Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. For sure you need that. Solo game is rough. Find a wingman. Doesn't need to be from this forum. Montreal has many wingmen around. You only need one or two good ones.
  3. @Breakingthewall I’m still in the mind set of wanting to say nothing is being everything though, I don’t think I can think about reality any other way tbh. For example: I always want to say things like nothing is real, and nothing is unreal and nothing is a separate self, or an ego, or nothing is relative or absolute, or nothing is everything. I can’t change my mind about that because it seems an all inclusive way of describing reality using words and language. If I don’t include the word nothing then the opposite of nothing would be a meaningless concept.
  4. It would be cool if you guys were in Montreal. I’d love to go out with some guys and see you in action. Im happy with my wins recently. But, for example last night I went out but didn’t really socialize. I didn’t see any girls I was into. But, I feel like if I was with other guys to push me and to see how they do things it would help me grow.
  5. Wow, everyones communication skills on this forum suck. If you disagree, feel free to explain why, like an adult. Instead of just throwing around substanceless insults.
  6. Vikings where pretty brutal. For one, kids where seen as extensions of their parents, so if you had beef with someone you'd go for their kids. Revenge was absolute. Eye for an eye or your a nobody, and nobodies where ripe for the taking. Whole families would be wiped out over revenge. It was seen as a right for victors to do as they please with those they defeated militarilly. It was common to amass power and wealth through simply defeating people. A king and a warlord are one and the same with no real effort to legitimize power. The relationship between power and wider society was more or less colonial. The families that would end up on top where the most ruthless, merciless and gifted. I have read of one guy who would go into the woods with his uncle too practice killing by attacking random stranger. His own mom killed his siblings for being too weak.
  7. Hahahahh I went from having sex with multiple new girls every week in my youth to barely having sex with anyone right now. I look better than in my youth, and I carry myself with way more confidence. My social skills, humour, flirting and ability to read people are also way better. The only thing is that I used to lie WAY more, lying in ways I didn’t even realize I was lying. And lying in ways, I rationalized in my favour: ”Without me making her cheat with me, she will never let go of her bad relationship”. ”If I don’t lie and seduce her to get attached to me, she won’t experience the amazing experience I will give her”. ”If I am not an asshole, she won’t experience the ecstasy when I give her my validation and ”love”.” ”NON-ATTACHED FREE LOVE BECAUSE SPIRITUALITY”
  8. @Zenterus I actually think both this post and your previous one contain a lot of valuable insights from a game perspective. You clearly have a lot of experience and have put serious thought into this. But reading them made me wonder about something a bit more fundamental. Why do we strategize, optimize and perform so much around the opposite sex in the first place? What do you think that ultimately stems from? Another thing I'm wondering about is the whole idea of projecting abundance, confidence or "high value." Isn't there a paradox there? If I genuinely feel worthy and abundant, why would I be thinking about how to appear abundant at all? It almost seems like the more concerned I am with communicating high value, the more it suggests I don't fully believe it internally. One mindset is: "I feel valuable because I have a lot of dating options, so I reinforce that image by behaving in ways I know are attractive." The other is: "I feel valuable simply because of who I am." In that case, dating becomes less about getting the other person or being perceived as high value, and more about expressing genuine attraction and seeing whether we're actually compatible. From that perspective, confidence isn't something I'm trying to project—it's just a byproduct of how I already feel about myself. Curious how you see that.
  9. What Clav does should not even be called game. He's just doing clickbait content for his male audience. Clav is not doing game, he's doing social media manipulation of dumb young men.
  10. You're contradicting yourself; if Clavicular has the Dark Triad traits and doesn't get laid even though he's handsome then the Dark Triad isn't effective. He managed to get girls in the US because he's famous or simply because he pays them (that's my conspiracy theory) but the moment he lands in France he just comes across as mentally ill.
  11. Not at all. You just need to approach and be flirty.
  12. No it’s not
  13. That's going to be a very strong dose for most people. I would start lower. 10mg is plenty. It's better to be safe than sorry. Always err on less rather than more with psychedelics. There is no harm in taking lower doses. Worse that will happen is you will be annoyed. Don't let anyone tell you that low doses are bad or wrong. It is never wrong to start low. I would never vape 15mg of a chemical I haven't tried before. That's too dangerous. I would start by vaping a few milligrams to see how it feels.
  14. Okay fair, but I do not understand how being direct is connected to the man not being non-high value or in scarcity to say so. Like if you truly feel worthy and on her level (or even above) why would you care on how you appear? I am not dissing the post, I like it but I am confused about this type of thinking. My coach (well, he is more my friend but he is a PUA coach in my city as well) does direct as well and has no issue with that. Like I doubt Leo DiCaprio would think about whether to go direct or non direct with a woman. He would just say what he feels like saying.
  15. It doesn't, but it can be deconstructed. I haven't achieved that either, but I've become aware of the possibility. Suffering is not inherently real, but a very intricate - may I say genius - construction of GOD.
  16. I totally understand what you’re saying now. I see it from your pov as well. And sorry for saying all I hear from you is blah blah blah, that’s just my bad, it was rude, I know that. You’re actually quite clued up to be honest, I’m starting to see what you are getting at now. Best.
  17. @Magnanimous That's hard to say because it all depends on your desires and needs. 30+ is a good general guideline. But it also depends on how heavily you want to use them. Light, rare psychedelic use is very different from heavy chronic use. I don't recommend heavy chronic use until your material life is in order. Light, rare use can be done with less hesitation. You can test the waters a bit and just see how it makes you feel. But if you are heavily focused on career, business, or dating, then I would avoid psychedelics for now.
  18. @Valach I repeat for the 5th time: Direct works, its just not optimal.
  19. @PsychedelicEagle I'm not being disrespectful towards you, dude, but you're wrong. Again, direct game works! I said that in the post too, but it's inoptimal. If you want more consistent results, you have to go in indirect and build the vibe, screen each other and escalate from there. You could be an awesome dude if a girl were to get to know you a bit, but if when you approachbher she just waves you off because you went direct and she was forced to make a decision, then it doesnt matter how amazing you might be. If going direct works for you, then wonderful man, keep doing it. But if your goal is to take your game to the next level, you're gonna have to adopt a higher paradigm.
  20. This comment makes sense in your head?
  21. @Psychonaut You're playing russian roulette. You never know how the coin will flip every night. It's very likely you are addicted, prove me wrong and take a month break.
  22. I mean you can be selective while being direct or giving a compliment no? Isn't the mindset "This person looks attractive and I am coming up to find out if we vibe as well"? Many times I've gone direct and then decided not to proceed based on her personality. Me saying I find het attractive is not me saying I want her to be my girlfriend or to even go on a date with me.
  23. All what Clavicular does is using pre selection. Hanging out with hot girls. Being in the spot light. Last month he went to France where nobody knew him and he got mogged. Couldn’t get a girl and ended up with a Jewess agent that was out to use him to promote Israel and Israeli position. Clav possesses all of the dark triad traits like Owen(that is what gets him laid, not his plastic face). I don’t agree that just going out gets you laid. I know guys who go out all the time and don’t get any. You need dark triad traits.
  24. Direct game is about opener. You select the girl and convey your character afterwards. Just because I tell the girl I find her attractive does not mean I will sleep with her. To me directness is about not going out of my way to convey character traits. If the girl is not even interested to the point of continuing the interaction after I open it, I let her go. There are too many people in the world, many of which will be interested. If you want to maximize the chance of a particular girl sleeping with you, then indirect may give you more chances, but the opportunity cost is high. The type of opportunity cost I'm not willing to pay.
  1. Load more activity