This stream auto-updates
- Past hour
-
I didn't find safeties noticeably superior. Mostly just slow.
-
Natasha Tori Maru replied to Rafael Thundercat's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
This shit is backwards. Biology and the differences between men and women are real. Some liberals and feminists live on other planets. I have no idea how these individuals come to these sorts of conclusions without group think and borrowing concepts. There is no critical thinking. -
Natasha Tori Maru replied to Rafael Thundercat's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
@Willy Phallicus I don't really care about continuing a dialogue with anyone so entrenched in a frame they cannot drop it for pure conceptual understanding. I'm literally too employed for this Peace -
ROFL - that tender skin though?! Fucking nightmare fuel man if I tried that on my labia I would have nothing left but tattered curtains Yep thats what I would imagine would be the challenge. Maybe any other dudes might have advice? Respect though, a purists device
-
What else would I be using it for? Besides my balls 😂 It's the tip of the chin and mustache that are troublesome. I find it bulky and hard to reach around the nooks of the nose.
-
Willy Phallicus replied to Rafael Thundercat's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Maybe you shouldn't assume so much. This isn't my first rodeo on this topic. I've done my homework. I understand their perspective better than they do and that's not a boast. Im not giving you my opinion here. This isn't Willy's perspective its the reality and Willy is putting it in perspective. I put the time and research in and I did it dispassionately and objectively. The OP is openly operating from an extremely biased perspective which, like Christianity, can't handle a modicum of criticism about their faith. Thats fanaticism, Im over and done with them and Im not making any fuckin apologies. I don't owe anyone jack shit and the universe damn well knows it. Look at the OPs latest offerings. Do you honestly think the USA is going to be run by clan mothers or a clan mothers system? And where's the evidence that states that's the way we have to go there OR ELSE. Or else what? Who are the clan mothers going to be? How and when do we decide to go to a Clan mother system (who can tell men to fuck off btw)? What's the obviously sane protocol for choosing our clan mothers? This is the shit they can't tell you and when they do you find out is has nothing to do with your individual human rights. Lets keep it in mind the fact that nature don't give a fuck about your opinions or theories. Nature doesn't suffer fools like the OP. You either got what it takes or you get run over - thats life on planet earth and that's not mans fault or womens fault. Human life could be better for everyone but the problem isn't male or female its just fucking human. Men and women are both shitty options. I want option C: Out of the us vs them perpetual civil war so Im not brutalized until the bitter, agonizing end and the OPs ideology is the path right to it. You can't rationalize saying that Patriarchy is extremist and evil and then logically conclude its opposite, Matriarchy is egalitarian and good and wholesome. Its a pipe dream for imbeciles. Equality looks like this: A council of 10, five men, five women elected by all men and women and they all have equal say. If that's not what you're advocating for then youre not on the same team as me. Edit: Let me correct myself here and say I don't care for a council either. If humans are running it no system is safe from corruption. Every peoples government always turns on the people, I think what humans need are a good sheppard but we just crucify those. -
Basman replied to Rafael Thundercat's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
The weakest aspect of many liberals and feminists I find the propencity to just ignore and deny things like biology or nature because it's too ugly. It's like getting lost in compassion as an absolute truth when it's just another state of many. - Yesterday
-
/close thread
-
Willy Phallicus replied to CARDOZZO's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Its the same question as "what is the absolute? or what is oneness?" - a question that can only be answered by the individual who goes beyond choronzon where the doors of perception are cleansed and everything is revealed. When that individual comes back, they can't tell you what it is in a way that can be truly understood by someone who never experienced it. It just is and you just know it. Love is Infinity and vice versa but saying it as concisely as that still wholly fails to do it any kind of justice. You need the experience not the answer to a question. The experience shows you are the answer to the question and there was never any question to begin with. Total mindfuckery. Its like when people go 'i just had this realization and felt this type of way' and you tell them they are God. Its true but most of them will never believe/embody it so they doubt it like Ralstons doing. The quote provided from Ralston from Unborn Tao shows where the fly in Ralstons ointment is. It sounds like he caught only a glimpse (albeit a real good one) of the mystery so he was never really transformed or touched by it and then used his brain exclusively to say something completely redundant (and derivative) about the nature of being but with a closed mind. Basically, he didn't turn into a living depiction of Jesus Christ upon reveal so in his estimation there's no way Love can be the heart of this matrix. -
I use one - the drawback is you have to be very careful regarding angle, speed & you have to do multiple passes. The cheaper cost, and less wastage, comes at the cost of speed imo - a cheap bic razor or gillette turbochad razor is essentially providing a strip of lubricant and multiple blade passes at once (depending on 2, 3 or 4 blades in one). Fuck man you use it on your face? FUCK. That's so many angles to pass over. I would slice the shit out of myself. I already have trouble not dicing up my achillies due to the angles on the lower part of the leg. I have to be much more focused, mindful and attentive with the safety razor.
-
@NetiNeti We'll handle via PM.
