Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. Now this you have to be careful with because there is at least a video proof of Mooji doing an extraordinary thing, an old video which you have to doubt about it being fake because it's old. If you want it I will send it to you. I've also sent it here on the forum before.
  3. Why do you have such high expectations for the people you date? I have lowered the bar for people I befriend or hook up with and I'm so much happier. I am the one who cares about consciousness, I let other people live their lives and don't judge them. Anecdotally, I had a close friend who has more conscious than avg and he was a PITA a lot of times, very boring and judgedamental guy. I stopped seeing him and replaced him w normies that make me laugh. I prefer a friend who makes me laugh than a know-it-all
  4. What makes you think that it is a "higher" stage? Human beings are social creatures and he mentioned that he is an extrovert as well. Higher stage is building healthy, nourishing, fullfilling relationships imo, which is what he desires
  5. https://www.reddit.com/r/dashcams/s/4Lua39muFP
  6. @Olaf This is your homework
  7. Today
  8. Perhaps it is a question of our ability to detect “higher consciousness” and what metrics we use to measure it against. As we develop, what we consider to be markers of higher consciousness can change. But how are we refining, learning and accumulating genuinely new methods of connecting relationally so that we can accurately assess “higher consciousness” in another person? There is always a risk that we THINK we know what markers to look for when identifying elevated levels of consciousness. The filter itself can become the block. And the filter changes as we grow. The problem is that the filter can become a fail mode: it can cause us to stop connecting with someone because they don't exhibit the particular markers we currently associate with higher consciousness. You run the risk of the frame itself being flawed when the question is framed as higher/lower, because ego can obviously sneak in: “I am above.” But that isn't the only possible block (that I am "above" and you are "below:). What we currently look for as markers of “higher consciousness” in another person might itself be outdated. Perhaps @Miguel1 is growing out of previous filters and trying to learn a new way? It could be what he is looking for as a marker is wrong - not that he automatically thinks he is above. My discernment may be flawed ≠ I am judging you as inferior
  9. It's due to its training. It was training to find statistical CORRELATION within data. The famous: Hitler was evil because he drinks water, therefore everyone that drinks water is evil. It's literally how reward function of the the machine learning model they use to create the LLM models, it's rewarded to be able to autocomplete plausibly the text, and they calibrate it to not memorize it verbatim too much so it gives it flexibility to hallucinate new content. They manage it like a cake recipe of curated text and deranged almost unfiltered internet dumps, somehow when they curate it just right during training it gives it the properties it they got currently. The issue with that approach, which they have tried to solve over and over again starting with DeepSeek-R1 when they introduced thinking mode fine-tuning via reinforcement learning by simply talking to itself until it was able to score higher on tests. It works good for things that have clear action and effects like coding, but it fails miserably for learning how to learn, for example, given a new esotetic language that it never saw in its training and instructions to code in it, they cannot do it, their ability to "learn" during a conversation is shallow and dependent on training. Humans somehow are capable of using their imagination and problem solving skills to come up with their own internal simulation of the world in real time, they need billions of dollars of synthetic material to do the same a child can do because evolution did imbue into us that ability otherwise we wouldn't have survived, we had to deal with learning real cause and effects. But even then, humans can see fake cause and effects where there are none. Like all the weird religions and fantastical ideas, prejudice and superstition. Even in humans seeing cause and effect clearly is very hard. Like how Leo Gura is going on this rampage towards the limitations of science, of how science is so caught up in mapping causes and effects that it believes it can know the substrate of the world/universe via observation from inside of the universe.

