Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. You know the good teachers from the bad. You can intuit it. Leo is a rolex. But he doesn't give it to you out of generosity or good intentions. He had his own intentions.
  3. Whether its real or not wouldn't really matter to me. It would be the difference between whether its a gift being given out of generosity because it would indeed look good on me or whether you're just trying to sell me a watch.
  4. Fuck Rolex - I do not rate. Enicar sherpa graph all the way - muah!
  5. Love it bro. You should start a journal on here
  6. Yeah. A rolex isn't always a Rolex. But sometimes it is. So let me ask you. How do you find out?
  7. Depends on how good it actually looks on me which was the pitch.
  8. He doesn't delve into anything but his own convictions. That's fine. But he admits he isn't enlightened so you would think he would.
  9. He is my spirit animal
  10. Record El Niño to bake Australia Well. I'll update you on the incineration down under. FUCK. The sad part is, I did a minor in meteorology at uni (maths was my major). We studied ice core samples from the Arctic in 2005/2006 looking at how the climate changes. Looking at the projected path we were on back then triggered 3/4 months of really bad depression for me.
  11. Yesterday
  12. Either he is trolling and this is more stuff to generate views - or his paradigm is slowly coming apart. I tend to think the latter, actually. I am prepared to be the fool... He was a Mormon and discarded that for blueprint. Fickle. Possibly falling hard for Kate Tolo has changed his austere views. There is only so much energy one can have for the neurosis he employs attending to his rigid life. Their relationship has some tells of codepandence. The other thought I have? Blueprint and the experiment was the narrative / beginning of the grift. The slow boil to be discarded for Immortals Care - the real cash cow. He very deliberately targeted an audience of neurotic, overanalysing, black and white thinking min/maxers. People who want shortcuts. People who would rather swallow 4/5 supplements than actually nail down sleep, hydration, nutrition, exercise and solid routine (lets be honest now, all the crazy blueprint shit he does moves the needle less than a millimetre, whereas these fundamentals substantially shift our quality of life). People who love hype, fantasy thinking - people who jumped on the AI hype train with him. People who are deathly afraid of aging, afraid of pain, afraid of their appearance falling apart. And above all - fear of death. The ultimate fear. Fear fear fear. He basically targeted fear and sold to it. Gotta give it to him
  13. Well. It's up to you how much faith you wanna put into the watch.
  14. From what I can infer - no to Ralston. Not sure about Einstein. I don't understand continually wanting to take down Ralston but also resolutely refusing to delve into his work to understand. If I wanted to tear apart someone's work I would first go straight to the source and investigate all counter claims to my own. This usually either convinces me out of my opinion or assists in my own ability to put forth a sound argument. Probably why I like to go at users who I disagree with a lot - it helps me sharpen the mind @Joshe >.> <.<
  15. Hope its got a long battery life because suffering is going to continue for eons to come.
  16. I got this watch that would look really good on you 😀
  17. I approached today and I didn't have too much time, so I rushed both my warm-up and approaches. As I am rushing, I feel the women still respond to me, but also make them feel in a rush, not because they are in a rush, but due to my lack of presence. Now chasing a certain number of approaches in a certain amount of time, sounds productive, but I think it is actually building resistance instead of presence. I guess still better than doing nothing, as it is making a habit of approaching, but not optimal for sure. Also once you rush it is kinda hard to stop that momentum, it is like you have to start present from the start, at least in my experience. Just like when you get angry, it is hard to go from anger to completly calm, it takes hours, it is better to be calm from the beginning, I guess. That is why I like to approach mostly in parks or places with nature, as I get in my natural element and relax, calm, although it could be a bit of a weird place to approach, probably best would be nature with some people around on the grass or something, so she doesn't feel like you are doing it in private. Yet a busy city center can make you feel in a rush even when you aren't in a rush, especially in the bigger cities with millions of people. Anyways, I would say location is important and one thing to make you present, like nature, but not rushing a certain number of approaches in a certain amount of time, also helps. It is okay to have a certain amount, but I think it shouldn't be too ambitious, as it would become more about rushing through the approaches than making one approach work well, be present and enjoyable both for her and you. btw let me know if you guys want to hear more of these updates on my approaching journey when getting back in to pick up? I thought it would be valuable to share my progression rather than state how it is or not. I am still learning and becoming aware myself as I am getting back into it.
  18. Ralston isnt the problem its the people that get snowed by him. Same goes for every other guru thats got shit to sell you.
  19. Has he even read Ralston? He talks of physics but has he read Einstein?
  20. 40. You guys are pups still Even 40 for me still feels SO young! I felt my 30's were really a lot calmer than 20's. A better decade. I feel just as good, vital, energetic and strong as I did at 18.
  21. In order to keep that wily snake chomping on its own tail for eternity you gotta spice things up a bit.
  22. My copy of Ending Unnecessary Suffering is with my brother - my post was referencing The Book of Not Knowing (which I have as a soft copy and can paste some contemplations, but they do not directly relate to suffering, just examples). Further to this - I might decline the request. I do not believe you have any true intention to really understand Ralston. I believe you will not truly listen, comprehend and understand because you are approaching this entire topic with an agenda: something to prove. And if I know humans, it's that if they have something to prove they will never really listen to what the other person presents. Coupled with the above, you have great issue with Ralston. There is evidence for this across many posts, threads, topics over the span of years on the forum. I don't believe you are earnest in wanting to understand. You have been recommended Ralston's work and books by myself and other members of the forum. Multiple times. In each instance - you never actually take action to read his works or teachings. You insist on someone else putting forth their interpretation and spin on their understanding. If you truly wanted a pure source and to understand, you would not be asking for secondary filtering through a user in this way (which can, and does, corrupt the teachings). I perceive you as wanting someone else to translate Ralston (and possibly accidently strawman him) so you can try to dismantle his work in a lazy manner. Sorry, but not sorry.
  1. Load more activity