Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. So what are you saying? You got god like intelligence? For example if you decide to develop musical intelligence you don’t need to practice because you know it all? I don’t think so. Some intelligences might have some overlap but they are very different from each other and they require different skill set. What Leo Gura defines as intelligence is very chopped, unclear and not clearly defined. Like most of his work. And then he has the audacity to criticize Ralston which is mind blowing.
  3. I really like Mark Carney.

  4. how to access higher levels of intelligence?

    Rafael Thundercat replied to YIDIRYIDIR's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    No, All the work I did till now to understand reality help a lot to be more calibrated socialy, understanding can be applied in any domain of life.
  5. Quite possibly he did, if you look at his final broadcast he did not seem mentally well at all. Seems a shadow of the David Wilcock I watched a few years back.

  6. how to access higher levels of intelligence?

    Rafael Thundercat replied to YIDIRYIDIR's topic in Personal Development -- [Main]

    For example?

  7. Starving Patriarchy

    Rafael Thundercat replied to Rafael Thundercat's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events

    One point here for the ones explicitly,subtly and sneakly dissmising structural issues. A while ago, someone commented : "Live and let live." under one post of a writer that brings up structural analysis including Patriarchy, Racism,Whiteness, Neo-colonialism Is the logic that "Life is just like this" "Nature,God whatever just wished this way" And honestly, the context almost doesn't matter, but when we are debating about systemic issues. we are not not debating whether pineapple belongs on pizza or whether someone prefers cucumber or lemon slices in their water. we are talking about structures. Power. Violence. Exploitation dressed up as normality. The kind of things that should not simply be "lived with," but questioned, challenged, and dismantled. So when someone says "live and let live" in response to structural critique, I immediately know one of two things: either they fundamentally do not understand systems, or they do understand them and simply benefit from pretending they don't. The phrase itself sounds harmless. It has the energy of a wooden sign in an Airbnb kitchen next to a surfboard. Relaxed. Easy. Deeply committed to never having to think too hard. But beneath its peaceful little surface sits one of the most effective status quo preservation mechanisms of our time. Because "live and let live" only works in a world where everyone has equal power to live. And that world does not exist. One of the teachings that mattered most in yoga is cause and effect. Not in the Instagram-spirituality sense where people post "good vibes attract good vibes" sitting in a Bali rice field and call it enlightenment. I mean the actual principle: everything we do — and everything we refuse to do — creates consequences. Every action shapes a relationship. Every silence protects something. Every refusal to engage has a beneficiary. Nothing exists in isolation, no matter how badly modern individualism wants us to believe otherwise. Is all the systems that exist are natural, God inspired and not needed to be undertood and dismantled for the sake of a better future so all the rants about corruption by Leo or anyone wherr need to stop full on and be considered inproductive since we are just debating systems that exist and are natural and ee better shut up and live and let live.
  8. WIll leave this here for anyone who wants to dig through reported cases https://nuforc.org/subndx/?id=highlights https://nuforc.org/map/
  9. "Because" might be a good example but in general you want to look at the use of certain connective prepositions (e.g. thus, therefore, if, so, then). And the more (or less) connected (e.g. if->then->therefore) the better.
  10. Not mine, yours 😘
  11. @Leo Gura Evil is a bit of an exaggeration, but there is definitely some form of good vs bad in a world where things are seperate, unity is when your dead, aslong as your alive you will live with duality, just cause in essence your God, doesn´t mean you are so smart as the universe, we can´t even move a pen with our mind, we are retard monkeys, not Gods, we can´t even percieve life from another perspective, only be aware of this body and this mind, so we are actually infinitely stupid compared to the universe.
  12. İt is the same as not attachment to thoughts, which is diets. But you can never control. Try to not to heart beat or liver function for 2 minutes. (As your mentioned to make it slave) You guys have no idea what you are talking about. At least, just listen.
  13. You can control your heartbeat through your breathing. Since you have changed that, you can also control your liver function through diet and breathing. Either you are the slave of your mind, or you make it your slave. Also, I didn't really mean that you should control the mind, but rather examine it; and the mind can learn.
  14. Trying to control the mind is, like trying to control liver function.
  15. Try to weather balloon yourself out of that one.
  16. @zurew 😶‍🌫️
  17. Today
  18. Aladdin's rug flying around looking for Aladdin.
  19. 14:39 What the fuck is that
  20. Oh shit.
  21. https://github.com/tambetvali/BulkLoad/blob/main/Conspiracy Theories.md This is the in-depth text and I will add illustrative materials quite now.
  22. I think that saying you should stop listening to the mind is an oversimplification. You must examine the mind and understand what is going on, to switch on the light, so to speak. I am training my mind to be a servant of the Absolute. Simply ignoring it offers only superficial liberation. The mind should serve as a tool imo.
  23. Some 20-30 years ago, I wrote "conspiracy theories": I argued that many fools would not follow our spiritual values, and we need to prepare for their failure. I argued that altough we need to be peaceful and forgiving, and allow their free word, we need to build civilization and protect ourselves, and depend rather on our circles. This was anonymous: I explained the traits, sentences, games and their short and long term outcomes, expressing that spiritual people now play their long term games themselves. We are not supported by tax, government or authentic selection of the best - rather, we materially rely on our own structure than some kind of contract between spiritual and material, which collects tax from everybody and feeds off everybody, authentically choosing and investing to future on real, futuristic basis. Here is what came: People reframed my theories into statements, like supposed criticism on some kind of "elites". Yes, material people could fight in long-term, like animal fights humans, but after long run we have houses, walls and cars and they turn more attention into their own lives for this ethical reason of civilization and it's long-term