Xstream

Showing all content.

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. Can you explain how Mohammed married a 6 year old and had sex with her at 9 and how that is used to justify child marriage to this day?
  3. Here's a thought: If women's periods are synced through air (this assumes an original state where synchronization was the norm), why are they and how did they get out of sync in the first place? Since we're all sharing the same air, everyone (at least every woman) should be synced to some 'average' or 'equalizer' source somehow, which is false. As well, virtually, every girl should be in sync with her mother at puberty, then may diverge or not, which is false. Also, women in small tribes should be in perfect sync, which is false.
  4. Whenever I wake up my thoughts are why I havent slept with two girls in my social circle who were open to it. They would have opened the door to the f*boy lifestyle. Now these doors are half closed. But idk if I would have enjoyed that even.
  5. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXOj_C6D5LD/?igsh=aXhzd2ViZXNnNHF5 Final boss of Israel LOL
  6. That's really interesting, never thought of it like that. Even if it improves more of cognitive empathy than actually being emotionally engaged in it, that's still a benefit that could be potentially worthy of pursuing. Might start reading fiction again
  7. Rat conformity
  8. Of course the reason people call this a cult very often is because imagine you are an average joe stumbling upon this and someone says "you're not a human, and you completely believe you're a human".
  9. @Carl-Richard The claims are not false due to statistical insignificance. They are false because they are not true under standard normal conditions. Isn't this the same person who was advocating for higher scientific standards? We shouldn't be lowering them now, should we?
  10. It's impossible to control your emotions because they are the expression of the deep structures of your psyche. Well, you can control them in the sense of not letting them overwhelm you, but not in the sense of preventing them from arising. What you can do is embark on a true inner journey in which a deep understanding of what you are, what your basic structures are, and why they create the vibration they do, is gradually revealed. In this process, you will see that emotional structures are embedded in your being, in your body, in your cells, but if you see them, you can radically change them. You can change completely, from being an anxious or depressed person to being at absolute peace with yourself and with reality. There are no shortcuts for this work; you have to go to the root.
  11. Today
  12. Greet her politely if you find her and never show any emotion. Act as if nothing she says or does affects you. Become a soulless robot to her. If that doesn't work, move.
  13. Nice, thank you. I definitely don't discriminate emotions that much. Although kids definitely get angry a lot (and frustrated, jealous or sad). Try stealing a candy out of their hands and they will punch you.
  14. It took 4 billion years of evolution to create a brain, trillions of generations of living beings competing, killing each other, and fighting to survive. To destroy it, a single stone is enough.
  15. We could know that we are, or that reality is. We can't know the infinity, but maybe it's possible to understand the structure of the reality. You don't need to know everything, just how reality happens. Lets wait a millennia of scientific evolution, then who knows.
  16. Have you actually been to a psychologist tho, or therapist or whoever? I don't really find them all that helpful, nor do I find all the psychobabble and therapy speak all that truthful LOL
  17. @Jirh Ask it to only treat the statements as false if they are categorically false (and not "so small to be insignificant"). Because me and @integral will immediately jump on that as "but there is something there".
