This stream auto-updates
- Past hour
-
Oppositionless replied to Oeaohoo's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
God isn't a person but all persons. -
Oeaohoo replied to Oeaohoo's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Thank you for your answer. The idea of God being alive intrigues me. What does it mean for God to be alive? In ordinary language, life is something which belongs to biological organisms. -
aurum replied to Oeaohoo's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
God cannot be a human, because a human is a limited finite form. -
@Lila9 I too view sex as a sacred act, but it also encompasses a lot more. None of what I said states I do not see sex as sacred. We will simply not agree. You need to revisit: Always? My frame is from within a stable committed relationship, to be clear. A man vetted by a healthy woman who does not have any attachment issues. I am not talking about doing anything we do not want to. I am talking about mutual care and affection for each partners needs within the realms of a relationship. When a man cares for me, I want to engage in love. I am not talking about trying to live up to any standards other than our own. If my words come out that way, it is not what is meant. Have you ever been with a man, and he propositioned you (with a kiss) and you weren't directly randy right then, but you went in with the kiss and rolled into a swoon because desire can follow action? Because I am talking about responsive desire. I think you might be jumping to conclusions because I am well aware there are reasons for not wanting or being able to engage in sex, haha! My comments relate to being responsible, as I said. If a women is saying no to sex because her man isn't taking care of a need - it is her responsibility to bring this up. To open a dialogue. This will make her feel heard and reignite intimacy through healthy communication, provided a solution is found or worked toward. We need to be vocal and communicate with men regarding what helps US feel 'in the mood'. This is what my comments were gearing towards. Not any sort of weird transactional sex shit. This is what I mean by saying women need to be responsible for advocating for their needs - because it will open up intimacy. And in my experience, sex naturally happens from this, as a physical manifestation of intimacy. This is what I mean by women taking responsibility for ensuring they desire sex with their partner - by knowing what will bring union and intimacy. Love.
-
Connor is one of the most developed masculinity influencers.
-
Dude, where is your self-respect? Why are you so insecure? Why are you self-trashing and proud of it? Making dead, non-erotic love with strangers, masturbating into their bodies just for the sake of your ego? To fulfill the bottomless hole in your soul? No wonder you feel empty. And this attention and validation you receive means nothing. You are just another guy to them, as they are just another girls to you. Let’s see you build a real connection with a woman, with a deep spiritual connection, mastering tantric sex, live with her for at least a decade, and raise non-mentally-screwed-up children. Then I would understand the pride.
-
I just want to know if it's possible to use the plug method for bufo alvarius flakes instead of smoking it.
-
Dodo replied to Mellowmarsh's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1kDso5ElFRg -
Not hiding the posts you think deserve to be hidden .
-
Aare any of yous into like a blend of mysticism->spirituality and philo? the reason i ask is cause the other day i had thought of makin a thread / ques., tho its slipped my mind, i do kno it involved some mystical thing. When i say mystical, i wanna say it was either on astrology/astronomy or aalchemy or ancient greek symbols, like one of these, but i forget. Tell me whaat yous into. and also, hey, say anythin yous want... talk about biscuits and mashed potatoes, i dun care. p.s. i also thought of somethin regarding socrates but i forgot that too, as i been very busy.
-
what do you mean by letting it ride?
-
Oppositionless replied to James123's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@LambdaDelta I think you're on to something . I can't make sense of love with my mind because I think how can God accept evil and suffering. -
Theres also power in just letting it ride ❤️.
