This stream auto-updates
- Past hour
-
Learn to hold yourself accountable.
-
This one really came as a surprise to me. Good on her !
-
Must watch Trump press conference: Trump loses his shit multiple times, and a reporter asks Trump if he'll endorse Vance for 2028 with Vance standing right behind him. Hilarious.
-
@Alexopit's men's problem, not women's or anyone else's. It's not the left that's pushing this. It's the right that is too uncomfortable living alongside people who are different from them. It's the right that pushes people toward radicalization. I was pushed to the left because of this right-wing madness. And my point still stands: the far right is the problem, not the left. Claiming that both sides are equally responsible is a false equivalence.
-
Damn! Her lung capacity is amazing to be able to win an ultra-marathon whilst nagging the whole way.
-
They don't need to rig that. The problem is higher up stream. Just because they found some women who hunt in some part of the world does not make it disprove larger average trends. No one is denying that some women in some cultures hunted. And some women were cannibals. So what? In ancient times women had to be more hardy just to survive. A man isn't always around to save you. So women had to step up or die.
-
She psyched her male competitors out by nagging in their ears about nothing in particular for 250 miles
-
And even if they would have pushed for good stuff, they have to understand that progress will never happen overnight. And if they push for too much progress, they might end up with regress due to ego backlash.
-
Sure... I don't deny that a lot of Sociologists have that bias. And I guess Archaeologists could have that bias as well... though it's harder to fudge that data. How in your opinion, did they rig up the study where they found a bunch of female skeletons buried across a variety of regions in the Americas with game-hunting tool kits? And how did they rig up the study where most foraging societies have woman doing some portion of the hunting duties? At a certain point, you have to recognize when your modern ideas about historical gender roles don't match the reality of how humans have historically operated.
-
Woke here means leftist, not spiritually woke. Woke agenda is often Marxist, anarchist, moralistic, and seeking artificial equality. Yes, there is a real problem with pushing a woke agenda, especially in science and history. Woke people don't believe in truth, they believe in social justice and equality. So they will sacrifice truth for equality. They will say things like that men and women are equally good at sports, and other such nonsense.
-
Who said your concerns presented aren't important? Meanwhile relationships are a bunch of crap. Men are getting worse and worse, women are choosing to live alone. Far right is raising because the left is making clear mistakes. Want to have less of thost things you are concerned about? Fix men. You will never fix men if you don't understand masculinity and demonize it instead. It is not enough to be "aware". You need to act properly too.
-
Woke agenda is being conscious 😂 Being aware. How is that an agenda? To me, it isn't. It's about being authentic and honest. But anti-wokeism has a real agenda. There's a huge push for far-right propaganda, unlike wokeism. I haven't seen any real force pushing wokeism, though I could be wrong. But anti-wokeism has powerful forces pushing it on us, force-feeding it to people. The Trump administration and those Russian fuckers are part of that force behind anti-wokeism. Wokeism is about being aware. That's not an ideology or an agenda. 😂
-
Work on loving yourself exactly as you are first and perhaps contemplating within meditation on areas where your personality and appearance could be polished and ways your social skills could be amped up. If you want to be seen as attractive and interesting on face value, imagining that girls can just sense your aura, this is definitely a fantasy if you can't help but want to impress them. This is likely stemming from a place of low self-esteem, hence why visualisation and contemplation is a great method to elevate your state and also just give yourself a bit of confidence that helps with your mental wellbeing in your private time.
-
Natasha Tori Maru replied to Natasha Tori Maru's topic in Off-Topic: Pop-Culture, Entertainment, Fun
Hyping this - bumpity bump bump New poster -
That is exactly the kind of stuff that is happening in the social sciences. The social sciences have been corrupted by post-modernist, anti-colonialist, SJW agendas. It is a real issue. Woke people do bad science because they have a need to validate their political worldview. A researcher with a PhD in colonialism or gender studies, like on that paper, will have a strong woke agenda. The lefty agenda is so baked into the academic cake that they don't even know it is there. They are fish in an ideological pond. David Graeber is a good example of this. His writes books on ancient history as science and he is a leftist political activist type. It makes his books unthrustworthy because he has an obvious agenda. Many of these social scientists are Marxists or anarchists and see the world through that lens.
-
Well, I suppose Trump has been so blatanly corrupt that voters can't help but see it. So I guess that's good.
-
Even if talking to a girl doesn't go anywhere, you are still engaging in the social domain and building that muscle, especially if you notice the inherent emotional/psychological challenge in speaking to whoever it may be. Acting on that anxiety (ironically, probably more excitement being filtered through anxiety) is the exact method to alchemise impressing into connecting. Yesterday I was in a bar in Cleveland and an attractive slightly older woman asked if the seat next to me was taken. I had no intentions of chatting her up, but just by being myself it already established rapport. This is what it means to not be in your head, if a woman senses that you are free-flowing then that's already instantly attractive, the content of what you're saying can even be a bit sloppy as long as you are conveying authentic, charming energy. Nothing happened between us, it was an enjoyable opportunity to have playful fun with the opposite sex for the both of us. 10 years ago, I couldn't have imagined that being possible. Now it's effortless, but it took countless hours of mastering the social domain of life. If you are honest with yourself and know you've not put enough hours in, having this mindset is self-explanatory.
-
Sure, there's a lefty agenda. I just don't think that the hypothesis that many pre-agrarian women were likely good big game hunters is some far-fetched lefty agenda. It seems pretty well supported and not even very surprising. It's been well-known for a long time that gender roles weren't as strongly delineated in pre-agrarian times as we once thought they were... and that men sometimes foraged and women sometimes hunted. And there's plenty of evidence to this effect. So, the idea of "Men only hunting... and women only gathering" was something that I learned was debunked when I was a freshman in college (almost 20 years ago). And I just looked it up, and more recent DNA studies on the remains of nomadic big game hunters in the Americas, it was revealed that 30-50% of the remains belonged to women... with variations depending on the site where the remains were tested. There's also a recent ethnographic study of modern foraging societies. And in that study it revealed that women hunt in 79% of hunter-gatherer societies... and engage in large game hunting in 36% of those societies. And unless there's something fundamentally different about those foraging societies compared to historical foraging societies, we can likely gather some clues about how foraging societies have historically operated. So, there's pretty strong evidence that women have historically engaged in the act of hunting... even if that wasn't their primary task. There's also strong evidence that women do very well with endurance over long-distances... with women sometimes even being the outright winners of ultra-marathons when competing with men and other women. There's also strong evidence that big game hunts were largely feats of endurance, where humans would track a very fast animal down until it's too tired and weak to run away or fight back. And the tools used to kill the large game didn't require a ton of upper-body strength. So, the idea that women may have an advantage with big game endurance hunting isn't an insane hypothesis... nor does it seem like a leftist plot.
-
I don't understand how this relates to my question to the OP.
-
why would you care about the women you're not attracted to.
-
Muhammad Ali and George Carlin.
-
integration journey replied to Loveeee's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Can you elaborate on your experience? I think I had those yeah. Specially after intense meditation. -
I identify with pure consciousness. Everything else will go away.
-
I'm just a guy that farts and stuff, and preaches about love and light hehe. The exercises are what should be followed my good sir, not me.
-
lol. They must have some idea because it ranked the #1 issue in a Fox News poll.
(2).thumb.jpg.9c387b2305ceaba12a843253afab43c1.jpg)