  10. Thought Art 📓

    Thought Art replied to Thought Art's topic in Self-Actualization Journals

  11. @Raze his Ynet interview (https://www.ynetnews.com/culture/article/byz8hexa6eex) calls for civilian evacuation before destruction, and this followed months after the February 8th 2025 tweet you shared. That matters when interpreting his intent. Yousef finished his Oxford speech I shared directly above (for the general reader); Haddad was removed. I’m evaluating his claims individually. Again, Mosab finished his Oxford speech despite many difficulties with some members of the audience, he most certainly was not removed, Haddad was removed. Which passage establishes your interpretation after accounting for his evacuation proposal? Also, its important to understand the historical context of Hasan's influence, especially in relation to his father as it connects directly with his passionate nature on the issues which obviously, can be both for the better but sometimes, and this is very pertinent based on how he is characterised by those against him, for the worst:
  12. I turned 30 now I’m fat and bald. Life is good.
  14. I feel like you're overconceptualising right now on the issue. My point was straightforward, going around with it too much obscures the self-insight. I tend to agree though with a point on how the flavour of Leo's teachings are marketed too hierarchically, which both protects the teacher from accurate evaluation from self to other and places flourescent coloured goggles on the followers that detaches them from reality filtering metrics which leads to the same problems as the teacher, and which can be discovered as evidence based examples represented on the forum to date. All growth needs to be levelled with presence before it can be fully integrated. To the level its not based on patterns I've observed it becomes wrapped instead in 'sticking points', blockages and neuroses on stages of development and where answers from consciousness to those problems are at risk of only being compensatory, self-protective and doubling down rather than the presence needed to integrate with actual raw reality. This tends to occur most where there are imbalances and disconnecting points between the intellect and one's emotions or rather broader nervous system. Sympathetically towards Leo, becoming a personal development teacher at such a young age, you're both naturally going to lean towards hierarchical organisation while you learn to make your own self-understanding and authority in sharing distinct from the cultural influences that may contradict your stances. This is evident in Leo's teaching style in the way he critiques culture, so my words have some weight in that regard. Horizontal reintegration as I highlighted in my previous comment requires far more experience and growth than what the average of any culture could possibly facilitate, much more so while a teacher is trying to carve out their own niche. Let's try to keep this as simple and straightforward as possible @Joshe, no unintentional obfuscation.
  15. Yeah that's true. But I was leaning more towards like you mentioned, the person prompting and managing the AI was in the old days the equivalent to an LLM lol. I think this all is all obvious to you at this point what I'll say below, but I'll leave it here for the sake of the discussion because I think those are important skills when coding with LLMs. AI can write code better than I ever did right now, but that's because I already had done my mental homework of thinking through complex problems and developing my software development mental maturity. Instead, what I meant there, is people that simply don't have in themselves that software development maturity of like... Testability. Not taking what it said at face value. Making debugging cycle as fast as possible. Not allowing the AI to introduce bugs and break old features Not going YOLO and trying to implement too much too fast, but also not wasting time specifying too much.: Knowing how big the "bite" / granularity / precision level the AI needs, and knowing when to bite more at a time, or less, etc. git hygiene: Not letting the AI write into the git history "I fixed this" when it's in fact broken. Differentiating between attempt and success. git branches: When to plow through on a single branch many features fast or even in a single prompt, and when to break it down on another branch so you can easily ignore or integrate that new feature when it's ready if it's large. knowing when the AI is going to a stupid direction that will make the code less maintainable Knowing when to ask the AI in chat mode only. No code. Just going meta with the AI and asking its opinion of what to do next, reviewing it and helping make broad decisions and analyze architectural trade-offs. Instead of just YOLOing more features. managing your own todo lists, list of priorities, and prompts and not letting it get lost in messy chats that might need to be reversed and the AI losing its precision on what you asked it on long contexts. Managing codebase bloat so the AI has a easier time ingesting into its context window and wasting less tokens / plan limits. Decoupling vs Coupling parts. When to duplicate and when to go DRY. Having the wisdom of when to continue fixing the current codebase and when to start from scratch with better defined specifications learned from that previous version, etc. Someone developing this experience is obviously better at coding than someone that just go yolo and has to start begging the LLM to stop breaking their code and don't even know how to use git.
  16. Because it is not information that I find interesting. I do not care about relationship advice much.
  17. You should be happy that spiritual teachers can get money for doing what they do and don't have to spend time doing other things to get money.
  18. @integration journey This is why you need cold approach or social circle game
  19. Justa cont., from this wri3ting, i got an idea for yas, As more of an artistic endeavor, Although its very difficult to wrap your head around since it would be like a balancing of practical conscious consciousness, combined w/ this Drac'on of possibility and eternity / That is, in shaping "who we are" and what we are to become, Where in "aware" and "Beingness" have alot of these Leo Gura'd Steps in between to comprehend... Iuno if ya can understand by virtue of that whole synopsis, cause its like, trying to interpret the now, in simultenaety within the mode of thought thats challenging the Self... and everyone else... Like, i can only know it from this perspective right now, but others may require a different one, And in some sense, you want it to relate to others, seeing as you can kill two bird w one stone by "relating" and "challenging", Like, those two things can be fused... sometimes, Like... But let me not get off track — just to get to the bottomline here im just calling it... PRJ., "Draco"... Like a temporary placeholder title. I feel like that it is transcendent enough that it can work. Like yas have to ask yourself the "high up" questions, what is the draco of possibility, but from a perspective that is itself just "Yourself", perceiving reality, making assumptions per usual... So its judgement, but its judgement thats no different from just existing, Like... Youve never Not'judged, its just got more world;Levels and direction... inb4 you may be required to lose yourself as well, as thats like, what Self is, its like... Partitions of living spaces, in a fortress/temple of consciousness. So you ask yourself what the fkhat it is... Why is it? Things like that.

