Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour

  2. gen z think like computers

    Natasha Tori Maru replied to Lucasxp64's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    So the fundamental issue is a lack of direct feedback with reality. That would do fucked up things to your ability to navigate and interact with the world. Reality is the feedback mechanism through which you learn how to navigate reality. Imagine trying to navigate the real world with only an abstracted representation as your wisdom/guidance? The pushback/feedback would be really unexpected and lead to cognitive dissonance.
  3. Yesterday

  4. gen z think like computers

    Bashar replied to Lucasxp64's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    Older genz are around 30 btw. Ipad kids are young genz and alpha.
  5. Belief is very powerful when you consciously choose them and test them against what’s right within. Most religious beliefs are similar to childhood beliefs about our self esteem. It was either passed to us by our parents or we made assumptions with our perspective at that time and what we had available to us. We can choose different now.

  6. Songs About Lying Mega-Thread

    Thought Art replied to Thought Art's topic in Off-Topic: Pop-Culture, Entertainment, Fun

    If you guys come across any songs please share them!

  7. What are your top 10 values?

    YIDIRYIDIR replied to kag101's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    Competence is probably the highest one just after the core ones (ones i won't sacrifice for competence, like truth or health) I have a big vision and all that matters to me at this stage of my life, where I'm building my life is how competent i am, because my life depends on it. at my career, at socializing, at being a leader, at making money....

  8. gen z think like computers

    Olaf replied to Lucasxp64's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    damn
  9. I’m not saying abstaining doesn’t give you a boot of confidence and clarity for like two weeks or three and that porn is bad but having a whole personality around semen retention is kinda stupid in my opinion.
  10. Exactly my thought. I guess someone will answer you with “powers”
  11. Highly situational but usually Im moved to ask the obvious question (are you okay?) and let body language, tone, vibe and the response to figure out the next move.
  12. And a good day to you! When you act on your highest excitement, you emit a high-frequency vibration. That frequency automatically uplifts the collective matrix of your planet! Your joy IS the service! We added it to remind you that you are all connected, whether you realize it or not! Several hundred. And the whole planet indirectly. You may recall seeing crystals during sessions. These allows beings to tune in. OUTSIDE. Why? Because your physical body is an object of perception! You experience it through physical senses. Your INSIDE world consists entirely of your non-physical architecture: your consciousness, your beliefs, your definitions, and your emotional state! Your physical body is a 3D physical manifestation. A holographic reflection of the beliefs and energy you hold on the inside! When you change your internal definition of yourself, the physical suit must correspond and reflect that shift! You agreed to themes to explore, and have set up certain scenarios, some of which may manifest, depending on circumstance. You have free will to explore your themes however you like, and you're free to fail.
  13. Self-Generated is a better term over self-created.. It's the logical place to head to as self-mastery increases. Self-generated happiness - when we can: > Regulate our own beliefs, emotions and agency: how is this not the logical conclusion to lead towards? Modern capitalistic toxically feeds from a consumer believing they cannot self-generate happiness or what's more sinister, simply believing all of the micro-beliefs that lead to that as a resulting conclusion a person never realised they even believe underneath. Self-generated intelligence - when we can: > Awareness over our own awareness and the ability to create stimuli in the moment and feedback loop over that stimuli across time allows us the capacity to self-augment between memory and perception. So how is this not the logical conclusion? Modern education has taught people to externalise their perception of the world around them and the subsequent use of their cognition, so they never learn the act of being able to self-generate cognitive feedback loops that improve their mental abilities. Self-generated creativity: when we can: > This one's the most native to people's tongues and therefore has the highest likelihood of being able to achieve a full belief change here because many of the micro-beliefs they have are already working in their favour because we have many external realities that serve as an authority to give people the self-permission to have this as a belief. > So the ability to imagine new modalities, lucid dream, explore and invent internal worlds, for the same reason we can feedback loop on intelligence we can do the same for the deepening of our own creative depths. Thus, how does this mastery not become an inevitable conclusion? The reason I have framed them as "Meaning/Purpose for human existence", because intelligence, creativity and happiness in tandem reveal what the purpose is going to be regardless as to the environment a human is placed in. There is also a deeper truth here, "Self-Ownership". And the triad reveals that as the path where sentience as an organic life form becomes increasingly complex and sophisticated enough that its purpose no longer belongs to the world but the world it inhabits within itself. That's really the paradigm shift here for meaning and purpose in this regard. For millenia, human beings have defined purpose and meaning as somehow existing external to themselves, which is arguably fine relative to the time period and the level of our cultural and mental evolution, however as a natural progression of this triad, increasingly more advanced forms of Self-Ownership become the natural path that self-reveals through its own example, without ever have to point externally. It becomes its own reception rather than waiting for external acknowledgement or approval. It's so weird to me that there isn't already a proper demographic around this yet. Creativity could fall under intelligence of course, however people divide them so much or confuse the two that the distinctions there. Creativity also cleanly implies that you're contributing to the building of the world, or a world. I should have also framed it as "Meaning (purpose) for Modern Digital Human-Hybrids Existence". Because I said on the first page of this thread that it depends on the category of the meaning of life we're referring to, and that just continually differentiating between those categories, and improving our answers across them, benefits the brainstorming of 'ultimate', again, depending the perspective we're coming from . Anyhow.