-
Natasha Tori Maru replied to Rafael Thundercat's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
@Willy Phallicus Hahaha I don't have an axe to grind I'm trying to steer the argument to point out blind spots and fallacy (pointing out hypocrisy is a fallacious argument - you wrote the words, but don't seem to be able to understand what you wrote) - but I am not going to argue a case, because I know that won't work for you - you are, as I said, too full of certainty. You cannot fill a cup that is already full. These topics tend to devolve into straight bias. I am pointing toward areas that you need to inspect. And I am intelligent enough to know that insight is the only way for someone like yourself to grasp a counter point. You should be able to see both sides of a perspective and not suffer so much cognitive bias. -
Willy Phallicus replied to Rafael Thundercat's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
None of what youre linking here matters because its gonna be what its gonna be - and its likely not going to be clan mother primitive. Let me put it another way: You have just as much power over the future as you do the present. Saving the world is a tall order. -
Rafael Thundercat replied to Rafael Thundercat's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
I will ignore the two last non-sense rants above since I dont have maturity to debate with kids. So I will drop this here for who interested in knowing that there are Matriarchal Societies and this Societies are not about Woman domination of men, they are simply another way of governance for humans. Lets let the chimps and gorillas in their own way of living and remember that we are another line of evolution. I think is already proved that we are somehow like apes but in another level of evolution. Humans gained capacity to organize in ways that apes cant. Here is the example for study. There are stories that change the way we understand the world. Not because they are new, but because they show us that what we today consider "normal" is not the only way to organize society. In the Haudenosaunee Confederacy (North America), the clan mothers embody another way of organizing society. A society where imposition or domination over others is not necessary for "things to work." Nor is the accumulation of resources and capital a priority... it is a society where responsibility, balance and care for life are prioritized. Here the Clan Mothers nominated leaders, could remove them from power, and sustained political legitimacy. Belonging, land and community life were organized through the maternal line. 🩸 And this was not just a political structure. It was also expressed in daily life: houses belonged to women, men joined the maternal clan and, if a relationship ended, it was he who had to return to his maternal home. Life was not fragmented between the political, the economic or the spiritual: everything formed part of the same fabric. This type of organization was documented in the 19th century by Lewis Henry Morgan and Ely S. Parker, though it was also questioned and distorted at the time, partly because it deeply challenged dominant ideas about power and the place of women in society. The work of Barbara Alice Mann allows us to return to these stories from a different place, showing that maternal authority in Haudenosaunee society was not an exception, but part of a balanced system centered on life. Now let me search for relevant books, references and videos. Books Barbara Alice Mann (the author referenced in the post): Iroquoian Women: The Gantowisas (2000) — Peter Lang Publishing. The definitive work on Haudenosaunee matriarchy, now considered a classic. Daughters of Mother Earth: The Wisdom of Native American Women (ed.) — explores women's roles pre-colonization. Make a Beautiful Way: The Wisdom of Native American Women — four essays from Indigenous women on matriarchy and colonialism. Encyclopedia of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois Confederacy) (2000), co-authored with Bruce E. Johansen — Greenwood Publishing. Lewis Henry Morgan (also cited in the post): League of the Iroquois (1851) — the first systematic 19th-century documentation of Haudenosaunee society. Sally Roesch Wagner: Sisters in Spirit: Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Influence on Early American Feminists (2001) — traces how Iroquois matriarchy directly influenced the suffragist movement. Videos Haudenosaunee | Women and Governance (YouTube): What Is The Role Of Clan Mothers In The Haudenosaunee Confederacy? (YouTube): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5ncZQxJOf0 Clan Mother: Healing the Community — The Ways (YouTube): Without a Whisper — short documentary on Clan Mothers and the suffrage movement (PBS): https://www.pbs.org/video/without-a-whisper-wnpj8u/ Inside the Vision for Clan Mothers Healing Village (PBS Native America): https://www.pbs.org/video/clan-mother-icf9k6/ 🌐 Official Sources Haudenosaunee Confederacy official site: https://www.haudenosauneeconfederacy.com/clan-system/ Onondaga Nation on Clan Mothers: https://www.onondaganation.org/government/clan-mothers/ Now kids, bring some substance to sustain all your blable. -
Willy Phallicus replied to Rafael Thundercat's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
A dude didn't write 50 Shades of Grey and men didn't turn it into a nearly two billion dollar franchise. -
Jodistrict replied to Jodistrict's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
That’s an insightful observation. Keller described her existence as a “double dungeon of darkness and silence”. Language unlocked her mind, turning chaos into relationship. Keller described this as the "living word" awakening her soul. Keller followed Swedenborg philosophy and emphasized that her “inner light” came from connections: human teachers/friends, the structured world of ideas via language, and ultimately the Lord as Divine Human. -
Basman replied to Rafael Thundercat's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
There's actually a positive evolutionary pressure for women to be submissive since they end up having more children. All of human history is indicative of such. Periods where women are politically equal to men is historically an anomaly, only afforded by unprecedented technological development. The fact that feminists tend have the fewest children is quiet indicative. Like this phenomena of women freezing during rape. If you think about it, it makes more sense for women to evolve to not fight their rapist tooth and claw because they are the one's that end up reproducing. Stockholm syndrome is pure survival when a woman gets raped and kidnapped by another tribe. She ends up a loving wife and all the happier for it. Brutal efficiency based on how our biology is shaped. It has a lot to do with the fact that we are warm blooded mammalians, where it's common for females to be smaller than males, with long gestation periods. Human nature would look a lot different if we laid eggs. -
