Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. Do you live alone? If you are independent, it is even more easier.
  3. Focus on learning game, learning how to be funny, social skills, verbal skills, voice, style. Go out relentlessly 3x week. It is impossible to not get laid.
  4. Yes, you can do it. Focus on what you can control. Fuck your height. Just focus on what you can improve and/or control. You can be 5cm taller with a specific shoes or boots but whatever.
  5. But as long as fear is still tied to one's perception of the world, the world can still hold one captive. That's why I think one must first break free from the shackles of the world in order to live freely in the real world. For me, form is only here to help me learn how to free myself from it. Ultimately, I see it as a projection of the mind, and when the mind is completely pure, there is no more projection, only endless expanse without limits. It's both, in my opinion. A boundless, otherworldly peace, so glorious that every word about it only spoils it. By the way, if you like Kali, you should read The Gospel of Ramakrishna if you don't already know it. He embodied Kali and surrendered himself completely to her. The openness in which he lived is beyond comprehension.
  6. @No1Here2c The woman evolved to hide and then be captured. Its in their DNA to not love as much and he be willing to switch partners easier. Its in the DNA of man to die for the people he loves. The woman who gets captured has to switch partners unwillingly to survive. Those woman then spawned us. This happened thousands of times and is now part our psyche.

  7. The Statistical Worldview

    Joseph Maynor replied to Carl-Richard's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    I would say this would be the wrong approach. This is way too theoretical and nobody will integrate this.
  8. Okay that says nothing about the feelings of the woman
  9. @No1Here2c When the man is having sex with a woman he is trying to find God.
  10. You sound batshit crazy
  11. @No1Here2c The metaphysical representation is the man cumming his light into the woman. The woman gets the mans light and the man is left in the black. This allows man to see God. The woman is the mans light. The man give everything to the light to be left empty.
  12. @Never_give_up Your desperation is a form of insecurity within yourself. Become a rock solid anchor for yourself & these sorts of issues will arise less & less. @Hojo Prove that.
  13. @No1Here2c Its a fact of life. Relationship are there for spiritual purposes. The woman exposes God in man and man give God to woman.
  14. The latter perhaps i agree with(don't really know for myself, simply working with what ive seen). In regard to the former i would caution you not to make assumptions about a perspective you have little to no reference point for.
  15. They dont love like men do. A man will give up his entire life for a woman. Like he will want to do it, willingly. I beleive evolutionarily its that way. What you crave is a desperate desire to kill yourself via a woman. The man evolutionarily wants to give his life to a woman.

  16. sleep problems

    No1Here2c replied to Judy2's topic in Health, Fitness, Nutrition, Supplements

    You can utilize those waking hours of the night in order to do deep meditation or contemplation, with little distraction. I find, when I wake up in the middle of the night is some of the best time for me to focus on inner work. I think the body has ways of providing the necessary conditions to facilitate our spiritual development.
  17. I've had this debate many times already. If this feels right to you, I would say keep on keeping on with it.
  18. Love is Good. Good is Love. = Truth.

  19. The Statistical Worldview

    zurew replied to Carl-Richard's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    A good chunk of hypothesis picking will come down to abductive reasoning - So Carl, do you have any thoughts on IBE (abductive, inference to the best explanation arguments) - more specifically how to cash out different epistemic virtues when you compare two or more hypotheses? More specifically would be curious about how you approach issues like miracle claims or supernatural claims and you how update your view and whether you have some kind of sophisticated principled approach by which you can compare supernatural claims to natural claims and would be also curious by what epistemic virtues you compare hypotheses. I will give you a specific example , and if you have an answer to this, then please walk me through your reasoning and approach using IBE or your statistical worldview and show me how you assign probability and or how you decide which hypothesis is more likely to be true and why. Example: There is an event that breaks the known laws of physics and you need to pick which hypothesis is correct or more likely to be true. H1) A powerful enough agent broke the actual laws of physics H2) The actual laws of physics was never broken, we just had a wrong understanding of the actual laws of physics , so the event that we observed was consistent with the actual laws of nature. H3) The laws of physics was actually broken, but no agent caused it, and this event was brute in principle, meaning nothing caused/triggered the event and it doesnt have any further explanation in principle. (I dont think these three hypotheses exhaust the possibility space, but for the sake of not making this issue even more complex than it already is, lets just only entertain and compare these three hypotheses). Side note: There is so much more that I would want to talk about related to worldview forming and hypotheses picking and issues surrounding these things (like your views on the PSR, your potential approach about how you navigate disagreements about assigned priors to hypotheses specifically in the context of apriori arguments and more) but I dont want to overwhelm you and the earlier given example is already complex and time-consuming enough.
  20. Love is just a word that we use to describe a feeling that we have towards something. The point is that this feeling is just being without the restriction of the negative, the preservation. And this feeling is never absolute, it's always "almost". If you open yourself totally to what you are, that is exactly what you are but without restrictions, it's absolute being , unlimited, and it's absolute love, you will say: alleluia! The fucking prodigal son is again at home
  21. This just shows me you don't know what Love is. This is common. People who know Truth don't necessarily know Love.
  22. Yes it is. If you are open to what being is, it's total, everything. More love than the biggest love that you imagined in your wildest dreams
  23. its true what the woman say that they can be attracted to unattractive men. They are metaphysical creatures. They like stories and engaging with the metaphysical part of being a human. So they get attracted to the 'person' thats inside the human. Being whiny is not attractive to them as it will make them think the 'person' is a pansy and whiney. Thats not a man to a woman. You need to be firm in your identity with a woman. They fully beleive their body and if you know how to make their body react they will like you. They dont logically think about things they feel their body react and go with it. You can make their body react with your words. If you have deformities you might have to work harder. If you are attractive its a bonus as that gives you the ability to make her body react easier. But if you are super attractive and dont make her body react at all beyond looks, its just as bad as being ugly. If you want the woman you have to say something to her that make her head shoot in a random direction, like if a woman came up to you and say you are beautiful ,your body would jump a little bit. They react to that type of stuff. Sexual innuendos that are not obviously sexual innuendos. Like I was talking to a woman and we were talking about impacted teeth and how you can get a dry socket and I called the impacted tooth a wet gooey hole and it make the woman lost track of what we were talking about. Talk about a time you had to go into a tight hole. For survival purposes they have to constantly think about how you are trying to hit on them. You can say sexual stuff without it being sexual and their bodies will automatically react. If their bodies react to the sexual innuedo they will think you are making them feel that way. They will think maybe I like this person when its just their survival mechanism going off. If you are 'innocent' like you claim you can do this easily. Keep in mind woman read their porno. Men will watch their porno. Once you make a woman react to what you do the information is logged into their system as karma and they will think of it everytime they engage with you or its part of your profile. If you do this alot they will like you cause their bodies keep reacting to you. Stop listening to red or black pill BS. Its total BS to make you a beta cuck! The information is hurting you and its not even real.
  24. This is not Love.
  25. @CARDOZZOI can't do looksmax, I am 167cm (5'6 i think). All I can do is become 10% body fat which will take many years. When I was a teen and was thin many women couldn't take their eyes off me or approached me to talk about something irrelevant and stuff like that. Some were (way) taller too. But that is the past, i don't know if the same will happen when (and if) i reach 10% body fat.
  26. @Consept if your on mobile click and hold the empty space with your finger and do select all and delete.
  1. Load more activity