  18. Actually while Christianity and the New Testament and especially the OT encourage slavery, Islam is the first religion that abandons it. Slavery was a very common barbaric practice and the Quran clearly abolished it and says its an entry to heaven to free your slaves. Being a military leader and killing people was not because Mohammed was a bloodthirst person, but because the first Muslims got heavily and barbarically persecuted by the pagans who worshipped statues as God and refused the concept of God as the eternal, and infinite oneness of existence. They saw the practices of their forefathers in danger which brought them heavy financial benefits through selling Idolatry like statues and pictures. It was a time where people were utmost barbarics, killed each other for tribal dominance, blinded each other taking their eyes out and enslaved their enemies. Mohammed had no other option than to lead wars not because of fun but because of desperate persecution. You can not deal with those types of people by cuddling them. It would be better to study Islam and its historic context rather than cherrypicking certain verses without knowing their context
  19. https://github.com/tambetvali/TalesAndStoriesOfMeAndAnAI/blob/main/VikingIlluminator/legalguide.md This is a guide born from a real conversation: someone first said “I don’t understand it,” then “I’m a materialist, I don’t believe Buddha,” and finally “It’s getting complicated, let’s just get hot chocolate.” That arc — confusion → skepticism → enough-for-now — became the prototype for explaining this work. Short explanation: This project models society, trauma, and illumination using simple simulations (nearest-neighbourhood, demographic logic, abstract integration) wrapped in Viking–Buddhist metaphors. It treats “chakras” as measurable social functions, not mystical organs, and reframes enlightenment as a distributed, material process rather than a monopoly of elites. Full Article 1. What this is The legalguide describes how illumination, genius, and social dynamics can be modeled using: – Local interactions (2nd chakra, like Conway’s Game of Life) – Global fields (6th chakra, whole-map abstraction) – Trauma integration (1st chakra as a function of past → present) – Amplification dynamics (7th chakra: constructive or destructive resonance) It’s a bridge between autist-savant logic, Buddhist emptiness, Viking materialism, and modern simulation science. 2. Why it matters The model argues that “illumination monopolies” are thermodynamically unstable. Knowledge treated as sacred and scarce becomes brittle. Knowledge treated as material and distributable becomes resilient. This reframes the 1% not as aliens or conspirators, but as natural high-gradient nodes in a shared field — useful when integrated, dangerous when mythologized. 3. Simulation Methods & References These ideas draw from: – Conway’s Game of Life (local rule propagation) – Demographic simulation models (population clustering, diffusion) – Systems theory (feedback loops, attractors) – Buddhist philosophy (emptiness, dependent origination) – Thermodynamics of information (energy gradients, dissipation) – Cognitive science (neuroplasticity, predictive processing) Books / Sources / Media – “The Systems View of Life” – Capra & Luisi – “Complexity: A Guided Tour” – Melanie Mitchell – “The Master and His Emissary” – Iain McGilchrist – “Why Buddhism Is True” – Robert Wright – Kurzgesagt videos on emergence & systems – Veritasium on information & entropy – Any Game of Life simulation tool (Golly, online demos) 4. What the model tries to solve – How trauma becomes a dynamic variable, not a fixed identity – How local social fields shape global narratives – How media/AI act as “third-eye tools” – How enlightenment can be treated as infrastructure, not mystique – How to explain complex ideas to real people who have limited patience 5. The human prototype The woman from yesterday unintentionally provided the perfect teaching model: – “I don’t understand it” → cognitive overload – “I’m materialist, I don’t believe Buddha” → worldview defense – “It’s getting complicated, enough, let’s get hot chocolate” → emotional boundary This is how society reacts to illumination models. The guide is built to meet people exactly there. 6. Closing If you want a simulation-based, materialist, Viking-Buddhist framework for understanding society, trauma, and distributed intelligence, the legalguide is a compact entry point.
