Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. Indeed. I have no argument with you brother. You are one of the few awakened left here to dwell in i don't know what
  3. Or none other. Words, beliefs, experiences comes and goes. If there is no body, there is no experience, beliefs etc... But You are always what You are. Body, existence, universe, anything you can experience or not experience is temporary.
  4. I have watched that. Thanks. Yes there is more to life and I guarantee I have lived more than you would ever want. Nowadays I just chill and I like to armchair shit.
  5. ‘Don’t cast your pearls before swine’ However, everyone is a mirror.
  6. I’m conscious with 100% certainty. If you are as well that’s solipsism debunked. Yes, technically there’s no way for me to know with 100% certainty that you’re conscious, but i know with 100% certainty that i am. So i can debunk solipsism for literally anyone else, just not conclusively for myself I guess. I would recommend you watch Leo‘s infinity of god’s episode. Also, get off the forum and go live life. You have 12000 posts dude. That’s literally not healthy to be constantly pondering stuff like this. Trust me, there’s more to life than philosophizing about fuckin solipsism.
  7. I don't or do consider anything. These are all function of mind. Mind thinks and it is it's function, heart beats, hand writes, none of it is You. Moreover, when You realize this, mind is at ease, only thinks what is to function in the moment, no past or future.
  8. I agree. For this reason I seperate the addiction from the person. I typically use terminology like 'the person suffering from the addiction'. Because it is an affliction and not them. I steer away from calling sufferers 'addicts' for this reason. The disease causes the person, as they are, to behave in a way that contradicts their soul. Their person. Who they are. And there are many consequences of that behaviour. It is also important to note that I consider someone addicted to something when they behave in a way that impedes functioning. On any level; interpersonal, social, fiscal etc. Unfortunately the fact remains they are not thinking in the correct way, regardless of how intelligent they may be. Endless compassion for sufferers ❤️
  9. It's nice when the creator of a show knows what the plot is going to be and plans out the whole show in advance, as opposed to not knowing the answers to the mysteries at the start and coming up with them on the fly based on popularity and consumer interest. Take Lost for example - s1 - fantastic, seems like it's building up to so much, then s2 hits and you realize "wait they're just improvising the plot".
  10. Totally .. 2Cs are important and add perspective. We need to be cautious when speaking on the topic of addiction, its sensitive and requires either deep education or lots of personal experience interacting with addicts or those who have recovered, I don't really get this from Leo on such topics- (of course I could be wrong).
  11. @Meeksauce amazing. i would call that more of a synchronicity though than a solipsistic experience. A solipsistic experience would be to realize that there is nothing outside your door. A wind will come on mediation. A powerful wind that I call the God Wind. That is a solipsistic experience. But you had something and it does show that there is a higher power.
  12. https://open.spotify.com/album/0XvgGcqNO8OOgfksc1tKXa?si=Cl2SCfrhSuac_XwCr6-9wQ Classical music is the deepest and most complex music. Fight me
  13. I do not think Leo was advocating for an unempathetic position with the statement that 'addicts are untrustworthy'. His point raises a healthy boundary for empathy - which is a more compassionate approach. Empathy with boundaries is compassion. Empathy without boundaries is self-abandonment/self-erasure. Boundaries prevent the corrosive nature of unchecked empathy. Which can lead to trusting someone suffering from addiction, and ending up exploited due to their actions. Just my 2C on how I read the statement.
  14. @Kokorec What prompted this question? It might help others understand your frame better - particularly what you mean by 'free'. I can see replies in this thread coming at you in a loaded way due to the nebulous terminology of that word
  15. Today
  16. I listened to Osho fervently for years, I didn't find out he was a perv cultist until after I got tired of him, but here's the best tip I got from him, from his book of secrets - Do not move your eyes. If you keep them still, you can turn everything you see into one solid block. That's nonduality. It's amazing that nobody just lays it out this clearly if they already have it but here it is. I was walking in central park when I had my first "oh shit, awakening is real" experience. I was in a meditative-like trance from walking 5+ miles and when I stopped moving my eyes, I saw all of the reality in front of me as a horizontal flame of light, like an unsheathing of God's sword. The best way I can explain it is my field of view slightly increased, I was acutely aware of the edges/ blackness surrounding my visual field and the strange loop or NONLOCALITY of experience became obvious. The "turn it into a solid" comes from Fred Davis - sometimes it's difficult to distinguish noise from real truth with him but that was the most instantly awakening pointer I've ever heard, as well as the "keep your eyes still" tip. If you keep your eyes still constantly around other people you'll look like a weirdo, so make sure to just do it in your private/meditative time.
  17. Do you spit on science or do you consider it?
  18. DHS says the two were members of Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, and that they weaponized their car to run over the agents Sounds familiar.
  19. This was when I was around 10, at my friend's house who I still consider one of the smartest people I know. We were discussing "what if my consciousness is the only one" (we had never heard of the term solipsism/religions pointing to it) as an interesting and plausible idea. It was one of the earliest existential crises for both of us, but something peculiar happened. I said "_______ (his sister) could knock on the door right now" (meaning if this was true). Not more than one second after I said that, KNOCK KNOCK KNOCK. We both panicked and she asked what was going on and we said nothing. Whether you believe something paranormal was going on or not, this would spook anybody. This was probably the main event of my childhood that really intrigued me to solipsism. I used to believe in coincidences, but after that I stopped. To this day I believe every thought you have manifests itself in reality in some shape or form, and I probably wouldn't believe that if not for this event.
  20. A realistic one. In addition - my response is from the frame of why an enlightened person would not force something on another.
  21. Yes, in a sense that their brains prioritize dopamine from their drug of choice over building character-. But also- addicts are human too. We can empathize without getting entangled in their dysfunction.
  22. How many years you are in this path. And still saying solipsism. Wake up. See, the one who comes and goes is mind. Any experience belongs to it. You are none. Neither universe, existence nor body. You are always what You are. Never moved, never began.
  23. That wasnt the question. Would you kill another to preserve your own survival? The answer must always be yes. Despite the consequences. Because if you say no you are dead. But if you say yes, you have to still live with that after.
  1. Load more activity