Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. I wish, but my subconscious just wants to buss a nut so I wake up.
  3. Try MILD or WILD. MILD is easier and better for beginner in my opinion.
  4. Wow we are alike. I agree with this 100%.
  5. Read The Phase. Or check out my IG https://www.instagram.com/reallucid__/
  6. I hate that I don't have a good answer (for someone who doesn't like dr. k). Again, most of my knowledge stems from observing ND people, also specifically seeking them out, which I would suggest all of you to do. A lot of my knowledge comes from scrolling and just different sources. I would suggest you to train the algorithm (through liking posts etc) of the platform(s) of your choice to recommend you good content about the topic and then find your own favorite sources.
  7. Yeah, but which method to lucid dream actually works ?
  8. Thank you, besides Dr K, what other channels would you watch when learning more about making the best of neuro divergence in practical life ?

  9. Distinction Journal

    Emull replied to Emull's topic in Self-Actualization Journals

    Saturday: January 24th, 2026. Tumbling down a rabbit hole is distinct from intentional wondering.

  10. Finished the LP course

    Jannes replied to Jannes's topic in Self-Actualization Journals

    Men ... I am really kind off in pain emotionally/ socially. I need a break.

  11. Distinction Journal

    Emull replied to Emull's topic in Self-Actualization Journals

    Saturday: January 24th, 2026. Convincing someone of your worth is distinct from radical self-acceptance.

  12. Distinction Journal

    Emull replied to Emull's topic in Self-Actualization Journals

    Saturday: January 24th, 2026. Not having anything to do is distinct from choosing metamorphosis.

  13. Distinction Journal

    Emull replied to Emull's topic in Self-Actualization Journals

    Saturday: January 24th, 2026. Intellectually grasping what someone states is distinct from intuitional grasping.

  14. Distinction Journal

    Emull replied to Emull's topic in Self-Actualization Journals

    Saturday: January 24th, 2026. Thoughtfully causing someone's metamorphosis is distinct from a thought-provoking impact.
  15. I think i watched one video of his once where he used some technique of 'shaming' onself into changing, which didnt feel right to me. Im sure he has a lot of valuable stuff. But for example, which specific video on the topic of neuro divergence has he done, which really spoke to you ? @Cred
  17. I've seen some people here criticize him, and frankly I don't understand. I am a big fan of him and see nothing wrong with him (I'm not an uncritical person). I'm interested in the perspective of the people who criticize him from a high conscious position.
  18. I struggle with this in a social context a lot. I need a lot of time to let people close to me, the social world moves at a much higher speed then I am comfortable with. Hugs are kind of part of the whole game so I do them even though I dont fully feel comfortable with them. But I am not really following my inner compass with this, you know when you feel your inner voice of I wanna hug this person because it feels good and this person because it feels good, its all just mudded for me so I going about it logically and when I feel overwhelmed that manifests itself kind of autistically.
  19. Then God would be an entity with desires, therefore you would explain the universe by placing God as the cause, but you wouldn't explain God. This is religion, and it's something inherent in the human mental structure. If you question religion, believers get defensive; that's also structural. They need that belief to maintain equilibrium. The anthropic principle is convenient but impossible; fine-tuning occurs at all levels, it is not accidental, it is structural. The only explanation that does not violate logic is that reality inevitably finds a way to allow for a limited structure without absolute closure, since reality is ultimately unlimited and a limited structure in all its facets is ontologically impossible. Structured reality always tends toward greater complexity and phase shifts. This occurs when it is possible, coherent. It is an ontological necessity that there be an opening to this phase leap; reality cannot be closed. This means that when a possible possibility manifests itself, it does so with parameters that allow for expansive opening. Any limited structure must bear the imprint of unlimitedness, since it is truly unlimitedness in a form. There is no maker or will, there is inevitability resulting from the absence of limits.
  20. People will become so disconnected from their intuition when AI tells them what to eat, when to eat, what exercise you need, when to do it, etc.
  21. @Wilhelm44Glad you asked. One healthy way I found to deal with the term Neurodivergence (ND) is by imagining each of the types of ND (ADHD, autism, HSP, gifted, etc) is to imagine each neurodivergency as a basket full of different symptoms (there are overlaps). I see the binary diagnosis framework as "if you have a significant amount of symptoms from one type of ND, you are diagnosed with that ND". In my opinion, the danger of this framework is, let's say you only have a single one symptom of a single one kind of ND let's say you have executive dysfunction (ED) which is a symptom of ADHD. You will not be diagnosed with that ADHD. Now if you don't have ADHD does this now mean that you don't actually have ED???? No. If you see the symptoms of ED in your life, you have it, regardless whether you qualify for an ADHD diagnosis. The important thing to understand is that even if you only have ED, this will have a significant impact on your life, and you will identify with the ND community to some extend. And my claim again, is that a significant amount of people here have a significant amount of symptoms even if they might not have (though many do qualify actually imo) enough from one basket to qualify for the diagnosis. So if you don't like labels, I encourage you to not use them on yourself, but instead learn about each basket and see which of the symptoms apply to you. Even if you don't qualify for any one diagnosis
  22. Well said! Generally they are more conscious than the mainstream society, Green > Orange. And there truly are good people who are open to healthy masculinity among them. Generally the older more mature ones who saw the problems that arrise with denying masculinity.
  23. ps Dr K really does not seem like the right channel to assist neuro divergent people.
  24. That is nice but very naive.
  25. What is the property of "awareness" of a stone? A stone is not an entity that can possess something like awareness. You might think so, but it's arbitrary. Well, It's a religious way of looking at it, but if instead of adhering to religious beliefs you observe reality, it's obvious that consciousness arises when reality is structured in a dualistic way. A stone is not an entity separate from the universe; a human being is. It operates according to its own laws; it is a universe in itself within a larger universe. It intentionally preserves and perpetuates itself. In contrast, a stone is only a consequence of the laws of the primary universe; it is not separate from it. Therefore, consciousness is the interface between two separate realities that arises from the need for self-preservation. Consciousness is one way in which reality appears.
  26. Today
  27. But is there actually an official definition for neuro divergence, for example, have they done tests to determine which specific parts of the brain work differently, or what specific brain chemicals are out of balance ? You just listed a whole range of symptoms.
  1. Load more activity