Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. Anyone who thinks that church attendance is needed and helpful to kids should reconsider their intelligence. Kids mostly know belief-making, so if you don't want your kids to have fucked-up ideas about God and the world, don't make your kids attend church. Church is not school.

  3. Decentering Man.

    Natasha Tori Maru replied to Rafael Thundercat's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events

    Responsibility is on us all, regardless of fault. The same could be said for yourself. On a wider note - my comments around communication style play into how this thread has evolved. I have no issue steering any thread back on topic, but users who are entrenched in bias shoot themselves in the foot when they cannot have a good faith, cohesive & wholistic view of a topic. This is a common pattern for these types of threads on the forum. This goes for all users - not singling you out @Lila9
  4. it's weird that she choose physics and space/time to push the boundaries on. You can't push the boundaries on these topics if you don't know what a paradigm is. All your imagination is wasted Inside the Box
  5. I was building paper airplanes when I was 4. I'm smarter than her and never read a book.
  6. The mainstream media loves these types of stories. They love to make the next posterboy or postergirl out of someone. But they aren't seriously looking into the intellectual depth of their work. This type of girl is perfect for a cover story for a news magazine. It is the perfect storm to impress casual readers. As soon as they proudly tout someone's high IQ, I'm out.
  7. @No1Here2c So you claim it should be possible through intuition?
  8. Yesterday
  9. 500 IQ physicist clueless about the actual physics or rather metaphysics of reality, the usual With a brain like that you'd think she'd connect some dots Never fails to amaze me

