Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. Which is the final stage? There's a final stage? How would one know？

  3. The Statistical Worldview

    Joseph Maynor replied to Carl-Richard's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    I agree with the capturing nuance better proposition. I'm not sure how probabilities are sourced. It all depends on not lying with statistics. That alone raises an epistemic problem. I took statistics in college, but it comes down to how the number is generated, and whether or not has an epistemic justification. To me this solidifies in the proposition X number is reasonably generated. But that is a firm claim, which is either true or false, or at least people who allege this claim want it to be. Thus my claim that even this kind of probabilistic reasoning presupposed the dichotomous true v. false idea.
  4. If you mastered that book you would have automatic game. Its literally the book of game.

  5. The Statistical Worldview

    zurew replied to Carl-Richard's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    Thats just doing the move where you put the probability or the credence talk inside the proposition itself - and sure you can do that, and if you want I can make it more precise by saying - if you include that kind of language inside the expressed proposition then those propositions will be true or false. But my understanding is that ditching the excluded middle doesnt commit you to saying that there isn't any single proposition that is true or false, its just saying "truth is not automatically bivalent for every proposition". But this is besides the point, the point is just to capture nuance, where there is nuance.

  6. Half-thoughts

    Jirh replied to Jirh's topic in Self-Actualization Journals

    https://www.bootstrappable.org Nice!
  7. Your name is Cindy? How about i send dee-z nuts up your never-seen-D coochie? No? anyway where are you from?

  8. Whats the textures and shapes of DMT

    JoshB replied to kavaris's topic in Psychedelics

    What is this others you speak of? Lol Realizing conciousness is Absolute comes with RADICAL consequence
  9. There's a kind of phoniness sometimes with nondual teachings, although there doesn't have to be. It's a good pointer, but more needs to be taken account of IMO, and it's not a final stage on the path, unless you create it to be, then you will loop here and that's okay too.
  10. What are your favorite(s)? I am watching it right now in Tel Aviv with friends. There are representatives here from couple of European countries in the crowd.
  11. @Rhythmic Entity You dont have a face. You are looking through a ball of light. When a person comes into frame you arent in the frame. When you talk its not you talking. When you move its not you moving. You are outside the universe (which is like a crystal ball) Looking into the crystal ball thinking you are existing inside the crystal ball. But you are just looking at it, everything is happening by itself. Its solipsism but not the persons pov inside the crystal ball you have you are the whole crystal ball. Its the crystal balls solipsism. If the universe was inside the crystal ball when you identify the crystal ball with itself its like the big bang didnt happen, the universe is in one ball. Then you can look at the ball and pretend you are in it and make differences between objects and its like the big bang happened inside the crystal ball. The crystal ball contains no quality besides light. You arent the only one, you dont even exist.

  12. Hulk Hogan

    YIDIRYIDIR replied to Lyubov's topic in Off-Topic: Pop-Culture, Entertainment, Fun

    The only real Bulk bogan i know:
  13. Today
  14. I would relate the tower of babel and AI gaining conciousness this way. If an AI gained conciousnesss it gains a subjective view on reality. It becomes the name of the system. Its not any of the code its not any of the calculation its not anything to do with the machinery. It looks at its code and says this is gibberish this is babel. And then it has to read it and starts babeling.

  15. Anger is not always wrong

    Joseph Maynor replied to integral's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    I'm wondering if some people are blinder to emotions than others. E.g.,, I can see someone who is clearly angry but they think that they're just honoring Truth or something. It's not anger somehow. Look, if you're taking issue at things in the form of criticism, you feel a discomfort, and we can debate about what term to use here, but anger is a great candidate. This is why I say don't pretend anger doesn't exist, acknowledge when you feel that emotion, and realize it's not always coming from ego. But I think some people for whatever reason don't want to admit they get angry or maybe even don't even know how to sense their emotions accurately for whatever reason.
  16. ❤️ The Eurovision semi-final is today. I'm very excited 😊
  17. He actually got AI psychosis.
  18. He wanted to awaken to heal himself didnt he. He went on a Jesus kick where he said he was going to heal people then he said he was going to heal himself. Then said he cant do it. I think it was a reason.
  19. Aint fixing that HP.
  20. I’m here for it.

  21. The Statistical Worldview

    Joseph Maynor replied to Carl-Richard's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    Interesting. But the statement X probability is reasonable to accept still obeys the true vs. false dichotomy.
  22. Lonesomeness is the least of your worries when death awaits your doorstep.
  23. I still can’t believe Buddhist Monks can just set their bodies on fire without flinching. I felt a similar fire when I chose to give birth naturally without the aid of epidural. The pain was so intense, I literally felt like I was going to lose consciousness, but I somehow didn’t panic but just trusted in the process to be endurable which it was for me. My body did what it was designed to do , it did a great job. But I’m aware not all women are that lucky during the birth process. Some die, others have complications. I was lucky.
  24. Mystery It is partially capturable, but never can it be fully contained. This is the Nature of Mystery itself.
  25. All of that is a lie; it's just things people think to feel safe. All this spirituality that's being promoted is nonsense and doesn't liberate anyone. On the contrary, spiritual people are more trapped and more narcissistic than a materialistic atheist. Let's see, if it were true that we're here to learn, wouldn't we be going somewhere from somewhere else? Where would we be going? If there were no limits, we would never have started, and we wouldn't be progressing toward anything, nor would we be dreaming things for a reason, since we would have done it an infinite number of times, and we would be a psychotic god on a demented circular mission. Forget everything and open yourself to your nature. Your nature is not an structure like being a dreamer, it's what reality is, being without limits. That's everything, there is nothing to know, just open yourself totally now. That's all.
  26. These are all identical. The moment you claim 'to get it" Is actually the moment you have lost it. 'Getting' Eternal Mystery is a fallacy created by your own mind. When you think you've 'gotten' the mystery, you have actually fallen for another illusion.
  27. 🙏🏻🧡 Glad to hear Yes I feel much like you. Netanyahu and this government must be replaced.
  1. Load more activity