Willy Phallicus replied to Rafael Thundercat's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
What men? Where? What are the numbers? Based off your proclamations of the problem the majority of women should already be raped and dead. So why arent they? Why are there female rapists then if its a man thing? Why arent there female NFL players then genius? You have a patriarchy because the dominate sex in nature is male. You have a patriarchy because men built civilization. Men are physically superior to women, its not up for debate. Go look at the primate world in case you need a refresher course on how nature implements gender roles. There are alphas, the alphas are male, the alpha runs the group and everyone goes along or gets fucked up by the alpha. Ability = might. If the mighty have a respect for the concept of self determination then the weak will go unmolested. If the mighty have no such respect then the weak will be subjugated. The weak are always at the mercy of the strong - if the strong are merciless then the weak are simply fucked. That's how nature works. Now contrast that to western society where rape is a thing that can happen but its not because all men are cool with it and think it should be a thing and women are lawfully equal to men. Most men find rape despicable and don't engage in it. You sound just like those female athletes who can't figure out the very practical reasons why they aren't paid as much as their male counterparts and just call it oppression so they don't have to come to grips with how inferior womens sports are to mens sports. What's the name of the fallacy and explain to me exactly, in detail, where and how I used the fallacy. Otherwise you're doing that thing I already accused you of which is completely ignoring my argument to tell me my argument is bad without proving any of the shit you type. Pointing out the stupidly in your face hypocrisy of someone's position is a completely valid form of counter argumentation and mind you I have to tell this to someone with the audacity to talk about good faith discussions. I'd say that's mighty hypocritical of you but apparently pointing out hypocrisy isn't a valid position. I don't need to be reminded that you don't have any argument, Ive only pointed it out like three times already. What you have is an axe to grind and you can't even manage that with any degree of effectiveness. Put your money where your mouth is and prove it or stop replying to me and wasting my time. Yeah that can happen when you actually know and understand the facts. My bad. Im completely open to having a real discussion but people like you and the OP make that impossible. You dont want a discussion, you want immediate validation and can't stand it when you don't get it. Y'know, like a typical western woman. -
Be a man - put your cock on the table and show them who's the real boss.
-
Recently jumped on the safety razor bandwagon because I've heard it gives a closer shave and is cheaper. Been using for about a week or so, and I have to honestly say I'm kinda disappointed. It doesn't really shave any closer, but is way harder to use and takes much longer while my skin is more irritated and getting nicked. It's also much harder to shave my balls with. And in my case isn't particularly much cheaper. I have very little facial hair and I've been reusing disposable razors without issue my entire life. A Bic pack can last me about half a year easily. I've spent more on buying a safety razor than I've done on disposable blades in years. If I have to spend even more on high quality lather to make it work then I'm definitely not saving much money. They are supposedly good for shaving legs with though. Ladies?
-
.thumb.png.6923c588efc2b0a901602fddf3954db2.png)
integral replied to CARDOZZO's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Thats possible, but most people that do weed get a body high and just relax, have sex, they even go to bed. I know alot of weed smokers, they definitely dont have anxiety from it, like at all... none. They have no spiritual concept or even any emotional development, there just random people. And dont tell me its the strain, what im saying goes deeper then that. -
Ask an alpha .. but that assumes you have a correct definition of it. Explore and embrace your masculine side, it’s more important than ever - especially nowadays
-
@Apparition of Jack Sounds like Russia
-
Hojo replied to Past-Philosopher-562's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
It can be pokemon from gameboy and think its that. In the 2d world. It can the exact same screen as pokemon from gameboy and conciousness thinks its the main character, because it is the way it is. You cant argue with what you are experiencing. You are forced to beleive it. It could be a 2d character viewed from top down and be outside and hear people talking silently in a room in a house and conciousness just has to say this is how reality is. The principle I would say is you currently engaging with the way it is now. If you stay not moving it must move I think. It must change. -
Past-Philosopher-562 posted a topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@Leo Gura You often say that reality, objects, boundaries, and structures are constructions of consciousness rather than independently existing entities. My question is about the operational implications of this claim. If walls, objects, and stable reality are ultimately imagined or consciousness-constructed, does your worldview imply that it is theoretically possible for consciousness to construct something like a “Solo Leveling system” — meaning: a persistent interactive interface, a store containing usable items, healing or recovery potions with objective physiological effects, weapons or armor materializing, and portals/gates opening into alternate spaces. I am not asking metaphorically, psychologically, or symbolically. I am asking whether your ontology allows literal causal manifestation of structured systems and objects like these into shared consensual reality. If not, where exactly is the limit between: reality being “constructed,” and physical constraints remaining non-negotiable? And what principle determines that boundary?