  14. What are your top 10 values?

    Natasha Tori Maru replied to kag101's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    In no particular order: Health Epistemic clarity/Truth Integrity/Honesty Intellectual independence/Autonomy Connection Integration Competence/effectiveness Beauty/Aesthetics Compassion Fairness/Justice All of these seems to be coherent around the broader themes of contact with reality, ethical consistency & development through engagement when I think on it. I find my values conflict the most around my commitment to truth and intellectual integrity and my commitment to fairness and humane treatment.
  15. The meaning of life is to give life meaning.
  16. Nothing is impossible.
  17. This is the most likely scenario.
  18. Jeremiah 5:3-6 יהוה עיניך הלוא לאמונה הכיתה אתם ולא־חלו כליתם מאנו קחת מוסר חזקו פניהם מסלע מאנו לשוב׃ O Lord, are not your eyes upon the truth? you have stricken them, but they have not grieved; you have consumed them, but they have refused to receive correction; they have made their faces harder than a rock; they have refused to return. ואני אמרתי אך־דלים הם נואלו כי לא ידעו דרך יהוה משפט אלהיהם׃ Therefore I said, Surely these are poor; they are foolish; for they know not the way of the Lord, nor the judgment of their God. אלכה־לי אל־הגדלים ואדברה אותם כי המה ידעו דרך יהוה משפט אלהיהם אך המה יחדו שברו על נתקו מוסרות׃ I will go to the great men, and will speak to them; for they have known the way of the Lord, and the judgment of their God; but they all alike have broken the yoke, and burst the bonds. על־כן הכם אריה מיער זאב ערבות ישדדם נמר שקד על־עריהם כל־היוצא מהנה יטרף כי רבו פשעיהם עצמו משבותיהם׃ Therefore a lion from the forest shall slay them, and a wolf of the deserts shall destroy them, a leopard shall watch over their cities; every one who goes out there shall be torn in pieces; because their transgressions are many, and their apostasies are great.
  19. As Bashar, I am not at liberty to give medical advice. But we always suggest starting with a thorough detox. Besides that. There is energy work you can do on yourself. Your beliefs may limit you, however. Stay true to your belief system. If you believe you need a healer, one may actually help. Follow your intuition. Take action. I'd suggest NEW by Robert Bruce for energy work. And there are suppliments for nerve healing.
  20. A termite mound ain't conscious dawg (by any reasonable philosophical inference). The human mind is a product of a single cell growing into a human, which is a recapitulaton of the evolutionary history. Every human is nested inside a fractal re-enacting of what came before. Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny. The (mineral-based) niche-building materials of humans do not undergo the same process for themselves. Each human is a tree unto itself. The argument is that the thing we usually reasonably conclude is conscious/sentient (life) has that history and that level of immense holistic computation, while this other thing is not even close to that. Nor does it possess any of the qualities that you would associate with a living organism if it even were possible to separate it from the history or that level of computation (which I again think is problematic): autopoesis (inside vs outside boundary being actively maintained, self-building), self-replication, self-concern, selective attention, relevance realization. The similarity is simply not there.
  21. Summary:

  22. Leo's Blog Discussion Mega-Thread

    Natasha Tori Maru replied to Leo Gura's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    Why Belief Is Wrong Shamelessly millennial coded: Perhaps Bull-Shit and Belief-System were always synonymous
  23. Can you explain this a bit more? Expand on how one makes decisions without emotion/feeling being a component?
  24. What’s the point of doing semen retention for a whole year? Like, what exactly are you trying to achieve here? If you have a girlfriend with whom you have sex, you obviously want to enjoy the experience and reach ejaculation sometimes, rather than always practising tantric sex or full-body orgasms without actually ejaculating. If you want to have kids, that’s another thing. But what’s the point of retaining your semen for years on end? Sexual health and wellbeing are important too. prolonged abstinence can lead to sexual frustration or obsessive sexual thoughts, making it harder to concentrate. So, what exactly are you hoping to achieve through long-term semen retention?
  25. Psyop @OBEler Have shared everything I've needed to say here. The persuasion technique is micro divergence. "Let's say and do things that give off 'the impression' without causing the deed". They view their relationship with the public as a system, and they're tinkering with public perception in the same way they perfect LLM's. It generates passive conversations on the subject of sentience, subjectivity etc rather than having to prove it. They are using these kinds of strategies because its precisely how they learn to tinker with LLM's. "How do we create the smallest possible changes with the greatest possible effects that produce the least possible cost?" It's a question they're trying to answer all day on how to improve the soon to be outdated use of large language models altogether. Those same circuits are still being activated when they're viewing how to market themsevles; so they view their marketing as a surgical operation more than they do an interaction they're having with the public on the subject of AI and sentience. This is the problem with these idiots, they think they're too clever to be reverse engineered. They don't realise that they're confusing the public's trust for gullibility and their deceit concerning as cleverness. An 'LLM' will never be anything remotely or comparable to sentient or have consciousness in the way we mean it. It's absurd, but its a conversation they're leveraging to scam the public for political and economic power.
  26. @Majed One day I did 100. I could have pulled some girls that day I did 100, but I didn't as I have struggle recieving when the opportunity is there. But my last 2 girlfriends came when I was in a pick up phase. If you do 100 in one day and you don't have struggle to recieve, I am sure you can pull someone this weekend. Try it out, one day 100 sets of girls, and one group is still one set.
  27. Is a rock conscious? No. Is a brain conscious? Also no. If a rock hits your brain, does your brain damage the rock or the rock damage your brain? Does the rock hit your brain or your brain hit the rock? Moral of the story: Don't use lethal weapons like your brain to attack innocent rocks. Rocks are the data centers of consciousness.
  1. Load more activity