practical, ethical goals. I was told "this is not intentional conspiracy": I do not know how "fools behaving like lack of system" must be conscious. It was told they have principle of innocence - in goal based logic, no. Goal based logic supports money, fame, power: you do not get paid, as if wering cutting edge. Here is the outcome: Materialist group was not attacked. I was not sure in this until now: but I can say, those theories have finished their work without anything illegal, which would happen on basis of my theories. Evidence is measured in the end, to reason about initial contract, claims and accusations. Materialist group managed to kick off this spiritual group from their society. Their "not being guilty" was and is now: ability to control out tax money, be our office law and country, and in other senses to "belong", for example ask for treatment from anybody, which must resemble ethically how they treat others rather than resembling lack of interest and not being able to think how this "rich materialist" would be any use, or any belonging. They are consciously, targetedly fighting for spiritual groups to death - I say "for" because they say it's useful and sane, and "to" does not mean they would die; it's the way they express we would die. Death is isolation from some society: who is in other, isolated, parallel reality does not exist in terms of money, gain and payoff. Here is implication: If we are kicked off, we do not belong. We did not break the law. Therefore, they do not belong: they do not belong to any group they kicked off, because superiority and equality games in game theory, are not to be connected (for loss - equality causation - and gain - superiority condition). If we do not belong, belonging to us did not have anything to do with their "innocence". To belong means they accept us as society, even through such neutral discussions: instead they say it's "conspiracy" to have "conspiracy theories". Time is linear and linearly, without crime we reached state of not belonging: this means, based on outcome, their initial forceful contract to belong was illegal, therefore also this activity to kick us out from somewhere, because without reason such accusations are illegal. Evidence is measured in the end, to reason about initial contract, claims and accusations. Goal based vs. causal: Accusations like Einstein made - and now they dislike Einstein because of my theories - where that intelligent fools and responsible idiots come to control our conditions. How we "treat" them, in sense of belonging to our group, does not matter at all if we do not belong theirs: Materialist accusations are based on causal logic, and this past experience based logic says "conspiracy" in some means if someone is acting intentionally. Goal based logic aims to perfect goal, then organizes it accusing not for doing, not that to be "not A" you have to "act against being A": in goal based logic, rather, intention is defined so: if you do not forcefully, realistically and resultatively do A, which means intentful doing, the same terms and logic of intentful being-against appears: to find high class honour law, one which needs acceleration and dense motive to say it's not "negative", and replace it with criminal law, where one needs to be "neutral". "Neutral", in future-oriented logic of doing, rather than being, means that something might resemble "conspiracy theory" in the way we see fool who is running and reorganizing our lives based on forgotten principles and personal sensations of belonging, worthiness and honourity. If materialist said long-term goals are idealistic, too high and not worth it, attacking people who did: in causal logic, they just followed the random events and outcomes they do not understand, and to make this claim makes it funny that they say they got "control with wisdom", "just solving their everyday problems". In goal based logic, you take the same algorithm of conspiracy: you get rather, if they are not truly doing strategic, directed and successful flow to not being criminals, indeed the simple "neutral man" has the same mathematical form of crime. They came to "materially punish", saying they "don't believe in spiritual ideas" and thus think, we would materially pay back such: A material man who wants to use "their own, believable logic", addressing goals and statements of our multidisciplinary logic, must get the fuck out. Because if my statement is made: I use GBL and make this statement; man with narrow course knows "logic", a binary system, and states "simply understanding your sentence by logic, if must have been logical statement of causal logic and not GBL, therefore I must reframe and explain your motives and intent myself". This turns to something like "intent", and like good-and-bad people, they are organizing into our zones, reservoirs and places of exile like Siberia, and telling they got human rights and we as bosses there in exile, the people who gained this high resource as ourselves, are somehow tiny and worth nothing and based on legal, civil rights they must provide with results of spirituality, because they are material and working for themselves as material people, and in social contract we should be spiritual, tiny and working for material people like slaves until we become materially useful, to get them closer to critical human rights given them at their birth: the rights of this ex-spirit civilization, the one built in spirit but reasoning the matter. Once we get the palace, built, people start doing abstract things like "entering". Once we organized our secret society to modest degree of love and support: it becomes abstract synonym of science itself, something one "belongs by right" - goal-based logic, which builds up, like money and competition, is seen as causal logic, which builds down, like avoiding crime or loss of basic rights. Materialist with their narrow, visible view, is giving authoritative opinions and thinking it's legal to make claims without exactly measuring the spirituality, having the right professionals and right income in right offices, not claiming that they would be "lied to" - if they ly, they won't belong. Notice: the funny words were intentional and were checked from dictionary for sufficient meaning, and intuitively for sufficient form. It's not like taking logic together, but a creative act.
  24. I understand exactly what you’re saying, and have always been saying. 😃 Keep up the good work, man. Love.
  25. @PsychedelicEagle no, i'm not looking to increase my caloric intake overall. i use soy milk, too, btw. and i supplement omega 3s. but of course it's still good to eat walnuts etc. anyway. the fat in dairy is more on the saturated side right? which isn't ideal?
  26. no problem at all:) sucralose is an artificial sweetener. the problem with it is that it can draw a lot of water to your intestines.
  27. It sounds like the wealth disconnects them from the reality of survival. Being spoon fed, you don’t have an incentive to learn how to hold the spoon., you get afraid to hold it.
  1. Load more activity