  10. The Statistical Worldview

    zurew replied to Carl-Richard's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    Carl is ducking an interesting talk about inference to the best explanation again . This guy would rather waste his time arguing with Leo over confused "proper" definitions than possibly have a substantive and fruitful talk about IBE.
  11. This guy is more dedicated to Truth and proper sensemaking than 99.9% of humanity
  12. Almost. The only thing I would add to that is that the proccess of referring isn't exclusive to group use, but it can be done by intention as well. There can be empirical facts about how a given group of people use a term, but that doesnt constrain you to that only use of the term. This is why for instance by the term "chicken" you can mean literally anything you want (even though there are empirical facts about in what context usually people use the term "chicken"). This is why in talks we usually ask what do you mean by "X" rather than just looking up "X" in a dicitionary. Yeah.
  13. Yes, I claim it is possible to hold this. Not necessarily as explicit, but as inuitive, implicit. All simultaneously. The 'highest potential' definition or understanding is not a rigid holding & maintaining of each and every understanding individually, but rather a full integration & superimposition of each, fully grasped together, such that the word can be placed into any context and Intuitively known from each possible definition & perspective simultaneously. I am not claiming that this operates in a fixed way or as a rigid system of definitional replacement, where you must logically know, switch out, & fit each definition and context to a word until you find a working match. Not how I claim this works. It is as precisely a fluid and shifting understanding of definition that makes this possible. If the mind were so rigid it could not see the term from each & every possible perspective and context. It would remain caught within its own, or the first basic few. This is not easily possible, or even very plausible, from the ordinary human state of consciousness. This requires a hyperaware, hyperfluid state, in which awareness itself may utilize a 'vision beyond' the basic human being's very narrow, rigid, limited perspective. This is a fluid 'system'.
  14. You said that ''you mastered" how to get friends, Do you practice ? If not ? HOW can you said that you mastered it ? Cause if you dont practice your social skill and your game going ou and socialising than YOU WILL NEVER EVER master it or have a good game Go out 3 times / week and open 10 women minimum Or 3 women every day to get decent improvements (15 open by week minimum) If you can debrief every day : What you did good ? What you should get better at next week Never focus on sleeping with the woman but ALWAY go out WITH ONE SOCIAL SKILL you want to train Open more eye contact vibe be fun etc ... If you want to improve hella fast Go open 5 girls minimum every day or go out in club bar 4 times/weeks and open every one to the club to socialise until the closing
  15. Fixed it. Thanks. The # symbol was breaking it.
  16. It is not even that the lemur must somehow grasp this consciousness, as it is known that the consciousness is what grasps the lemur and its perceptual world. There is nothing really that the lemur 'must do' to have this 'click in its mind', as the doing, and anything which could 'click into place' for it, is already what consciousness will hold within it. It is this intrinsic grasping nature of consciousness that must itself be understood. That regardless of the lemurs understanding, consciousness will be there experiencing it. That is itself the understanding. At the same time that the lemur need not do anything, the only way for the lemur to have a snowballs chance through hell of getting this is for him to work very hard to understand it. This work goes deeper than words, linguistics, & logic. It requires utilization of imagination, and direct conscious awareness. It requires the ability to navigate conscious state through various means. This is all only a model, a tool for communication, & a surface level one at that. Words will only ever 'capture' the very surface. Hence the difficulties in communication here. No human model will ever touch the full depth of consciousness. Or effectively convey the scope of Truth
  17. So you claim it is possible to hold every single possible context of a definition as a knowing, simultaneously? This appears like an impossible ideal limit. Definitions simply do not operate in a fixed way. It is a compression of usage across contexts. I don't think steering toward "Can humans hold every context simultaneously?" And proposing it is possible, with no case, is as useful as asking “Which distinctions are most useful, precise, and experientially honest in this conversation?”
  18. Clip #048 has this bug when you click on the dedicated page. it just says "Clip #048 - The"
  19. All social dynamics have varying degrees of cult-like dynamics, including Actualized. But actualized is a very mild place when it comes to cult-like dynamics. The fact that people are regularly and openly criticizing Leo and the only pushback they get from him is mostly on factual and technical errors. There's more room for individuality here than the average school classroom. I agree that certain people here should focus on improving their material standards and/or are too mentally ill currently to do the super deep stuff. I consider myself the former. Most of my interactions here are mostly for fun and aren't very serious since I basically already have everything I need to make progress on my goals as is.
  20. I'm talking mostly about diet and exercise.
  21. The context within the frame can be expanded through various means. Context is held within the eyes of the character, a sort of imagined frame, which does not have distinct defined basis in the image itself, but is rather a filter through which all shape/color must be passed before any content reaches the observer 'inside' of the lemur. All of this is held within the true frame. The scope of the character's context can be expanded, but the frame always remains. When the character thinks to have broken out of the frame, is actually a breaking out of context that was imaginarily held as the frame itself. Context can never be Truth, it can never be the entire frame. Context itself is as function of the lemur which is an aspect of the scenery held within the true frame. The frame is Truth. The frame is pure Consciousness. The true frame is the 'actual container' for all of the activities within it. The world/character, & the actual experience of the characters perception, of which is Illusorily held within the character's imagined/presented context, is all within the true frame of consciousness itself. 'The frame', or consciousness itself, has no distinct qualities to it. It cannot be grasped in the same way as any aspect of the image. It is of a different sort of nature. The consciousness is the true observer. It is not held within the lemur. But rather the entire wholistic process is grasped by consciousness all at once, and presented as 'the lemurs existence from within its own eyes' It can almost be thought of as if there is no frame. The black border does not exist, as that too is an artifact of the lemur looking out. Rather everything spills seamlessly into the white void, which has no end, has no limit, or divisive quality, so it cannot be grasped through the traditional means that the lemur understands. Lemur himself only understands division and distinct aspects; Things with quality(color, forms, texture, etc...etc...)
  22. Yeah so a person uses the word to point to something. So a word won't be meaningful put out the user.
  23. Clip #266 xD, the Bible verses of the TikTok generation Imagine being an internet spirituality scholar in the year 2100.
  25. This is the wildest misapplication of that teaching. Lol
  26. The case could be made that some members have a cult like devotion to Leo and/or Leo's teachings. There are plenty of sound bites from Leo that can be taken out of context to frame him as a cult leader. There is no real evidence of a cult, just some data being interpreted to fit a theory.

  27. Finished the LP course

    Jannes replied to Jannes's topic in Self-Actualization Journals

    Men I just feel flatened despite taking medication. A lot of uni stuff. I need to get used to that level of effort.
  1. Load more activity