  20. I would reject the underlying premise that the members of other cult like communities have arbitrary belief systems. Its not arbitrary, you can often times abstract and explicitly spell out their epistemology (the way they acquire their "knowledge" ). But one main difference is the underlying claim that you can independently validate the claims that are made by the leader . The issue in practice though again, is that thats just a facade, because as long as you disagree with Leo, the implication will be that there were issues with your validation process and that you need to do it over and over again (do more drugs, more spiritual work, more contemplation etc) up until the point you agree with the leader. So epistemically there is seemingly an out, where you can independently check things, but socially and cult dynamics like you have the same exact same type of punish-reward system: If you agree with the leader you are profound and intelligent and cool, if you disagree you are self-deceived and dumb. You are sovereign and you are the ultimate authority as long as you agree, but if you disagree then you should take Leo's opinion over yours and if you wont, then you are dumb and closed minded. There is also a big internal force inside the community where they will press you with a bunch of different tools to undermine your confidence in that you are more correct that the leader and that you need to do more work (for instance, "you are not open minded to the fact that Leo is more right than you" etc). And there is more stuff that I left out in my long previous ramble. You can notice that Leo is a big manipulative weasel, not just because he only acknowledges limitation when he is hard pressed and when not pressed he immediately goes back to his natural habitat and acts as an authority on spiritual subjects, but because he constantly jumps back and forth in a similar way about his superiority as well . In one breath, he will say that he is not human and that he is above all the limited ,garbage epistemology that humans practice (and so he doesnt care about what any human spiritual leader or philosopher has to say or what objections they have), but when you press him on that claim , then he will immediately change the meaning of that very claim and will pretend that what he really meant was "the reason why he is not a human is because he is God and everyone is God" - and so he will act like he didnt just remove himself from the limitations that he thinks humans have, and pretends that he didnt just treat everyone else as just humans and that he only treated himself as God. And the "Im assuming you guys are intelligent enough to interpret my words and posts correctly" in Leo language just means "whatever context we are in right now, and whatever interpretation will make me look the best in this particular situation right now, go with that interpretation and ignore all the previous context that my messages were embedded in; particularly if that would me look bad or if that would make me contradict some of the things I already said". Some other similarities with other cults are - leader has 0 epistemic humility , 100% confidence in everything that surrounds the core of the community, 0 ability to self correct epistemically, because the norm for what it means for anyone to do the practices right collapses back down to what the leader's interpetation is and what the leader accepts to be true. Another interesting subtle dynamic here is that as long as you demonize other communities and point out why they are wrong and why they are dumb , then your sovereignty will be invoked and praised and you will be rewarded for "thinking for yourself"; but if you use your critical thinking and sovereignty to criticize actualized.org, then the claim will be that you are engaging in unconscious group dynamics and that you are biased towards other communities and that you are just unconciously parroting other people. (and basically its impossible that you manage to arrive at a different conclusion than Leo and that your conclusion can match a different leader's answer or a different community's answer). And hence you will be labeled self-deceived and being a conformist towards other ideas and towards other group of people and your sovereignty (which was given so much importance and which was praised so much up until the point you agreed with the core main ideas of actualized.org) will be immediately trashed and undermined. So in practice and at the end of the day, its not just that the answer to the question "what is Truth" will be directly dependent on Leo and its not just that the norm that decides whether you do the pracitces right or whether you did enough work will be directly dependent on Leo , but even the norm that reveals whether you actually act sovereign and whether you actually practice your sovereignty or not - even that will be directly depended on and judged and answered by Leo (you are not sovereign if you disagree with the main ideas, because you are self-deceived and run by unconscious factors).
  21. Being more attuned to presence can make you sort of fine with being fractured, because you can always loop back into presence when you discover the crack. But paradoxically, it can also make you better at identifying the cracks and how to solve them. And if you also realize that the endless looping is actually less conducive to presence than smoothing out the cracks, you will hyper-fixate towards fixing the cracks. Because once the cracks are fixed, it becomes smooth.
  22. This is absolutely false. No sources, credible or otherwise, are even attached. Please do not spread false information.
  23. You and every aspect of your experience. I Am = Oneness. The lone, infinite dreamer dreaming infinite dreams. Pure fucking magic. The Kingdom is inside you and outside you. It is You - always has been and always will be.
  24. Cringe. Be an uncouth hobo and attract the 10s with nerfs. Only half-joking. Aside from perhaps basic personal hygiene and bare minimum knowledge of social conventions, people trying to hack social interactions is to me like when somebody uses AI to think or write for them. At some point, you just realize there is nothing there and it's completely inorganic and hollow like a metal tube.
  25. Its okay to want money and a companion. There's no hypocrisy in it. So long as you're primary drives aren't prestige, luxury, fame or power/influence over others you'll be fine. You dont need to deny those things either should they come to you so long as they are balanced out with higher faculties and finer sentiments.
  1. Load more activity