-
No, I addressed exactly what you said. Please don't gaslight me. You said that women are not open enough to romance and sex, but women are always open to romance. Men are not open to romance on the other hand. Sex is another issue, because it is not safe for women. This is a fact. So this is very rational of women not be so much open to sex. Sometimes because of toxic retoric such as yours, women are too open to sex with men who don't have their best interests at heart, just because they were gaslighted into believing they should always be open because it is “feminine.” Women should never give at their own expense if they don't feel comfortable with it. Love is not about crossing each other's boundaries but about reaching mutual understanding. I see sex as sacred, not something to be performed, quite the opposite. You were actually the one who implied that because men bring emotional maturity, women should bring sex. you framed sex as a reward, which I see as very outdated view. As I said, emotional maturity shouldn't be conditioned with sex. Sex is so sacred to me that I would never do it if I were not 100% there, and I would not want my daughter to do it if she didn’t truly want it. And if a man loves a woman, he will understand. Sometimes a woman is on her period, sometimes she is sick, sometimes she is tired. She is not an object or a sex toy to be used at a man's will.
-
I am Weird, and I know it. Furthermore: - following mainstream social norms 🗑️ - seeking approval from others 🗑️ - not speaking up due to fear of being rejected 🗑️ - masking who I really am 🗑️ - judging others based on their appearance 🗑️ - following rules by the book 🗑️ - appeasing to authority figures 🗑️
- Today
-
If you read what I wrote - no where did I say it was owed to men in any sort of transactional way. My statement is around responsibility. Sex is something to be mutually engaged in. I feel women SHOULD take responsibility to be honest and open. Ensure they are in a good healthy state to want to engage in sex. Something is wrong if you aren't willing to engage in give/take with a partner. It is just realistic. I think your views on sex are looking at it as something to be 'taken' and 'performed'. Not so in my eyes. It is not a reward. It is not for one partner. It is for both. Do not put words in my mouth. You make many inferences and assumptions about my view without asking questions. Your rant should be directed somewhere else, as it has little to do with anything I claim. This is your assumption.
-
Thursday: February 12th, 2026. Optimistic outlook in one's future is distinct from guaranteed success.
-
Thursday: February 12th, 2026. Honoring the diversity of perspectives is distinct from mocking minorities.
-
Thursday: February 12th, 2026. Daydreaming about what can be is distinct from idolizing fantasy.
-
Thursday: February 12th, 2026. Noble intention to be non-judgemental is distinct from holier-than-thou treatment.
-
Thursday: February 12th, 2026. Impeccable discipline to be virtuous is distinct from outward-centered disdain.
-
Have you ever had In-And-Out Burger? It is a must if you have not yet. There is even a secret menu: https://www.in-n-out.com/menu/not-so-secret-menu
-
Opposite problem for me. There’s probably thousands of posts that I’ve made that deserve to be hidden. I just ignore it and move on instead.
-
I'm vulnerable to a fault on this forum, haven't decided if it's a good or bad thing lol. I can't always tell whether it's helpful because my OCD involves a lot of checking and reassurance seeking, so if I make a vulnerable post and I realize I'm posting for reassurance I hide it.
-
Where did the assumption that the feminine cares less about truth than the masculine come from? Who did you hear that from, and why do you view this as truth? Who does this belief serve? How is this weaponized? I suspect that there is an underlying dark motivation behind this assumption (an ego stroke) rather than actually seeking the truth. Is this your sneaky ego trying to feel superior to women? Maybe deep down you also fear your feminine side. If you truly cared about truth, this assumption alone wouldn't satisfy you. You would need to question everything, always. If people don't automatically accept your assumptions as truth, it is actually a good sign and not something to be intimidated by. Did you fantasize that you could just approach people who have different life experiences than yours, who may be in a survival mindset, with a random radical assumption, and that they would accept you as their messiah or something? Just because some guru says that reality is a hallucination says nothing to me, even if what he says is true. I should think for myself. Unless I experience something that convinces me that this is the case, I should remain suspicious but open. If I am provided with math solutions, I am not satisfied. I want to solve them on my own. I want to be immersed in the process. This is more interesting. Someone may provide me with a general guide on how to solve math problems, but I want to arrive at the solution myself. This would be more reliable for me. Anyone can hand me a solution to a difficult math problem, but they could lie about it, solve it incorrectly, or be grandiose, so why should I trust their solution? Let me solve it on my own, and then we will see.
