns in society directly cause violence. It creates the thing it supposed to protect against!
  5. My friends and relatives don't like him too 😅 I will show a poll soon (:
  6. This is such an absurd generalisation. One of my good friends is schizophrenic, and he happens to be on the spectrum for what qualifies as extreme universal open mindedness, more to your point. That said, schizophrenia gives him debilitating cognitive and psychological problems, with and without the medications he takes, and any benefits have never materialised beyond his already pre-existing brilliance in and of himself without the schizophrenia. I thought of a new connection after reading my comment, the relationship between dreams and psychosis at the functional level, and after beginning my own investigation into this relationship between the two because of logic saying that clinical investigations into dreaming would help clinical interventions on psychosis. I don't know a lot about psychosis and abnormal psychology, but where my thinking is going now is if we take the premise that predictive-processing and source-monitoring theories of psychosis are the crux, and we learned how dreams are created and how people can lucid dream in them. I genuinely think there's a real clinical path towards dream interventions overlapping with positive outcomes concerning the development of interventions for those on the spectrum for psychosis. Not necessarily by getting people with psychosis to "dream" a certain way, rather more along the lines of structurally and functionally mapping what the theoretical limits of what optimal dreaming could look like in healthy subjects, understanding the mechanisms for how this is possible, then using that as the groundwork for interventions to help people "dream the waking world" lucidly, so without elements we normally connect with psychosis.
  7. Interesting ya the constitution part makes it extra tricky but it's been amended in the past. But as you said already it probably has more to do with culture than anything else. Interestingly the hijab isn't even in the Koran the way guns are in the constitution. So you are right guns have no chance of being banned. Just curious would you want to ban guns in the US?
  8. @trenton HEy, can you ask him if his girlfriend can send you her video and can you upload it here? Cant be that difficult. "it was just a black screen as if the entire film was just deleted and blacked out with no sound. " I am a software developer, I look on technical side. A captured video with just a black screen is as mysterious to me as seeing an alien on it. So please if you could upload the black screen video from his girlfriend? If she claims she has deleted the video this whole story will probably fake.
  9. That's possible in practice too, but the social cost is almost unbearable, long, and laborious. ( could be done faster in 2040 though, with the army involved and something as long as a google map scanning ) But guns will just become more & more obsolete in the next 20 years. Unless you own a swarm of automated sniper drones dictated by big-corp AI, with frequencies that can detect "iron" and probably laser your metal with automated precision. (Or just headshot you like a cheat code in a video game.) That might happen by 2040 at scale and be easily controlled by governments. So people with guns will definitely not do shit against police forces, firstly. (I thought the gun was supposed to allow you to fight a tyrannical state; that won't be possible anymore.) Good only for poor people fighting each other. People in France: what's your salary? -> fuck off People in the USA: do you have a gun? -> "none of your business" (they do lol) Proof: Leo, do you have guns at home? As a French person, my view is that guns don't prevent violence; they create the outcome in your brain that you can fight or shoot, so you'll have the possibility of fighting or shooting instead of running and increasing your odds of never being shot. Most people die in gunfights when they have guns, rarely if they run away or coward out. The idea of fighting a retard is good in theory (in practice, your odds of ending up dead are 80% higher than if you only have the possibility of running).
  10. That's why @James123says he is unbelievable 😂
  11. Online disinhibition is a hell of a drug
  12. https://www.actualized.org/insights/things-ive-been-wrong-about I found this blog post from 2017 where Leo lists the things he was wrong about before that, and one of them was: "I was wrong about the metaphysics of the law of attraction. I no longer believe the law of attraction merely works through brute mechanical means." He made a video in 2014 talking about law of attraction being just about shifting focus and attention, changing your thoughts and reprogramming your subconscious. which are practical psychological stuff. which is probably what he was wrong about. Do you think law of attraction works in ways more than just psychological and mechanical? @Leo Gura I would really appreciate your take on this.
  13. Today
  14. Nah it is your destiny to remain a hippopotamus
  15. Dude. Guns a protected by Constitution. You are just ignoring that. You are talking about changing the US Constitution to ban guns. That is possible in theory but will never happen in practice. This is like banning rice in China. Good luck.
  16. My instinct loves red meat, pork, cheese, certain grains especially wheat, ginger and garlic, and spirits. It hates milk, legumes, eggs, most seafood, and excessive sugar or fruit. When I was in high school I listened to the vegan things and started eating lots of legumes, I had the first flare-ups of irritable bowel syndrome of my life and cognitives issues. Then came milk, because of Ray Peat and Aajonus Vonderplanitz, and this time the issues were diarrhea lol... and cognitive problems. I still have certain preconceptions about food but the more I eat instinctively the fewer problems I have. It makes no sense to base food quality entirely on objectivity, since only your central nervous system possesses enough information about you to know what is beneficial for your homeostasis.
  17. The language used in parts of this thread is unnecessarily abrasive and dehumanising. "It's a men's thread" shouldn't mean that the men here are allowed to talk about women like they're evaluating the quality of a piece of meat. The same applies when you read content in women's dating spaces and you see them talking about men like they're evaluating a bank account. It's bad when either gender does it.
  18. What we need is to figure out how to project what makes the dancing work 24/7 in any circumstance
  19. The thread is just low quality and this forum has struggled with this for a while now: its full of low quality garbage that has nothing to do with personal development or consciousness to do and this type of red pill vibe thread is thr last thing the culture of this forum needs. i agree with Natasha that the way this thread is framed and the way girld are being discussed is inappropriate, this is not the red pill forum by Owen Crook, its supposed to be a forum about self actualization & consciousness, some mod bragging about having fucked 250 girls paints a certain picture, that might explain why only a few girls are interested in joining this, the pickup & red pill influence on the forum is a big flaw
  20. @questionreality what do you think I am disagreeing with? The thread itself? No.
  21. @Inliytened1 To answer your question, on a beach under a blanket! This was in the evening and there were not many people there but still was so thrilling. Contrary to what some other people say, I appreciate this thread and the raw unfiltered way that you write. It’s nice to see some authenicity for a change. @Natasha Tori Maru The title of the thread alone makes it clear that this is a man’s thread, so the few women who are on this forum can avoid it completely and don’t have to read it. Some of you (people in general not women) these days get offended and triggered way too easily… There is nothing inherently wrong with what he is writing, mutual sexual encounters are not a crime. Don’t like the language used? Then don’t read it or should there be a warning message in the beginning just like in videos, “viewer discretion is advised” ?
  1. Load more activity