  20. Is it the end of dating apps?

    integration journey replied to pablo_aka_god's topic in Dating, Sexuality, Relationships, Family

    So how the fuck do you meet someone living here then lol
  21. I think it would be interesting if you made a video about this specific topic, because you said many of us think this way and it is actually the main reason I no longer listen to spiritual gurus, this specific thing, if it would be clairified more I would be more open to listening to spiritual gurus again.
  22. Just making sure we're on the same page. Elevation, not evaluation. What I'm suggesting is that the lens of self-optimization is largely the problem, not growth itself. Leo's teachings make it very easy for growth to become verticalized with a hierarchy. You're not merely learning, becoming more aware, etc., you're "moving up", past the others. You become "more conscious", "more developed", and the "normies" and "low-conscious" people below you stagnate because they don't give a shit. Isolation and distance from others are somewhat obvious consequences of such a stance. So I think self-optimization is a key pillar propping up the problem here. IMO, Miguel would need to drop the self-optimization frame to to solve this problem. But of course, if he knew the cost, he'd likely reject the solution. Because the solution is to put the self back in its proper place, which is outside of a hierarchy. Of course Miguel would say "this is just the reality - I'm higher consciousness and that's just the truth of the matter", (like you pointed out in the SD thread), but why would one place such a high bar on connection and refuse it if it doesn't happen on their impossible terms? It's not a question of "How do I as a high-conscious person find people that I can connect with?" It's a question of "Why do I refuse to connect with people who are not as high-conscious as me?" Deep connection can obviously be had with "low-conscious normies". As a general rule, if you're looking onto reality and it seems broken, defective, or something about it is fucked up, you're the one that created the mess. What caused the problem? You did. Where did you go wrong? My money is on: growth has been verticalized with a hierarchy, and you need to figure out what that is serving, because something is being served. This is where the gold is. Also, a leading hypothesis: Miguel has tried to connect deeply with many woman and they have rejected his attempts, and instead of seeing those failures to connect as his own lack of tact, he sees them as "the girl is just too low conscious to go there with me". I think this because there was a conversation we had a while ago where he explained he tried to connect deeply with a woman in a way that had a high probability of being perceived as weird/cringy and the girl didn't want anything to do with it. Obviously, we don't have all the data, but this seems plausible to me. I hope I'm not sounding harsh here. I've been through my own challenges relating to the "low conscious normies", lol. Not a fun time.
  23. Why can’t you relay the advice from high development level experts
  24. You mean any video? Lol
  25. @Leo Gura okay interesting, I will think about it
  26. My video request is a video.
  27. I am not a good source for relationship advice. You are better off listening to relationship experts.
  1. Load more activity